Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essay 2
1501104
Nishant Shah
Essay 2
1501104
widest in their region. They considered themselves as the upholders of Hindu tradition and
their aim was redemption of their lost glory, now by taking up terrorism against British
colonialism.
Most of Gandhis charisma did not extend to Chitpavans. If the Kshatriyas were absent, the
Chitpavans would have enjoyed greater status and they incorporated as traditional rulers,
landowners and warriors elements of the Kshatriya identity and lived with many of the
Kshatriya fears and anxieties relating to womanhood
Nishant Shah
Essay 2
1501104
his political career as a participant in Gandhi initiated Civil Disobedience Movement. Though
he had grudge against Gandhi, he respected Gandhi for what he had done for India.
Despite the similarities, there were basic dissimilarities which set Godse aside from Gandhi.
Godse, unlike Gandhi was in the tradition of the Westernized upper-caste elements in the
tertiary sector of the Indian society who had dominated the Indian political scene during that
time. He was greatly inspired by the freedom struggle traditions of urban middle-class
Bengal, Punjab and Maharashtra, which valued Indias imperial rulers, conceptualized
politics as a ruthlessly rational zero-sum games in which opponents losses must be
maximized. He was totally irrational about Gandhis emphasis on political ethics, soul force
and the moral supremacy of the oppressed over oppressor. Both differed in their perception of
Hinduism. Gandhi wanted to organize Hindu as a larger political community rather than a
religious group. Godse perceived history as a chronological sequence, where Hindus were
ruled by Muslims and Christians humiliating Hindus and should be redressed. Gandhi on the
other hand did not take chronological sequence into account. Most importantly Godse felt
that Gandhi had supported Pakistan more than India and hence had failed in his duty as the
Father of the Nation.
Nishant Shah
Essay 2
1501104
country might often compel us to disregard non-violence. Arjun had to fight and slay quite a
number of his friends and relations, including the revered Bhishma, because the latter was on
the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Ram, Krishna and Arjun as
guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.