Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BNagaraju1,MRajaRoy1,PVenkateshReddy1,KSatyanarayana1
DepartmentofMechanicalEngg,AnilNeerukondaInstituteofTechnologyandSciences,
Sangivalasa,Visakhapatnam531162,AndhraPradesh.
Email:1anitsnagaraju@gmail.com,2anitsrajaroy@gmail.com,
3
venkateshreddy348@gmail.com,
1. INTRODUCTION
CraneHooksarehighlyliablecomponentsthat
are typically used for industrial purposes. It is
basicallyahoistingfixturedesignedtoengagea
ring or link of a lifting chain or the pin of a
shackle or cable socket and must follow the
healthandsafetyguidelines.Thus,suchan
Fig1.1CraneHook
2.LITERATUREREVIEW
Crane hooks are the components which are
generally used to elevate the heavy load in
industriesandconstructional
sites.Recently,excavatorshavingacranehook
are widely used in construction works site. M.
Shaban et al [1] studied the stress pattern of
cranehookinitsloadedcondition,asolidmodel
of crane hook is prepared with the help of
ABAQUS software. Real time pattern of stress
concentration in 3D model of crane hook is
obtained. The stress distribution pattern is
verifiedforitscorrectnessonanacrylicmodel
of crane hook using shadow optical method
(Causticmethod)setup.Bypredictingthestress
concentration area, the shape of the crane is
modifiedtoincreaseitsworkinglifeandreduce
the failure rates. E. Narvydas et al [2]
investigated
circumferential
stress
concentration factors with shallow notches of
the lifting hooks of trapezoidal crosssection
employing finite element analysis (FEA). The
stressconcentrationfactorswerewidelyusedin
strengthanddurabilityevaluationofstructures
and machine elements. The FEA results were
usedandfittedwithselectedgenericequation.
This yields formulas for the fast engineering
evaluation of stress concentration factors
withouttheusageoffiniteelementmodels.The
design rules of the lifting hooks require using
ductilematerialstoavoidbrittlefailure;inthis
respect they investigated the strain based
criteria for failure, accounting the stress
triaxiality . SpasojeTrifkovic et al [3] analyzes
thestressstateinthehookusingapproximate
andexactmethods.Theycalculatedstressesin
various parts of the hook material firstly by
assuming hook as a straight beam and then
assuming it as a curved beam. Analytical
methodswereusedwiththehelpofcomputers,
usingFEM.BhupenderSinghetal[4]presented
thesolidmodelingandfiniteelementanalysisof
crane boom has been done using PRO/E
WILDFIRE 2.0 and ALTAIR HYPER MESH with
OPTISTRUCT 8.0 SOLVERY. Torres et al [5]
studied the probable causes which led to a
failureofthecranehookinservice.Thestudyof
accident includes: details of the standards
governingthe manufacturinganduseoflifting
3DESIGNOFCRANEHOOK
Machine frames having curved portions are
frequentlysubjectedtobendingoraxialloadsor
to a combination of bending and axial loads.
With the reduction in the radius of curved
portion, the stress due to curvature become
greater and the results of the equations of
straight beams when used becomes less
satisfactory. For relatively small radii of
curvature, the actual stresses may be several
times greater than the value obtained for
straight beams. It has been found from the
resultsofPhotoelasticexperimentsthatincase
ofcurvedbeams,the neutralsurfacedoesnot
coincidewithcentroidalaxisbutinsteadshifted
towards the Centre of curvature. It has also
been foundthat thestresses in the fibers of a
curved beam are not proportional to the
distancesofthefibersfromtheneutralsurfaces,
asisassumedforastraightbeam.
Thedesignofcranehookwasdonebyassuming
the data pertaining to load(w), C.S.A and
curvatures which are used in industrial
applicationsofcranehookasshowninFigs3.1
to3.4
W=20KN=20103N;Ri=50mm;Ro=150mm;
h=100mm;b=60mm
ri = Distance of inner fibre from centre of
curvature,C
ro = Distance of outer fibre from centre of
curvature
rc = Distance of centroidal axis (CG axis) from
centreofcurvature
Resultantstressattheinsidefibre,
+ =3.33+30.66=33.99MPa(tensile)
Resultantstressattheoutsidefibre,
= 3.3314.66 = 11.33MPa
(compressive)
Fig3.1DesignofCraneHookwithrectangular
C.S.A
Fig3.2DesignofCraneHookwithTrapezoidal
C.S.A
Resultantstressattheinsidefibre
=3.33+25.169=28.499MPa(tensile)
Resultantstressattheoutsidefibre
= 3.3316.63 = 13.3MPa
(compressive)
W=20kN=20103N;Ri=50mm;Ro=150mm
;h=100mm;bi=90mm;
+ =6.163+32.654=38.817MPa(tensile)
Resultantstressattheoutsidefibre
W=20KN=20103N;Ri=60mm;Ro=150mm;
d=90mm
Fig3.4DesignofCraneHookwithcircularC.S.A
Resultantstressattheinsidefibre
+ =3.143+43.31=46.461MPa(tensile)
Resultantstressattheoutsidefibre
4.MODELLINGOFCRANEHOOKUSINGCATIA
CATIA serves the design tasks by providing
differentworkbenches.Aworkbenchisdefined
asaspecificenvironmentconsistingofasetof
tools,whichallowstheusertoperformspecific
design tasks in a particular area. The basic
workbenches in CATIA V5 are Part design
workbench, Wireframe and Surface Design
workbench, Assembly Design workbench, and
Draftingworkbench.
.
Fig4.2CATIAModelofCraneHookwith
TrapezoidalC.S.A
Fig4.3CATIAModelofCraneHookwith
TriangularC.S.A
Fig4.4CATIAModelofCraneHookwith
circularC.S.A
Fig4.1CATIAModelofCraneHookwith
RectangularC.S.A
5FINITEELEMENTANALYSISOFCRANEHOOK
USING
ANSYS
The finite element method has become a
powerfultoolforthenumericalsolutionofwide
range of engineering problems. Applications
range from deformation and stress analysis of
automotive aircraft, building, and bridge
structurestofieldanalysisofheatflux,seepage
and other flow problems, with advances in
computer technology and CAD systems,
complexproblemscanbemodeledwithrelative
ease.
In this method of analysis, a complex region
definingacontinuumisdiscretizedintosimple
geometric shapes called finite elements. The
material properties and the governing
relationships are considered over these
elements and considering the loading and
constraints, results in a set of equations.
Solution of these equations gives us the
approximatebehaviorofthecontinuum.
6RESULTSANDDISCUSSION
Inthiswork,fourdifferenttypesofsectionsof
crane hook are designed successfully by using
curvedbeamconcept.TheinducedStressesare
determined for a load of 20 KN using curved
beamconcept.
The solid modal was prepared using CATIA V5
R20versionandexportedtoANSYSusingIGES
format.Thehookisfixedatthetopendinx,y
andzdirectionsandarefullyconstrained.The
innercurvatureofhookissubjected20KNload
andisappliedonnodes.Theresultsofstresses
obtainedforacranehookwhichismadeupof
steelmaterialareplottedintheFigs6.1to6.4.
The results obtained through analytical and
theoretical methods are good in agreement
withminordeviationandshowninTable6.1.
1
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =1
TIME=1
SY
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.128E-08
SMN =-32.8385
SMX =34.918
JAN
2 2015
19:25:01
1
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =1
TIME=1
SY
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.136E-06
SMN =-21.0289
SMX =31.5627
JAN
2 2015
19:41:06
Y
Z
MX
MN
-21.0289
-9.34188
2.34514
-15.1854
14.0322
-3.49837
25.7192
8.18864
19.8757
31.5627
1
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =1
TIME=1
SY
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.189E-06
SMN =-31.9517
SMX =40.8183
JAN
2 2015
19:52:27
Y
ZX MX
MN
-31.9517
-15.7806
.390518
16.5616
32.7327
-23.8661
-7.69504
8.47607
24.6472
40.8183
1
NODAL SOLUTION
STEP=1
SUB =1
TIME=1
SY
(AVG)
RSYS=0
DMX =.220E-06
SMN =-29.3076
SMX =47.3809
JAN 2 2015
20:01:07
Y
X
MX
MN
Fig 6.4 variation of Stresses for a crane hook
made of steel with Circular C.S.A along Y
Direction
-29.3076
-12.2657
-20.7866
4.77618
-3.74476
21.8181
13.2971
38.8599
30.339
47.3809
Y
X
Z
MX
MN
-32.8385
-17.7815
-25.31
-2.72449
-10.253
12.3325
4.80402
27.3895
19.861
34.918
7.CONCLUSION
1.Thecranehooksaresuccessfullydesignedfor
fourdifferentcrosssectionssuchasrectangular,
trapezoidal, triangular and circular by using
curvedbeamconcept.
2. The model was prepared using CATIA
softwareandanalysishasbeencarriedoutusing
ANSYS.
3. The trapezoidal cross section gives better
results in comparison with other three cross
sectionsasbecausestressesinducedarelessin
trapezoidalcrosssection.
4. The stresses obtained in theoretical and
analyticalmethodsareingoodagreement.The
modelpreparedisusedforfurtherstudiedwith
differentloadsandalsofordifferentmaterials.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Shaban, M. I. Mohamed, A. E. Abuelezz
and T. Khalifa, Determination of Stress
Distribution in Crane Hook by Caustic,
InternationalJournalofInnovativeResearchin
Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2,
Issue5,May2013.
[2] E. Narvydas, N. Puodinien,
Circumferentialstressconcentrationfactorsat
the asymmetric shallow notches of the lifting
hooksoftrapezoidalcrosssection,ISSN1392
1207. MECHANIKA. 2012 Volume 18(2): 152
157.
[3]SpasojeTrifkovi,NebojaRadiet.al,Stress
analysis of crane hook using FEM, INFOTEH
JAHORINAVol.10,Ref.C2,p.244248,March
2011.
[4]BhupenderSingh,BhaskarNagar,B.S.Kadam
andAnujkumar,ModelingandFiniteElement
Analysis ofCraneBoom,International Journal
ofAdvancedEngineeringResearchandStudies,
Vol.I/IssueI/OctoberDecember,2011/5152.
[5]Y.Torres,J.M.Gallardo,J.Domnguez,F.J.
Jimnez E, Brittle fracture of a crane hook,
EngineeringFailureAnalysis17(2010)3847.
[6]Takuma Nishimura,Takao Muromaki et. al,
Damage Factor Estimation of Crane Hook (A
DatabaseApproachwithImage,Knowledgeand
Simulation), 4th International Workshop on
ReliableEngineeringComputing(REC2010).
Table6.1ComparisonofStressesobtainedin
Theoreticalandanalyticalmethods
THEORITICAL
ANSYS
SECTIO
COMPRE TEN COMPRE TEN
N
SSIVE
SILE SSIVE
SILE
RECTAN
33.9
34.9
GLE
11.3
9
10.25
1
TRAPEZ
28.4
31.5
OIDAL
13.3
9
15.18
6
TRIANG
38.8
40.8
ULAR
23.01
1
23.86
1
CIRCULA
46.4
47.3
R
18.58
6
20.78
8