OVERVIEW OF THE PROBLEM

The researchers conducted the study at Philippine Technological Institute of

Science Arts and Trade Inc., The School is using manual process of inventory. Based on
the researchers interview with the custodian, the common problem of the school due
the inefficiency of manual inventory, security is also being risked. If not properly
monitored, theft and loss of items can actually take place. The clients responsible on the
task also needs to check the stocks once in a while so as to monitor which items are
already getting below the allowable minimum quantity.Because of the draining work,
there were circumstances when the inventory record in the computer does not tally with
the actual amount of the available items.

BREAKDOWN OD RESPONDENTS
The Researchers conduct a survey to students to come up
with evaluation survey on different category and characteristic of
proposed system. Characteristic s namely Usefulness, UserFriendliness, Accuracy, Efficient, Speed, Reliability, Design,
Performance. To be able to know and determine whether the
system is such a good and effective alternative material for
teaching, the researchers get () respondents; whose () is
professionals and are the IT Students and computer literature
person who will evaluate the system

Finding Of Study
The study of Ph

SA

Strongly Disagree

Agree

Undecided

DisAgree

SD

Strongly Disagree

Usefulness
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(35*5) (14*4) (0*3) (1*2) (0*1) / 50
175+56+0+2+0/50
233/50
4.66

Scale Value: Strongly Agree

User Friendliness
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(26*5) (23*4) (1*3) (0*2) (0*1) /50
130 + 92 + 3 + 0 + 0 /50
225/50

4.50 Scale Value: Agree

Accuracy
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(30*5) (16*4) (3*3) 1*2) (0*1) / 50
150 + 64 + 9 + 2 + 0 /50
225/50
4.50 Scale Value: Agree
Efficient
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(29*5) (18*4) (2*3) (1*2) (0*2) (0*1) /50
145 + 72 + 6 + 2 + 0 /50
225/50
4.5 Scale Value: Agree

Speed
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(31*5) (13*4) (5*3) (1*2) (0*1) / 50
155 + 52 + 15 + 2 + 0 /50
224/50
4.48 Scale Value : Agree
Reliability

(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R

(30*5) (26*4) (4*3) (0*2) 0*2) (0*1)/50
150 + 104 +12 + 0 + 0 /50
266/50
5.32 Scale Value: Strongly Agree

Design
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(16*5) (11*4) (1*3) (2*2) (1*1) /50
80 + 44 + 3 + 4 + 1 /50
132/50
2.64 Scale Value : Undicided

Performance
(SA*5) (A*4) (U*3) (D*2) (SD*1)/R
(26*5) (22*4) (1*3) (1*2) (1*1) /50
130 + 88 + 3 + 2 + 1 /50
224/50
4.48 Scale Value: Agree

Efficiency

For the efficiency in likert scale which is the software

performs tasks assigned to it properly with minimal seatbacks got
the scale of 4.74 which is the equivalent interpretation of strongly
agrees.
Speed
For the speed of the system is likert scale which is the
software exhibits optimum performance and execution over a
period of time got a scale value of 4.6 which is the equivalent
interpretation of strongly agree.
Reliability
For the reliability of the system in likert scale which is the
software performs tasks at any given time whenever it is needed
got a scale value of 4.58 which is the equivalent interpretation of
strongly agree.
Performance
For the Performance of the system in likert scale which is the
software is effective got the scale value of 4.48 which is the
equivalent interpretation of agree.