Professional Documents
Culture Documents
would be difficult to make a case that imagery and beauty are inconsequential to authentic
Christian worship.
But what do we make of Christian concerns about both evangelism and social justice? These
are, of course, central to the mission of the Church. But must we assume that these are
threatened by a Christian aesthetic? In my impression, far too little has been said among
Christians about the role of beauty in fulfilling the mission of the Church. In his work, Glory
of the Lord: A Theological Aesthetics, Hans Urs Von Balthasar has argued that aesthetics
might be a significant dimension of the Churchs apologetic. The beautiful symmetry of
revealed truth in the liturgy can faithfully embody the good news to our culture of sight and
sound. Likewise, in Until Justice and Peace Embrace, Nicholas Wolterstorff suggests that a
contributing element to modern despair is the aesthetic poverty of our cities and suburbs.
How do we effectively proclaim our commitment to Gods shalm if our worship does not
point people to the beauty of Gods kingdom?
In the end, when Christian worship is reduced to the merely pragmatic, and worship space is
utilitarian, we stand in danger of undermining our own proclamation. Surrounded by so much
ugliness, the recovery of a Christian aesthetic may be more than a luxury, it may be a
vocation. We may discover that it is our special call to give embodied witness to the Gospel
by an aesthetic that dignifies the mundane much as God does in creation, incarnation and new
creation.
Rev. Michael A. Van Horn, Ph.D. is Associate Professor of Theology and Worship at North
Park Theological Seminary in Chicago and a member of the Covenant Commission on
Church Music and Worship.
For the pre-Midwinter Worship Connection, Michael will bring the closing message-- set in
the context of Choral Eucharist in the Anglican worship tradition.