Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDITORIAL
NOIDA/DELHI
THE HINDU
North Koreas
provocative move
he underground nuclear test by North Korea
that apparently used a hydrogen bomb has expectedly aggravated tensions in East Asia.
South Korea, which called the explosion an
unpardonable provocation, has already cancelled
cross-border initiatives. Japan has termed it a serious
threat to its national security. Most major global powers, from the United States to Russia and even China,
have condemned the explosion. The provocation is likely to invite more economic punitive measures by the
United Nations Security Council. The North Korean
economy is going through a tough phase, and any further
sanctions would jeopardise it further. Why Kim Jong-un
took the extreme step now is anybodys guess, though
the move itself was not surprising given the regimes sinister, paranoid ways of operating. Ever since Mr. Kim became North Koreas leader after his fathers death in 2011,
he has flexed the countrys military muscle and caused
provocations without hinting at any tangible foreign policy goal. He ordered the countrys third nuclear test,
which led directly to additional UN sanctions. Tensions
escalated between the two Koreas last year after they exchanged artillery fire. With the latest hydrogen bomb explosion claim, he has upped the ante in this game of
provocations.
Mr. Kims aim could be to tighten his grip of power
over the state. The number of executions in North Korea
reportedly rose under his watch, triggering speculation
over whether the regime is facing internal strains. In
2013, Mr. Kim had ordered the execution of his uncle and
former mentor. He may also be playing a high-stakes diplomatic game for an Iran-like deal where he could swap
his countrys nuclear arsenal for international recognition and economic partnership. The third and more likely explanation is that Mr. Kim is sending a message to
South Korea and the West that his regime is ready to go
to any extreme in the wake of military hostilities. This
clearly demonstrates the failure of the nuclear diplomacy which the U.S. and other major powers were involved
in for the past several years. Whatever Mr. Kims real intentions, his moves come at the cost of regional stability,
and pose dangerous portents for the world. The only
country that could reason with North Korea and persuade it to join back talks is China. Even for Beijing, despite its historical ties with Pyongyang, it is a daunting
task. Mr. Kim does not seem to be particularly interested
in the China-ally tag. In September, he refused an invitation from Chinese President Xi Jinping to attend celebrations marking the end of the Second World War. Four
years after coming to power, he is yet to visit Beijing. Despite his detachment and potential militarism, the world
doesnt really have any option but to resume talks with
Pyongyang. China has the historical responsibility to
lead the efforts to solve the crisis on the Korean peninsula, much like what the Russians did in securing the Iran
deal.
CARTOONSCAPE
For justice in
equal measure
ews that Bollywood actor Sanjay Dutt will be
released by the end of February after serving
a five-year prison term for being in possession of an AK-56 assault rifle over 20 years
ago will surely draw contrasting reactions from the film
industry on the one hand and wider society on the other.
His peers in filmdom and his legion of fans may see
cause for great happiness in his impending release.
However, there may be a larger section of society that
may wonder whether justice will truly be served if Mr.
Dutt, who is already seen to have enjoyed generous
spells of furlough and parole while serving his sentence,
is being treated in a special way by his release being advanced by about eight months. Given the widespread
perception reinforced by the recent acquittal of another film star, Salman Khan, in a hit-and-run case
that the system will work only to the advantage and benefit of celebrities, questions will naturally be asked
whether Mr. Dutt is being treated preferentially. Arrested in the aftermath of the 1993 Mumbai blasts, he spent 18
months in prison before getting bail. In March 2013, the
Supreme Court confirmed a lower court conviction, but
reduced his jail term from six to five years. After being
given time to wind up his film commitments, he began to
serve the 42-month remainder of his term in May 2013.
Even then, citing reasons as trite as that he was married
and had children, and that he had depicted on screen a
form of Gandhian protest, many had appealed for pardon on his behalf. The Maharashtra Governor, however,
did not succumb to the demand for preferential treatment to him solely on the basis of his popularity.
In the normal course, a prisoners release eight
months ahead of the completion of his term will not give
rise to unusual scrutiny. Good behaviour is reason
enough for routine remission for all convicts, and there
may be no cause to suspect that Mr. Dutt has been chosen out of turn. Yet, the State government will have to be
cautious and scrupulous in computing the exact number
of days he is legally entitled to, mainly to dispel the popular impression that he is being favoured. The actor may
have spent as many as 146 days on parole or furlough
since May 2013. In law, a furlough is an entitlement
earned by spending specified periods in jail, while parole is granted only in an emergency. Both are considered necessary to help prisoners maintain continuity in
their family life and help them avoid the ill-effects of protracted incarceration. Comparisons are also bound to be
drawn between Mr. Dutts case and that of Zaibunissa
Kazi, a septuagenarian fellow-prisoner who is also serving a five-year term in the same case. It will only be fair to
expect that the rules of remission will apply in equal
measure to all prisoners regardless of their social stature
or background.
CM
YK
Letters emailed to letters@thehindu.co.in must carry the full postal address and the full name or the name with initials.
Questions on Pathankot
We must stop living in a dream
world and be prepared for reality.
Pakistan knows that it can only fight
a proxy war with India and we need
to be prepared for that (Editorial,
Jan.7).
Despite
multi-layered
security at our borders, it has been
shown that terror elements are able
to slip across the border, something
which raises questions about the
way in which our borders are being
Sectarian tensions
West Asia is on the boil ever since
Saudi Arabia and Iran have locked
M. Jeyaram,
Sholavandan, Tamil Nadu
Balasubramaniam Pavani,
Secunderabad
Tipston Rubus,
Bengaluru
ND-ND