To,

Office of the addl. Dy. Commissioner

of police ,

Cum-public information officer: north-west district,

Ashok vihar, delhi- 110052 .

Subject:
Appeal against reply with reference to the application dt. 18.12.2015
in r/o Sh. Ravi Bhateja ( D E P O L / R / 2016 / 00612 & 61570/ 2 )
RTI
Act2005, received in thy office vide ID No.29 /RTI
Cell/NWD, dated 05.01.16
through
PIO/RTI/Vigilance, Delhi's
letter
(ID-1829/15)/4836/RTI
Cell/Vigilance, dated 31.12.15, ID
No.73/RTI Cell/NWD, dated 08.01.16 & Dy.
No.21(Misc.)/RTI
Cell/NWD, dated 06.01.16
.

Respected sir ,
KINDLY refer to your REPLY FOR application and to inform that the so
called self explainatory report of SHO/P.S. Adarsh Nagar of the district north west , is
ambiguous , misleading and non-est as far as the provisions of Police Act in
accordance with the statues of constitution is concerned . The applicant very
respectfully submits and lay emphasis on the fact for the purpose of registering an FIR
against the culprits and subsequent legal processes ,the following observations were
made by the honorable supreme court of India regarding deciding upon the questions
of law w.r.t hearing a suit having similar cause of action .

Sri G Srinivasa Reddy vs State By H.S.R. Lay Out Police ... on 18 January, 2014" The
High Court appears to have been impressed by the fact that as the nature of the dispute
was primarily of a civil nature, the appellant was not justified in resorting to the
criminal proceedings." Accepting such a general proposition would be against the
provisions of law in as much as in all cases of cheating and fraud, in the whole
transaction, there is generally some element of civil nature. However, in this case, the
allegations were regarding the forging of the documents and acquiring gains on the
basis of such forged documents. The proceedings could not be quashed only because
the respondents had filed a civil suit with respect to the aforesaid documents. In a
criminal court the allegations made in the complaint have to be established
independently, notwithstanding the adjudication by a civil court. Had the complainant
failed to prove the allegations made by him in the complaint, the respondents were
entitled to discharge or acquittal but not otherwise. If mere pendency of a suit is
made a ground for quashing the criminal proceedings , the unscrupulous litigants,
apprehending criminal action against them, would be encouraged to frustrate the
course of justice and law by filing suits with respect to the documents intended to be
used against them after the initiation of criminal proceedings or in anticipation of such

proceedings. Such a course cannot be the mandate of law."Therefore requesting for the
needfull as yourself are the ultimate authority entrusted for the implementation of the
statues of the lawfor justice . Thanking you ,
Ravi Bhateja
28/45
,
Punjabi bagh
New Delhi-26.
Mob: 9899293039 , ravibhateja1978@gmail.com