Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are many questions relating to annulment and divorce in the Philippines, and many of the
concerns of our readers had already been addressed in previous articles. Nevertheless, to
consolidate everything for everyones easy reference, here are the FAQs on annulment and
divorce in the Philippines:
Is divorce allowed under Philippine laws?
No, divorce is not allowed in the Philippines. However, there are certain instances wherein the
divorce secured abroad by the foreigner-spouse, and even by former Filipinos, are recognized
under Philippine laws. More discussion here (Judicial Recognition of a Foreign Divorce Decree).
Would it make any difference if I marry abroad where divorce is allowed?
No. Filipinos are covered by this prohibition based on the nationality principle, regardless of
wherever they get married (and regardless where they get a decree of divorce). Discussions
relating to Overseas Filipinos or OFWs are transferred in Part V.
Is annulment different from a declaration of nullity of marriage?
Yes. In essence, annulment applies to a marriage that is considered valid, but there are grounds
to nullify it. A declaration of nullity of marriage, on the other hand, applies to marriages that
are void or invalid from the very beginning. In other words, it was never valid in the first place.
Also, an action for annulment of voidable marriages may prescribe, while an action for
declaration of nullity of marriage does not prescribe.
So, if a marriage is void from the very beginning (void ab initio), theres no need to file
anything in court?
For purposes of remarriage, there must be a court order declaring the marriage as null and void.
Entering into a subsequent marriage without such court declaration means that: (a) the
subsequent marriage is void; and (b) the parties open themselves to a possible charge of bigamy.
What if no marriage certificate could be found?
Justice Sempio-Dy, in the Handbook of on the Family Code of the Philippines (p. 26, 1997
reprint), says: The marriage certificate is not an essential or formal requisite of marriage
without which the marriage will be void. An oral marriage is, therefore, valid, and failure of a
party to sign the marriage certificate or the omission of the solemnizing officer to send a copy of
the marriage certificate to the proper local civil registrar, does not invalidate the marriage. Also
the mere fact that no record of marriage can be found, does not invalidate the marriage provided
all the requisites for its validity are present. (Citations omitted)
Can I file a petition (annulment or declaration of absolute nullity of marriage) even if I am
in a foreign country?
Yes, the rules recognize and allow the filing of the petition by Filipinos who are overseas.
What are the grounds for annulment?
1. Lack of parental consent in certain cases. If a party is 18 years or over, but below 21, and the
marriage was solemnized without the consent of the parents/guardian. However, the marriage is
validated if, upon reaching 21, the spouses freely cohabited with the other and both lived
together as husband and wife.
2. Insanity. A marriage may be annulled if, at the time of marriage, either party was of unsound
mind, unless such party after coming to reason, freely cohabited with the other as husband and
wife.
3. Fraud. The consent of either party was obtained by fraud, unless such party afterwards, with
full knowledge of the facts constituting the fraud, freely cohabited with the other as husband and
wife. Fraud includes: (i) non-disclosure of a previous conviction by final judgment of the other
party of a crime involving moral turpitude; (ii) concealment by the wife of the fact that at the
time of the marriage, she was pregnant by a man other than her husband; (iii) concealment of
sexually transmissible disease or STD, regardless of its nature, existing at the time of the
marriage; or (iv) concealment of drug addiction, habitual alcoholism or homosexuality or
lesbianism existing at the time of the marriage. However, no other misrepresentation or deceit as
to character, health, rank, fortune or chastity shall constitute such fraud as will give grounds for
action for the annulment of marriage.
4. Force, intimidation or undue influence. If the consent of either party was obtained by any of
these means, except in cases wherein the force, intimidation or undue influence having
disappeared or ceased, the complaining party thereafter freely cohabited with the other as
husband and wife.
5. Impotence. At the time of marriage, either party was physically incapable of consummating
the marriage with the other, and such incapacity continues and appears to be incurable.
Impotence is different from being infertile.
6. STD. If, at the time of marriage, either party was afflicted with a sexually-transmissible
disease found to be serious and appears to be incurable. If the STD is not serious or is curable, it
may still constitute fraud (see No. 3 above).
What if a spouse discovers that his/her spouse is a homosexual or is violent, can he/she ask
for annulment?
Homosexuality or physical violence, by themselves, are not sufficient to nullify a marriage. At
the very least, however, these grounds may be used as basis for legal separation.
How is legal separation different from annulment?
The basic difference is this in legal separation, the spouses are still considered married to each
other, and, thus, may not remarry.
Is legal separation faster than annulment?
Not necessarily. The petitioner in a legal separation, just like in an annulment, is still required to
prove the allegations contained in the petition. More important is the mandatory 6-month
cooling off period in legal separation cases. This is not required in annulment or declaration of
nullity cases. The court is required to schedule the pre-trial conference not earlier than six (6)
months from the filing of the petition. This period is meant to give the spouses an opportunity for
reconciliation.
What are the grounds for legal separation?
1. Repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct directed against the petitioner, a
common child, or a child of the petitioner.
2. Physical violence or moral pressure to compel the petitioner to change religious or political
affiliation.
3. Attempt of respondent to corrupt or induce the petitioner, a common child, or a child of the
petitioner, to engage in prostitution, or connivance in such corruption or inducement.
4. Final judgment sentencing the respondent to imprisonment of more than six years, even if
pardoned.
5. Drug addiction or habitual alcoholism of the respondent.
6. Lesbianism or homosexuality of the respondent.
7. Contracting by the respondent of a subsequent bigamous marriage, whether in the Philippines
or abroad.
8. Sexual infidelity or perversion.