Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/envsoft
Review
Abstract
This review is intended as a comprehensive but concise summary of present capabilities in coastal pollutant, ecosystem and water
quality modelling. It reflects the recent rapid developments in multidisciplinary modelling in shelf seas.
The behaviour of conservative pollutants that act as passive tracers is contrasted with those that have more complex behaviours,
including oil spills. The importance of sediment modelling is emphasised, since contaminants commonly exist in both a dissolved
and a particulate state, or adhere to sediments.
Recently developed ecological models can have great complexity, reflecting the complexity of the real ecosystem. These models
are now being linked to physical models of coastal waters and run with the same resolution. This has become possible only recently
because of increases in computer power, particularly the availability of parallel systems at reasonable cost.
The main advances in physical modelling are likely to come through greater understanding of turbulence and other sub-gridscale processes as well as increased resolution.
In the coastal seas there is often a lack of oceanographic data, which is even greater for the many biological and chemical
variables than it is for physical variables. This is probably the single most important factor limiting the progress of operational
water quality models. 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Coastal; Pollutant; Ecological; Water quality; Modelling; Multidisciplinary; Review
Contents
1.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
365
366
367
368
368
370
4. Physical modelling . . . . . . .
4.1. Diffusion and dispersion .
4.1.1. Vertical diffusivity . . .
4.1.2. Retinoic acid syndrome:
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
a report of
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
two casesLateral dispersion
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
374
374
374
375
364
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
model
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
376
377
378
378
5.
6.
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380
1. Introduction
A general review paper covering the modelling of pollution, the ecosystem and water quality in coastal waters,
and the prospects for making this modelling operational,
is timely for at least two reasons. One is the increase in
such multidisciplinary modelling in the last decade, and
the need for an introductory review for those modellers
who previously were limited to a single discipline. The
other is the increase in computer power, involving the
use of parallel processing, which has made it possible
for the first time to run linked physical and ecological
models on the same high resolution. Multidisciplinary
modelling is therefore coming of age, and moving to the
stage where it is feasible to contemplate running a model
operationally to provide real-time predictions of water
quality in coastal waters.
The intention here has been to cover this very wide
and active field comprehensively but concisely to give
an accurate picture of present capabilities. To explore
individual topics in greater depth the reader is referred
to the bibliography.
This subject is essentially multidisciplinary: to attempt
to understand the whole system demands knowledge of
disciplines ranging over ecology, biogeochemistry, toxicology, sedimentology and fluid dynamics, while modelling the system involves numerical analysis and, for
complex simulation models, coding techniques for highperformance computers such as massively parallel
machines. The total coastal system is extremely complicated and includes many variables and processes including highly non-linear interactions. Most modelling to
date has therefore tackled only part of the system, or
very simplified systems, in order to make progress and
gain insight. Only recently have high-resolution hydrodynamic models and complex ecological models been
combined. The effectiveness of such deterministic models for making useful predictions about the ecosystem is
not yet completely proven and can still be controversial:
Nuttle (2000) argues in favour of the more traditional
empirical approach.
In this paper the view is taken that it is the physical
system and the physical conditions that are fundamental
and set the stage for the chemical and biological systems. While there can be some influence of these on the
physics (for example, the effect on penetrating solar
365
C
C
C
K
ui
t
xi xi ijxj
(1)
is the core of any equations determining pollutant concentration C. Kij is the diffusivity tensor: usually for
shelf seas it is assumed that Kij 0 if i j and that
K11 K22 KH, a horizontal diffusivity, and K33
KV, a vertical diffusivity. This equation alone would
describe a passive tracer. The diffusion part represents
tracer motion on scales too small for the model to represent. If the flow is laminar, i.e. if there is no turbulence,
the diffusion is on the molecular scale, with a thermal
diffusivity of the order of 1.4 107 m2 s1 in pure
water. In coastal waters, the flow is almost always turbulent and the effective diffusivity is several orders of magnitude greater. Diffusion due to sub-grid-scale processes
in a model is often described by eddy diffusivity, often
determined by a turbulent energy equation, which,
366
although much greater, nevertheless behaves like molecular diffusion: fluxes are always down-gradient and
sharp changes are always smoothed out. This does not
necessarily represent the real processes of mixing that
may be taking place, and in reality there may be stirring
of material into thin filaments of high concentration that
are ultimately diffused on the molecular scale. The distinction could be important if the highest local concentration of a pollutant is important, rather than the average
within a model grid box. The ability of a model to predict concentrations from the advectiondiffusion equation is always limited by the resolution of the model as
well as the representation of sub-grid-scale mixing in the
diffusion term. This will be discussed further in Section
4. In a particle-tracking model, where advection is
straightforward, diffusion must be represented by random motion of the particles, determined by the value of
eddy diffusivity. However, convergence in the largescale velocity field can lead to narrow filaments of particles that would not be so well resolved by a concentration equation.
In addition to the advectiondiffusion equation are the
terms that describe the way the pollutant behaviour differs from a passive tracer. These must also be represented in a particle-tracking model, possibly by a
change in the properties of each particle. For a dissolved
radioactive substance, this may simply be a decay of the
radioactivity with time. For a sediment, or other particulate matter, there may be a fall velocity. For large particles, there may be other differences between the particle velocity and the water velocity. For sediments there
may need to be terms representing deposition and resuspension at the sea bed, cohesion and flocculation. There
can be terms representing interaction, whether chemical
or biological, with other variables. The algorithm for
each individual pollutant variable needs to be derived
from a clear understanding of how that pollutant behaves
in coastal waters.
In the following subsections the simplest pollutants,
which behave most like passive tracers, are treated first,
and then pollutants with more complex behaviours are
described.
2.1. Pollutants as passive tracers
A passive tracer is subject simply to advection and
diffusion and sources and sinks, possibly including
exchange across the sea surface and sea bed. The water
movement is independent of the tracer concentration, so
can be calculated separately. Quantities behaving in this
way include some dissolved metals (Prandle et al., 1993;
Charnock et al., 1994). Sources may typically include
rivers and the atmosphere; sinks for dissolved metals
may include adsorption on to particulates. The latter process is greater for some metals, for example lead, than
for others and for these the behaviour is less like a sim-
particulate to dissolved phases) and low uptake by particles, and very fine particles with low settling velocities.
Most pollutants, however, do not behave like simple tracers and much of the emphasis in the following sections
is on the additional terms beyond advection and diffusion that are needed to model them.
2.2. Sediment and SPM
Here, SPM stands for suspended particulate matter,
while sediment also includes those particles which lie on
or near the sea bed. Coarse material with grain size
larger than about 0.1 mm generally moves only as bed
load except during exceptional storms. Sediment may be
cohesive (particles, more often fine ones, may stick
together) or non-cohesive. The modelling of sediment
and SPM is important not just for its own sake but
because pollutants may exist in a particulate phase or
adhere to or be adsorbed on to particles and because
particulates are an important part of ecological and water
quality models. For example, nutrients and detritus can
exist as particles, and SPM in turbid waters reduces
light levels.
The main additional terms in the equation for SPM
concentration are those that account for sinking, erosion
and deposition at the sea bed. Sinking is represented by
a fall velocity, which can be an addition to the vertical
advection in the model. The fall velocity varies according to the size of the particle, so a model needs to have
separate SPM variables for a range of particle sizes.
Sediment is deposited on and eroded from a separate
benthic layer. This layer in turn can be modelled in
detail, including the effects of bioturbation. Erosion may
be supposed to occur if the bed stress is greater than a
critical value, and then increases as the stress increases,
while deposition occurs if bed stress is less than another
critical value. For particles of finite size and density different from the water, the assumption that they behave
as a passive tracer with the addition of a fall velocity is
of course a simplification of their complete dynamics
(Maxey, 1990). The interaction of particles in suspension
is also often neglected in SPM transport models.
Results shown by Holt and James (1999) for SPM
from coastal sources in the southern North Sea show
how the addition of the extra sinking, erosion and deposition terms can result in a considerable difference from
the dispersion predicted for a passive tracer. SPM transport can depend strongly on the sequence and timing of
erosion and deposition together with the variable winddriven circulation. The bed stress, which is a critical
quantity in the model formulae, is strongly influenced
by storms (partly through enhancement due to waves in
shallow areas) as well as tidal currents, varying through
the spring-neap cycle.
As an alternative to the concentration equations a particle-tracking method can be used (Puls and Su n-
367
368
369
370
mentation and resuspension, volatilisation and degradation. Pollutants such as heavy metals can adsorb to
inorganic suspended matter, while others such as organic
micropollutants can adsorb to POC or DOC, calculated
using equilibrium sorption equations involving Kd and
Kpoc. The intercomparison, which showed a considerable
deviation of the modelled from the measured values for
Cd (usually model values were lower), led to the conclusion that there was a lack of quality-controlled field
data to calibrate and validate the models.
This lack of data is likely to limit the testability of
the most sophisticated models, and not only are monitoring data needed for the interior of the model for testing
purposes, but input data are also required to give boundary conditions. In the intercomparison above (Stolwijk
et al., 1998) the substances chosen were some for which
adequate boundary data and field data as well as process
knowledge were thought to be available. For other substances there are even fewer data, and therefore there
is even less chance of accurate predictions, even if the
understanding of their behaviour is good and simulated
well by the models.
3. Ecosystem modelling
An ecosystem may be defined as a connected group
of organisms together with their environment. More
particularly, it involves a natural unit of living and nonliving components that interact to form a system in
which an interchange of materials and energy takes
place. Ecosystem or ecological modelling must describe
the interactions between all elements of the ecosystem
in either a deterministic or an empirical manner. Despite
some remaining controversy over the effectiveness and
usefulness of the deterministic numerical models (Nuttle,
2000), which follow the time-stepping approach of the
hydrodynamic models but may be much more complex
as shown below, these are the types of model that will
be discussed here.
All ecological models involve some form of simplification since it is not feasible to include every organism
individually or indeed every species. Many models
aggregate these biological components and abstract them
into functional groups or compartments. For example,
all phytoplankton may be considered together and within
this group associated state variables such as carbon and
nitrogen may be defined. These functional groups represent the main functional roles of production (e.g.
phytoplankton), consumption (e.g. zooplankton, fish)
and decomposition (bacteria). Individual organisms
within a functional group are assumed to be identical
and physiological processes and population dynamics
are described in terms of fluxes of carbon and nutrients
between functional groups and between organic and
inorganic material. Functional groups may be subdivided
371
into size classes to create a food web. A review of functional group models may be found in Totterdell (1993).
However, the functional group models have limitations
when it comes to representing the larger, long-lived
organisms in the higher trophic levels. For example,
biomass increase here may be by growth of individuals
rather than by increased numbers of identically sized
organisms. Other approaches such as structured population models and individual-based models can then be
used. Structured population models are appropriate for
considering cohorts of particular species with multi-stage
development, and can be coupled with spatially resolved
models (e.g. Bryant et al., 1997). Individual-based models track individuals through time and consider their
interaction with the environment. Although this technique has been used with the larger animals such as wading birds (Wolff, 1994), a similarly Lagrangian approach
has been applied to plankton (Woods and Barkmann,
1994). Multi-species models may be constructed from a
combination of hydrodynamic, functional group, structured population and individual-based models.
Functional group models are commonly used to simulate phytoplankton and nutrient cycling. Phytoplankton,
which is responsible for most marine primary productivity, consists of microscopic floating plants (algae)
and bacteria (cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae) which
by photosynthesis use sunlight to convert dissolved inorganic substances to organic material: in a simplified form
this is represented by
6CO2 6H2OC6H12O6 6O2
(2)
372
part of the food chain in terms of energy transfer in certain circumstances. The small zooplankton also consume
the small phytoplankton, extending the microbial loop
to the microbial food web.
The complexity of the biological system means that
there is less consensus on the basic equations describing
it than for the physical system. Models have been constructed with varying levels of detail. One of the simplest
is the early model of Riley (1946), in which phytoplankton biomass is represented by a single variable P, and
its rate of change is given by
dP / dt P(PhRG),
(3)
being 1 1. It had also been applied to a 4.5 km resolution grid, with hydrodynamics from a two-dimensional
model, around the Humber estuary, with 359 biologically active cells (Allen, 1997).
The enormous computational demand of a biological
model such as ERSEM, in comparison with the hydrodynamic model alone (there are some 100 extra variables,
around 30 to 40 of which need to be advected and
diffused), requires the power of a massively parallel
computing system if it is to be run with the resolution
in both space and time of a typical three-dimensional
shelf-sea physical model. This has now been achieved
in the coupling of ERSEM with the POL3DB model
(Allen et al., 2002). This hydrodynamic model is
described by Holt and James (2001), and includes scoordinates in the vertical, to maintain a resolved upper
mixed layer across the shelf edge in a terrain-following
coordinate system, and an advanced piecewise parabolic
advection scheme (see Section 4). Despite the computational demands of using this scheme with many variables, the performance of parallel systems means that
the calculation of annual cycles in three dimensions with
ERSEM on a shelf-wide grid with 12 km horizontal resolution and 20 levels in the vertical is readily achieved,
and higher resolutions are feasible. The parallel scheme
is based on domain decomposition in the horizontal, with
the use of the MPI (Message Passing Interface) standard
for communication between processors (Proctor et al.,
1999). The POL3DB model has been developed with the
assistance of funding from the UK Met. Office, and an
earlier version is running operationally there (from June
2000), so in principle the physical variables for the
coupled model are available operationally. All of the
elements for an operational shelf-wide ecosystem model
would be present if the necessary inputs and boundary
conditions for the ecological variables were also available in real time.
As the resolution of models increases and they
become eddy-resolving, they will be able to address
problems such as the observed patchiness of phytoplankton (Powell and Okubo, 1994; Abraham, 1998). The resolution required for an eddy-resolving model in shelf
seas is the order of 1 km or better (see Section 4).
As was remarked in the previous section, the ecological models have not generally included any direct effect
of contaminants such as oil or toxic chemicals. However,
an important aspect of water quality they have been used
to study is that of eutrophication, the effect of excess
nutrient supply, which may come from sewage outflow
or agricultural fertilisers in river run-off. The resulting
excess plant and phytoplankton growth is followed by
decay, in which bacteria use dissolved oxygen in the
water. These bacteria also decompose organic matter that
may be in the original outflow; sewage is a particularly
large source of this in coastal and estuarine waters. The
capacity of a volume of water to consume oxygen is
373
374
4. Physical modelling
As stated in the Introduction, a good representation of
the physics is the necessary basis for a water quality
model. Physical modelling will not be reviewed comprehensively here; an overview of coastal models may be
found in Greatbatch and Mellor (1999). We concentrate
first on the modelling of diffusion and dispersion and
then outline some further topics that are important for a
physical model underpinning a water quality model.
4.1. Diffusion and dispersion
While present physical models may be expected to
give reasonable results for sea level, currents, temperature and salinity at medium (10 km) resolution, given
good boundary forcing information, it is not completely
clear that they are able to predict accurately the dispersion of pollutants. One of the main reasons for this is the
central importance of the advectiondiffusion equation,
which involves turbulence, which is generally unresolved in these models and remains a challenging problem in itself. So we review here the physical processes
of dispersion of material in the sea and the ability of
present models to reproduce them. It was noted in Sec-
375
376
377
378
379
380
6. Conclusions
1. Considerable advances have been made in recent
years in the elements needed for predicting coastal water
quality operationally, namely three-dimensional hydrodynamic shelf-sea models and ecological, pollutant and
Fig. 2. An outline of progress since 1960 for hydrodynamic and ecological models, and computer power.
381
382
over the northwest European shelf is now looking feasible, which was not the case a decade ago.
6. Physical models are limited by our understanding
of turbulence and how to parameterise sub-grid-scale
processes generally. Quasi-two-dimensional eddies and
Langmuir circulation may have important effects on dispersion and mixing. Internal waves and convection
influence mixing across the thermocline and deepening
of the mixed layer. Improvements in understanding these
usually unresolved processes will improve the physical
models: with finer grids (as in large eddy simulations)
some may become resolved by the model. A model with
fine-scale bathymetry may resolve the non-linear effect
of chaotic stirring, which could be significant in some
coastal areas.
7. While we may expect continual improvement in
the model codes and in scientific understanding of the
underlying processes, and continuing increases in computer power at decreasing cost, leading to the feasibility
of calculations with ever more variables on ever finer
grids, the consequential demand for ever more data,
including bathymetric data, will not be easily satisfied.
This is because of the expense of data gathering and the
need for large international bodies to organise it and
make sure the data are readily available. For operational
modelling, the requirement to have data in real time is
added. This has not developed for the ocean as it has
for the atmosphere, and although GOOS is providing a
focus for the necessary developments it is probably
reasonable to conclude that the single most important
factor limiting the progress towards operational water
quality models is a lack of data.
Acknowledgements
This paper is based on a review funded by the Met.
Office under contract PB/B3197. I would like to thank
the referees, whose comments and suggestions have considerably improved the paper.
Appendix A
Web sites of some organisations modelling water
quality in coastal areas:
ASA (Applied Science Associates): www.appsci.com
DHI (Danish Hydraulics Institute): www.dhi.dk
HR Wallingford: www.hrwallingford.co.uk
HydroQual: www.hydroqual.com
MUMM (Management Unit of the Mathematical
Model of the North Sea, Belgium): www.mumm.ac.be
POL (Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory):
www.pol.ac.uk
Charnock, H., Dyer, K.R., Huthnance, J.M., Liss, P.S., Simpson, J.H.,
Tett, P.B. (Eds.), 1994. Understanding the North Sea System. Royal
Society of London, London.
Colella, P., Woodward, P.R., 1984. The piecewise parabolic method
(PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational
Physics 54, 174201.
Craig, P.D., Banner, M.L., 1994. Modelling wave-enhanced turbulence
in the ocean surface layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography 24,
25462559.
Cushman-Roisin, B., Tang, B., 1990. Geostrophic turbulence and
emergence of eddies beyond the radius of deformation. Journal of
Physical Oceanography 20, 97113.
Dahlgaard, H., 1995. Radioactive tracers as a tool in coastal oceanography: an overview of the MAST-52 project. Journal of Marine Systems 6, 381389.
Davies, A.M., Xing, J., 1999. Sensitivity of plume dynamics to the
parameterization of vertical mixing. International Journal for
Numerical Methods in Fluids 30, 357405.
Davies, A.M., Luyten, P.J., Deleersnijder, E., 1995. Turbulence energy
models in shallow sea oceanography. In: Lynch, D.R., Davies,
A.M. (Eds.), Quantitative Skill Assessment for Coastal Ocean
Models. Coastal and Estuarine Studies, vol. 47. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 97123.
de Kok, J.M., 1997. Baroclinic eddy formation in a Rhine plume
model. Journal of Marine Systems 12, 3552.
Delvigne, G.A.L., Sweeney, C.E., 1988. Natural dispersion of oil. Oil
and Chemical Pollution 4, 281310.
Dippner, J.W., 1990. Eddy-resolving modelling with dynamically
active tracers. Continental Shelf Research 10, 87101.
Elliott, A.J., 1986. Shear diffusion and the spreading of oil in the surface layers of the North Sea. Deutsche Hydrographische Zeitschrift
39, 113137.
Elliott, A.J., Hurford, N., Penn, C.J., 1986. Shear diffusion and the
spreading of oil slicks. Marine Pollution Bulletin 17, 308313.
Faller, A.J., Auer, S.J., 1988. The ro les of Langmuir circulations in
the dispersion of surface tracers. Journal of Physical Oceanography
18, 11081123.
Fasham, M.J.R., Ducklow, H.W., McKelvie, S.M., 1990. A nitrogenbased model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer.
Journal of Marine Research 48, 591639.
Flather, R.A., Mason, D.C., Davenport, I.J., Gurney, C., 1998. A digital elevation model of the intertidal areas of the Wash, England,
produced by the waterline method. International Journal of Remote
Sensing 19, 14551460.
Fox, A.D., Maskell, S.J., 1996. A nested primitive equation model
of the IcelandFaeroe front. Journal of Geophysical Research 101,
1825918278.
Garrett, C.J.R., 1983. On the initial streakiness of a dispersing tracer
in two- and three-dimensional turbulence. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 7, 265277.
Garrett, C.J.R., MacCready, P., Rhines, P.B., 1993. Boundary mixing
and arrested Ekman layers: rotating stratified flow near a sloping
boundary. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 25, 291323.
Geernaert, G.L., Katsaros, K.B., Richter, K., 1986. Variation of the
drag coefficient and its dependence on sea state. Journal of Geophysical Research 91, 76677679.
Gent, P.R., McWilliams, J.C., 1990. Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models. Journal of Physical Oceanography 20, 150155.
Ghil, M., Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., 1991. Data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography. Advances in Geophysics 33, 141266.
Gill, A.E., 1982. AtmosphereOcean Dynamics. Academic Press, New
York (662 pp.).
Grant, W.D., Madsen, O.S., 1979. Combined wave and current interaction with a rough bottom. Journal of Geophysical Research 84,
17971808.
Greatbatch, R.J., Mellor, G.L., 1999. An overview of coastal ocean
models. In: Mooers, C.N.K. (Ed.), Coastal Ocean Prediction. Coas-
383
384
385