Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Laski was always a Zionist at heart and always felt himself a part
of the Jewish nation, although he viewed traditional Jewish religion
as restrictive.[19]
Laski tried to mobilise Britain's academics, teachers and
intellectuals behind the socialist cause; the Socialist League was
one effort. He had some success but this element typically found
itself marginalised in the Labour Party. [20]
Political career
Laski's main political role came as a writer and lecturer on every
topic of concern to the left, including socialism, capitalism,
working conditions, eugenics, woman suffrage, imperialism,
decolonisation, disarmament, human rights, worker education,
and Zionism. He was tireless in his speeches and pamphleteering,
and was always on call to help a Labour candidate. In between he
served on scores of committees and carried a full load as a
professor and advisor to students.[21]
Laski plunged into Labour party politics on his return to London in
1920. In 1923, he turned down the offer of a parliament seat and
cabinet position by Ramsay MacDonald, and also a seat in Lords.
He felt betrayed by MacDonald in the crisis of 1931, and decided
that a peaceful, democratic transition to socialism would be
blocked by the violence of the opposition. In 1932, Laski joined
the Socialist League, a left-wing faction inside the Labour Party.
[22]
In 1937, he was involved in the failed attempt by Socialist
League in co-operation with the Independent Labour Party and
the Communist Party of Great Britain to form a Popular Front to
bring down the Conservative government of Neville Chamberlain.
During 193445 he served as an alderman in the Fulham Borough
Council and also the chairman of the libraries committee.
In 1937, the Socialist League was rejected by the Labour Party
and folded. He was elected as a member of the Labour Party's
National Executive Committee, of which he remained a member
until 1949. In 1944, he chaired the Labour party conference and
served as the party's chair during 194546. [14]
Declining role
During the war, he supported Prime Minister Churchill's coalition
government and gave countless speeches to encourage the battle
against Germany. He suffered a nervous breakdown brought
about by overwork. During the war he repeatedly feuded with
other Labour leaders, and with Churchill, on matters great and
small. He steadily lost his influence. [23]
In 1945 general election campaign Churchill warned that Laski
as the Labour Party chairmanwould be the power behind the
throne in an Attlee government. While speaking for the Labour
candidate in Nottinghamshire on 16 June 1945, Laski said "If
Labour did not obtain what it needed by general consent, we shall
have to use violence even if it means revolution". He was replying
to a question planted by Conservatives hoping to get exactly that
response. The next day accounts of Laski's speech appeared and
the Conservatives attacked the Labour Party for its chairman's
advocacy of violence. Laski filed a libel suit against the
Conservative Daily Express newspaper. The defence showed that
over the years Laski had often bandied about loose threats of
"revolution." The jury found for the defendant within forty minutes
of deliberations.[24]
Clement Attlee gave Laski no role in the new Labour government.
Even before the libel trial Laski's relationship with Attlee was a
strained one. Laski had once called Attlee "uninteresting and
uninspired" in the American press and even tried to remove him
by asking for Attlee's resignation in an open letter. He tried to
delay the Potsdam Conferenceuntil after Attlee's position was
clarified. He tried to bypass Attlee by directly dealing
with Winston Churchill.[9] Laski tried to preempt foreign policy
decisions, laying down guidelines for the new Labour
government.
Legacy
Deane has identified five distinct phases of Laski's thought that
he never integrated: pluralist (19141924), Fabian (19251931),