Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Original Russian Text N.M. Shchegolkova, 2007, published in Vodnye Resursy, 2007, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 238248.
AbstractResults of long-term monitoring of water quality parameters of the Moskva River section within the
limits of the city are generalized. The dynamics in quality parameters of the water entering the city wastewater
treatment plants, purified effluents of the treatment plants, and river water is analyzed. A relationship between
the concentration of organic matter in the river water at the exit from the city and WWTP capacity is demonstrated. Periods of unfavorable environmental state of the river in terms of oxygen regime are singled out based
on oxygen regime dynamics. Variations in the river self-purification process are shown. It is stated that purified
effluents of the WWTP are a component of the city hydrological system.
DOI: 10.1134/S0097807807020121
INTRODUCTION
The Moskva River is subjected to considerable
human impact throughout its course, but this effect is
most pronounced in the Moscow city zonethe zone
of a largest megalopolis. The city development is
accompanied by the construction of the municipal sewerage system, whose effluents become a component of
the river.
Water quality in the river can be regulated by
decreasing toxic substance concentrations at point
sources of water pollution, which also include sewerage effluents, as well as by intensifying water self-purification processes in the river [16]. At present, rivers are
contaminated, primarily, by non-point pollution
sources [11, 26, 29]. The development and implementation of up-to-date wastewater treatment technologies
result in the fact that, on urbanized areas, purified water
quality becomes higher than that of the river [19]. In
this connection, the improvement of the state of water
resources in the river necessitates the intensification of
intra-system processes aimed at river water self-purification, which, in turn, requires the assessment of the
main structural and functional characteristics of the
river ecosystem, as well as the processes determining
the river water self-purification. It is also necessary to
take into account the results of hydrological, hydrochemical, hydrobiological, and engineering ecological
studies.
There are only few scientific papers devoted to the
analysis of big river systems operation, because such
analysis is labor consuming and necessitates combining
numerous parameters in one analytical center. The
available papers describe in detail water resources of
217
218
SHCHEGOLKOVA
have studied river water and purified effluents of Moscow WWTP, as well as bottom sediments [19] in the
river section more than 100 km long. The accumulated
database enables us to perform historical analysis of
relations between water quality parameters and the
municipal sewerage system operation and identify relations between the river water self-purification, on the
one hand, and technological processes of domestic
wastewater treatment, on the other hand. These problems are the target of this paper.
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
219
Fig. 1 Schematic map of the Moskva River, showing the present and past locations of the city wastewater treatment facilities. Wastewater treatment facilities operating at present: Kuryanovo Aeration Station (KWWTP) (since 1951); Lyubertsy Aeration Station
(LAS) (since 1963); Zelenograd Aeration Station (ZAS) (since 1966); Yuzhnoe Butovo Wastewater Treatment Plant (BWTP) (since
1998). Non-operating water treatment facilities: (1) Lyublinio Filtration Fields (18991970); (2) Lyubertsy Filtration Fields (1914
1975); (3) Kozhukhovo Aerofiltration Station (19291970); (4) Fili Aeration Station (19361972); (5) Zakrestovskay Aeration Station (19351966); (6) Shchukino Aeration Station (19511975); (7) Kuntsevo Aeration Station (19611966); (8) Tushino Aeration
Station (19611980); (9) Lyublino Aeration Station (19401996).
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
14000
1 2
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Years
220
SHCHEGOLKOVA
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
221
222
SHCHEGOLKOVA
Table 1. Main stages in the development of the aquatic environment in the city
Seasonal variations
in the SDR values
SDR
Years
l/(pers. day)
Prior to 1740
Share of untreated
domestic wastewater Oxygen regime of the river within
in the total river runoff,
the limits of the city
%
>12 000
<5
Natural, favorable
17401870
120003100
60
<10
Satisfactory
18711936
3100600
40
3050
Unfavorable in summer
Unfavorable
19371964
6001200
+20
2030
19651978
12001400
+15
Decrease to zero
19791996
14001300
Satisfactory
19972004
1300800
70
Satisfactory
Unfavorable in summer
increase in the SDR value was promoted by the construction of the Moscow Canal in the 1930s, which
allowed for a twofold increase in the dilution of effluents. Water supply via the Moscow Canal was growing
during the whole second part of the XX century. In spite
of this fact, till the 1950s, the SDR value did not exceed
600 l/(pers. day). Theses were the lowest values for the
whole citys existence. At that time, BOD5 at the exit
from the city reached 21 mg 2/l, the concentration of
ammonium was 4.7 mg N/l, water saturation with dissolved oxygen fell down to 30% [12].
The most rapid growth of the population number was
observed in 19261941 (about 200000 people per year)
and in 19571959 (about 600000 people per year).
1
2
3
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
2003
2001
1999
1997
1995
1993
1991
1989
1986
1984
1982
1980
1977
1974
1972
1970
1967
1964
1962
1960
1958
1956
1953
1939
1897
20
Years
Fig. 3. Dynamics in the ratio of overland flow, forming the Moskva River runoff at the exit from the city. Discharge of: (1) untreated
domestic wastewater; (2) river water (without domestic wastewater); (3) purified wastewater.
WATER RESOURCES
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
223
7000
16
14
1
6000
2
12
5000
10
4000
8
3000
6
2000
4
1000
2
0
0
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Years
BOD5, mg O2/l
SHCHEGOLKOVA
Q, thous. m3/day
224
Fig. 4. Dependence of the water quality at the city exit on the degree of overland flow canalization. (1) Total discharge of all the
water treatment plants, dealing with domestic wastewater; (2) concentration of biologically oxidizable organic substances (in terms
of BOD5) at the exit from the city.
Table 2. Characteristics of purified wastewater leaving the Kuryanovo Aeration Station (KWWTP) and those of the river water
downstream of the outlet, depending on the dynamics in the urban load on the river (HL is hydraulic load, RC is rated capacity)
In the wastewater entering
the KWWTP
Years
annual dynamics on
average BOD5
ratio between the HL the load in values with the conterms of
fidence interval
and RC, %
BOD5, of < 0.05, mg O2/l
tons/day
In the river
minimum
values of
dissolved
oxygen
concentration downstream of
the outlet,
mg O2/l
average values
of dissolved oxygen concentration with a confidence interval of
< 0.05, mg O2/l
12.4
13.56 1.29
25.5
>/>
0.2
4.40 0.36
27.2
6.50 0.62
10.2
</>
2.4
6.98 0.43
11.8
4.52 0.38
3.7
</>
2.5
6.92 0.44
0.9
6.72 1.34
7.5
</<
4.7
6.97 0.44
WATER RESOURCES
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
exceeded the rated capacity RC of Kuryanovo Aeration Station by 40% [23]. This period was characterized
by the poorest quality of wastewater treatment (BOD5
averaging 13.6 mg 2/l). An extremely broad range of
fluctuations in BOD5 values, characterizing the quality
of effluents of wastewater treatment plants, testifies to
the operation stability of the treatment facilities. The
range of fluctuations in BOD5 load was decreasing
between the first and the second periods. During the
first period, the rated capacity of the treatment plants
was lower than the hydraulic load, and the organic load
was growing at the rate of 12.4 tons/day in terms of
BOD5. During the second period, when the rated capacity did not exceed the hydraulic load any longer, the
water quality treatment against BOD5 improved to
6.5 mg 2/l (Table 2). Further improvement of wastewater treatment quality was observed during the third
period (19831996), when the organic load was
decreasing. During this period, the station operated
under permissible hydraulic overload (up to 10%).
Nowadays, the organic load from the city is increasing
again, the rated wastewater treatment plant capacity
exceeding the real load. For the last several years of
observation, the average BOD5 values for the purified
effluents of the Kuryanovo Aeration Station varied
from 5.7 to 5.9 mg 2/l.
During the periods of revolutions and war [15], the
load on wastewater treatment facilities in terms of biologically oxidizable organic substances, suspended solids, and nitrogen decreased. Similar phenomena were
observed during perestroika. In 19891999, the concentrations of nitrogen, BOD5, and COD in the water
entering the Kuryanovo Aeration Station decreased.
The load in terms of organic matter and nitrogen
decreased by almost 30%. During periods unfavorable
for the city population, decreased organic substances
load improved the quality of purified wastewater and
changed its bacteriocenosis, which affected the processes of water self-purification in the river.
Changes in the quality of wastewater treatment at
the Kuryanovo Aeration Station affected dissolved
oxygen concentration in the effluents of the treatment
plant (Table 2) and the BOD load on the river (Fig. 5).
After the Moscow Canal was put in operation,
S.N. Stroganov [11] estimated the critical load in terms
of BOD5 for the river within the limits of the city at
40 tons/day. His calculations were made based on the
standard for 1942, prescribing the minimum dissolved
oxygen concentration in the water to be no less than
4 mg 2/l. Until the early 1970s, the load upstream and
downstream of the Kuryanovo Aeration Station
exceeded the critical value. Along the whole river
course within the city of Moscow, dissolved oxygen
concentration during all summer seasons was lower
than 4 mg 2/l. The minimum values upstream and
downstream of the outlet were less than 1 mg 2/l.
WATER RESOURCES
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
t/day
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
225
1
2
3
1955
1965
1975
1985
1995
2005
Years
226
SHCHEGOLKOVA
%
80
60
40
20
0
1962
()
1972
25
1982
1
2
1992
2002
Years
(b)
y = 0.2513x + 1.6832
R2 = 0.3849
15
5
25
15
5
30
(c)
y = 0.2441x + 29.998
R2 = 0.8806
40
50
60
70
%
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
CONCLUSIONS
The problem of ensuring favorable environmental
conditions in a river flowing through a big city should
be solved by studying the ecological processes within
the system comprising the river and biological wastewater treatment facilities. In the XX century, inverse
correlation was observed between the concentration of
biologically oxidizable organic substances in the
Moskva River at the exit from the city and the capacity
of wastewater treatment facilities. Within the period of
37 years, a direct correlation existed between the
BOD5/COD ratio in the water entering the biological
water treatment facilities and in the purified wastewater. During the periods of rapid changes in the quality
of inflowing wastewater (19942000), an inverse correlation was observed between the said parameters.
River flow regulation entailed the occurrence of
self-purification processes that previously were not typical of natural streams. Downstream of the outlets of
biological wastewater treatment facilities, a peculiar
zone with higher water temperature and specific plankton organisms was found to form. This zone does not
freeze in winter, which determines its peculiar oxygen
regime.
For a river with medium water abundance, receiving
effluents from a megalopolis, the SDR values and the
ratio between the volume of untreated wastewater,
treated wastewater, and the river water can be regarded
as the integral load on the river.
REFERENCES
1. Alimov, A.F., Golubkov, S.M., and Panov, V.E., Regularities in the Functioning and the Management Strategy of
Ecosystems the Neva Estuary, in Ekologicheskoe sostoyanie vodoemov i vodotokov basseina reki Nevy (Ecological State of Water Bodies and Watercourses in the Neva
Basin), St. Petersburg: SPbNTs RAN, 1996, pp. 187
203.
2. Water Supply to Moscow City Via the Construction of
Reservoirs in the Upper Course of the Moskva River and
on Its Tributaries, Tr. Komissii po izyskaniyu novykh
istochnikov vodosnabzheniya g. Moskvy (Proc. of Commission for the Search of New Sources for Water Supply
to Moscow City), 1927, vyp. 1, pp. 116122.
3. Gorlenko, V.M., Dubinina, G.A., and Kuznetsov, S.I.,
Ekologiya vodnykh mikroorganizmov (Ecology of
Aquatic Microorganisms), Moscow: Nauka, 1977.
4. Zinchenko, T.D., Vykhristyuk, L.A, and Shitikov, V.K.,
Methodological Approach to the Assessment of the
Environmental Conditions of River Systems in Terms of
Hydrochemical and Hydrobiological Indices, Izv.
SamNTs RAN, 2000, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 233243.
5. Kozlova, N.M., Biological Characteristics of Suspended
Particles in Treated Wastewaters Discharged into Water
Bodies, Depending on the Operation Regime of Aerotanks, in Tekhnologiya ochistki stochnykh vod g. Moskvy
(Wastewater Treatment Technology in Moscow City),
Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1973, pp. 821.
WATER RESOURCES
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007
227
6. Konstantinov, A.S., The Main Principles for the Assessment of the Capacity of Biological Self-Purification System in Water Bodies, Some Characteristics of Its Functioning in the Volgograd Reservoir, and the Methods for
Establishing the MAC under Natural Conditions, Vodn.
Resur., 1973, no. 4, pp. 149153.
7. Kriksunov, E.A., Lobyrev, F.S., Burmenskii, V.A., et al.,
Assessment of the State of Ichthyofauna in the Moskva
River in the Zone of Influence of WWTP, Voda i
Ekologiya. Problemy i Resheniya, 2005, no. 2 (23),
pp. 4252.
8. Metodika otsenki tekhnologicheskoi effektivnosti raboty
gorodskikh ochistnykh sooruzhenii kanalizatsii (metodicheskie rekomendatsii) (Procedure for the Assessment
of the Operation Efficiency of Municipal Sewerage
Treatment Facilities (Methodological Recommendations), Moscow: ONTI AKKh, 1983, p. 29.
9. Mikrobiologiya zagryaznennykh vod (Microbiology of
Polluted Waters), Mitchell, R., Ed., Moscow: Meditsina,
1976.
10. Otchet komissii po ochistke stochnykh vod, sostoyashchei pri Kanalizatsionnom otdele Moskovskoi gorodskoi
upravy. Prilozheniya za 30.10-01.11.1912 g (Report of
Commission on Wastewater Treatment, Sewerage
Department, Moscow Administrative Board. Applications for October 30November 1, 1912), Moscow:
Gor. tipografiya, 1913, book 1, vol. I, II, pp. 4855.
11. Papina, T.S., Transport i osobennosti raspredeleniya
tyazhelykh metallov v ryadu: voda - vzveshennoe veshchestvo - donnye otlozheniya rechnykh ekosistem.
Analit. obzor (Transport and Distribution of Heavy Metals in the Series WaterSuspended MatterBottom Sediments of River Ecosystems. Analytical Review), Novosibirsk: GPNTB SO RAN, 2001.
12. Popova, N.M., Sanitary State of the Moskva River Estimated by Long-Term Hydrochemical Data (Review of
Publications for 1965), in Protsessy zagryazneniya i
samoochishcheniya reki Moskvy (Pollution and SelfPurification Processes in the Moskva River), Moscow:
Stroiizdat, 1972, pp. 2350.
13. Sadchikov, A.P. and Kozlov, O.V., Troficheskie vzaimootnosheniya v planktonnom soobshchestve (Trophic
Relationships in Planktonic Community), Moscow:
Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1999.
14. Composition of the Moskva River Water near the Moskvoretskii Bridge in Different Months from 1898 to 1910,
in Tr. Soveshchaniya po ochistke stochnykh vod, sostoyashchego pri Kanalizatsionnom otdele M. K. Kh.,
(Proc. of Meeting on Wastewater Treatment, Sewerage
Department, M, K, Kh, M.), Moscow: II tipo-litografiya,
Moscow: S. N. Kh, 1922, pp. 343357.
15. Stroganov, S.N., Pitanie Moskvy v 1903-1922 g.g. po
nablyudeniyam nad stochnoi zhidkostyu (Nourishment
of Moscow in 19031922 Estimated by Observations of
Wastewaters), Moscow: Tip. M. K. Kh, 1923.
16. Khenderson-Sellers, B., Inzhenernaya limnologiya
(Engineering Limnology), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat,
1987.
17. Khentse, M., Armoes, P., Kur-Yansen, I., and Arvan, E.,
Ochistka stochnykh vod. Biologicheskie i khimicheskie
protsessy (Wastewater Treatment: Biological and Chemical Processes), Moscow: Mir, 2004.
228
SHCHEGOLKOVA
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
rophytes to Algae in Lake Apopka, Florida, Hydrobiologia, 2000, vol. 418, no. 1, pp. 217227.
Battle, J.M. and Mihuc, T.B., Decomposition Dynamics
of Aquatic Macrophytes in the Lower Atchafalaya, a
Large Floodplain River, Hydrobiologia, 2000, vol. 418,
no. 1, pp. 123136.
Behrendt, H., Altschuh, J., Sixt, S., et al., A Unified
Approach to Exposure Assessment by Computer Models
for Degradation Reactions and Soil Accumulation: the
Triazine Herbicide Example, Chemosphere, 1999,
vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 18111823.
Fenchel, T., King, G.M., and Blackburn, T.H., Bacterial
Biogeochemistry: The Ecophysiology of Mineral
Cycling. Second Edition, San Diego: Elsevier Acad.
Press, 1998.
Lemly, A.D. and Hilderbrand, R.H., Influence of Large
Woody Debris on Stream Insect Communities and
Benthic Detritus, Hydrobiologia, 2000, vol. 421, no. 1,
pp. 179185.
Randall, C-W. and Hoehn, R.C., Grizzard T.O., et al.,
The Significance of Heavy Metals in Urban Runnnoff
Entering the Occoquan Reservoir, Virginia, Water Res.
Center Bull, 1981, vol. 132, p. 252.
WATER RESOURCES
Vol. 34
No. 2
2007