Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5/19/2015
Managerial Economics
Sisir Debnath
Session 7
Deadliest Killer?
Suppose you want to offer a mosquito abatement
program to your community.
The cost of the program is 5 lack Rs.
The total benefit of the program is more than 5 lack.
There are 100,000 households which will benefit.
Can you charge Rs. 5 to each household and break
even?
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
BP Oil Spill
BP drills a well in the depths of the Gulf of
Mexico, hoping that the marginal benefits from
large oil deposits exceed the marginal costs of
drilling
The explosion of Deepwater Horizon creates an
oil spill that threatens the livelihoods of Louisiana
fishermen
The fishermen were not party to the decision to
drill
Drilling creates a social problem that is not
addressed through unrestricted markets
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
Public Goods
Transactions in free markets with price systems
always make market participants better off
If all participants were not better off, the
transaction would not take place
But what about non-participants? They might
either benefit or suffer from transactions between
market participants
The objective of today's class is to analyze the
provision of goods and services that impact both
market participants and non-participants
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
Today
Public Goods and Externalities
Public Goods
Externalities
Optimal provision of Public goods
Coasian bargaining
Pigouvian taxes
Cap and trade
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Public Goods
Apart from usual goods and services, we consume
many public services everyday
The military protects us even without a conscious
choice to consume their services
Roads, railways and telecommunications enable us to
access different goods and services
Health and education services increase our ability to
appreciate different goods and services
Imagine life without public goods and services
Libertarian paradise?
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
Public Goods
Public goods are goods and services that are nonrivaled and non-excludable in consumption.
National defense is a pure public good.
Non-rivaled: marginal cost of protection given the
level of defence is zero.
Non-excluded: One person cannot exclude another
from protection.
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
10
11
12
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
13
Externalities
Think about the following examples:
Introducing a knowledgeable worker to a team of
employees increases the team's productivity
Vaccination against communicable diseases
protects not only vaccine receivers, but reduces the
probability others around them get the disease
Literacy not only improves a person's job
prospects, but also allows society to use written
contracts and forms of communication
14
Externalities
An externality is the effect of a decision by one set of
parties on others who were not participants in that
decision.
Externalities are not always beneficial
Air pollution from a factory or a car's tailpipe has a
negative impact on asthma sufferers who live or work
close by
A business that underfunds the pension fund pushes
the cost of providing retirement income on society
Corruption by bureaucrats has a negative impact on
users of public services
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
15
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
16
Cost, P
S1 = Marginal
Social Cost
S0 = Marginal
Private Cost
Cost of externality
P1
P0
D = Marginal
Social
Benefit
Q1 Q0
17
Cost, P
S = Marginal
Private Cost
P1
Benefit of
externality
P0
D1 = Marginal
Social
Benefit
D0 = Marginal
Private Benefit
Q0
Q1
18
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Externality Solution
Goods and services with negative externalities are
over-supplied by private markets
Goods and services with positive externalities are
under-supplied by private markets
If externalities have a significant negative (positive)
impact, how does one mitigate (encourage) their
incidence?
Internalize the externality
Alter incentives so that individuals take account of
externality in their own actions
19
Externality Solutions
Private solutions
Moral codes
Private charities
Bargaining (Coase theorem)
Public (government) solutions
Regulation mandating maximum (negative
externality) or minimum (positive externality)
provision
Pigouvian taxes (for negative externalities) and
subsidies (for positive externalities)
Cap and trade
Privately developed public solutions
Social institutions
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
20
Cost, P
S1 = Marginal
Social Cost
S0 = Marginal
Private Cost
Cost of externality
P1
P0
D = Marginal
Benefit
Q1 Q0
Social
21
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Coase Bargaining
Example:
A perfume factory is downstream to a paper mill.
Gunk from the paper mill impose a negative
externality on the operations of the perfume
factory.
The paper mill could reduce effluents by installing
filters.
The perfume factory could eliminate the impact of
the gunk by treating water before use.
22
Coase Bargaining
Definition: A property right is a legal rule that
describes what economic agents can do with an object
or idea.
Example:
Deed to parcel of land
Patent on an idea
23
Coase Bargaining
Example: Case 1: No explicit rights allocation.
Both the paper mill and the perfume factory can
do whatever they wish.
Perfume Factory
Paper Mill
No Treatment
Treatment
No Filter
(500,100)
(500,200)
Filter
(300,500)
(300,300)
24
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Coase Bargaining
Example: Case 2: The perfume factory has the right
to clean water and sets a fee of Rs. 500 for receiving
gunk.
Perfume Factory
No Treatment
Paper Mill
Treatment
No Filter
(0,600)
(0,700)
Filter
(300,500)
(300,300)
25
Coase Bargaining
Example: Case 3: The mill has a right to pollute and
sells fresh water for Rs. 250.
Perfume Factory
Paper Mill
No Treatment
Treatment
No Filter
(500,100)
(500,200)
Filter
(550,250)
(550,50)
26
Coase Bargaining
Summary of the main results
Ownership of property rights affects income
distribution
Party with property rights is compensated by other
party
Property rights are valuable
With no impediments to bargaining, assigning
property rights results in efficient outcome
Joint profits are maximized at this outcome
Efficiency is achieved regardless of who receives the
property rights!
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
27
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
28
29
Pigouvian
Tax
Abatement
30
10
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Supply
PC
Pigouvian Tax
PS
Demand
QO
QM
Quantity of Aluminium
31
Rs./ton
32
Rs./ton
Trade 1 unit
of right to
pollute
MAC1
Firm 1 0
Firm 2 10
5
5
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
10
0
33
11
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Rs./ton
34
Rs./ton
MAC1
Net Cost
Savings
Firm 1 0
5
5
Firm 2 10
10
0
Rs./ton
35
Rs./ton
Firm 1 0
Firm 2 10
5
5
Sisir Debnath, Managerial Economics, Indian School of Business
10
0
36
12
PostLectureSlides
5/19/2015
Allocation
37
38
39
13