Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ngel Garca-Iglesias1*, ngel GarcaSnchez1, Ima Moslemi1, David BeltrnVaquero2, Mara Paz Alonso-Reyero3
and Toms Rodriguez-Bravo1
Hospital Universitario. Universidad de Salamanca,
Spain
2
Institute of public Health. Madrid. Spain
3
Hospital Universitario. Len. Spain
1
Research Article
Introduction
The diagnosis of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN), has
increased in the last decades as a result of the increased number of
hysterectomies performed to women of all ages either for benign
gynecological processes, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
or cervical cancer. It has been noted that 15% of patients who had
cervical cancer developed recurrence or vaginal intraepithelial
neoplasiaafter hysterectomy [1].
Cervico-vaginal cytology has been established as a means of
singular value, to detect recurrences of preinvasive and invasive
disease of the lower genital tract in women both in cervical and vaginal
lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology in the prevention
and diagnosis of recurrences after hysterectomy or the appearance of
new lesions induced by papillomavirus is well documented [2].
The prevalence of VAIN is variable, ranging between 0.3 to 0.5
per 100.000 women, appreciating little variability with other studies
[3], occasionally reaching values of 7 per 100.000 women. VAIN may
occasionally be multifocal, associating with CIN or vulvar lesions [4],
a circumstance that would require performing routine cytological
screening.
Cervico-vaginal cytology controls posthysterectomy, detects
different types of VAIN of varied locations, frequently in the vaginal
vault, forcing, depending on the age, size and location of the lesions to
establish conservative treatments that are effective [5], trying to avoid
recurrences with the least aggressiveness [6]. This has established
several treatment modalities, from medicated, such as topical 5%
imiquimod, 5- fluorouracil and trichloroacetic acid to surgical
Inclusion criteria
In the present study, we have included all patients diagnosed of
Citation: Garca-Iglesias , Garca-Snchez , Moslemi I, Beltrn-Vaquero D, Alonso-Reyero MP, et al. (2016) Co2 Laser Treatment for Vaginal Intraepithelial
Neoplasia, Assesment of Recurrence. J Gynecol Res Obstet 2(1): 017-020.
017
Diagnostic criteria
Patients, who were referred for treatment with CO2 laser, had
undergone liquid-based cytology, identi-fying cellular alterations
following the Bethesda system. Included patients underwent
colposcopic study, applying 5% acetic acid and subsequent application
of iodine solution. The affected areas were biopsied using punch or
LLETZ, in both single and multiple lesions. The material obtained
from the biopsy was processed by the Pathology Department. The
detection of HPV was performed by HIBRID Capture II test, a sample
was collected with a brush from the vaginal vault and the material
obtained was placed in Digene Specimen Transport Medium (STM).
The detection of high-risk viruses was carried by CLART HPV 2
detection system, which allows the simultaneous detection of 35 HPV
genotypes in a single analysis.
Biopsy in 5% of the cases was done by punch and in the
remainder a 10 mm x 10mm LLETZ loop electrode was used. Lesions
were previously identified by colposcopy with acetic acid and iodine
solution.
Discussion
VAIN 2 and VAIN 3 lesions can be treated with equal success
using excision or laser vaporization with success in 69% to 79% of
cases following either treatment. Selection of treatment depends
on a number offactors. VAIN 3 lesions located at the vaginal apex
in women who have had hysterectomy for CIN are more likely to
become invasive early. The evolution of VAIN to vaginal carcinoma
is not well established [8]. Most women CIN 3 71.2% followed by
Laser treatment
Characteristics
<45 years
41
31.29
45 years
90
68.7
Menopause
39
29.77
Smoker
58
44.27
Fibroids
21
16.03
CIN I
10
7.63
CIN II
26
19.84
CIN III
55
41.98
Statistical analysais
Carcinoma in situ
6.1
Cervical cancer
11
8.39
VAIN I
2.29
VAIN II
22
16.79
VAIN III
106
80.91
Single
43
32.82
Multiple
88
67.17
HPV 16
92
70.22
Other HPV
39
29.77
Results
018
Age
Type of lesions
Laser ablation
Recurrence
VAIN I
3 (2.29%)
VAIN II
22 (16.79%)
4 (3.05%)
VAIN III
106 (80.91%)
20 (15.26%)
Total
131
24 (18.33%)
Citation: Garca-Iglesias , Garca-Snchez , Moslemi I, Beltrn-Vaquero D, Alonso-Reyero MP, et al. (2016) Co2 Laser Treatment for Vaginal
Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Assesment of Recurrence. J Gynecol Res Obstet 2(1): 017-020.
Age
p-value
<45 years
2.18
1.33-5.12
0.72
45 years
2.05
1.15-9.77
0.04*
1.99
0.99-12.38 0.76
Cervical cancer
4.33
0.82-17.61 0.31
6.33
1.53-19.21 0.03*
Single
3.71
0.71-13.10 0.81
Multiple
2.69
0.86-14.21 0.66
1.66
1.09-11.16 0.05*
Type of lesions
HPV 16
* P<0.05.
019
Conclusion
CO2 laser vaporization technique is effective in treatment of
VAIN but risk factors must be taken into account because they
favor recurrence. These risk factors for recurrence of VAIN are age,
previous intraepithelial lesions and infection with papillomavirus
genotype 16.
References
1. Gupta S, Sodhani P, Singh V, Sehgal A (2013) Role of vault cytology in
follow-up of hysterectomized women: results and inferences from a low
resource setting. Diagn Cytopathol 41: 762-766.
2. Stokes-Lampard HJ, Wilson S, Waddell C, Bentley L (2011) Vaginal vault
cytology test: Analysis of a decade of data from a U.K. tertiary centre.
Cytopathology 22: 121-129.
3. Boonlikit S, Noinual N (2010) Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective
analysis of clinical features and colpohistology. J. Obstet Gynaecol res 36:
94-100.
4. Smith JS, Backes DM, Hoots BE, Kuman RJ, Pimenta JM (2009) Human
papillomavirus type-distribution in vulvar and vaginal cancer and their
associated precursors. Obstet Gynecol 113: 917-924.
Citation: Garca-Iglesias , Garca-Snchez , Moslemi I, Beltrn-Vaquero D, Alonso-Reyero MP, et al. (2016) Co2 Laser Treatment for Vaginal
Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Assesment of Recurrence. J Gynecol Res Obstet 2(1): 017-020.
5. Bansal M, Austin RM, Zhao C (2011) Correlation of histopathologic followup findings with vaginal human papillomavirus and lw-grade squamous
intraepithelial lesion papanicolau test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 135:
1545-1549.
6. Li H, Guo YL, Zhang JX, Qiao J, Geng L (2012) Risk factors for the
development of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. Chinese Medical Journal
125: 1219-1223.
18. Li H, Geng L, Guo YL, Guo HY, You K, et al. (2009) Analysis of diagnosis
and treatment of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia and correlation to cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 44: 171-174.
20. Kim HS, Park NH, Park IA, Park JH, Chung HH, et al. (2009) Risk factors for
recurrence of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in the vaginal vault after laser
vaporization. Laser Surg Med 41: 196-202.
21. Schockaert S, Poppe W, Arbyn M, Verguts T, Verguts J (2008) Incidence of
vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia after hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia: a retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 113-1-5.
22. Gunderson CC, Nugent EK, Elfrink SH, Oro MA, Moore KN (2013) A
contemporary analysis of epidemiology and management of vaginal
intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208: 410-e1-6.
23. Massad LS (2008) Outcomes after diagnosis of vaginal intraepithelial
neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis 12: 16-19.
24. Frega A, French D, Piazze J, Cerekja A, Vetrano G, et al. (2007) Prediction
of persistent vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia in previously hysterectomized
women by high-risk HPV-DNA detection. Cancer Lett 249: 235-241.
25. Pearson JM, Feltman RS, Twiggs LB (2008) Association of human
papillomavirus with vulvar and vaginal intraepithelial disease: opportunities
for prevention. Womens Health 4: 143-150.
Copyright: 2016 Garca-Iglesias , et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
020
Citation: Garca-Iglesias , Garca-Snchez , Moslemi I, Beltrn-Vaquero D, Alonso-Reyero MP, et al. (2016) Co2 Laser Treatment for Vaginal
Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Assesment of Recurrence. J Gynecol Res Obstet 2(1): 017-020.