Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SITE INVESTIGATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE INVESTIGATION
CHRISTOPHER B. PICKLES
Abstract
Environmental site investigation and characterization is a complex process that often includes a large number of variables, a limited number of
resources, and not nearly enough time to complete properly. The investigation of a site is, however, potentially the most important part of an
environmental project. Site investigation is so important because nearly
all other aspects of the project, from financial decisions to engineering
designs and construction tasks, are based on the findings of an initial site
investigation. How a problem is solved is always determined by what
problem solvers know about the problem; in general, the site investigation
tells the site investigator everything that needs to be known about a site.
The goal of site investigation is to understand the conditions present
at a site and to choose a method to record and present the findings for later
reference. Economic and political factors often play a large role in the
depth and accuracy of environmental site investigations. The amount of
time and resources needed to provide a complete and thorough site investigation is often lacking due to one or more economic or political factors.
By going step by step through the site investigation process, students
and practitioners can see the great importance site investigation lends to
the overall success of a project. Additionally, by gaining a thorough understanding of the current state of technology and methodology used for environmental site investigation, readers will better understand how to make
their site investigations more efficient and beneficial to a project.
KEYWORDS
development, engineering, environmental, geology, geotechnical, investigation, remediation, site, site development, soil contamination, urban
planning
Contents
List of Figures
xi
List of Tables
xiii
Preface
Acknowledgments
xv
xvii
10
13
13
13
16
17
19
20
20
viii Contents
21
21
23
23
23
23
25
26
27
27
29
29
29
29
3.2.2Outcrops
31
31
32
33
33
34
36
37
37
38
41
41
41
55
62
64
65
66
Contents ix
68
70
71
72
73
73
Bibliography
75
Index
77
List of Figures
Figure 1.1.An illustrated representation of
multiple soil layers called soil strata.
11
14
15
15
16
17
24
27
28
31
38
39
46
47
Figure 4.3.A sample of the typical layout for graphing the soil grain
size distribution curve with a log scale on the x-axis. 47
Figure 4.4.Picture of the equipment used for determining the
liquid limit.
48
48
50
51
Figure 4.8.A diagram of the equipment and test setup for the
fallinghead permeability test.
52
53
55
57
59
64
65
66
Figure 4.16.A typical site map with soil boring locations and soil
profile alignment.
67
70
70
List of Tables
Table 4.1.A list of the various tests that will be explained in this
chapter
42
61
Preface
For decades, scientists and engineers have played an important role in
governance of the human interaction with the environment. It has become
apparent over the course of history that scientists and engineers dance
on a fine line between those who promote and protect the health of the
environment and those who, albeit unwillingly, destroy the environment.
Many are those who work tirelessly to clean up rivers and streams, regulate emissions, and create new technology to encourage healthy interaction with the environment. The modern fast-paced world is also filled with
those who have ordered other priorities, such as net income, above the
health of the environment. Notwithstanding the aim of a particular firm or
scientist or engineer, everyone will benefit from a thorough understanding
of environmental site investigation.
If the aim is to clean up a contaminated site or provide some type of
remedy for contamination, the first step will be to understand the extent of
the problem by investigating the site. Those who have other objectives in
mind, for example, production of a chemical, will benefit from knowing
what type of work will be required in the event of a spill or site closure.
This text follows step by step through the process of site investigation with
a primary focus on environmental sites.
There is a particular importance for the engineering or science
students to understand environmental site investigation. The m
ajority
of work
performed as part of an environmental site investigation is
performed by young engineers and scientists. A student of these disciplines
will, therefore, benefit most from a thorough understanding of the site
investigation process.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank his many teachers, both in engineering and
in life, who gave him the knowledge and clear understanding needed to
help others.
Special thanks to Jerry Hopcroft from the Wentworth Institute of
Technology for advising the writing of this book. Also, thank you to
the many other engineering professors and professionals who provided
guidance and support in creating this first edition.
Thanks also to the guidance and support from the many people who
work for Momentum Press and made the publishing of this material
possible.
Thank you all.
CHAPTER 1
Geology and
Environmental Site
Investigation Overview
1.1INTRODUCTION TO GEOLOGY AND
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE INVESTIGATION
Environmental site investigation and characterization is a complex process that often includes a large number of variables, a limited number of
resources, and not nearly enough time to complete properly. The investigation of a site is, however, potentially the most important part of an
environmental project. Site investigation is so important because nearly
all other aspects of the project, from financial decisions to engineering
designs and construction tasks, are based on the findings of an initial site
investigation. How a problem is solved is always determined by what
problem solvers know about the problem; in general, the site investigation
tells the site investigator everything that needs to be known about a site.
The goal in site investigation is to use a number of methods to understand the conditions present at a site and to choose a clear and detailed
method to record and present the findings for later reference. For a small
project, this process might include a few shallow soil borings and soil tests.
The information resulting from the subsurface investigations would then
be cataloged and presented on a map or in a report. For larger projects, site
investigations are often composed of ongoing testing and sampling over
longer periods and might include several phases of implementation.
Economic and political factors often play a large role in the depth and
accuracy of environmental site investigations. The amount of time and
resources needed to provide a complete and thorough site investigation are
and scientists have used clues from rock samples to estimate the age of
the earth. The oldest clues indicate that the oldest rocks are on the order
of 4.8 billion years old. The geologic timescale can be summarized as
a timeline of events that show how the earth has changed over the past
4.8billion years.
The clues that have been used to compose the geologic timescale
come from what is known as the rock record. The rock record presents a
historical indication of how the earth has changed in a particular spot. If
a visit is made to a site with an exposed mountain side or rock face, analyzing the different types of rock and soil, along with how they both are
layered, will provide a good idea of how that part of the earth was formed.
To make use of the rock record of a particular site, some basic information
about geologic formations, rock types, and soil types is very helpful.
It is useful to recall basic geologic components that make up the earth.
Starting from the center of the earth and working outward toward the
atmosphere, the basic components are the inner core, outer core, mantle,
and crust. The inner core and the crust are the only two components that
are solid. The crust is created by the continued cooling of the molten mantle by the atmosphere. As the earth continues to compress and shift, the
solid crust at the surface is constantly changing form. In some areas,the
crust is being forced downward back into the mantle, and in other areas
the crust is being separated. In the areas of separation, new molten material rises to the surface and is cooled by the atmosphere to form a new part
of the crust. The zones where the crust is either being compressed back
into the mantle or separated are called fault zones. The large portions of
the crust that compose the area between fault zones are known as plates.
The continuous compression and expansion of the crust leads to shifting of the plates and significant geologic activity along the fault lines. In
cases where a plate is being forced down into the mantle, a deep rift might
form. Similarly, where a plate is being thrust upward into the atmosphere,
a high mountain range will develop.
There are many other forces contributing to the shaping of the earth
surface other than the compression and expansion of the crust. Glaciation, for example, has played a huge role in recent history. Geologist have
recorded evidence in many areas that the enormous sheets of ice that make
up a glacier have leveled entire mountain ranges as the ice slowly creeps
across the surface of the earth. Weather conditions including wind, rain,
and snow also play a significant role in degradation of rock and transport
of soil particles.
Perhaps the most interesting alterations to the earth crust in the last
several hundred years are related to the activities of the human race.
A fold is another useful identifier in understanding geologic formations. Over time, as the tectonic plates shift and cause areas of the crust to
Ground surface
Stratum 1
Stratum 2
Stratum 3
Stratum 4
compress, the soil strata will heave and dip. In some cases, the movement
is so great that the strata actually fold over each other. An example of a
fold is illustrated in Figure 1.2.
Faults are caused by a full shearing of soil strata caused by shifting of
tectonic plates and other surface movements. The deep seated movement
will cause a shearing through the earth of a measurable distance, and the
shear line is known as a fault. Faulting is illustrated in Figure 1.3.
Fractures will occur through the soil strata because of the tension
and compression associated with movement of the crust. Fractures can
also be caused by weathering at the surface. Fractures are illustrated in
Figure1.4.
Fault line
qualities of the parent rock but are, in general, much harder. The c rystal
structure is typically fine grained and, in some cases, very beautiful.
Igneous rocks are formed when hot molten rock cools and solidifies.
During the cooling process, crystals may or may not form depending on
the conditions. Igneous rocks, in general, can be classified into two types:
intrusive and extrusive. The intrusive type is created when the rock is
cooled slowly deep within the earth under high pressure where crystal
structure usually develops. The extrusive type is created when molten
rock cools quickly at or near the surface (picture hot lava flowing into the
ocean). The key identifier for igneous rocks is that they are relatively hard
and dense. Additionally, intrusive rocks (such as granite) typically have
larger crystal structure visible to the naked eye. Extrusive rocks (such as
basalt) typically have a fine grained structure and might be easily mistaken
for a harder sedimentary or metamorphic rock.
1.2.4 SOIL TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS
As the shaping of the earth continues over time, the continuous
compression and expansion of the crust causes great degradation of
the many rock types. Additionally, surface conditions such as weather,
glaciation, and human influences lead to further degradation of the soil.
Five basic soil types can be initially defined with more detail to come in
the chapters that follow. To understand the five primary soil types, it is
instructive to look at how they are formed and where they come from.
In this section, the basic soil types are noted with a review of the characteristics of each.
Gravel, the first general soil type, can be formed in many ways. Surface weathering of an exposed parent rock, or degradation and separation
of particles in a rapid flowing river are two examples. Gravel, then, is
simply pieces of broken rock that have been deposited together in a semihomogeneous mass. Gravel can include many particle sizes ranging from
3 in. stones down to microscopic clay particles, or can be uniform with all
similar size particles. Gravel typically refers to any soil deposit inclusive
of rock fragments greater than in. The most commonly used gravel at
construction sites is in. Note that the dimensions given are the smallest
dimension of the fragment. Thus, a stone in. in diameter, but 2 in. long,
might still pass through a in. screen.
Sand, the second general soil type, like gravel, can be formed in any
number of ways, but is generally formed by the same principle meansthe
breakdown of larger rock. Once gravel particles are more finely pulverized
over time, a sand deposit will be formed. In essence, a sand deposit is just
a mass of really small rock particles.
Smaller than sand, and the third general soil type, is silt. Once the
sand has been so finely pulverized that the resulting mass resembles that
of powdered flour, the sand is now a silt. We can understand what silt is by
picturing a handful of sand tossed into a bucket of clean water. No matter
how clean the sand is, once the sand particles settle to the bottom of the
bucket, the water will remain murky and discolored for at least a few minutes afterward. This discoloration is caused by the ultrafine silt particles
that have remained in suspension.
Clay is the fourth general soil type. Clay particles are unique in the
world of soils in that they stand alone from the previous three soil types.
Gravel, sand, and silt are all formed from some type of mechanical degradation of rock, that is, breaking of parent rock or rock particles into
smaller particles. Clay particles are formed by mechanical and chemical
breakup of the crystal structure of rock. One example of how this might
happen can be imagined at the delta of a river. Far upstream large boulders
are smashed against each other over time by the rapid water flow. The
resulting chips and pieces of smaller rock form gravel deposits. As the
river levels out and flows more smoothly, only the small gravel particles
are carried further to create sand deposits. Further still, the smallest silt
particles are deposited. Lastly, the finest of the particles, clay particles,
are deposited and cast out into the open water. The difference of the clay
particles is that they have come from every stage of the river. If a large
boulder up stream was not moved by the water flow, no rock fragments
would be formed, there would be no gravel, and no sand and no silt would
result. However, just from the natural chemical breakdown of the rocks,
regardless of size, some individual fibers of the crystal structure begin to
get washed from the parent rock. Those particles are carried downstream
and deposited as clay. One example is the breakdown of granite. One of
the main minerals in granite is feldspar. As granite is worn over time, large
deposits of the clay mineral kaolinite can be formed from the decomposition of the parent rock.
Organic material is the fifth general soil type. Organic material, sometimes referred to as peat, is a very important soil type because it is very
common in the topsoil that covers the surface in many locations. Organic
material can also be deposited underground and mixed in with other soil
types. This material usually includes decomposing plant matter such as
leaves, grass, or wood fibers. Organic material is typically more heterogeneous than other soil deposits and has hydraulic and strength properties
that are hard to predict.
Soil particles act like very tiny straws and want to draw up water in
the same way. With many soil particles acting together, the soil stratum
will act like a sponge. If a sponge is dipped in a tub of water, the effect will
be the same as the effect with the strawswater will climb up through the
pores of the sponge. Also, like the straws, there will be a portion of the
sponge that is fully saturated and is above the water pooled in the tub. This
effect is due to the capillarity of the pores.
As noted, the phreatic surface is the point with zero pore water
pressure. This means that this is the point in the sponge where the transition is made between partially and fully saturated. The water at this point
has reached equilibrium because the pressure caused by the soil capillarity,
or pore pressure, is equal and opposite to atmospheric pressure. The net
total pressure at this point, therefore, is zero. The area above the phreatic
surface, inclusive of partially saturated soils, is known as the vadose zone.
Figure 1.5 shows a representation of the different ways in which water
exists below the ground.
What makes environmental site investigation unique from any other
site investigation is that environmental sites typically have some type
of contamination. Understanding the site geology is critical when dealing with site contamination. Contamination at a site can come in many
forms from hazardous volatile liquids, such as gasoline, to different
types of solids, such as powdered chemicals and plastics. Whether the
contamination is in the form of a chemical spill or a potentially hazardous
material, the contamination at site is in some way obstructing or degrading
the natural, healthy state of the site, and its inhabitants, both human and
nonhuman. The key to properly understanding a site with contamination
is to understand the contaminants present and how they will interact with
the materials at the site. If a water soluble powder chemical, for example,
is deposited on an impervious clay stratum, it might be considered lucky
Vadose
zone
Capillary
fringe
Water
table
Zone of
saturation
Flo
ater
undw
gro
w of
clay, such as that which was deposited in an ancient lake described previously, would supply a limited flow of water due to the low permeability.
On the other hand, if the sand and gravel layer was tapped, the high permeability would yield an excellent source for fresh clean water. Aquifers
can also interconnect and act as transport channels for contamination.
Therefore, it is critical to protect these geologic features from becoming
contaminated. Understanding what surface and groundwater features are
located at or near a site is a key aspect of understanding the geology of a
site and as they relate to an environmental site investigation.
1.3FIELD IDENTIFICATION
Field identification of different geologic conditions at a site can save a
great deal of time and money when conducting an environmental site
investigation. Surface indicators such as the vegetation can lead to important indications about the site geology. Field identification of geologic formations, rock types, soil types, and groundwater conditions is an art that
can only be perfected over time with many years of experience.
1.3.1 GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS
The usefulness of geologic formations can vary greatly depending on
the purpose of the site investigation and the plans for a site. If a site is
being selected for a small building and a parking lot, for example, the
site with several large rock outcrops is obviously less ideal than a flat
site with sandy gravel because the rock will need to be leveled with fill
or excavated. The size of a site will also determine how useful geologic
formations are in site investigation. If a quarter acre lot is being used
for a residential p roject, an outcrop hundreds of feet away will not be
very useful for giving clues about the subsurface conditions. However, if
a highway alignment is being planned over several miles, any geologic
features in the region of the alignment could be investigated and yield
useful information.
1.3.2 ROCK TYPES
A simple geologists hammer is an invaluable tool for the field identification of rock types. The hammer can be used to break rock fragments
away from outcrops and to crack open small boulders to get a good look at
basalt) typically have a fine grained structure and might be easily mistaken
for a sedimentary rock like sandstone. The variations in crystal structure
are related to the time that the materials have to cool from the molten
state. Intrusive rocks are labeled as such because they cooled inside the
earth and, therefore, cooled slowly resulting in a relatively large crystal
structure. Extrusive rocks are cooled faster and typically result in a finer
(a)
(b)
the source. The contaminants that are not deposited directly into the
groundwater often are moved into the groundwater through the vertical
flow of infiltration water, but, most commonly, a significant portion of the
contamination remains in the soil at the site of the release. Moreover, as
the groundwater moves through the soil, any contaminants contained in
it tend to deposit onto the soil particles the water is flowing through and
thereby contaminates larger volumes of the soil than would have been
contaminated in the absence of the infiltration and the movement of the
groundwater.
The location of groundwater is typically indicated by the depth of the
groundwater table or phreatic surface. In most cases, this depth can be
simply determined with an acceptable degree of accuracy by measuring
down from the top of a bore hole to the water surface. By reading the
depth of the water table in several borehole locations, the water table can
be identified across the site. Note that in drilling operations, the borehole
will often be filled with water, or water might be expelled from the borehole by the drilling equipment. Site investigators should provide time for
the water level to equilibrate before reading the depth of the water table.
Additionally, the water table in some coastal areas that are close enough to
tidal waters might be subject to the fluctuations of the tide.
Another anomaly, in terms of groundwater, is a perched water table.
In some cases, an impervious soil layer will keep water ponded at an elevation above the natural water table in the area. In this case, the water
creates the illusion that the water table is much closer to the surface
than it actually may be. Site investigators can avoid problems with this
by drilling a well below the level at which water is first encountered. If
the soil boring stops at the first sign of water, and the site investigator
assumes that this is the water table, there is no way to know if this is in
fact only perched water, or the true water table. By continuing the boring
into multiple layers of soil below the first encounter with water, the site
investigator can understand if the true water table has been reached or if
there is perched water at the site.
Aquifers are not as easily identifiable as the groundwater table. Generally speaking, the groundwater table is usually determined at one depth
below the ground surface for each site, or parts of a site. Aquifers, on
the other hand, vary in three dimensions and can intersect only part of a
site, or be large enough to cross the area of several states. In most areas,
aquifers can be identified on geologic maps indicated by past research by
geologists and engineers. The important concept for site investigators to
understand is how variations in soil permeability create aquifers below the
ground. This understanding, described earlier in this chapter, along with
the foresight to identify aquifers at site by way of geologic maps and other
past records is the best way to identify the presence of aquifers at site.
soil samples off site for testing, for example, the site investigator should
be aware of what special provisions must be made for the transportation
of the materials that may be considered hazardous.
1.4.2 GROUNDWATER FLOW
For materials in the ground, whether classified as a hazardous contaminant or not, groundwater is typically the key transporter. For this reason, site investigators dealing with environmental sites should develop
an understanding of the site groundwater and groundwater flow in the
initial stages of the project. In some instances, in extremely dry climates,
the groundwater might be so deep below the surface (several hundred
feet) that it is not even worth monitoring. In other cases, a project might
be subject to tidal and seasonal changes in the water table and have water
close to the ground surface. In the later instance, installation of groundwater monitoring wells and other equipment is an important, and often
costly, part of the project.
Groundwater flow has the potential to transport contamination off
site. For this reason, monitoring of groundwater flow around contaminated
sites can become a very political issue. Imagine that a site groundwater
is contaminated and the plume of contamination is slowly progressing
toward a property line. The party responsible for the contamination will
potentially be opening the door for many additional technical and legal
problems if the contamination is allowed to enter the neighbors property.
Site investigators, designers, and project planners will all benefit from an
early investigation and understanding of the site groundwater flow.
1.4.3 AQUIFERS AND PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES
As noted in the previous section, the most common transporter of contamination across a site, or from one site to another, is groundwater. The
same water that permeates underground aquifers and feeds streams, rivers,
lakes, springs, and other water features is at risk when contamination is
on the move. Permeable aquifers that can act as a superhighway for contaminant transport, along with all public water supplies, must be diligently
guarded against contamination. A site investigator dealing with a contaminated site with groundwater flow should be well aware of any such features, even if they are several miles away. Proper precautions should also
be taken to notify the municipality tapping the nearby water supply.
Index
A
AASHTO Soil Classification
System, 58
American Association of State
Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO) system, 56
Aquifers, 1013, 1719, 20
ASTM D1557 Standard Test
Methods for Laboratory
Compaction Characteristics of
Soil Using Modified Effort, 49
ASTM D1586 Standard Test
Method for Penetration Test
and Split-Barrel Sampling of
Soils, 34
ASTM D2216 - 10. Standard
Test Methods for Laboratory
Determination of Water
(Moisture) Content of Soil and
Rock by Mass, 42, 44
ASTM D2435/D2435M. Standard
Test Methods for OneDimensional Consolidation
Properties of Soils Using
Incremental Loading, 54, 55
ASTM D2487 Standard Practice
for Classification of Soils for
Engineering Purposes (Unified
Soil Classification System), 56
ASTM D3441 Standard Test
Method for Mechanical Cone
Penetration Tests of Soil. (deals
with mechanical cones), 35
78Index
Contaminants
of concern, 6263
location of, 6768, 6970
testing and classification, 6364
transport, 1920, 2627
CPT test. See Cone penetrometer
(CPT) test
D
Data collection, 3839
Dolomite, 7
Dynamic site investigation, 7174
initial investigation, 7273
monitoring and modeling, 7374
E
Earth crust, 45
Environmental site investigation
aquifers and public water
supplies, 20
comparing test results, 6465
contaminants, 1013, 1719,
6264, 6770
contaminant transport, 1920,
2627
economic and political factors
in, 12
field data, 5455, 6667
geologic maps and soil maps,
2728
goals, 1
groundwater flow, 20
historical information, 2327
aerial photography, 2325
contaminant transport, 2627
previous projects, 2526
office background investigation,
2328
political implications, 2122
site mapping, 66
subsurface investigation, 3339
surface investigation, 2933
topographic maps, 27
wetland and tidal zones, 21
Extrusive rocks, 8, 1416
F
Field identification, 1319
Field data, 6667
G
Geologic formations
faults, 6
field identification, 1319
fold, 5
fractures, 67
Geologic maps, 2728
Geologic timescale, 34
Geology
basics, 35
overview, 12
site, 23
Google Earth, 23
Gravel, 8, 16, 59
Groundwater, 1013, 1719,
6869
aquifers, and contamination,
1013, 1719
as contaminant transport, 1920,
2627
sampling and monitoring wells,
3738
surface and, 3132
H
Hand auger, 37
Hand sampling tools, 37
Health hazards, 3334
I
Igneous rocks, 8, 1416
Index testing
Atterberg limits, 4748
consolidation, 5455
moisture calculation, 4445
particle-size analysis, 46
permeability, 5154
shear strength, 4951
soil compaction tests, 49
specific gravity, 4546
Intrusive rocks, 8, 14
Index 79
K
Kant, Immanuel, 3
L
Limestone, 7
Logs, soil boring, 3839
M
Mapping
site, 66
subsurface, 68
Marble, 7
Metamorphic rocks, 78, 14
Mottling, 6162
N
Nebular Hypothesis, 3
O
Organic material, 9, 6061
P
Particle-size analysis, 46
Permeability, 5154
Q
Quartzite, 7, 14
R
Rocks
igneous, 8
metamorphic, 78
sedimentary, 7
S
Sample disturbance, 43
Sampling
accuracy and reliability, 7071
ground water, 3738
hand sampling tools, 37
soil borings and, 3436
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps, 25
Sand, 89, 5960
Sandstone, 7
Sedimentary rocks, 7, 14
80Index
mottling, 6162
organic material, 9, 6061
sand, 89, 5960
silt, 9
Specific gravity, 4546
Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils, 34
Split-spoon method, 14, 35
SPT. See Standard penetration test
(SPT)
Squantum Point Park, 25, 27
Standard penetration test (SPT), 34
Stratigraphy, 5
Subsurface investigation
groundwater sampling and
monitoring wells, 3738
hand sampling tools, 37
health hazard implications, 3334
logs and data collection, 3839
soil borings and sampling, 3436
test pits, 3637
Subsurface mapping, 68
Surface investigation
outcrops, soil/rock, 31
site investigation exercise, 3233