Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matthew W. Dunnigan
Markus A. Mueller
I.
INTRODUCTION
II.
V
+
Sun
PV
Load
Isc
Load
Id
D
q (V + IRs ) V + IR
s
I = I sc I 0 e kT 1
Rp
Load
I = I sc I 0 e kT 1
(1)
kT I sc
ln
+ 1
q I 0
(2)
MPP
where
I is the current of the solar PV cell (A)
(3)
Isc
Power (W)
(4)
Current (A)
qV
e kT
P = V I = VI sc VI 0
Rp
Voc =
Isc
Ip
Id
Voltage (V)
Voc
(5)
(6)
where
v i (k ) is the kth current velocity of the ith particle.
x i (k ) is the kth current position of the ith particle.
(7)
where
) kn + c1initial
(8)
) kn + c2initial
(9)
c1 (k ) = c1 final c1initial
c2 (k ) = c2 final c2initial
Rp
IV.
(10)
SIMULATION RESULTS
CONCLUSION
120 W
33.70 V
3.56 A
3.87 A
42.10 V
0.47
1365
1000 W/m2
25 0C
TABLE II.
TRACKING EFFICIENCY OF THE MPPS OF THE SOLAR PV
PANEL USING THE STANDARD PSO, DYNAMIC PSO AND P&O ALGORITHMS
Case
No.
G
(W/m2)
T
(0C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1000
1000
2000
2000
3000
3000
4000
4000
5000
5000
25
50
25
50
30
40
30
40
35
45
o
MPP5
o
MPP4
o
MPP3
o
MPP2
o
10 3000 W/m
5 2000 W/m
1000 W/m2
0
20
30
Voltage (V)
Voltage-Power (V-P)
Power (W)
600
40
10
20
30
Voltage (V)
40
50
Current (A)
25 C
50 0C
75 0C
1000C
10
Power (W)
150
160
180
200
70
60
50
Standard PSO
Dynamic PSO
40
P&O
30
20
20
30
Voltage (V)
Voltage-Power(V-P)
40
50
10
20
30
Voltage (V)
40
50
20
40
60
5 6
Case
10
REFERENCES
[1]
25 0C
50 0C
75 0C
1000C
50
Figure 9. Tracking efficiency of the MPPs of the solar PV panel using the
standard PSO, dynamic PSO and P&O algorithms
100
0.19
0
80
100 120 140
Iteration step number
80
1
0
60
10
0
40
90
Voltage-Current (V-I)
20
100
3000 W/m2
2000 W/m2
1000 W/m2
0
Figure 8. Best fitness versus the iteration step number of the dynamic PSO
algorithm
Best fitness
4000 W/m2
200
0.1
50
5000 W/m2
400
0.15
0.05
MPP1
10
800
0.2
Best fitness
4000 W/m2
Current (A)
5000 W/m2
15
0.25
Voltage-Current (V-I)
20
160
180
200
Figure 7. Best fitness versus the iteration step number of the standard PSO
algorithm
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
neural network for solar PV system, 1st Int. Conf. Elect. Energy Syst.,
ICEES 2011, pp. 264-268, 2011.
S. J. Kang, J. S. Ko, J. S. Choi, M. G. Jang, J. H. Mun, J. G. Lee and D.
H. Chung, A novel MPPT control of photovoltaic system using FLC
algorithm, 11th Int. Conf. Control, Automat. and Syst., ICCAS 2011,
pp. 434-439. 2011.
V. Padmanabhan, V. Beena and M. Jayaraju, Fuzzy logic based
maximum power point tracker for a photovoltaic system, Int. Conf.
Power, Signals, Controls and Comput., EPSCICON 2012, pp. 1-6, 2012.
Md. A. Azam, S. A. A. Nahid, M. M. Alam and B. A. Plabon,
Microcontroller based high precision PSO algorithm for maximum
solar power tracking, Int. Conf. Inform., Electron. and Vision, ICIEV
2012, pp. 292-297, 2012.
K. Ishaque, Z. Salam, M. Amjad and S. Mekhilef, An improved particle
swarm optimization (PSO)-based MPPT for PV with reduced steadystate oscillation, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., pp. 3627-3638, 2012.
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, Proc. IEEE
Int. Conf. Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948, 1995.
TABLE III.
OBTAINED VMPP, IMPP AND PMPP OF THE SOLAR PV PANEL USING STANDARD PSO, DYNAMIC PSO AND P&O ALGORITHMS
Case
No.
G
(W/m2)
T
(0C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1000
1000
2000
2000
3000
3000
4000
4000
5000
5000
25
30
25
30
30
40
30
40
35
45
Theoretical values
VMPP
PMPP
IMPP
(A)
(W)
(V)
33.70
3.56
120.00
33.72
3.57
120.38
35.31
7.06
249.29
35.77
7.11
254.32
35.84
10.66
382.05
36.72
10.74
394.37
36.18
14.17
512.67
36.36
14.27
518.86
36.09
17.82
643.12
37.31
17.93
668.97
P&O algorithm
IMPP
PMPP
VMPP
(V)
(A)
(W)
32.77
3.47
113.71
32.90
3.57
117.45
32.87
6.88
226.15
33.80
6.94
234.57
34.04
10.30
350.61
34.75
10.43
362.44
34.59
13.18
455.90
35.11
13.71
481.36
35.78
17.19
615.06
36.03
17.77
640.25