Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ombudsman
Postal Area 9.53
th
9 Floor, The Tower
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
DX 152380 Westminster 8
29 March 2016
Dear Mr Yyyyyy
Your complaint
Thank you for your correspondence with my officers setting out your concerns
about the Judicial Conduct Investigations Offices handling of your complaint.
Your case was passed to an Investigating Officer who made some initial
enquiries with the JCIO. I have now completed a preliminary Investigation into
your complaint and I enclose a copy of my report. I do not believe a review is
necessary as there is no prospect of any finding of maladministration.
I realise that this will be a disappointment to you, but would like to assure you that I
considered both the handling of your complaint and the points you raised most
carefully.
Yours sincerely,
the JCIO's view that the issues raised by Mr Yyyyyy related to DJ Curtis'
judicial decision-making and case management and not his personal conduct
was consistent with its guidance. According to Rule 8 a letter can be only be
considered a complaint by the JCIO if it "contains an allegation of misconduct
on the part of a named or identifiable person holding office". It must
otherwise be dismissed. Leaflet JCI01 on the JCIO website states that:
"A Judge's role in court is to make independent decisions about cases
and their management. These are often tough decisions, and Judges
have to be firm and direct in the management of their cases.
Examples of Judges' decisions include the length or type of sentence,
whether a claim can proceed to trial, whether or not a claimant
succeeds in their claim, what costs should be awarded and what
evidence should be heard."
This sort of decision cannot form the subject of a complaint. If you are
unhappy with such a decision you are advised to seek legal advice
from a solicitor, local law centre, Citizens Advice Bureau or the
Community Legal Service to discuss whether you have a right of
appeal."
"If your complaint is not about a Judge's decision but about the
Judge's personal conduct you have the right to complain to the JCIO.
Examples of potential personal misconduct would be the use of
insulting, racist or sexist language".
the JCIO clearly explained why DJ Curtis' actions and decisions did not relate
to his judicial conduct and appropriately advised Mr Yyyyy that his concerns
could only be addressed via the appeal process;
it is not within my remit to consider the decision made by the JCIO to dismiss
Mr Yyyyyy's complaint or the concerns he has raised about DJ Curtis. I can
only consider the process followed in their investigation of the complaint, and
it is my view that they followed the correct and proper procedures to
determine the validity of the complaint;
I note that Mr Yyyyyy claimed that DJ Curtis' manner had been antagonistic
and belittling and particularised this in reference to the judge's response to his
oral evidence and his handling of issues surrounding the payment of Mr
Yyyyyy's council tax. I asked the JCIO to comment on whether it considered
asking for further information about this allegation and it said:
The accusation that DJ Curtis was antagonistic and belittling
comes at the opening of a discreet section within the complaint
entitled "Inappropriate Comments/Discrimination". In this
section he goes on to give examples of what DJ Curtis said,
including his concluding comments and the questions he
asked in relation to whether the complainant had a bank
account why the council tax payments were not made by direct
debit.
The caseworker has concluded, and I agree with his
assessment, that the comments cited in this section of
the complaint relate to the opening allegation that DJ Curtis
was antagonistic and belittling. There would have been no
need to ask for further particularisation of those points as, read
in the context of that whole section, Mr Yyyyyy has given
examples to illustrate the allegations he was making. The
examples given all relate to how DJ Curtis has dealt with the
proceedings before him, questions he has asked in relation to
the evidence or an expression of his opinion on the evidence
that has been presented. None of these things relate to
personal conduct on the part of DJ Curtis and were therefore
correctly rejected under rule 8.
The caseworker makes specific reference to the allegation of
antagonistic and belittling behaviour in his rejection letter. He
quotes an example that has been given to support the
allegation and explains why those actions do not constitute
misconduct. I am therefore also satisfied that Mr Yyyyyy has
received accurate and detailed reasons as to why the
complaint has been rejected."
I feel that the JCIO handled these complaints in the appropriate manner as
the allegations related to DJ Curtis' judicial decision-making and case
management, rather than judicial misconduct, and could only be considered
via the appeal process;
although the JCIO appear to have believed that the appeal to the High Court
referenced by Mr Yyyyyy was an appeal of DJ Curtis' decision, as opposed to
a related matter, cited for reference purposes only, this interpretation was not
unreasonable and did not render its investigation unsound. Indeed, it would
4
it would also not have affected its advice to Mr Yyyyy that, as such, it was
unable to "review a judicial decision to be able to ascertain whether it was
correct in law or made as a result of bias". It correctly advised Mr Yyyyyy that
these were matters for an appeal and that only if, on appeal, a judge was
criticised for their decision because of bias, would this then be open to
consideration by the JCIO.
Mr Paul Kernaghan
29 March 2016