Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As mentioned in the previous point, the most compelling reason to reduce inventory
is often the directly financial one, avoiding your funds being tied-up unnecessarily.
Before we get into detail, let us clarify one thing that people often get wrong. If you
reduce you inventory by $1m in a given year, your profit in that year is not
increased by $1m, only by the cost of servicing that working capital. Let us explain.
Imagine you have a house worth $1m (wouldnt that be nice), and you have a
mortgage on that house at an interest rate of 5% per annum.
If you sell the house, you are not instantly $1m better off, because you need to
repay the mortgage with the money you make. You will however be $50k per year
better-off because you will no longer have to pay the interest.
For those who know a little more about business
Now relate that back to a businesss inventory. You reduce inventory by $1m, but
your annual profit only increases by the amount of interest that you would have
paid on that capital.
Actually its a little more complex than that. When a business is making financial
decisions, it will use a cost-of-capital percentage which is typically higher than
normal bank interest rates. This is because it should judge any investment not only
against the cost of borrowing money, but also against all the more profitable uses to
which that money might be put. Dont get too hung up on this, but recognise that
cost of capital is typically higher than base interest rate.
Lets say that our example business has a cost-of-capital judged at 8%.
Now lets look at the impact on each of its main financial statements, of reducing
inventory by $1m.
The Profit and Loss account shows an annual improvement of $80k. As we have just
explained this is effectively the impact of not paying interest on the cash that you
previously had tied up in stock.
The balance sheet can be affected in one of two ways. If you reduce your inventory
and keep or re-spend the resulting cash, the balance sheet value does not change;
youve simply swapped one type of asset for another. If you use the funds to repay
a loan, the balance sheet value will drop as youve reduced both your assets and
your related liabilities.
The cash flow statement is the only one that is directly impacted by the full $1m. By
reducing the inventory you make available $1m of cash that flows into the business
as a one-off benefit.
Irrespective of all these complexities, reducing inventory is clearly financially
beneficial, and thats why it is often at the top of a businesss priorities.
3. The Nature of Stock Finished goods-01
c
Now lets look at how the inventory level of a particular manufactured item varies
over time.
The first thing to note is that you are unlikely to always have the same level of
inventory, so its often sensible to talk about average levels rather than levels at a
point in time.
Many manufactured items are made in batches so, for example you may sell 10 per
day but choose to make a batch of 140 on one day every two weeks. The result is
the type of saw tooth pattern that you see on this page, where the inventory level
jumps up when a batch is produced, and then declines gradually as the goods are
sold.
The simplified aim in this example is to reach a point where you have zero units left
in stock at the point that you make the next batch, so you start the period with 140
and then sell 10 per day for fourteen days until you have none left.
In reality, there are two reasons why you need to hold a bit of extra inventory, over
and above this basic saw tooth pattern.
The first is to guard against unexpected things like selling more than the average 10
per day, or something going wrong during the production batch. In case these
happen, you hold whats referred to as Safety Stock. This starts to get consumed if
sales increase or production is late. The amount of safety stock you hold varies
depending on how much of a disaster it would be to run out of stock.
The other reason for holding more inventory, is to cater for the amount of time the
goods spend in transit. If your factory is a long way from your retail store, you will
have to hold inventory that has been produced, but is not yet ready for sale,
because its not yet reached the store.
This is the concept of pipeline stock.
Pipeline stock refers to any inventory which is on its way to the point at which it can
be sold, but has not yet reached that point.
As well as goods which are actually on the move, this could include goods that are
waiting for customs clearance at a port, or are in a loading bay waiting to go on a
truck.
6. How inventory is expressed
Lets now go back to the important subject of safety stock, and the decision about
how much of it to hold.
As this shown, the calculation depends on a trade-off between the cost that would
be incurred if you ran out referred to as the costs of lost sales or COLS; and the
cost of holding excess stock referred to as the cost of stock or COS.
If you dont need to provide a very reliable service, the cost of lost sales is low so
its not worth incurring the cost of holding additional stock.
If however your target service level is high, the cost of lost sales must be significant
and it can therefore be worth holding additional stock despite the cost.
Lets clarify what we mean by the cost of lost sales and cost of stock.
Firstly, the cost of lost sales is often more than just the revenue that you lost by
missing a sale. It could include loss of reputation, permanent loss of business from
dissatisfied customers or worse. Imagine the consequence if a pharmaceutical
manufacturer runs out of a life-saving drug.
Equally, the cost of stock is (as we have previously discussed) more than just the
cost of storage space. It also includes the working capital tie up in inventory and the
risk of obsolescence or shelf-life issues.
At the end of the day, the decision about how much safety stock to hold is very
subjective. It depends highly on the circumstance of the business or the individual
product.
Weve already said that the need to hold safety stock is to overcome uncertainty.
Uncertainty in production success, sales levels or the timing of the next production
run. So how can safety stock be reduced, other than by accepting a lower service
level. Here are a few options:
The diagram above attempts to show variation in demand, and its effect on the
now familiar saw tooth pattern of inventory consumption.
Of the three angled lines, the one in the middle marked forecast sales represents
the expected rate of sales, and the rate therefore at which inventory is expected to
decline.
The shallower line represents the minimum rate of sales, given a particular standard
deviation of demand. On this line, the inventory will decline more slowly and there is
likely to be excess stock still available when the time comes for the next production
run.
The steeper line shows the likely maximum rate of sales. On this line, the inventory
will decline faster and more quickly eat into safety stock.
Should you hold enough inventory to cater for the maximum rate of sales, or should
you allow inventory to run out in the unlikely event of this steep sales line
occurring? Thats back to a judgement based on the cost of lost sales and the cost
of holding inventory.
The shaded portion of the graph on this page shows how you might choose to draw
a line that represents that greatest variability of demand that you are willing to
cater for in your management of inventory.