Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kriswanto , MD
Yudi Her Oktaviono , MD. PHD
Departement of cardiology
Dr. Soetomo General Hospital - Airlangga University
Surabaya - indonesia
Historical Note
Recognized since 16 th century.
Lannaec (French physician) introduced term Dissection aneurysm in 1819.
King George 2 of Great Britain died (october 25,1760) while training on the
commode and was the first well documented case of an aortic dissection.
Historical Note
First successful outcome of modern treatment of aortic dissection was attributed to
Dr. DeBakey in his report, 1955 and later he devised a classification that is widely
used today as Debakey classification.
Anatomy of aorta
VEIN
Tunica intima
endothelium
basement membrane
internal elastic lamina
Tunica media
circular smooth muscle
external elastic lamina
Tunica adventitia
CAPILLARY
endothelium
basement membrane
With H&E, elastin fibers and smooth muscle cells are hard to discern. Under
high power, focus up and down with the fine focus knob, and look for fibers
that are birefringent (they look like they glow). These are elastin fibers.
A = tunica intima (interna) B = tunica media C = tunica adventitia (externa) arrowheads = vasa
vasorum
1.25
Classification
Percentage
Type
60%
10-15%
DeBakey I
DeBakey II
25-30%
DeBakey III
Stanford A
Stanford B
Proximal
Distal
Incidence
Ranges from 2-10 per 100,000 person-years
Evidence of dissection is found in 1-3% of all autopsies
International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD)
65% men
mean age 63yrs
Women tend to present older (67 vs. 60yrs)
Mortality
When left untreated
33% of patients die within the first 24 hours
50% die within 48 hours
~75% die within 2-weeks
Predisposing factors
Older patients
Younger patients
Clinical Features
Abrupt onset of severe, sharp or "tearing" posterior chest or back
pain (70-90%)
Pulse deficit
weak/absent carotid, brachial, or femoral pulse resulting from
intimal flap or compression by hematoma
HTN at initial presentation is more common in those with a type B
dissection (70 vs 36%)
Clinical presentation
Clinical presentation
DIAGNOSTIC
EKG Findings
normal (31%)
nonspecific ST--T wave changes (30-42%)
(commonly, LVH and strain patterns associated with HTN)
Labs
D-dimer ?
14-center international study of 220 patients (87 with AD, 133 controls)
D-dimer levels 3213 1465 and 3574 1430 for type A and B
respectively
Sensitivity 96.6%, Specificity 46.6%
Possibility that D-dimer could be used to help rule-out aortic dissection
Suzuki et. al. Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection by D-Dimer. Circulation 2009; 119,
2702-2707
Chest X Ray
Imaging
Summary of specialized imaging techniques
Angiography
CT
MRI
TEE
Sensitivity
Poor
Average
Excellent
Excellent
Specificity
Good
Good
Excellent
Good
Site of tear
Good
Poor
Excellent
Good
Excellent
Useless
Excellent
Excellent
Pericardial
effusion
Useless
Poor
Excellent
Good
Coronaries
Excellent
Useless**
Good
Average
Aortic
Regurgitation
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
0.50
TEE
0.21
CT Scan
Angiography
First definitive test for aortic dissection
Traditionally considered the gold standard
Involves injection of contrast media into the aorta
Disadvantages
Medical management
Basic management
Type A dissection surgery
Type B dissection medical management, TEVAR
Medical therapy
Reduce systolic BP to 100 to 120 mmHg or the lowest level that is tolerated
IV Beta blockers
Bentall procedure
TEVAR
1.20
Type B
5 yrs 60 - 80%
10 yrs 40 80%
Spontaneous healing of dissection is uncommon
Long-Term Management
Medical therapy
Serial imaging
Overview
Incidence of aortic dissection is at least 2000 new cases per year
Peak incidence is in the sixth to seventh decade
Men are affected twice as commonly as women
Mortality in the first 48 hours is 1% per hour
Early diagnosis is essential
Pathophysiology
The chief predisposing factor is degeneration of collagen and elastin in
the aortic intima media
Blood passes through the tear into the aortic media, separating the
media from the intima and creating a false lumen
Dissection can occur both distal and proximal to the tear
Classification
Debakey system
Type I
Originates in the ascending aorta, propagates to the aortic arch and beyond it distally
Type II
Confined to the ascending aorta
Type III
Confined to the descending aorta, and extends distally, or rarely retrograde into the aortic
arch
Classification
The Stanford system
Type A
All dissections involving the ascending aorta
Type B
All other dissections regardless of the site of the primary intimal tear
Predisposing factors
Age, 60-80 yrs old
Long standing history of hypertension
80% of cases have co-existing HTN
Takayasus arteritis
Giant cell arteritis
Syphilis
Collagen disorders
Marfan syndrome (6-9% of aortic dissections)
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Cocaine
Trauma
Clinical Symptoms
Severe, sharp, tearing posterior chest pain or back pain (occurs in 74-90% of pts)
Pain may be associated with syncope, CVA, MI, or CHF
Painless dissection relatively uncommon
Physical Exam
Pulse deficit
Weak or absent carotid, brachial, or femoral pulses
these patients have a higher rate of mortality
Clinical signs
Acute MI
Cardiac tamponade
Pleural effusions
Hypertension or hypotension
Hemothorax
Variation in BP between the arms (>30mmHg)
Neurologic deficits
Clinical Signs
Involvement of the descending aorta
Splanchnic ischemia
Renal insufficiency
Lower extremity ischemia
Spinal cord ischemia
Diagnosis
Generally suspected from the history and PE
In a recent study in 2000, 96% of acute dissection patients could be identified based
upon a combination of three clinical features
Immediate onset of chest pain
Mediastinal widening on CXR
A variation in pulse and/or blood pressure (>20 mmHg difference between R & L arm
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnostic Tests
EKG
Absence of EKG changes usually helps distinguish dissection from angina
Usually non-specific ST-T wave changes seen
CXR
Cardiac Enzymes
Chest X-Ray
May show widening of the aorta with ascending aorta
dissections
Present in 63 % of patients with Type A dissections
Diagnostic Imaging
Not performed until the patient is medically stable
Has been a dramatic shift from invasive to non-invasive diagnostic
strategy
Spiral CT scan
TEE
MRI
Angiography
Imaging
Can identify aortic dissection and other features such as:
Spiral CT
Sensitivity 83%
Specificity 90 - 100%
Advantages
Noninvasive
Readily available at most hospitals on an emergency basis
Can differentiate dissection from other causes of aortic widening (tumor, periaortic hematoma, fat)
Disadvantages
TTE
First used to diagnose aortic dissections in the 70s
Sensitivity 59-85%, specificity 63-96%
Image quality limited by obesity, lung disease, and chest wall
deformities
TEE
Sensitivity 98%
Specificity 95%
Advantages
TEE
Lower specificity attributed to reverberations atherosclerotic vessels or
calcified aortic disease producing echo images that resemble an aortic
flap
Disadvantages
Contraindicated in patients with esophageal varices, tumors, or strictures
Potential complications: bradycardia, hypotension, bronchospasm
MRI
Sensitivity 98%
Specificity 98%
Advantages
Safe
Can visualize the whole extent of the aorta in multiple planes
Ability to assess branch vessels, AI, and pericardial effusion
No contrast or radiation
Disadvantages
Conclusions
Conventional TTE is of limited diagnostic value in assessment of the
thoracic aorta
Both TEE and MRI have excellent sensitivity, however MRI is more
specific
MRI is the study of choice for stable patients
TEE is the study of choice for unstable patients
Treatment
Acute dissections involving the ascending aorta are considered surgical
emergencies
Dissections confined to the descending aorta are treated medically
Unless patient demonstrates continued hemorrhage into the pleural or
retroperitoneal space
Surgical Options
Excision of the intimal tear
Obliteration of entry into the false lumen proximally
Reconstitution of the aorta with interposition of a synthetic
vascular graft
Type A Dissections
Operative mortality varies from 7-35%
27% post-op mortality
Patients who died had a higher rate of in-hospital complications such
as strokes, renal failure, limb ischemia, & mesenteric ischemia
Hypotension or shock
Renal failure
Age> 70 yrs
Pulse deficit
Prior MI
Underlying pulmonary disease
Preoperative neurologic impairment
Renal and/or visceral ischemia
Abnormal EKG, particularly ST elevation
Aortic Dissection
Matt White
February 8, 2010
Morning Report
Aortic Dissection
Background
Epidemiology
Clinical characteristics
Diagnostic Modalities
Treatment
Aortic Dissection
Background
Epidemiology
Clinical characteristics
Diagnostic Modalities
Treatment
History
First known case was King George II on October, 25, 1760
First successful repair by Dr. Michael DeBakey in 1955.
". . . spontaneous tear of the arterial coats is associated with
atrocious pain, with symptoms, indeed, in the case of the aorta of
angina pectoris and many instances have been mistaken for it"
William Osler, 1910.
Mechanism
Primary event is a tear in the aortic intima.
Degeneration of aortic media, or cystic medial necrosis, is felt to be a
prerequisite nontraumatic aortic dissection
Blood passes into the aortic media through the tear, separating the intima
from the media and creating a false lumen.
Mechanism (contd)
Propagation of the dissection can occur both distal and
proximal to the initial tear,
Complications of dissection:
ischemia (coronary, cerebral, spinal, or visceral)
aortic regurgitation
Pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade
Nomenclature
DeBakey classification system
Type I - Originates in ascending aorta, propagates at least to the aortic arch
and often beyond it distally.
Type II Originates in and is confined to the ascending aorta.
Type III Originates in descending aorta, rarely extends proximally but will
extend distally.
Daily (Stanford) classification system
Divided into 2 groups; A and B depending on whether the ascending aorta is
involved.
A = Type I and II DeBakey
B = Type III DeBakey
Aortic Dissection
Background
Epidemiology
Clinical characteristics
Diagnostic Modalities
Treatment
Aortic Dissection
Background
Epidemiology
Clinical characteristics
Diagnostic Modalities
Treatment
Aortic Dissection
Background
Epidemiology
Clinical characteristics
Diagnostic Modalities
Treatment
Pre-OR management
Virtually all non-shocked patients require medical
management prior to surgery
Aim of medical management:
reduce the absolute pressure on the damaged aortic media
Reduce the rate of rise of that pressure (dP/dT).
Medical management
Blood pressure control
Blood pressure control
Blood pressure control
Pain control
Antihypertensive choice
Labetalol for beta blockade
Nitroprusside if HR controlled but SBP still >100mmHg
Antihypertensive choice
Start with -blockers
use of a vasodilator in isolation will actually increase
aortic shear stress by widening the pulse pressure and
the dP/dT of left ventricular ejection.
References
Davies, Crispin; Bashir, Yaver; Shively. Cardiovascular
Emergencies. London, GBR: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001. p151172
Manning, Warren. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of aortic
dissection. UptoDate
Suzuki et. al. Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection by D-Dimer.
Circulation 2009; 119, 2702-2707