Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Orifice
Water Distributor
Packing Column
Flow Meter
Receiver Tank
Air Blower
Make-up Tank
was filled with deionised water up to the zero mark n the scale.
Deionised water was added to the wet bulb sensor reservoir to the fullest.
All appropriate tubing was connected to the differential pressure sensor.
The appropriate cooling tower packing was installed for the experiment.
Temperature set point of temperature controller was set to Error: Reference source not
found. The 1.0kW water heater was switched on and water was heated up until
Column: C
Water Flow Rate: 2LPM
Blower: Fully Opened
Heater (kW)
0.5
1.0
1.5
31.8
31.4
31.3
T1 (0 C )
Air inlet wet bulb
26.9
26.7
26.3
T2 (0 C )
Air outlet dry bulb
27.8
28.8
30.5
T3 (0 C )
Air outlet wet bulb
29.0
29.9
31.5
T4 (0 C )
Water inlet temperature T5
31.7
34.3
37.7
(0 C )
Water outlet temperature
27.2
27.8
28.6
T6 (0 C )
Heater Power (W)
420
807
1218
Dp Orifice (Pa)
66
67
68
Dp Column (Pa)
70
83
96
0.5
1.0
1.5
Column: C
Water Flow Rate: 2LPM
Blower: Half Opened
Heater (kW)
31.4
31.2
31.3
T1 (0 C )
Air inlet wet bulb
26.9
26.5
26.6
27.5
28.7
30.7
28.3
29.7
31.6
31.1
34.3
38.0
27.1
27.7
28.6
T6 ( C )
Heater Power (W)
425
808
1242
Dp Orifice (Pa)
60
62
64
Dp Column (Pa)
67
72
78
T2 ( C )
Air outlet dry bulb
0
T3 ( C )
Air outlet wet bulb
0
T4 ( C )
Water inlet temperature T5
0
( C)
Water outlet temperature
0
D
p
O
rifc
e
D
p
O
r
i
f
c
e
V
s
H
e
a
t
r
(
k
W
)
.6
6
8
5
.6
7
5
.6
5
5
.0 0
.5H
1
1
.
5
2
e
a
tr(k
W
)
D
p
C
o
l
u
m
n
V
s
H
e
a
t
r
(
k
W
)
1
0
8
6
0
4
2
00 0
.5H
1
1
.
5
2
e
a
tr(k
W
)
Graph 1
Based on graph 1, it can be seen that as the power heater increased the pressure difference on
orifice also increased. However, the difference is only by one which can be considered small.
From this graph, the relationship between the heater and pressure difference is directly
D
p
C
o
lu
m
n
Graph 2
Based on graph 2, it can be seen that as the power heater increased the pressure difference on
column also increased. The difference is by tenth which is considered as big addition on the value
Dp of column . From this graph, the relationship between the heater and pressure difference is
D
p
O
r
i
f
c
e
V
s
H
e
a
t
r
(
k
W
)
6
5
4
6
3
2
6
1
0
5
9
80 0
.5H
1
1
.
5
2
e
a
tr(k
W
)
directly proportional to each other. Other than that, it also shows that the effect of heater are
greater toward column that the orifice.
D
p
O
rifc
e
Graph 3
Based on graph 3, it can be seen that as the power heater increased the pressure difference on
orifice also increased. The difference between Dp is by two which is bigger than the Dp of orifice
from graph 1. From this graph, the relationship between the heater and pressure difference is
directly proportional to each other. It also shows that the opening of blower also affecting the
increase in Dp of orifice.
D
p
C
o
lu
m
n
D
p
C
o
l
u
m
n
V
s
H
e
a
t
r
(
k
W
)
8
0
7
5
0
6
5
00
.5H
1
1
.
5
2
e
a
tr(k
W
)
Graph 4
Based on graph 4, it can be seen that as the power heater increased the pressure difference on
column also increased. The difference between Dp is by five which is smaller than the Dp of
column from graph 2. From this graph, the relationship between the heater and pressure
difference is directly proportional to each other. It also shows that the opening of blower also
affecting the increase in Dp of column. Other than that, it also shows that the effect of heater are
greater toward column that the orifice.
CALCULATION
Sample calculation
Blower Damper
Water Flow rate = 2LPM
Heating Load = 0.5
Blower fully opened = 100%
Range of cooling tower;
range
range approach
4.5
4.5 0.3
100%
100%
= 93.75%
Total cooling load;
Cooling load = heater power (W) + heating load (kW)
= 420 W + ( 0.5 kW )
1000W
1kW
= 920 W
Air mass flow rate per unit area;
(kg/s) =
From psychometric chart ( Felder &
Rousseau, 2005, p. 385);
Air inlet wet bulb, T2 @ Twb = 26.9 0C
V m3 / s
A m 2 V m3 / kg
Interpolation:
Twb (0C)
V (m3/kg)
20.00
0.85
26.9
30.06
0.90
26.9 20.0
V 0.85
V = 0.884 m3/kg
=
2.0
L 1min 1m 3
min 60s 1000 L
0.0225m 2 0.884m 3 / kg
m kg , of , air / m 2 s
h kg , water / kg , air
Twb (0C)
20.00
0.0286
26.9
30.06
0.0148
26.9 20.0
h 0.0286
1.684 10 3 kg , air / m 2 s
0.01913kg , water / kg , air
= 0.0880 kg/m2s
Water mass flow rate to air mass flow rate ratio;
r=
m kg , of , water / m 2 s
m kg , 0of.0880
, air / m 2 s
1.684 10 3
r=
r = 52.26
* for the other value, just repeat the same calculation as in the previous sample calculation by
using the value obtained from the experiment.
Power (kW)
1.5
Range (0C)
4.5
6.5
9.1
Approach of cooling
0.3
1.1
2.3
tower ( C)
Efficiency of cooling
93.75
85.53
79.82
920
1807
2718
1.684 10-3
1.678 10-3
1.681 10-3
0.0880
0.0865
0.0842
52.26
51.52
50.12
tower,
Total cooling load
(W)
Air mass flow rate
per unit area
(kg/m2s)
Water mass flow rate
per unit area
(kg/m2s)
Water mass flow rate
to air mass flow rate
ratio, r
Power (kW)
1.5
Range (0C)
6.6
9.4
Approach of cooling
0.2
1.2
95.24
91.67
82.46
925
1808
2742
1.684 10-3
1.679 10-3
1.678 10-3
tower ( C)
Efficiency of cooling
tower,
Total cooling load
(W)
Air mass flow rate
per unit area
(kg/m2s)
0.0880
0.0853
0.0858
52.26
50.80
51.16
Psychometric chart