Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description:
Students in this course will develop an in depth understanding of the current themes and
polemic in the field of humanitarian aid, both at the theoretical levels of international political
theory as well as at the operational and practical implications of their work in the field. The
course will also provide a unique opportunity for critical reflection, analysis, and debate on the
negotiation approaches of INGOs working in development, relief, and advocacy contexts. A
significant factor in meeting humanitarian objectives, however, is the capacity of humanitarian
officials to negotiate access to beneficiaries and to secure protection both for recipients and for
staff in the context of often very sensitive political and military environments. The role of
humanitarian aid agencies is thought to be to save lives and ameliorate suffering. Whether or to
what extent humanitarian agencies achieve these goals can be due to a number of factors, from
a topography that might make communication and transport more or less easy, to the prevalence
of corruption and insecurity in distribution chains and to the increasingly politicized nature of
humanitarian aid.
Objectives:
1. Trace the evolution of INGO’s and their role in International Relations Theory, with an
emphasis on transnational networks and global network theory.
4. Clarify the extent to which humanitarian action has had an impact on the ground; are
humanitarian organizations better able to save and protect the lives of those at risk?
How is this impact measured?
Evaluation:
Introduction
Snydr, Jack (2004). One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy (November/December,):55-62.
Vasquez, John. (1999). The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to
Neotraditionalism. Cambridge University Press. Ch.1-2.
Kenneth Waltz, Man, the State and War, (NY: Columbia University Press, 1959). Ch. 1, Ch. 6.
Baldwin, David (ed.). (1993). Neorealism and Neoliberalism Columbia University Press. Ch.1.
Michael Doyle, “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 80
(December 1986): 1151-1169.
Collective Security
Claude, Inis. (1973). Power and International Relations. Ny: the free press.
Nye, Joseph. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public
Affairs
Pentland, Charles. (1983). International Theory and European Integration. Itahaca: Cornell
Univ. Press.
2. Multi sectoral networks
Benner, Thorsten, Wolfgang H. Reinicke., and Jan Martin Witte. (2002). Beyond
Multilateralism: Global Public Policy Networks. International Politics and Society Online.
Retrieved December 14, 2008, from http://www.fes.de/IPG/ipg2_2000/artwitte.html.
De Mars, William. (2005). NGO’s and Transnational Networks. Wild Cards in World Politics.
Pluto press.
Keck, Margaret & Sikkink, Katherine. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks
in International Politics. Cornell University Press.
Sikkink, Katherine. (1998). Transnational politics, international relations theory, and human
rights: a new model of international politics is needed to explain the politics of human rights.
Political Science & Politics. American Political Science Association. Retrieved December 31,
2009, from http://www.jammoull.net/upprobe/uploads/dffe58c0a7.pdf
Benner, Thorsten, Wolfgang H. Reinicke., and Jan Martin Witte. (2004). Multisectoral
Networks in Global Governance: Towards a Pluralistic System of Accountability. Global Public
Policy Institute, Fritz Thyssen Foundation.
Bovens, Mark. (2005) Public Accountability: A Framework for the Analysis and Assessment of
Accountability Arrangements in the Public Domain. This paper is an adapted and extended
version of a chapter on public accountability which will be published in E. Ferlie, L. Lynne &
C. Pollitt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford University Press. pp. 1-
12, pp. 15-19, pp. 22-24
4. Humanitarian Diplomacy
5. Moral Dilemmas
Anderson, Mary. (1998). “You Save my Life Today, But For What Tomorrow?” Some Moral
Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid. Hard Choices: Moral Dilemmas in Humanitarian Intervention.
Moore, Jonathan. (ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bradol, Jean-Herve. (2004). The Sacrificial International Order and Humanitarian Action.
Weissman, Fabrice (ed.) In the Shadow of ‘Just Wars’; Violence, Politics and Humanitarian
Action. Médecins sans Frontières.
Ignatief, Michael. (1998). Television and Humanitarian Aid. Hard Choices: Moral Dilemmas in
Humanitarian Intervention. Moore, Jonathan. (ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Kiley, Sam. Do African Nations a Favor; Don’t Feed Them. Times online, October 23, 2009
Luttwak, Edward N. (1999). Give War a Chance. Foreign Affairs. 78, 4. Retrieved December
21, 2009 from http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~jwestern/ps62/edward_n_luttwak.htm
Mikolajuk, Christine. (2005). Thanks, But no Thanks: The Other Face of International
Humanitarian Aid. Harvard International Review. 26 (4) – Winter. Retrieved December 31,
2009, from http://hir.harvard.edu/index.php?page=article&id=1291
Arbuckle V, James. (2006). Military forces in 21st Century Peace Operations. No Job for a
Soldier? pp. 5-7, pp. 31-37, pp. 74-82. Contemporary Security Studies. Routledge.
Chandler, David. (2002). From Kosovo to Kabul; Human Rights and International Intervention.
Pluto Press. pp. 21-52.