Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
James Wilson
Structural Option
AE 481W Senior Thesis
The Pennsylvania State University
Faculty Consultant: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................2
1. Structural Discussion .....................................................................................................3
1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Floor and Roof System of the Superstructure .............................................................. 4
1.3 Superstructure Columns ................................................................................................ 5
1.4 Lateral System ............................................................................................................... 6
1.5 Substructure ................................................................................................................... 7
1.6 Foundation ..................................................................................................................... 7
1.7 The Grand Entrance.......................................................................................................8
2. Design Codes...................................................................................................................9
2.1 Norwegian Standards Used in Original Design............................................................ 9
2.2 Codes and Reference Standards used in Senior Thesis .............................................. 10
3. Materials .......................................................................................................................11
3.1 Steel ............................................................................................................................ 11
3.2 Concrete ..................................................................................................................... 12
Appendix ...........................................................................................................................19
A1 Wind Loads ............................................................................................................... 19
A2 Seismic Loads ............................................................................................................. 22
A3 Snow Loads ................................................................................................................ 26
A4 Beam Spot Check ....................................................................................................... 27
A5 Column Spot Check .................................................................................................... 32
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Executive Summary
The purpose of this report is to assess the existing conditions of the
PricewaterhouseCoopers building and to gain an understanding of the procedures used in
its structural design. It encompasses a structural discussion, code overview, material
summary, determination of design loads and spot checks.
The design codes used by the structural engineer to determine loads on the
structure are Norwegian Standards. As the Eurocodes will be implemented across Europe
within the next couple of years, this technical report makes an attempt to follow the
Eurocodes when possible. However, with limited guidance on procedures alternative
codes have additionally been used. Lateral loads have been determined in accordance
with ASCE 07 and spot checks follow LRFD provisions.
An effort has been made to summarize the properties of the materials used in the
building as well as their designations in accordance with various standards.
The gravity loads on the structure were found to be directly in accordance with
the Eurocodes. Lateral loads were calculated to be greater than those determined by
design engineer and needs further review. Reasons for the discrepancies could be
differences in design codes, reference location and assumptions as well as errors in
manual calculation.
A spot check of one column and one beam indicates the members of the structure
are adequate to carry design loads. The reason for the calculated member capacities being
considerably larger than the loads is most likely due to simplifying assumptions made in
calculations.
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
1 - Structural Discussion
1.1Introduction
The superstructure of the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) building consists of
concrete plank decking on steel frame with cast in place concrete cores. Along the
exterior of the building the concrete planks typically rest on HSQ profile beams, while
along the interior they rest on steel angles connected to the concrete core. The exterior
steel beams are supported by circular steel columns filled with reinforced concrete. A
grand opening at the center of the facade is allowed through the use of three steel trusses.
To provide lateral resistance there are concrete cores located centrally in each leg of the
building. The cores are integrated into substructure which is comprised of cast in place
concrete. The foundation uses steel and concrete piles driven between 30 and 40m to
bedrock.
W
S
N
E
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Along the exterior of the building the concrete planks typically rest on HSQ profile
beams. The beams are welded steel shapes fabricated by prefabrication engineer,
Contiga. Connections between beams and deck elements are made with cast in place
concrete containing stirrups that loop around shear tabs on the beams (figure 5). Beams
with concrete elements on either side, have steel reinforcing bars that span across the top
of the beam and between element joints (figure 5).
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Interior planks typically rest on steel L150x15 steel angles (figure 6). The angles are
welded to steel plates at the top and the bottom with 5mm fillet welds. The plates contain
steel tabs that are cast into the concrete core. Beams are similarly connected to the
concrete wall using steel angles and plates with steel tabs (figure7)
Figure 4,5,6, and 7 are from report Hulldeker p Stl bresystem provided by Norsk Stlforbund and
Betongelement Foreningen.
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
According to Design guide for concrete filled columns by Corus UK limited, advantages
to concrete filled structural hollow sections are:
They provide architects and engineers with a robust and inherently fire resistant
column.
During construction the steel sections dispenses with the need for formwork and
erection schedule is not depended on concrete curing time.
During finishing concrete, filling is protected against mechanical damage.
When completed, columns provide greater usable floor area, higher visibility,
reduced maintenance, and are aesthetically pleasing
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
1.5 Substructure
There are two stories below grade comprised of cast in place concrete. The slab at
the lowest level is 500mm thick with recessed areas for elevator shafts. Floor slabs are
300mm thick except in the areas that are below outdoor areas where slab thickness has
been increased to 400mm.
1.6 Foundation:
The foundation uses steel and concrete piles to transfer axial tension, axial
compression and lateral loads to the ground. There are five different types of piles used
which are driven between 30 and 40m into bedrock. Pile capacities are dependent on pile
type, connection type, and whether bending is about strong or weak axis.
The barcode strip is being built in sections. This meant that the PwC building stood
complete before the next building to the west had begun. Therefore uneven loads from
ground pressure to the west were accounted for in the design.
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
5
Level 8
323.9x6.3
Level 7
273x16
273x16
Level 6
Level 5
HSQ 56 exterior
HSQ 03 interior
HSQ 56 exterior
HSQ 03 interior
Figure 15: Truss Elevation
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
2 - Design codes
2.1 Norwegian Standards Used in Original Design:
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
ASCE 7 2005: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
IBC 2006: International Building Code
10
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
3 - Materials
3.1 Steel
Metric
Item
Fu
Fy
Ea
(N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)
S355
A572Gr50
355
510
210 000
S355
A572Gr50
355
510
210 000
B500C
500
210 000
HISAR460
still need to determine
Va
Item
Euronorm
ASTM
Fu (ksi)
Fy (ksi)
Va
Columns
Beams
Reinforcing
S355
S355
B500C
A572Gr50
A572Gr50
-
51
51
-
74
74
72
Columns
Beams
Reinforcing
Piles
Euronorm
ASTM
.3
.3
-
Density
(kg/m3)
7 850
7 850
-
Imperial
Ea
(ksi)
30 500
30 500
30 500
.3
.3
-
Notes
1. Metric densities are converted to imperial form using 1 lb/ ft = 157 kg/m3
2. Metric material strengths are converted to imperial form using 1 psi = .006894 N/mm2.
Values are rounded down to nearest whole number.
11
Density
(Ib/ft3)
50
50
-
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
3.2 Concrete
Metric
Item
Cast in place
Prefabricated
Columns
Norwegian
Standard
B35
B45
B45
Eurocode
CEN
C35/45
C45/55
C45/55
fck
(N/mm2)
35
45
45
fctm
(N/mm2)
3.2
3.8
3.8
Ecm
(N/mm2)
33 500
36 000
36 000
Norwegian
Standard
B35
B45
B45
Eurocode
CEN
C35/45
C45/55
C45/55
fck
(ksi)
5
6.5
6.5
fctm
(ksi)
0.46
0.55
0.55
Ecm
(ksi)
4 850
5 222
5 222
Imperial
Item
Cast in place
Prefabricated
Columns
12
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Thickness
(mm)
Reference
Density
(kN/m3)
Unit Weight
(kN/m2)
500
450
400
300
-
25
25
25
25
-
12.5
11.3
10
7.5
3.7
Reference
Design Value
Design Value
Design Value
Design Value
Design Value
Other
Item
Faade
Outdoor terrace
concrete steps
steel steps
Reference
Design Value
Design Value
Design Value1
Design Value
Notes
1.
2.
Where Design Value has been listed under reference, the unit weight shown is that obtained by
structural design engineer. Architectural details of floor/roof/faade finishes were not provided
prior to this technical report. Without that information accurate unit loads were difficult calculate
and therefore found it more suitable to list design values.
Metric unit weights have been converted to imperial form using 1psf = .04784kN/m2. Values are
rounded up to nearest whole number
13
Unit
Weight
(psf)
262
237
210
157
74
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Area
Office spaces
Cafeteria
Outdoor terrace
Auditorium
Corridors
Technical Rooms
Archives (stationary)
Archives (On rollers)
Outdoor "under opening"
Outdoor
Reference
Category
B
C1
C1
C2
C3
-
Unit
Weight
(kN/m2)
2
3
3
4
5
5
7
12
20
20
2.8
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
105
190
Unit
Weight
(psf)
42
63
63
84
105
105
147
251
418
418
60
Concentrated
Load (kN)
Snow Loads
Snow Load
Notes
1.
2.
Where Design Value has been listed under reference, the value shown is that obtained by
structural design engineer. Architectural details of floor/roof/faade finishes were not obtained
prior this technical report. Without that information accurate unit loads could not be calculated and
therefore it was more suitable to list design values.
Metric unit weights have been converted to imperial form using 1psf = .04784kN/m2. Values are
been rounded up to nearest whole number
14
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
35.9 psf
34.9 psf
34.0 psf
33.0 psf
31.9 psf
30.7 psf
16.3 psf
29.4 psf
27.9 psf
26.3 psf
24.3 psf
21.7 psf
18.0 psf
15
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
26.05 psf
25.3 psf
24.6 psf
23.9 psf
23.1 psf
22.3 psf
22.5 psf
21.3 psf
20.3 psf
19.1 psf
17.6 psf
15.7 psf
13.1 psf
16
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
58.2 kips
50.5 kips
42.8 kips
35.7 kips
29.0 kips
23.1 kips
17.7 kips
12.9 kips
8.8 kips
4.7 kips
2.4 kips
0.8 kips
287 kips
17
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
5 Spot Checks
5.1 Fourth Story Beam
An exterior fourth story beam was spot checked for this analysis. The beam was
checked for bending and shear in accordance with LRFD provisions. The calculations
determined the beam capacity to be larger than the applied load, however there were
numerous simplifying assumptions made. Mainly the beam is experiencing torsion which
was neglected in the calculations and would decrease the capacity of the beam. Another
factor is that only two load combinations were checked, 1.2D +1.6L and 1.4D. Lastly the
codes used to check the member were not the same as those used by the design engineer,
which could create discrepancies. If these considerations were taken into account I
believe the beam would be more adequately sized. A summary of findings is listed below.
Beam: SB - 155
Profile: HSQ53
Span: 26.3ft
Mu: 140 kips
Mn: 461 kips
Vu: 23.6kips
Vn: 732 kips
5.2 First story composite column
A typical first story composite column was checked for this analysis. The column
was checked for axial gravity load in accordance with LRFD provisions. The column was
assumed to have pinned connections at either side and contain no lateral loads. From the
calculations it was determined that the design load was approximately half of the
columns capacity. Reasons for the beam appearing to be oversized could be the design
engineer chose a column that would keep uniformity throughout the building. Other
reasons are differences in design codes and manuals used. A summary of findings is
listed below.
Column: SS - 115
Size: 323.6*6.3mm
Pu: 500 kips
Pn: 1073 kips
18
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Appendix
A.1 Wind Load Calculations
A1.1 Summary of values determined from ASCE 07 method 2
VelocityPressure
VBasicWindspeed
OccupancyCategory
Kd
ImportanceFactor
GustFactor
120
III
0.85
1
L
B
h
N/S
82
234
147
E/W
234
82
147
n1
gQ,gv
0.5
3.4
0.5
3.4
gr
Iz
Q
3.29
0.25
0.77
3.29
0.25
0.8
V
Vz
120
101.3
120
101.3
N1
2.22
2.22
CpWindwardwall
CpLeewardwall
0.8
0.5
Rn
Rh
0.8
0.25
0.08
0.25
CpSidewall
0.7
RB
0.17
0.4
RL
R
G
0.147
1.35
1.3
0.055
1.06
0.943
ExposureCategory
Kzt
B
1
Internalpressurecoefficients
EnclosedStructure
GCpi=+/0.18
PressureCoefficients
W
82 ft
S
h = 146 ft
N
E
234 ft
19
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
height
(ft)
Kz
qz
Roof
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
146
133
121
109
97
85
73
61
49
37
25
13
0
1.102
1.072
1.043
1.013
0.979
0.943
0.903
0.858
0.806
0.744
0.666
0.553
34.53
33.58
32.69
31.73
30.68
29.56
28.30
26.89
25.26
23.32
20.86
17.33
N/SWindward
35.91 +/ 6.22
34.93 +/ 6.22
34.00 +/ 6.22
33.00 +/ 6.22
31.90 +/ 6.22
30.74 +/ 6.22
29.43 +/ 6.22
27.96 +/ 6.22
26.27 +/ 6.22
24.25 +/ 6.22
21.69 +/ 6.22
18.03 +/ 6.22
Pressure(psf)
N/SLeeward
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
22.45
+/
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
Total
58.36
57.37
56.44
55.44
54.35
53.18
51.88
50.41
48.72
46.70
44.14
40.47
0.00
East / West
Floor
height
(ft)
Kz
qz
Roof
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
146
133
121
109
97
85
73
61
49
37
25
13
0
1.102
1.072
1.043
1.013
0.979
0.943
0.903
0.858
0.806
0.744
0.666
0.553
34.53
33.58
32.69
31.73
30.68
29.56
28.30
26.89
25.26
23.32
20.86
17.33
N/SWindward
26.05 +/ 6.22
25.33 +/ 6.22
24.66 +/ 6.22
23.94 +/ 6.22
23.14 +/ 6.22
22.30 +/ 6.22
21.35 +/ 6.22
20.28 +/ 6.22
19.06 +/ 6.22
17.59 +/ 6.22
15.74 +/ 6.22
13.08 +/ 6.22
20
Pressure(psf)
N/SLeeward
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
16.28
+/
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
6.22
Total
42.33
41.62
40.94
40.22
39.42
38.58
37.63
36.57
35.34
33.87
32.02
29.36
0.00
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Height
(ft)
Roof
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
146
133
121
109
97
85
73
61
49
37
25
13
0
Tributary
Tributary
Force
AreaAbove AreaBelow
(kips)
(ft)
(ft)
0
558
33
558
491
61
491
491
56
491
498
55
498
484
54
484
491
52
491
491
52
491
491
50
491
491
49
491
491
47
491
491
45
491
538
43
538
0
22
TotalBaseShear=
Shear
(kips)
33
93
149
204
258
311
362
413
461
508
553
596
618
618kips
East / West
Floor
Height
(ft)
Roof
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
146
133
121
109
97
85
73
61
49
37
25
13
0
Tributary
Tributary
Force
AreaAbove AreaBelow
(kips)
(ft)
(ft)
0
1593
67
1593
1401
126
1401
1401
116
1401
1420
114
1420
1382
112
1382
1401
109
1401
1401 S 107
1401
1401
104
1401
1401
101
1401
1401
97
1401
1401
92
1401
1535
90
1535
0
45
TotalBaseShear=
21
Shear
(kips)
67
193
309
423
535
643
750
854
955
1052
1144
1234
1279
1279kips
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Boston,Mass
42.35
71.06
D
0.28
0.068
1.577
2.4
Table20.31
USGAJavaMotionParameter:
USGAJavaMotionParameter:
Table11.41
Table11.42
SMS
0.44156
Eq11.41
SM1
0.1632
Eq11.42
SDs
SD1
OccupancyCategory
T
SDC
0.293
0.108
II
2
B
USGAJavaMotionParameter:
USGAJavaMotionParameter:
IBCTable1604.5
Sec12.8.2
Table11.61
R
I
TL
H
Cs
E/WDirection
N/WDirection
5.5
Table12.21
1
Table11.51
6
147
0.01
Figure2215
22
R
I
5.5
1
Table12.21
Table11.51
TL
H
Cs
6
147
0.01
Figure2215
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Story
Roof
wx(kips)
2402
hx
146
k
1.75
wxhx^k
14811132
Cvx
0.20
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Totals
2473
2473
2473
2473
2473
2473
2473
2471
2165
2165
2165
0
28682
133
121
109
97
85
73
61
49
37
25
13
0
NA
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
NA
12856810
10898144
9079848
7383724
5879786
4507279
3294083
2244895
1205323
609009
195804
0
72965837
0.18
0.15
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
V=Cs*W
286.81844
23
Fx(kips) Vx(kips)
58.2
50.5
42.8
35.7
29.0
23.1
17.7
12.9
8.8
4.7
2.4
0.8
0
286.8
58
109
152
187
216
239
257
270
279
284
286
287
287
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Level
TributaryArea
(ft2)
Roof
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
14391
14391
14391
14391
14391
14391
14391
14391
14391
11756
11756
11756
0
Deck+Super
Imposed
(psf)
127
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
0
Beam+Connections
(psf)
DeadLoad
(kips)
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
0
1986
1669
1669
1669
1669
1669
1669
1669
1669
1364
1364
1364
0
Faade
Story
Roof
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Perimiter
(ft)
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
581
587
587
587
587
587
Trib.Height
(ft)
6
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
6
24
WallLoad
(psf)
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
Wallload
(kips)
52.29
104.58
104.58
104.58
104.58
104.58
104.58
104.58
105.66
105.66
105.66
105.66
52.83
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
Concrete Core
Level
Story
Height(ft)
1to12
12
North/South
Thickness(ft)
1
Dist(ft)
196
East/West
Thickness(ft)
1.3
Columns
Story
Coulmns
Approxweight
percolper
story(lb)
DeadLoad
(kips)
12
28
0.5
28.5
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
24
24
24
24
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
28.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
25
Dist(ft)
136
Density
(lb/ft3)
Load
(kips)
150
671.04
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
A3 Snow Loads
Snow loads are calculated in accordance with NS-EN 1991-1-3: 2003 Eurocode 1
Item
Reference
Value
Table 5.2
0.8
Ce - Exposure coefficient
Table 5.1
Table NA4.1(901)
3.5 kN/m2
Ct - Thermal coefficient
Sk - Characteristic snow level on ground
s = uiCeCtsk
s = (.8)(1)(1)(3.5)
s = 2.8 kN/m2
Imperial s = 60 psf
26
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
27
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
28
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
29
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
30
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
31
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
32
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
33
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
34
Technical Report 1
James Wilson - Structural Option
Advisor: Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Oslo, Norway
9/29/08
35