Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biology 112
Alan Reid
University of the Fraser Valley
Matthew Strauss
April 4, 2016
Ladies and Gentlemen of the board, we face a crisis. Without going into detail why, only
3 of the designated 12 animals can be saved. They have been chosen and the rational why
follows.
The question is not who to save but who can be lost. Who, when removed from their
ecosystem, will result in the least impact? Those who are 'keystone' in their respective
environment must be saved. Therefore, cultural and social status must be ignored. Humans can
adapt to such changes. In no particular order, each animal will be assessed and graded on a 4
point scale.
Point Value
Status
Koala
Phascolarctos cinereus
Habitat
Forested Australia
Prey
Eucalyptus
Predators
Status
Least Concern
Points
A Koala's impact on it's local ecosystem appears minimal. Food for other carnivores but
neither wide spread enough or essential enough to cause distinct impact on the food chain. As the
Koala primarily ingests Eucalyptus and is not necessary for Eucalyptus control, the Koala is
graded as Non-Critical in it's ecosystem. If removed entirely, local predator's would find other
sources of food and the eucalyptus would grow as before.
Aye-Aye
Daubentonia madagascariensis
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Status
Endangered
Mole Rat
Heterocephalus glaber
Habitat
Prey
Tubers
Predators
Snakes
Status
Not Threatened
Abundant and radicivorous, the mole rat's food will continue to persist in neither excess
nor recess. The snakes that prey on the mole rat may feel the impact, but it is believed not overly
so. Unique to the Mole Rat is it's longevity and particular resistance to cancer (Buffenstein,
2005). For medical reasons, maintaining the mole rat population for study would be preferred,
but not over the potential destruction of other ecosystems. A 2 is given with preference over
other 2 rated animals.
Panda
Ailuropoda melanolecua
Habitat
Prey
Eucalyptus
Predators
Status
Endangered
Panda waste contains microbes being studied for potential biofuel; 2000 panda's left.
Points
The Giant Panda, like the Koala, receives a 2 for being neither essential for predators nor
necessary for keeping the Eucalyptus in check. Notable is the scientific research being done in
panda waste, where microbes are being studied for their potential biofuel benefits. This would
place the Panda above other 2 rated animals (equal with the Mole Rat).
Hipposideros lamottei
Habitat
Prey
Insects
Predators
Status
Critically Endangered
Points
Lamottes Round Leaf Bat, while not technically isolated in it's ecosystem, has only 6
known species in existence. The damage humans are doing to its habitat obscures the actual
impact the Round Leaf Bat's absence would have, but it can be extrapolated from the lack of
current serious detrimental effects that the Round Leaf Bat is not critical to the ecosystem.
Harp Seal
Pagophilus groenlandicus
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Status
Threatened
Points
Widely hunted by mammals across large northern expanses, the harp seal provides food
for many creatures. It's declination would be felt throughout the northern species but it is not
known how deeply. It garners a 3 due to their volume in northern environments, where few
species manage to survive. It's importance is largely as food and thus would rank lower than
other 3 rated animals.
Alligator
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Status
Not Endangered
The Alligator provides a control on local animals.. The absence of Alligators can be
assumed to damage local ecosystems from the spike in Coypu and Muskrats ranking the
Alligator at 3.
Jaguar
Panthera onca
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Humans
Status
Near Threatened
Keystone predator status is currently debated but tends to describe a creature that
maintains local populations through hunting (Steiner, 2003). Like the Alligator, the Jaguar is
thought to keep other populations in check. Its ecological impact is disproportionate to it's
population (Vandermeer, 1998). For that reason, the Jaguar receives a 3.
Vulture
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Status
Points
Wide spread and only threatened in Indian ecosystems due to diclofenac poisoning , the
Vulture provides recycling of dead animals (Green, 2004). The Vulture only eats dead or dying
animals and as small animals can provide the same, the vulture is not essential to its ecosystem
and is ranked 2.
Agalychnis annae
Habitat
Prey
Insects
Predators
Status
Endangered
Points
Keeping no populations in control, providing no current scientific benefit and food for
specific fish that do not depend on it, the Blue Tree frog is a low 2 due to it's lack of proposed
impact were it absent from its ecosystem.
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Status
Vulnerable
Points
Food for humans and other animals, the Soft Shell Turtle is not essential to any particular
Clown Fish
Amphiprioninae (subfamily)
Habitat
Prey
Predators
Status
Not Endangered
Points
The Clown Fish provides a symbiotic relationship to anemone (Dunn, 1981). As the
Clown Fish is not essential to particular ecosystems and keeps no populations in check through
predation or being preyed upon, it is rated at 2.
Of the animals evaluated, the following have been chosen to save: Jaguar, Alligator and
Harp Seal. The scientific benefits of saving the Giant Panda and Mole Rat are being researched
and currently unknown. The Jaguar and Alligator provide population control that, were they
absent, local populations are assumed to increase and detrimentally influence the local
ecosystem. The Harp Seal provides food for animals in northern ecosystems that, were they
absent, would have significant difficulty in finding other food due to the desolate environment
they inhabit. All other animals are acceptable losses in comparison to these three.
References
Buffenstein, R. (2005). The Naked Mole-Rat: A New Long-Living Model for Human
Aging Research [Abstract]. The Journals of Gerontology, 60(11), a, 1369-1377. Retrieved April
3, 2016, from http://biomedgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/11/1369.short
Green, R. E., Newton, I., Cunningham, A. A., Shultz, S., Gilbert, M., Pain, D. J., &
Prakash, V. (2004). Diclofenac poisoning as a cause of vulture population declines across the
Indian subcontinent [Abstract]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41(5), 793-800. Retrieved April 3,
2016, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00954.x/full
Steiner, C. F. (2003). Keystone predator effects and grazer control of planktonic primary
production [Abstract]. Oikos, 101(3), 569-577. Retrieved April 3, 2016, from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12309.x/abstract
Vandermeer, J., & March, S. (1998). Indirect Effects with a Keystone Predator:
Coexistence and Chaos [Abstract]. Theoretical Population Biology, 54(1), 38-43. Retrieved April
3, 2016, from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580997913575