Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://journal.pan.olsztyn.pl
e-mail: pjfns@pan.olsztyn.pl
INTRODUCTION
Resistant starch is defined as asum ofstarch and its degradation products which are not absorbed inthesmall intestine ofahealthy man. Especially starch available for bacteria
colonizing thecolon is ofoutmost importance tohealth promoting properties, due toits ability tolower pH oftheenvironment. Theincreased acidity ofintestinal digesta is caused
by bacterial fermentation of resistant starch and formation
ofshort chain fatty acids, which affect theselection ofcolonic
microflora, thus stimulating thegrowth ofanumber ofbacteria groups, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus inparticular,
as well as eliminating or diminishing counts of pathogenic
microorganisms. Thefatty acids formed inthelarge intestine
influence the organisms metabolism, particularly the synthesis ofcholesterol and triglycerides. Butyric acid produced
inthedistal section ofthegastrointestinal tract plays akey role
intheprevention ofcolonic and rectal cancer. Food products
containing resistant starch, incomparison tothose rich infully digestible starch, cause slower release ofglucose after meal
intake and, inconsequence, reduce insulin response, which is
beneficial todiabetic patients. Reduction inthecalorific value
offood (theso-called low calorie food), prolonged sensation ofsatiety as aresult ofslow blood glucose release as well
as increased intestinal filling evoke by resistant starch make
ituseful indiets for overweight patients [Ziba, 2009].
Various types of resistant starch (RS) can be distinguished: RS 1 starch physically inaccessible for digestive
enzymes, e.g. starch of partly milled cereal grains; RS 2
starch resistant to the activity of amylases, non-gelatinised
Authors address for correspondence: Magorzata Kapelko, Department of Food Storage and Technology, Wrocaw University of Environmental and
Life Sciences, ul. C. K. Norwida 25, 50 375 Wrocaw, Poland; tel.: (48 71) 320 54 87; e-mail: m_kapelko@wp.pl
Copyright by Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences
154
Soluble and extruded starch preparations were subjected
toroasting with amixture ofphosphates or with glycin (Figure 1). Subsequently, themodified preparations obtained were
roasted again with phosphates or glycin in order to obtain
doubly modified starch (Spg, Sgp, Epg, Egp). Thereference
samples were roasted, chemically non-modified preparations.
Inorder tocarry out thephosphorylation, anaqueous solution ofphosphates was mixed with starch or modified starch
preparations, dried at atemperature of60C for 12h and roasted at 160C for 3h. Themodified starch was rinsed with ethyl
alcohol at 1:3ratio and dried at 30C [Ziba et al., 2007a].
Heating with glycin was run as follows: anaqueous solution ofglycin was mixed with starch or modified starch preparations and then handled analogously to the esterification
process [Kapelko et al., 2007].
itoscillates from 60to90mg/100g [Teege, 1984]. Inmonophosphates obtained from potato starch by roasting for 3h at
atemperature of160C itaccounts for ca. 800mg/100g [Fortuna, 1994]. Thecontent ofphosphorus innon-phosphorylated starch preparations ranged from 56to62mg/100g for
soluble starch and from 70to75mg/100g for extruded starch
(Table 1). The phosphorylation caused a multiple (ninetotwelvefold) increase inphosphorous content inthestarch
preparations. The highest content of this element was noticed in crude monophosphates (Sp 709 mg/100 g, Ep
775mg/100g). Roasting ofstarch with phosphates and glycin
significantly diminished the content of phosphorous, and
theextent ofthose changes was affected by theorder ofmodifications applied. The content of phosphorus in the Spg
preparation was higher by 14% than that reported intheSgp
preparation, whereas intheEpg preparation higher by 19%
in comparison to the Egp preparation. Presumably, the decrease inphosphorous content instarch preparations roasted
with glycin is due tothepartial blocking ofphosphate groups
access tostarch by Maillard reaction products formed during
roasting with glycin.
Water solubility depends on, among other things, thetype
ofstarch [Fortuna, 1994], themethod ofits modification and
the temperature of measurement. All preparations of modified starch were characterised by substantial water solubility at
Table 1. Content of phosphorus in starch preparations.
Preparation type
59.88
Sr
57.21
Sp
708.67
Sg
61.57
Srr
56.48
Spg
667.34
Sgp
583.29
74.83
Er
72.81
Ep
775.28
Eg
72.31
Err
70.37
Epg
738.43
Egp
621.25
LSD = 3.21
Analyses
Theresultant preparations ofextruded (E) and soluble (S)
starch, and modified starch preparations were analysed for:
content ofphosphorus by thespectrophotometric method according tothePolish Standard [PN-EN ISO 3946:1994]
after wet combustion inamicrowave system for sample preparation Mars 5(CEM Corporation) [PN-EN 13805:2003];
water solubility at atemperature of30or 80C [Richter
et al., 1968];
flow curves of5% pastes at atemperature of50C with
theuse ofanRS 100rotary viscosimeter (Haake), at ashear
rate of1300s -1, which were described by theOstwald equation [Ziba et al., 2007b];
susceptibility ofthepreparations totheactivity ofamyloglucosidase (amigase by Genecor) after gelatinisation at
a temperature of 100C. The temperature of hydrolysis was
37C and the concentration of enzyme was adjusted so that
saccharification of gelatinised native starch occurred after
120min oftheprocess. Thecontent offree glucose was determined colorimetrically at awavelength of=500nm, using
areagent for glucose concentration assay containing glucose
oxidase and peroxidase (Biosystem). Saccharification was
claimed tobe complete when two subsequent results, obtained
every hour, did not differ between one another [Ziba et al.,
2007b].
The results were subjected to a statistical analysis using
ananalysis ofvariance at aconfidence level ofp<0.05[Stanisz, 2001].
T. Ziba et al.
155
atemperature of30C (Figure 2). Thesolubility ofthechemically unmodified soluble starch preparation accounted for 75%,
and that ofextruded starch for 66%. Theroasting was noticed
toincrease thesolubility ofextruded starch only toasmall extent, and thesolubility ofsoluble starch preparations by 10%.
The phosphorylation of the studied preparations resulted
intheir increased solubility inwater. TheSp monophosphate
was characterised by water solubility of 92%, whereas Ep
ofabout 76%. Asimilar relationship was noticed by Fortuna
[1994] in starch monophosphates obtained from starches
of different origin. An increase in the number of phosphate
groups inthestarch chain is accompanied by thedisruption
ofinternal bonds stabilising its crystalline structure, which can
enhance thesolubility ofpreparations. Theheating with glycin
resulted indiminished solubility ofstarch preparations. TheSg
preparation was characterised by app. 80%, whereas Eg by
62% water solubility. This dependency was likely toresult from
Maillard compounds formation, which affected thesolubility
ofthemodified preparations [Kroh et al., 1996]. Water solubility was also significantly affected by theorder ofmodifications
applied, namely greater solubility was noticed for thepreparations phosphorylated and then roasted with glycin, than for
those modified inthereversed order.
Asimilar tendency, however at aconsiderably higher solubility, was observed inthecase ofsolubility determination at
atemperature of80C (Figure 3). Thesolubility ofthechemically unmodified soluble starch preparation accounted for
92%, while that of the extruded starch for 82%. Roasting
was found to increase solubility value, which in preparations modified by roasting with phosphorus amounted
to98%. Incontrast, roasting with glycin diminished solubility
ofthemodified preparations by 80%. Theorder ofmodifications applied affected thestudied feature toasignificant extent. Much higher solubility was noticed for thepreparations
modified with phosphorous and then glycin than for those
modified inthereversed order
Flow curves ofthepastes prepared from theinvestigated
starches are depicted inFigure 4. Theflow curves ofpastes
prepared from soluble starch and its modified preparations
did not display any distinct differences. At themaximum shear
rate, theshear stress values oftheanalysed solutions were low
Table 2. Rheological parameters of prepared starch preparations.
Preparation type
R2
17.35
1.436
0.994
Sr
16.51
1.403
0.995
Sp
17.77
1.376
0.996
Sg
17.52
1.342
0.993
Srr
17.79
1.372
0.995
Spg
16.89
1.400
0.995
Sgp
17.52
1.389
0.996
19.96
1.475
0.996
Er
17.47
1.399
0.998
Ep
14.08
1.635
0.995
Eg
16.50
1.462
0.996
Err
16.63
1.407
0.996
Epg
15.73
1.560
0.997
Egp
17.33
1.436
0.996
156
T. Ziba et al.
Sr
98.85
Sp
91.57
Sg
86.84
Srr
84.04
Spg
98.95
Sgp
82.08
99.62
Er
98.85
Ep
86.84
Eg
96.40
Err
91.47
Epg
92.24
Egp
94.41
LSD = 1.75
and ranged from 1.9 to 2.1 Pa. Considerably greater differences inthecourse oftheflow curves were noticed for thesecond group oftheanalysed preparations. Thepaste obtained
from extruded starch was characterised by thehighest values
ofshear stress intheentire course oftheflow curve, reaching
5.5Pa at themaximum shear rate. Single and double roasting
ofthis type ofstarch decreased twice thevalue oftheshear
stress recorded. Itwas caused by starch thermolysis proceeding during roasting [Lewandowicz, 2001]. Roasting oftheextruded starch with phosphates or glycin increased shear stress
values, incomparison tothose oftheroasted chemically unmodified starch. Theshear stress value ofthepaste obtained
from monophosphate at themaximum shear rate accounted
for 4.7Pa, whereas theone obtained from starch roasted with
glycin for 8.0Pa. Double chemical modification ofextruded
starch also increased shear stress value, and theorder ofmodifications affected the course of the flow curves. The paste
made oftheextruded starch modified by phosphorylation and
then roasting with glycin was characterised by higher shear
stress values than thepaste obtained from thestarch modified
inthereversed order. This is likely toresult from differences
inphosphorous content, which enhances viscosity ofpastes
tothegreater extent than glycin [Ziba et al., 2007a].
Parameters oftheOstwald-de-Waele exponential equation
describing flow curves were compiled inTable 2. Thedetermination coefficient R2>0.993proves good fitting ofexperimental
data tothemodel applied. Then index, being ameasure ofdeviation from theNewtonian flow, was much higher than unity
(1.39-1.64). Therefore, the pastes obtained are of the shear
thickening type. However, itis ofno practical significance due
tovery low values oftheshear stress, and also low viscosity
oftheanalysed solutions. Theconsistency coefficient K, being
ameasure ofpaste viscosity intheinitial phase ofshearing,
was very low and ranged from 0.0016to0.0110Pa sn.
The degrees of starch preparations saccharification with
amyloglucosidase were presented inTable 3. Thechemically
unmodified soluble starch and extruded starch were more
susceptible to the enzymes activity; they were hydrolysed
up to approximately 99%. Not complete enzymatic degradation of extruded starch has been confirmed by other authors [Ralet et al., 1990; Unlu et al., 1998], although some
others have reported on the lack of the effect of the extrusion process on the formation of resistant starch [Faraj et
al., 2004]. Single roasting ofthepreparations did not evoke
any substantial changes in their susceptibility to enzymatic
hydrolysis. In turn, the re-roasting process significantly enhanced theresistance ofstarch toamyloglucosidase activity.
Thesaccharification degree ofSrr starch accounted for 84%,
while that ofErr starch for 91%. Theinfluence ofroasting on
theamylolysis ofstarch was reported inother papers [Masyk
et al., 2003]. Dextrins formed during thermolysis and free
glucose bind tostarch chains randomly at high temperature;
itresults intheformation ofbonds between glucose residues
that do not occur innative starch. That is why those bonds
cannot be disrupted by amylolytic enzymes [Leszczyski,
2004]. Single modifications applied in the study decreased
thestarch susceptibility toamylases activity and their impact
varied depending on thetype ofstarch. Thephosphorylation
decreased the susceptibility to amylolysis more effectively
in the case of extruded starch (Sp 92%, Ep 87%), whereas
roasting with glycin inthecase ofsoluble starch (Sg 87%,
Eg 96%). Double chemical modification carried out invarious orders affected starch preparations toadifferent extent.
Roasting with glycin of starch monophosphates enhanced,
whereas phosphorylation of starch previously roasted with
glycin diminished thesusceptibility ofthepreparations toamylases incomparison tosingly modified starch preparations.
Unexpectedly, it was noticed that doubly modified starches
(except ofSgp starch) were saccharified tothegreater extent
than re-roasted starch. Itcould have been caused by Maillard
reaction and esterification that are claimed toblock theformation of untypical 1-2 and 1-3 glycosidic bonds during
theroasting ofnative starch.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Themodifications applied affected properties oftheobtained starch preparations, and thedirection and extent ofthose
changes depended on thetype and order ofmodifications.
2. The content of phosphorous in starch not subjected
tochemical modification ranged from 57to75mg/100g ofstarch.
The phosphorylation caused ca. tenfold increase in phosphorous content ofpreparations, and ahigher content was noticed
in preparations roasted with phosphates and then with glycin,
incomparison tothose modified inthereversed order.
3. Thephosphorylation caused anincrease, while roasting
with glycin adecrease inwater solubility ofstarch, incomparison totheroasted chemically unmodified starch. Thewater
solubility ofdoubly modified starch was affected by theorder
ofmodifications applied. Ahigher solubility was noticed for
thepreparations phosphorylated and then modified by roasting with glycin, than for thepreparations modified inthereversed order.
4. All preparations produced were characterised by low
viscosity ofpastes formed, and themodifications ofsoluble
starch carried out did not affect the course of flow curves.
Roasting extruded starch diminished, whereas chemical mod-
157
Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej w Krakowie, 2001 (in Polish).
8. Masyk E., Leszczyski W., Gryszkin A., Modificationinduced
changes inpotato starch susceptibility toamylolytic enzyme action. Pol. J. Food. Nutr. Sci., 2003, 12/53, SI 1, 5456.
9. Polish Standard PN-EN 13805:2003. Food products. Determination oftrace elements. Pressure mineralization (inPolish).
10. Polish Standard PN-EN ISO 3946:1994. Determination
of the total phosphorus kontent with the spectrophotometric
method (inPolish).
11. Ralet, M.-C., Thibault J.-F., Della Valle G., Influence of extrusion-cooking on thephysico-chemical properties ofwheat bran,
J. Cereal Sci., 1990, 11, 249259.
12. Richter M., Augustat S., Schierbaum F., Ausgewhlte Methoden
der Strkechemie, VEB Fachbuchverlag Leipzig 1968.
13. Stanisz A. Przystpny kurs statystyki w oparciu o program Statistica PL na przykadach z medycyny. 2001, vol. 1, Statsoft Polska,
Krakw (inPolish).
14. Teege G., Strke und Strkederivate. Behrs GmbH Co., 1984,
Hamburg.
15. Thanh J.L., Baszczak W., Lewandowicz G., Digestibility
vs. structure offood grade modified starches. EJPAU, 2007,
10, 3.
16. Unlu, E., Faller J.F., Formation of resistant starch by a twinscrew extruder. Cereal Chem., 1998, 75, 346350.
17. Ziba T., Resistant starch infood products. 2009, in: Potato III.
Food 3(Special Issue 1), (eds. Yee N., Bussel W.). Global Science
Books, pp. 6771.
18. Ziba T., Kapelko M., Jacewicz K., Styczyska M., Properties
ofextruded starch modified with phosphorus and glycin. Pol. J.
Food Nutr. Sci., 2007a, 57, 4(C), 633638.
19. Ziba T., Kapelko M., Gryszkin A. Selected properties ofpotato
starch subjected tomultiple physical and chemical modifications.
Pol. J., Food Nutr. Sci., 2007b, 57, 4(C), 639645.
Received May 2009. Revision received December 2009 and accepted March 2010.