Review Formalities

Review Team
The HAZID review will be structured as a logical series of review session to focus
Upon particular combination of units and project phases,which will then be combined
To form a composite this shall be issued as a single report.
The project HSE Manager shall be responsible for the review logic and for organizing
The composite report and shall be supported by the Lead Technical Safety Engineer and
Or the Lead Environmental Engineeer.
The project HSE Manager,a Lead Technical Safety Engineer or Lead Environmental
Engineeer shall chair the review session, which should be attended afull time basis by :

Project HSE Manager( or nominated representative)

Lead Technical Safety Engineer( or nominated

representative)

Lead Environmental Engineeer ( or nominated

representative)

Process Engineer.(Area /unit or nominated by Project

Process Manager)

Project Engineer (Area /unit or nominated by Project

Process Manager)

Client representative
Other attendees who may be required on apart time basis, may include:

Construction Engineer

Commissioning Engineer

Civil Engineer

Fire and Gas Engineer

Electrical Engineer

Piping Engineer

Licenser(Process) Engineer (If known / available, otherwise licensor information

Presented by the process representative.
Document Needed
The following documentation is required

Block Flow Diagram ( BFDs) or Process Flow Diagram (PFDs)

Plot Plans

Location map of surrounding area

The following information is useful, but not necessary (Especially at initial review)

Safety data Sheet

Safety Philosophy Document

Sufficient copies should be provided for each attendee.
Timing
The initial HAZID review will be carried out when BFDs are available.The HAZID
Exercise will be refreshed and the report updated once the PFDs and basis licensor
information are available.

Methodology:
The scope and boundaries of the HAZID review are the areas/units,project phases
Logic as described in section 2.
General information ,describing the setting of the project should be described where
Known eg, Proximity/location of neighbouring properties & sensitive receptors,
prevailing wind direction etc.
To aid the reviews a table of hazardous material present in the area(shown in attachment
1) to be investigated shall be completed by the Process Engineer, where the information
Is available.This shall classify the material a an explosive, flammable or toxic risk.
The review will be structured as aphased(By activity e.g. Construction)Series of session
Focused upon particulars units /area.This will enable certain key personnel to be present
at relevant session
The review will focus upon the phase 1 development but will considered the phase 2
(Naphtha Cracker Complex)and its implication for phase 1 at a summary level( with the
Anticipation that phase 2 activity will be the subject of its own HAZID exercise at a later
time)
The (phase 1) review and the inherent (Sub.) review session will be structured on the
following logic and ordre:

General/ overall site and surrounds briefing and consideration

Briefing and and consideration by related group of process etc. units or areas, viz
Refinary, aromatics complex ,FCC comlplex

Briefing and and consideration of externalities(e.g. Remote utilities supplies etc.)

Outline briefing and summary consideration of phase 2 and its implication

Reconsideration of general/overall issues.

For each activity/unit under review , The Lead Process Engineer should explain the
process/activities to be carried out by describing each BFD And PFD.Licensor
representative (if available) shall provide supporting licensor information. Where
appropriate, key discipline enginer(e.g.construction) may be expected to outline relevant
issues.
Consideration should than be made by the Review team to the following

Identification of hazards or aspects typically a

structured review using the Checklist available in attachment 2

Assessment of the hazard-description of the hazard ,

consequence and any application safeguards.

Causes-Event that could result in a loss of containment

of the hazard.

Consequence-Result of the release on the

workforce,local population and environment.

Safeguards-Physical and procedural measures that will

eliminate or reduce the likelihood of ahazar.
To aid the identification of hazard events and environmental aspects ,reference should be
made to the Checklist (Attachment 2) and consideration given to different project phase
and/or operational scenarios.Environmental aspects-typically emission /discharge to the
environment can show positive or negative impacts as well as social or economic impact.

Health issues or implication (for worker occupational health or community health as

chronic or long term effects )may also be considered.
As each hazard or aspect is identified it shall be recorded on the worksheet (attachment
3)together with known control measures.Control measure may include design
requirement or operating procedure.
The significance of any source and the adequacy of the planned control measure shall be
judged by those present at the review.Any additional control measures identified as a
result of the review shall be recorded and assigned to the relevant engineer as an action
Any areas where further