Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Human rights means rights those are inherent in human beings. Men are born with these
inalienable rights and are entitled to these rights irrespective of sex, place of residence,
national or ethnic origin, religion, language or any other status. The Universal Declaration of
Human Rights(UDHR) 1948 and the Constitution of Bangladesh are the main sources of
human rights in Bangladesh.According to the United Nations Universal Declaration of
Human Rights 1948, all human beings are born to be free and equal in identity and rights;
are also entitled to right to life, liberty, personal security, freedom from torture and degrading
treatment, freedom from arbitrary arrest and exile, right to be considered innocent until
proven guilty, right to social security, right of peaceful assembly and association. (Article 1,
3, 5, 9, 11, 20, 22 of UDHR).Again according to the constitution of Bangladesh, all citizens
are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law; protection of right to life and
personal liberty; safeguards as to arrest and detention; freedom of movement, assembly and
association.(Article 27,31,32,33,36,37,38 of the Constitution)
Law enforcement agency is a government agency which is responsible for the enforcement of
law or insurance of the obedience to the laws. Law enforcement officials are obliged to know,
and to apply, international standards for human rights (UN,2004). Discipline, security and
progress-the only law enforcement agency of Bangladesh that runs according to this motto is
Bangladesh police. Bangladesh police is divided into different branches like metropolitan
police, traffic police, rapid action battalion, police bureau of investigation and criminal
investigation department. All officials shall at all times fulfill the duty imposed on them by
law, by serving the community and by protecting all persons against illegal acts, consistent
with the high degree of responsibility required by their profession. But whenever the
protector becomes vitiator the law and human rights cannot fulfill their aim and violation
occurs. Violations of human rights by law enforcement officials are more severe than others.
Thus law enforcement agency lost their admissibility and reliability.
On 11th January 2016, physical and psychological torture of bank official Golam Rabbi; on
15th January 2016, physical torture of Bikash Chandra Das by the civil team of police; on
31st January 2016, the sexual harassment of Farhana Akter by SI Ratan Kumar Halder and on
3rd February 2016, the death of petty shopkeeper Babul Matbar by the police; makes people
more worried about the violation of fundamental rights. Lastly, on 15 February 2016, SI
Ashraful and suspended Corporal of Bangladesh Air Force were apprehended by public at
the time of extorting gold. All of these incident portraits the abuse of power by the police
because they are not working within the parameters laid down by law, in absolute good faith
and with transparency. That is why the violation of human rights by law enforcement
officials has become a major concern.
National Human Rights Commission, Odhikar ,Ain O Salish Kendra(ASK) ,Bangladesh
National Womens Lawyer Association, Human Rights Watch are working spontaneously to
support victims. The constitution of Bangladesh guarantees all the major internationally
recognized human rights. To assure this code of conduct and new guidelines for arrest, bail,
custody, search, interrogation are essential for police. Police should be given incentives and
awards for their performance. At the same time, they should be given exemplary punishment
for their misdeeds and a separate independent agency should be formed to investigate the
crimes committed by the law enforcing agencies.
Rights of Man and of the Citizen respectively, both of which established certain legal rights.
Additionally, the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776 encoded into law a number of
fundamental civil rights and civil freedoms. These were followed by developments in
philosophy of human rights by philosophers such as Thomas Paine, John Stuart Mill and
G.W.F. Hegel during the 18th and 19th centuries. The term human rights probably came into
use some time between Paine's The Rights of Man and William Lloyd Garrison's 1831
writings in The Liberator, in which he stated that he was trying to enlist his readers in "the
great cause of human rights". In the 19th century, human rights became a central concern
over the issue of slavery. A number of reformers, such as William Wilberforce in Britain,
worked towards the abolition of slavery. This was achieved in the British Empire by the Slave
Trade Act 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act 1833. In the United States, all the northern
states had abolished the institution of slavery between 1777 and 1804, although southern
states clung tightly to the "peculiar institution". Conflict and debates over the expansion of
slavery to new territories culminated in the southern states' secession and the American Civil
War. During the reconstruction period immediately following the war, several amendments to
the United States Constitution were made. These included the 13th amendment, banning
slavery, the 14th amendment, assuring full citizenship and civil rights to all people born in the
United States, and the 15th amendment, guaranteeing African Americans the right to vote.
Many groups and movements have achieved profound social changes over the course of the
20th century in the name of human rights. In Western Europe and North America, labour
unions brought about laws granting workers the right to strike, establishing minimum work
conditions and forbidding or regulating child labor. The women's rights movement succeeded
in gaining for many women the right to vote. National liberation movements in many
countries succeeded in driving out colonial powers. One of the most influential was Mahatma
Gandhi's movement to free his native India from British rule. Movements by long-oppressed
racial and religious minorities succeeded in many parts of the world, among them the African
American Civil Rights Movement, and more recent diverse identity politics movements, on
behalf of women and minorities in the United States. The establishment of the International
Committee of the Red Cross, the 1864 Lieber Code and the first of the Geneva Conventions
in 1864 laid the foundations of International humanitarian law, to be further developed
following the two World Wars. The World Wars, and the huge losses of life and gross abuses
of human rights that took place during them, were a driving force behind the development of
modern human rights instruments. The League of Nations was established in 1919 at the
negotiations over the Treaty of Versailles following the end of World War I. The League's
goals included disarmament, preventing war through collective security, settling disputes
between countries through negotiation and diplomacy, and improving global welfare.
Enshrined in its charter was a mandate to promote many of the rights later included in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
At the 1945 Yalta Conference, the Allied Powers agreed to create a new body to supplant the
League's role; this was to be the United Nations. The United Nations has played an important
role in international human-rights law since its creation. Following the World Wars, the
United Nations and its members developed much of the discourse and the bodies of law that
now make up international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
Origins of rights
Human rights are typically divided into two categories: negative human rights (rights to be
free from) and positive (rights to) although other categorisations exist. Negative human rights
follow mainly from the Anglo-American legal tradition, and are rights which denote actions
that a government should not take. These are codified in the United States Bill of Rights, the
English Bill of Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and include
freedoms of speech, religion and assembly. Positive human rights follow mainly from the
Rousseauian Continental European legal tradition, and rights that the state is obligated to
protect and provide. Examples of such rights (not all are universally agreed upon) include:
the rights to education, to a livelihood, and legal equality. Positive rights have been codified
in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in many 20th century constitutions. The
origin of modern positive rights in international law may be traced to the creation of the
International Labour Organization in 1919 as a Western response to the socialist ideology of
the Russian Revolution of 1917. A categorisation offered by Karel Vasak is the three
generations of human rights: first-generation civil and political rights (right to life and
political participation), second-generation economic, social and cultural rights (right to
subsistence) and third-generation solidarity rights (right to peace, right to clean environment).
Out of these generations, the third generation is the most debated and lacks both legal or
political recognition. Some theorists discredit these divisions by claiming that rights are
interconnected. Arguably, for example, basic education is necessary for the right to political
participation. Aside from the international legal human rights framework, there are several
possible sources of rights thinking. One justification stems from natural law. The theory
espoused by the US Declaration of Independence and ingrained in Anglo-American legal
thought is that rights arise from a divine Creator, and are thus a part of a moral philosophy.
Religious societies tend to try to justify human rights through religious arguments. For
example, liberal movements within Islam have tried to use the story of Adam in the Qur'an to
support human rights in a Muslim context.
Philosophy of human rights
The philosophy of human rights attempts to examine the underlying basis of the concept of
human rights and critically looks at its content and justification. Several theoretical
approaches have been advanced to explain how and why human rights become part of social
expectations. One of the oldest Western philosophies on human rights is that they are a
product of a natural law, stemming from different philosophical or religious grounds. Other
theories hold that human rights codify moral behavior which is a human social product
developed by a process of biological and social evolution (associated with Hume). Human
rights are also described as a sociological pattern of rule setting (as in the sociological theory
of law and the work of Weber). These approaches include the notion that individuals in a
society accept rules from legitimate authority in exchange for security and economic
advantage (as in Rawls) a social contract. The two theories that dominate contemporary
human rights discussion are the interest theory and the will theory. Interest theory argues that
the that the principal function of human rights is to protect and promote certain essential
human interests, while will theory attempts to establish the validity of human rights based on
the unique human capacity for freedom.[11] The strong claims made by human rights to
universality and have led to persistent criticism. Philosophers who have criticized the concept
of human rights include Jeremy Bentham, Edmund Burke, Friedrich Nietzsche and Karl
Marx. A recent critique has been advanced by Charles Blattberg in his essay "The Ironic
Tragedy of Human Rights." Blattberg argues that rights talk, being abstract, is
counterproductive since it demotivates people from upholding the values that rights are meant
to assert.
Treaties
In 1966, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) were adopted by
the United Nations, between them making the rights contained in the UDHR binding on all
states that have signed this treaty, creating human-rights law. Since then numerous other
treaties (pieces of legislation) have been offered at the international level. They are generally
known as human rights instruments. Some of the most significant, referred to (with ICCPR
and ICESCR) as "the seven core treaties", are:
1. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
(adopted 1966, entry into force: 1969)
2. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
(CEDAW) (entry into force: 1981)
3. United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT) (adopted 1984, entry into force:
1984)
4. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (adopted 1989, entry into force: 1989)
5. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (adopted 2006, entry
into force: 2008)
6. International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and
Members of their Families (ICRMW or more often MWC) (adopted 1990, entry into
force: 2003)
Part V, chapter XIV of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 deals with the police and their
powers to investigate. Whenever any person is arrested or taken into custody and it appears
that the investigation cannot be completed within 24 hours and there are grounds to believe
that the accusation or information is well founded, the officer in charge of the police station
may forward the accused to the magistrate and the magistrate may authorize the detention of
the accused in such custody for a period not exceeding 15 days. After investigation if it
appears to the police that there is sufficient evidence or reasonable ground of suspicion to
justify the forwarding of the accused to a magistrate such officer shall release the person from
custody on his executing a bond with or without sureties. And if upon an investigation it
appears to the officer that there is sufficient evidence or ground, such officer shall forward the
accused under the custody of the Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence
upon a police report and to try the accused and send him for trial.
The general rule is that special orders for the remand of accused persons under section 167
must not be granted to the police without good and sufficient cause shown, accused persons
should be brought before the Magistrate having jurisdiction who, if further investigation is
necessary, he can adjourn his enquiry from time to time under section 344 of the Code. When,
however, a person is brought before the Magistrate prior to the granting of an order of
detention the latter must be satisfied that
a) there is a substantial ground for suspecting that the person had committed a definite
offence such as to
warrant his arrest and detention; and
b) his remaining in the hands of the police is really necessary, such detention may after tend
to defect justice
rather than further it, and should not be ordered without evidence sufficient to warrant it on
the principles stated above.
The order of remand is upon the subjective satisfaction of the magistrate that there is a
necessity of granting remand for the interest of the case. Now a days it has become a practice
of the police in almost every case to apply for the remand of the accused whether there is any
actual need or not. This section is now being misused as an instrument for interrogation and
to obtain a confessional statement or any other information through torture. This is how the
police manipulate the situation and there are many reported deaths in police custody
(discussed earlier) for torturing the arrested person.
Section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
According to section 54 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr. Pc.), the police can arrest
anyone whom it suspects of being involved with any crime. Under section 54 of the Code of
Cr. Pc. 1898, individuals may be arrested under suspicion of criminal activity without any
order from a magistrate or a warrant. According to the section, there are nine specific
reasons for which the police may arrest someone under this law. These reasons (summarized
from the original) are:
If the person arrested has been concerned in any cognizable offence or if there has been
credible information against him, or the police have reasonable suspicion to think so;
If the person has in his possession any implement of house breaking and cannot give a
lawful excuse for doing so;
If a person has been proclaimed under this or any other Code or by government order, to be
an offender;
If there is reasonable suspicion to believe that the person possesses stolen property;
If the person obstructs a police officer on duty, or if the has or attempts to escape from
lawful custody;
If the person is a deserter from the armed forces of Bangladesh;
If the person has been concerned in or if there is credible information of his being so
involved in or there is reasonable suspicion that he is concerned in committing any act abroad
which would have been a punishable offence in Bangladesh (if committed in this country).
He would be detained under custody in Bangladesh under the Fugitive Offenders Act 1881 or
under extradition laws;
If the person is a released convict, he can be arrested if the does not notify the sentencing
judge of his change of address or absence from residence;
If the arrest of a specific person for a specific crime has been made by another police
officer by requisition. Some persons initially detained under section 54 are subsequently
charged with a crime, while others are released without charge. However, the term
reasonable suspicion, credible information or reasonable complaints appears in several of
the reasons under which a police officer can arrest a person under section 54 of the Code of
Cr. Pc. Unfortunately, these terms are one of the reasons why this section is so misused.
Therefore, after the arrest under section 54, the police forward the person before the
Magistrate with a prayer for remand under section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
which has been discussed earlier.53 To some officers, moreover, S/54 of the Code of Cr. Pc is
the way to get money.
Section 100/86 of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Ordinance
Section 100/86 of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Ordinance (here after DMP Ordinance)
echoes the provision of section 54 of the Code of Cr. Pc. Section 86 of DMP Ordinance deals
with the punishment of persons on suspicions motives between the times of dusk to dawn.
The law states that, if a person is seen between the hours of dusk to dawn, acting under
several stated circumstances the police arrest him/her under reasonable suspicion.
Section 86 of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police (DMP) Ordinance provides (unofficial
translation): If any person is found in following situations during the period between sunset to
sunrise:
a) Equipped with dangerous machinery without satisfactory reasons, or
b) Covered face or in disguise without satisfactory reason, or
c) Present in any residence or any other building or any boat or water vessel or any other
transport without satisfactory reason, or
d) Sleeping or wandering on any street or in any place without satisfactory reasons, or
e) Possessing the tools of entering any house forcefully without satisfactory reason, then the
person will be liable for one year imprisonment or fine of taka two thousand or both.
Section 100 of the DMP ordinance provides: in the presence of any police officer or in his
attention if any person commits any offence under this Ordinance or any other law in force,
that police officer can arrest him without warrant.
However S/54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is applied all over Bangladesh but S/86 of
DMP Ordinance is used for arrest in the Dhaka Metropolitan area only. It is also common for
person arrested under S/54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to find they latter charged
under the Special Powers Act 1974, a repressive law favored by all the governments, or the
Controls of Narcotics and Drugs Act or even the Explosives Act. This conversion occurs
where a prayer or petition for detention under these Acts, is submitted to the district
magistrate from the concerned police station, through the superintendent of police. The
district magistrate then issues a common order and sends it for approval to the
ministry of Home Affairs.
The Special Powers Act 1974
The Special Powers Act 1974 (here in after SPA) is deemed by human rights activists and
other members of civil society as a repressive law. The use and abuse of this Act in the name
of protecting the security of the state has resulted in a steady pattern of human rights
violations. The Act provides Special Measures for the prevention of prejudicial activities,
for a speedy trial and punishment for grave offences. Under prejudicial acts the law includes
acts that are prejudicial to:
the sovereign and/or state; to the maintenance of friendly relations between other states and
Bangladesh;
to the security of Bangladesh;
to the safety or maintenance of public order;
to the peaceful co-existence among different classes and section of the community;
to the maintenance of law and order;
to the security of any section of the public;
to the economic and financial interests of the state;
For aforesaid grounds police can arrest any person at any time.
Who are detained under section 54, Section 100/86 and the SPA?
Investigations carried out by Odhikar since January 2003 have shown that the larger majority
of persons arrested under S/54 of the Cr. Pc, and section 100/86 of the DMP Ordinance, and
under the SPA are from very poor economic background. They are either homeless person,
rickshaw pullers striving to make ends meet, small scale vegetable and fruit vendors, street
children, destitute women who, being abandoned by their husbands, turn to the streets to try
and support their children and youths suspected as terrorists, extortionists and for rival
political activities.
Role of NGO
Consequences
Human rights violations have become daily occurrences in Bangladesh. The populations with
limited financial resources are especially vulnerable to human rights violations. Those who
have been victims of human rights violations often try to seek help from community leaders,
law enforcement agencies, lawyers, journalists, human rights advocates and organizations,
and local government officials. Authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over
security forces. Security forces reportedly committed human rights violatns .The most
significant human rights problems were ;
Political violence
Hundreds were killed and injured in violent attacks surrounding the controversial January
elections. Both Bangladeshs ruling party, as well as opposition parties, were responsible for
the violence. Supporters of the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party and the Jamaat-eIslami party threw petrol bombs to enforce strikes and economic blockades. Before and after
the election, attackers also vandalized homes and shops owned by members of Bangladeshs
Hindu and Christian communities.In response, the government cracked down on opposition
members, naming hundreds of them as suspects in violent attacks. Members of law
enforcement agencies carried out extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, arbitrary
arrests, and unlawful destruction of private property.
Human rights violations on the high seas
Bangladeshi and Myanmar citizens from a jungle in Sadao District under the Shongkhal
Province of Thailand, along the Malaysian border. It is believed that the deceased were
traveling to go abroad by sea as illegal migrant workers. At the same time, Thai police also
found some abandoned camps where migrants were detained by their traffickers. It was leant
that more than 10 thousand poor Bangladeshis and citizens belonging to the Muslim minority
Rohingya population of Myanmar, enter Malaysia for work through this notorious human
trafficking route. Syndicates of human traffickers from Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand and
Indonesia have also been trafficking poor citizens of Bangladesh and Myanmar by luring
them with jobs in Malaysia. When the incident of mass graves was published in media the
whole world paid attention. At one stage, the governments of Malaysia, Thailand and
Indonesia increased patrols in their maritime waters and the security forces of these countries
pushed back migrant-filled boats into non-territorial waters. As a result hundreds of boats
carrying thousands of migrants were floating in the Andaman Sea and Malakka Channel.
Many traffickers and sailors fled from the boats after stopping the engines. Many boats were
sunk in the sea as the engines were shut. On May 16, 2015 at least 104 people died in a clash
amongst migrants for food on a boat floating near a Malaysian beach.On
May 20, 2015 a three-nation Foreign Minister level meeting was held in Kuala Lumpur,
where Thailand and Indonesia also attended.
Extrajudicial killings
The law and justice delivery system of the country is becoming increasingly questionable and
human rights are being seriously violated due to the persistence of extrajudicial killings.
Odhikar has noticed that in the border areas especially in Coxs Bazaar and Teknaf, human
trafficking is increasing significantly. The security force are killing people in the name of
shootout and stating they were traffickers. As a result, before even proving their crimes in
Court, victims are being killed. This also creates an obstruction for tracing the actual
masterminds behind human trafficking. In May 2015, a total of 18 persons were allegedly
killed extra-judicially.
Torture in custody
Fact finding missions on incidents of torture, highlighting the fact that this practice must stop.
On October 24, 2013 the Parliament, through voice vote, passed the Torture and Custodial
Death (Prevention) Act, 2013. Despite this, incidents of torture in the custody by law
enforcement agencies continue.Ex; On May 14, 2015 Rezaul Islam (55) of Khayersuti village
of Dogachi Union under Pabna Sadar Police Station was picked up from his house and
allegedly beaten to death by Detective Branch (DB) police.
The law enforcement agencies are enjoying impunity, which helps them to continue such
activities. RAB and police are not only targeting political opponents but also attacking
ordinary citizens. Several people have already become disabled due to shooting by law
enforcement agencies.Ex ; On May 24, 2015 Sabbir Hossain Sohan (17) a Higher Secondary
Certificate examinee of Keshobpur Degree College Jessore, was detained from Keshobpur
Bazaar and was beaten and shot in his right leg by the police of Monirampur Police Station.
Enforced disappearance
The enforced disappearance of persons has been practiced since the mid 20th century.
Enforced disappearances constitute an extreme violation of human rights, infringing many
fundamental rights. Furthermore, not only is the person affected who becomes the direct
victim, but also his or her family, colleagues and friends as well as society as a whole. Most
of the disappeared are persons who are critical of their governments. It is said that enforced
disappearances are replacing the extra judicial killings in Bangladesh. According to
information gathered by Odhikar from January to May 2015, 36 persons have been
disappeared; of them, eight were later found dead and 16 were later produced before the
Court and whereabouts of 12 persons are still unknown.
Death in custody
The laws both in national and international sphere, these legal mandates are absent in practice
and that is why death in police custody is a growing phenomenon in Bangladesh. As to the
Code of Criminal Procedure, custody of an accused or a witness means custody of the court
in its ultimate sense. The transitional custody of a person may be with the police. But the
ultimate authority to decide the fate of the suspect rests with the court .It is alleged that due
to lack of treatment facilities and negligence by the prison authorities, many prisoners
became ill which caused death. In May 2015, a reported 10 persons died in prison. Among
them, nine died due to illness and one committed suicide. On May 3, 2015 a convicted
prisoner of the BDR Mutiny and former MP of BNP, Nasir Uddin Pintu died in Rajshahi
Medical College Hospital.
At present a number of journalists faced torture, threats or harassments from law enforcement
agencies, (gangsters), government officials, or the student wings of various major political
parties. May 2015, five journalists were injured, 10 were threatened and one was arrested.
Furthermore, eight local newspapers were shut down.
Authorities arrested several members of the notorious Rapid Action Battalion (RAB)
following intense public outrage over the abduction and apparent contract killings of seven
men in Narayangunj in April. Although the government claims that almost 2,000 RAB
members have been punished for various misdemeanors since the groups inception, there
was not a single prosecution for extrajudicial executions, torture, or arbitrary arrests before
the Narayanganj incident. Independent organizations estimate that the RAB has been
responsible for approximately 800 unlawful killings over the past 10 years. Allegations of
violations by members of the police and other law enforcement agencies, including the
Border Guard Bangladesh, were not independently investigated or prosecuted.
BSF continues shooting and killing Bangladeshi citizens at the border areas over the years,
ignoring protests made by various groups. This matter has been repeatedly raised in regular
meetings between border guards of the two countries. The BSF has not deviated from its
policy of shooting at anyone seen near the border. This kind of incident is a clear violation of
international law and human rights; and threats to the sovereignty of Bangladesh . In May
2015, three Bangladeshi citizens were killed by the Indian Border Security Force (BSF). Of
them, two were shot dead and one was tortured to death. Furthermore, two Bangladeshi men
were injured. Of them, one was shot and one was tortured.
Vested interest groups are oppressing religious minority citizens over variousinterests
including land grabbing, extortion etc. the government should bring the perpetrators before
justice. the government should ensure security of all the citizens belonging to the minority
communities in Bangladesh. May 30, 2015 a group of criminals attacked Joykali Mandir
situated at Alenga Jaminderbari under Kalihati Upazila in Tangail District.
Bangladeshs personal status laws governing marriage, separation, and divorce overtly
discriminate against women, and the government showed no sign of willingness to undertake
a comprehensive review to ensure equality and protection for women and girls. As to the
behavior with woman the Code of Conduct for police personnel in police stations states:
Female visitors will have to be behaved with highest courtesy and manner and decency will
have to be maintained in words and behavior with them. As to the responsibilities of officer
in charge, this Code states: If any female comes to an officer-in-charge with complaint or for
any other reason, he will give her standing welcome and behave with her decently. He will
show courtesy and modesty in his behavior and conversation.. In May 2015, a significant
number of women became victims of rape, dowry related violence, acid attacks and sexual
harassment by stalkers.
Statistical Findings
Extra judicial killings
Extrajudicial killings by the law enforcing agencies continued in 2013. The table below
shows that police are used as the main instrument of repression, particularly in extrajudicial
killings. From 18 reported victims in 2012 the rate of extrajudicial killings by the police
jumped to 175 victims in 2013. There were no incidents of BGB1 being involved in
extrajudicial killings jointly with police during 2009 2012, but in 2013, the BGB was
involved with police to kill 32 people extra judicially, while BGB alone killed 11 people,
(compared to 8 for the years 2009 2012). Similarly, between 2009 2012 there were no
incidents of killings by a joint operation by police, Armed Police Battalion, RAB and BGB;
however, in 2013, such joint operations killed 64 people.
Table 01: Person killed by extra-judicially (2009-2013)
Law
Enforcemen
t
Agencies
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Grand
Total
RAB
29
38
40
43
68
41
230
Police
119
175
18
31
43
75
342
Police and
Armed Police
Battalion,
RAB, BGB
Joint Forces
64
64
11
RAB-Police
25
41
BGB (former
BDR)
Police-BGB
11
19
32
32
RAB-Coast
Guard
RAB-PoliceCoast Guard
25
11
Coast Guard
Forest Guard
Ansar
Jail Authority
Army
Grand Total
172
329
70
84
127
154
764
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
0
146
7
37
5
161
10
50
0
139
24
43
4
118
17
43
3
84
16
45
Grand
Total
12
648
74
218
Threatened
Grand Total
33
223
63
289
53
259
49
231
73
221
271
1223
Abduction
99
127
74
23
Killed
35
29
38
31
Injured
68
79
100
62
Grand Total
202
235
212
116
2010
2009
Grand Total
43
25
292
74
98
270
72
77
390
189
200
952
Total number of
women
244
336
299
246
Total number of
children
393
452
473
450
Unidentified
Total
29
26
33
15
666
814
805
711
2010
2009
Total
248
213
1342
311
243
1929
0
0
74
559
456
3345
Killed
158
273
305
235
227
1198
Physical abuse
261
535
192
122
81
1191
Suicide
17
14
19
22
11
83
Total
436
822
516
379
319
2472
Workers Rights
The poor condition of the workers and the criminal negligence they suffer were fully revealed in the
tragic deaths of the workers of Tazreen Garments on November 24, 2012, and most recently at Rana
Plaza. On April 24, 2013 Rana Plaza, a 9-storied building situated at Savar Bus Stand, Savar
collapsed, which resulted in the reported death of 1129 persons and about 3000 injuries. There were
five garment factories from the second to seventh floors at Rana Plaza. About 5000 garments workers
were working inside the building during the tragic incident.9 Later three others succumbed to injury
and human remains were later found in the grounds where the building once stood.
Industrial/factory accidents and deaths are common in Bangladesh, and the systematic negligence of
buyers, owners and the government of Bangladesh have reach intolerable levels. There were protests
all around the world centering on the Rana Plaza incident and the need for stringent measures and safe
working conditions. Apart from hazards such as fires and building collapses, the workers suffer
irregular payment of wages, overdue overtime pay and poor working conditions on a regular basis.
Killed
Injured
Grand Total
2014
745
746
2013
1145
5566
6711
2012
115
2773
2888
2011
917
921
2010
33
2389
2422
2009
1301
1308
Grand Total
1304
12946
14250
Minority Rights
The Political, social and economic vulnerability of the religious minority groups in Bangladesh have
not changed much since last year. Because of the politicisation of the issue, it has become difficult in
real terms to protect the minority citizens by the state. The increasing polarisation of the society into
secularists and Islamists creates political conditions for persecution on minority groups from both
sides. The secularists are accusing the Islamists of attacking the places of worship and villages of nonMuslims, while Islamists respond by claiming that all incidents are a ploy of the government to show
them in bad light.
Between the blame game, perpetrators escape conveniently and remain outside the law.
Total
Temple
2013
118
441
125
322
13
1026
2012
69
81
46
24
224
2011
107
21
25
13
183
2010
244
20
23
315
2009
502
12
28
573
Total
1040
31
568
247
322
47
29
16
2321
Year
Home
Property
Rape
Miscellaneous
Looted
Attack
Idol damage
Grabbing
Land
Abducted
Arrested
Assaulted
Injured
Killed
Recommendation
The increasing rate of extra judiciary killing is being a threat of the democracy of
Bangladesh. It violates the human rights. Many people are killed by this way without any
judicial procedure. It shows a bad picture of Bangladesh to other countries. Government must
stop extra judicial killing to protect its democracy. Here give some recommendation about
this
1. The government should be active to protect extra judicial killing.
2. The police or law enforcement agency should be followed the rules of arrest.
3. The police or law enforcement agency may be allowed to arrest on suspicion only
after collecting some relevant material/evidence in support of the arrest without
warrant.
4. The police or law enforcement agency must be required to effectively notify the
relatives of the arrestee about the time, place of arrest and venue of custody within the
shortest possible time, preferably not exceed12 hours after arrest.
5. The competent magistrates may be authorized to release an arrested suspect should the arresting
police fail to file a case within a specified short period of time, preferably within
48hours from arrest
6. The lawyers(s) of the victims choice must be allowed to meet him/her as early as possible
and stay there during interrogation.
7. Increase public awareness.
8. The government should cooperate with the human rights organization.
9. The investigation of extra judicial killing should done by other person like magistrate
not by the police authority.
Conclusion
To protect the people from human rights violations in Bangladesh, the law enforcing agencies
are the responder in our criminal justice system. Bangladesh still retained the Police Act 1861
which is tainted with colonial policing. Political and bureaucratic interference, low salaries,
governments control of promotions and transfers etc still remain as the major drawbacks of
our security forces. Therefore, to bring the security forces in line with the 21st century is a
great challenge for us. The Police Reform Program (PRP) should keep all the above
loopholes in mind before making any strategy in Bangladesh. The role of a vibrant civil
society, NGOs, door agencies to create pressure upon the rulers of the Country to initiate
strategic reforms cannot be overruled. Moreover, with institutional changes respect for human
rights, rule of law and good governance should also be the safeguards for human rights in the
domestic regime. If it is done, the security forces can be made accountable and friendly to the
common people. Once the security forces are made accountable towards the people, the rate
of human rights violations in Bangladesh will be decreased.
References
Ain O Salish Kendra.(2013).Rights Violation. Dhaka. Bangladesh.
Ain O Salish Kendra. (2014,2015, 2016)).Documentation. Dhaka.
Retrived
from:
www.askbd.org/ask/category/publications-and-resources/human-
rights-reports/
Government
of
Bangladesh.(2015).Constitution
of
Peoples
Republic
of