Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 1 - VISCOSITY
General:
One of the properties of homogeneous liquids is their resistance to motion. A measure of
this resistance is known as viscosity. It can be measured in different standardized
methods or tests. In this experiment, viscosity will be measured using an LVDV-II+ Pro
viscometer.
Theory:
The absolute viscosity is a material property that plays a fundamental role in most fluid
flows. In this experiment, the value of for a fluid is determined by measuring the torque
T required to rotate a cylinder of length L and radius R in a well containing the fluid. See
Figure 1.1.
V
(1.1)
y
The rotary viscometer used has a narrow gap s between the outer radius R of the cylinder
and the inside of the well wall (Fig. 1.1). The velocity gradient (strain rate) can be
calculated using the small gap assumption. The shear stress can be calculated using the
cylinder surface area and the measured torque. On the Brookfield viscometer, the torque
T is not displayed directly, but rather the fraction of the maximum torque Tmax
measurable by the instrument:
T
Spindle #1
Spindle #4
Radius (cm)
0.9421
Radius (cm)
0.1588
Spacing (cm)
0.448
Spacing (cm)
0.080
Data Collection:
Cold Molasses
Spindle #
Temp.(F)
eff
Room Temp.
Molasses
Spindle #
Temp.(F)
RPM
%T
eff
RPM
Hot Molasses
Spindle #
Temp. (F)
%T
eff
RPM
Corn Syrup
Spindle #
Temp. (F)
%T
eff
RPM
Ketchup
Spindle #
Temp. (F)
%T
eff
RPM
%T
Plot shear stress vs. strain rate data for each fluid. Find the best fit equation for
the data and determine the viscosity. Explain the errors.
Compare the viscosities calculated using the torque percentages and RPM values
given by the viscometer with the experimental viscosity readings from the
instrument. Calculate the error percentages. Comment on the results.
Plot shear stress vs. strain rate data of all molasses data on the same chart.
Explain the impact of temperature on the viscosity of molasses. Compare results
with the curves for other fluids in the textbook and/or online sources. Be sure to
cite these sources.
closer to the edge of the beaker than it is to the guard, the calibrated spacing
value that we need will be thrown off.
6. Finally, its time to start taking measurements. To begin, press the motor
on/off button on the viscometer face. The spindle should begin to rotate at the
designated RPM speed. In order to change the RPM speed, press the Set Speed
button. Then, press the Up or Down arrows according to which value of RPM
you are trying to reach. The value of RPMs will appear just to the right of the
currently running RPM value. Once you find an RPM that you wish to reach,
press the Set Speed button again and that RPM value will become the
currently running speed. There will be a different torque percentage for each
RPM value. In order for the values to be valid, the torque percentage must be
above 10% and below 100%. If the torque reaches 100% or above, the screen
will display EEEE. If this occurs, simply reduce the RPM speed.
7. About RPM speeds. There are two sets of RPM speeds. To test and
understand what this means, scroll through the RPM speeds and when you reach
the maximum, continue upward and another set of speeds will begin. Any speed
can be used that keeps the torque within its allowable range. A good idea is to
start at the lower RPMs and work up to faster velocities. The viscometer reaches
equilibrium faster that way.
8. To finish and shut off, press the motor on/off button and the spindle will stop
rotating. Remove the spindle and viscometer from inside the fluid. At this time
the viscometer can be shut off. The spindle can then be removed. Remember
that the spindle is a reverse thread. Also remember to press upwards on
the upper drive and hold while unscrewing the spindle.
9. Next, clean the spindle and the viscometer and return it to its case. Warm water
and paper towels will be sufficient for cleaning. Be sure to remove all of the
material from the spindle to avoid contamination.
IMPORTANT!!!!
This Viscometer costs over $1200. The most tedious part
of using the viscometer is installing and removing the spindle.
The spindle has reverse threads and can easily be ruined. The
shaft of the motor is also sensitive to pushing and pulling and
can be bent out of alignment easily if one does not take care
removing the spindle.
SO BE CAREFUL!!!
5
2. Attach electric wire and plug into outlet. Using on/off switch on the back of the
device, turn the device on. 3 dots will then appear on the display screen.
3. In order to reach the desired temperature, press and release the turn-knob once.
The current temperature will appear (Fahrenheit should be displayed as the
temperature). Then, turn the knob either left or right until the desired temperature
displays on the screen. Once the desired temperature is displayed on the screen,
do not touch the turn-knob again. In a few seconds the display will return to the
current temperature. The circulation pump will turn on at this point and the
temperature will begin to change. To see the temperature that you are trying to
reach, simply press and release the turn-knob, and it will be displayed again.
4. Allow sufficient time for the water bath, and fluid that you are testing, to reach
the desired temperature.
5. IMPORTANT!!!! Remember that the fluid and flask is going to be hot after
heating and to take proper precautions not to injure yourself or damage the
equipment.
6. After testing is complete, and you are finished with the water bath, simply turn the
device off using the on/off switch on the back of the display panel.
7. If the bath is not going to be used for a significant period, empty the water.
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 2 PRESSURE AND FORCE
General:
The objective of this lab is to observe the relationship between pressure and force.
Pressure gauges and weights will be used to observe pressure. These readings will be
compared to predicted pressure values. This lab will briefly discuss trend line selection.
Theory:
Pressure is defined as force per unit area. Since this is a general relationship, the unit
system (U.S. or SI) must be consistent within the equation. See Equation 2.1.
P
F
A
(2.1)
Experimental Procedure:
This experiment will use multiple weights applied to a water-filled cylinder of known
geometry. The cylinder is connected to a Bourdon-tube pressure gauge which will
provide the recorded pressure readings. See Figure 2.1 below.
The weights are applied on the cylinder side. The diameter of the cylinder of each
apparatus is listed on the instrument ID tag. At least 5 weight combinations must be
tried, and each combination must be applied three times. The trials should be performed
7
in a random order (i.e., do not add the weight and then read the gauge three times without
doing anything). The intermediate fluid is water. Water is selected because it is nearly
incompressible and does not dissipate pressure within the fluid.
Experimental errors should be listed and accounted for. Human error is not an error.
Using that phrase means that an unknown mistake was made and no effort was made to
identify it, remove it, or quantify it. This is unacceptable. An idea of the magnitude of
the errors should also be mentioned (one error may change the values by 0.1% while a
different one may change the values by 10%).
Data Collection:
Weight (kg)
Weight combination
Pressure (kN/m2 or
Trial #1
Trial #2
lbf/in2)
Trial #3
A data table should compare the recorded pressure with the calculated pressure.
Percent Error should be used.
Is the
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 3 MANOMETRY
General:
Manometry utilizes the change in pressure with elevation to evaluate pressure. There are several
instruments available to measure pressure depending on the magnitude of the pressure and the
characteristics of the fluid to be studied.
Theory:
By measuring the height of liquid in a simple manometer, it is possible to compute the gage
pressure at the center of the vessel to which the manometer is connected. A manometer uses a
different fluid than the one in the main vessel (i.e. water). By measuring the deflection of the
manometer fluid (e.g. mercury) in a U-tube, the pressure in the main vessel can be calculated if
the specific weights of the two fluids are known. In this lab we will use a U-tube manometer
(Figure 3.1).
oil
1
h1
B
h3
h2
water
Figure 3.1: The Manometer
The hydrostatic pressure equation states that there is no horizontal variation in pressure in a static
fluid. Therefore,
PA PB
(3.1)
The change in pressure with height in a fluid is given by
(3.2)
P h
where is the increase in pressure due to moving down a distance in a fluid of specific
weight . Note that the pressure at points 1 and 2 in Figure 3.1 is P=0.
Experimental Procedure:
In this lab we will calculate the specific weight of vegetable oil and a salt water solution.
First, you will use the vegetable oil and water in the manometer. Fill the tube mostly with water,
then some oil and measure the heights h1, h2, h3 as shown in Figure 3.1. Add a little more oil and
repeat three times. Be sure not to have the oil-water interface near the bottom of the tube. If it
is, then oil could possibly come out the other side of the tube, causing two unknowns.
After cleaning the tube out, use the salt water solution and oil. The tube should be mostly full of
salt water now, with some vegetable oil on one side like before. Take your measurements of
heights and add increments of oil just like the previous step. This time, the known specific
weight will be the newly calculated value of vegetable oil. You will use this value to calculate
the specific weight of the salt water.
Data Collection:
h1 (cm)
Clear Water
Salt Water
h2 (cm)
h3 (cm)
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
Determine the specific weight of the cooking oil and the salt water. Compare the specific
gravity calculated for the cooking oil with values that you look up from an outside source
(textbook or internet, cited appropriately).
Are these results as expected? Do they correspond to our knowledge of certain fluids
being less dense/more dense than other fluids?
Describe in your own words how the principles of manometry are applied in this
experiment.
What problems would have to be overcome if we were to measure the unit weight of salt
water only using the equipment specified, without the cooking oil? What are some
possible
solutions?
10
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
p h
(4.1)
Where p = pressure at any point;= specific weight of the liquid; and h is the vertical
distance from the surface to the point where pressure is measured. Any surface in contact
with a liquid, therefore, experiences a force that can be calculated from:
Fw
area
pdA w
area
zdA w hc Aw
(4.2)
Where Fw = the total force exerted by the fluid on the area, dAw = the elemental area on
which the pressure p is applied, hc = the depth to the centroid of the surface; and Aw = the
area of interest. If the total force of the fluid could be represented by a force acting at one
point on the surface, this point would be known as the "center of pressure." Knowing the
specific weight of the fluid, the shape of the plate, the location of the plate under the fluid
surface, and the orientation of the plate, the magnitude and location of the force of the
fluid on the submerged area can be determined using Equation 4.2.
Table 4.1 - Dimensions of the Test Apparatus
Radius of inner cylinder
10.0 cm
20.0 cm
7.5 cm
10.0 cm
11
Figure 4.1: Definition sketch of force of fluid on a plate. Note that all the forces
acting on the curved surface of the Plexiglas act along lines passing through the
pivot point (A). Therefore, only the hydrostatic force acting on the flat surface
creates a moment about (A).
Experimental Apparatus:
Figure 4.2 shows the test apparatus (a) and the measurable for the tank (b). Table 4.1
gives its required dimensions. The apparatus consists of counterbalancing weights to
zero the instrument, a scaled lever arm to measure the distance to the added moment, a
quadrant tank to contain the water, and a gradation plate to read elevations for the tank.
12
Force of Water
The force of the water on the plate (Fw ) is a function of hc and can be calculated using
Equation 4.2. If the water level is below the top of the plate, S is less than Sh and the case
is un-submerged. For our rectangular plate, the value of hc is given by Equation 4.3.
S St
(4.3)
hc
2
If the water level is above the top of the plate, S is greater than Sh and the case is
submerged. The value of hc is then given by Equation 4.4.
hc S Sh
S h St
2
(4.4)
W Larm Fw I d M
(4.5)
where Fw is the force of the water, M (given in Equation 4.6) is the moment about (A)
due to the hydrostatic pressure distribution, and W is the total amount of weight added to
the balance arm to bring the apparatus back to equilibrium. Figure 4.3 shows calculation
of moment of force of water about (A).
L2
M dM PLwdl
(4.6)
L1
The lever arm for the weights (Larm) can be read from the instrument. Id is the lever arm
for the water force. This is the distance from the center of pressure to the pivot on the
instrument, not the water surface. To convert this to yp we use Equations 4.7a and 4.7b.
200 S
(4.7a)
if S 200mm: y p exp I d
cos
13
if S 200mm:
y p exp I d
200 S
cos
(4.7b)
Figure 4.3 Schematic of the momentum calculation of force of water about (A) (for
submerged case)
Experimental procedure:
1. Set the lever arm distance and use the rotating slider to level the apparatus at the
desired .
2. Record St, Sh, and
3. Add weights, ensuring that the hanger has not moved from its set distance.
4. Pour water into the quadrant tank until balance is restored.
5. Measure and record S for the specified angle and weight W.
6. Repeat steps 3 and 4 for 6 different weights. Use a total of at least two weight
combinations below 3 N and at least four combinations above 3 N.
7. Empty the quadrant tank.
8. Repeat steps from 1 to 7 for =20o, and 40 o.
Be sure to use the same combination of weights for each angle.
14
Data Collection:
Angle o
Lever Arm [mm]
------------------------Weight [N]
Angle o
Lever Arm [mm]
------------------------Weight [N]
15
Angle o
Lever Arm [mm]
------------------------Weight [N]
Calculate the moment about point A due to the hydrostatic pressure on the plate
using (4.6) and plot this moment vs the moment due to the weight.
Plot the distance between the center of area and the center of pressure (
y p exp hc ) vs. (S-St) for all three angles on the same graph. Explain the
falling limb of the graph using equations as necessary. What number(s) should
approach?
16
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
z
(5.1)
g
2
where P = pressure (F/L ); = specific weight of fluid (F/L ); V = mean velocity of fluid (L/t);
z = elevation of fluid above datum (L); and H = total head (ft-lb/lb or N-m/N).
If we assume no energy is lost between two points, the total head along a streamline is the same
(H1 = H2). Substituting Bernoullis equation in for total head, we get Equation 5.2.
P1
V12
P V
z z
g
g
(5.2)
Figure 5.1 shows a closed conduit system with an inviscid, incompressible fluid flowing through
it. Sections 1 and 3 have the same diameter, and section 2 has a smaller diameter.
Q1 Q2 V1 A1 V2 A2
(5.3)
where A1 and A2 are the areas of sections 1 and 2. For a given geometry (A1, A2), one can solve
for up to two unknown using Equations. 5.2 and 5.3 (V1, V2) and hence the flow rate.
Experimental Procedure:
We will measure pressure from all of the pressure taps at three flow rates to get profiles of the
pressure along the venturi. Non-dimensional parameter will be used to normalize these
values. Normalizing values means that various dissimilar values that follow the same trend are
modified by a constant parameter within each dataset. This allows the data points to plot on top
of each other, showing that the trend is common between them.
hn h1
v22
2g
(5.4)
For the remaining runs we will only measure the pressure difference between the entrance
section and the throat.
18
For a given Q, calculate the dimensionless parameter in expression (5.4). Plot () vs.
distance along the Venturi for all 3 profile runs on the same chart. No trend line is
necessary, just connect the points.
Plot the velocity head and pressure head along the Venturi Meter for your profile data on
the same plot (one plot per profile for each of the three full profiles). Be sure to plot the
velocity head on top of the pressure head like it was shown in lab and in Figure 5.1.
Identify the Energy Grade Line. The best fit lines should reflect the behavior of the fluid,
but it is not necessary to show the equations.
Calculate h1-h2 using the measured flow rate and Bernoullis Equation
Plot (h1-h2)calc vs. (h1-h2)measured
Plot Qcalc from (h1-h2)measured vs Qmeasured
Plot (h1-h2)measured - (h1-h2)calc (= head loss) vs. Q and fit both a straight line and a
quadratic curve
Comment on which it the most appropriate fit and why.
19
c
(mm)
d (2)
(mm)
e
(mm)
20
f
(mm)
g
(mm)
h
(mm)
j
(mm)
k
(mm)
l
(mm)
21
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 6 DETERMINING COEFFICIENT OF DISCHARGE
General:
The objective of this lab is to determine the coefficient of discharge of a tanks outlet considering
the outlet as an orifice.
Theory:
The usual purpose of an orifice is the measurement or control of flow from a reservoir. It can
also be used to make a pressure differential (drop). When there is no inflow, conservation of
volume is given by
dh
(6.1)
AT
Qout ,
dt
where AT=Area of tank and Qout=outlet flow rate given by
Qout CD Ao 2 gh
(6.2)
22
Head, h (cm)
1st run
Time
(min)
Head, h (cm)
2nd run
23
Time
(min)
Head, h (cm)
3rd run
Assuming that the outlet can be treated as an orifice with discharge coefficient CD,
calculate the theoretical height as a function of time by solving equations (1) and (2).
Note that substituting (2) into (1) gives you a first order ordinary differential equation.
Use the analytical equation from the previous step to fit it an appropriate curve through
your measured height vs time data and estimate CD
Comment on any possible sources of error.
24
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 7 FLOW OVER A V-NOTCH WEIR
General:
A weir is an overflow control structure built across an open channel for the purpose of
measuring the flow discharge. V-notch weirs are sharp crested weirs.
Theory:
Consider the V-notch shown in the figure 7.1. Let H be the height of water surface and
be the angle of notch. Then, W is width of the notch at the water surface
W 2 H tan
(7.1)
Consider a horizontal strip of the notch of thickness dh under a head h. Then, width of the
strip,
(7.2)
W 2( H h) tan
2
Bernoullis equation can be used to show that the theoretical discharge through the strip
is
25
where,
8
K
2 g tan
15
2
(7.5)
Let Qa be the actual discharge. Then the coefficient of discharge, Cd, is given by
Q
Cd a
(7.6)
Qt
5
Qa KCd H 2
(7.7)
The co-efficient of discharge depends on relative head (H/P), relative height (P/W) and
angle of the notch ().
Experimental Procedure:
26
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
Data Collection:
Angle of the notch, =
Head from datum to vertex, P =
Observation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Some Specific Questions to Address:
27
Actual
Discharge
Qa 0.2041* h
0.4648
CD
Qa
Qt
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 8 FORCE ON A SLUICE GATE
General:
A sluice gate is a vertical gate installed in open channels to control the discharge. It
allows water to pass underneath the gate. This device may be used as a flow measuring
device. We will also use it to illustrate the momentum theorem.
Theory:
In hydrostatics, the force on a submerged gate was easily calculated from the linear
increase of pressure with depth. We now know from Bernoullis equation that as velocity
increases, pressure decreases. The water just upstream of a sluice gate may be moving,
so typical hydrostatic equations do not apply anymore and we must go to the Momentum
equation. The momentum theorem comes from Newtons Second Law of Motion
(Equation 8.1)
F the rate of
change of momentum
(8.1)
The force of water on the sluice gate may be computed from the momentum theorem
assuming one-dimensional flow and neglecting shear stresses along the channel bed and
the side walls. See Figure 7.1 for a diagram shoving forces and velocities.
Fg
V1
y1
ys
28
y2
V2
The downstream depth will be hard to measure due to the highly unstable flow. In the lab
you will measure the downstream depth and observe the difficulties. You will check
your measured depth using a contraction coefficient Cc, such that
y2theo Cc ys
(8.2)
Values of Cc have been calculated by von Mises by assuming flow through a sluice gate
to be inviscid flow through the upper half of a two dimensional slot, as shown in Table
6a.1.
Table 8.1: von Mises Contraction coefficients for Equation 6a.2
ys/y1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Cc = y2/ys
0.611
0.612
0.616
0.622
0.631
0.644
29
With a conceptual knowledge of physics and fluid mechanics, the gate force is simply the
integral of the pressure over the gate area. See Equation 6a.3. In our case, pressure
varies over the height of the gate.
Fg
zmax
PdA
(8.3)
Here dA bdz . Since piezometers measure pressure head instead of actual pressure, the
values muse be converted by multiplying h by the specific weight of water (remember
P h ). This leads to Equation 7.4.
Fg
zmax
hdA
(8.4)
Here, the actual pressure head, h, can be found with the equation:
(8.5)
Knowledge of integrals allows the user to recognize that the integral of the pressure head
variation per unit width with depth is equal to the area under the curve of a plot of
pressure head (h) against depth (z). Thus, Equation 8.4 becomes Equation 8.6. See
Figure 8.3 for an example plot. The dots represent pressure head readings from
piezometers located at various elevations. Correct locations for the y-axis intercepts are
critical.
Fg Area under the curve * width
Elevation,
z (ft)
Pressure=h
Figure 8.3 Plot of pressure variation on the gate in the vertical direction
30
(8.6)
(8.7)
Q bys *
area
2 gy1 * K
velocity
(sluice equation)
(8.8)
coefficient
Note that this is similar to the empirical equation for the flumes orifice plate:
0.4648
(orifice equation)
Q 0.2041* h
(8.9)
Values of K are given by Rouse and provided in Table 7.2. Using this information and
the relatively simple measurements of sluice gate opening size and upstream depth, the
flow rate can be calculated.
Table 8.2: Values of flow coefficients for use in Equation 8.8
K
0.611
0.599
0.588
0.578
0.568
ys/y1
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Note: In the case of the specific apparatus that we use in this lab, there is a variation in
the scale attached to the sluice gate. The piezometer tubes for the taps near the bottom of
the gate take up some space, so the scale was attached 0.4 inches (0.0333 ft) above the
bottom of the gate. The tap locations listed (z) are the correct actual distances from the
bottom of the gate but the values read from the gradation behind the piezometers will be
less than their true values. For example, a water level reading of 0.1 ft on the scale is
actually 0.133 ft from the bottom of the gate. Thus, the correction needs to be applied to
the
piezometer
readings
as
shown
in
Figure
8.4.
31
Compare the measured value of downstream depth (y2) with the value derived
from Equation 8.2.
Determine the flow rate using the energy equation, the calibrated Orifice equation
8.9 and the Sluice gate equation 8.8.
Calculate the theoretical value of the net force of water acting on the sluice gate
from the momentum equation. Determine velocities V1 and V2 using all three Q
estimates calculated previously. Hence, you will determine three theoretical
values of force. (Note: Use the theoretical value of y2 from Equation 8.2 in your
calculations of theoretical force.)
Make a plot of z vs. pressure on the gate similar to that shown in Figure 8.3. Pass
a smooth curve through the data points. Dont forget to extend the line to
intersect with the appropriate points on the axis. On the same graph plot the
hydrostatic pressure equation P zmax z
Calculate the experimental value of the force on the gate by integrating the
pressure distribution numerically.
Calculate the percent difference between the values of force on the gate
determined by experiment and the three theoretical forces.
Analyze your results and draw your conclusions regarding the validity of the experiment
results. Refer to each of the items you have been asked to determine
32
Data collection:
Units:
Upstream depth, Y1:
____
____
____
Channel Width, b:
____
____
Tap Number
Piezometer
Piezometer
Tap Location (z) Reading
(ft)
(ft)
0.008
0.017
0.025
0.042
0.083
0.125
0.167
0.208
0.25
0.333
0.417
0.5
0.625
0.75
0.875
33
To integrate, we take the limit of the summation. This requires knowledge of the
functions behavior at every x-value. In an experiment, we only have data at specific
points and do not know the actual function (were trying to determine/prove it). If we
cannot integrate we must revert to the summation process.
34
Adding up the area of our known rectangles will provide the area under the curve. The
final value may not be as accurate, but it is incredibly easy to perform in a spreadsheet.
The distance between two recordings is calculable from the cells, and this will give the
dx value. f(x) is the value of the function the reading that we have taken and will
be plotting as y. This is another cells value in the spreadsheet. Each row will then
have an associated dx and y so a differential area can be found. The summation of
all of those differential areas will be the area under the curve! Obviously, if more
recordings are made then the accuracy will increase because the distance between
recordings (dx) will decrease.
There are various sub-methods for the area of the differential element. Figure A3.1
shows the area of the element calculated from the highest of the two functional values of
the element. This consistently over-estimates the area. A similar method is to always
take the first value (functional value on the left side of the element). This method can
have varying error, as the behavior may lead to a mix of over- and under-estimations,
making the accuracy uncertain. Another method is to make a trapezoidal shaped element,
which assumes linear behavior within the element see Figure A3.2. This method is
very accurate is the preferred method for approximate numerical integration. A third,
more complex method involves looking at the adjacent elements and finding a more
general trend (think of a decaying function). For the purposes of this lab, the extra
accuracy of this method is not worth the extra computation.
Alternate methods of area determination
There are other methods of finding the area under the curve that require more work by
hand. One method is to plot a line through each of the data points and use a planimeter to
traverse a scaled plot. This provides good results but is limited to the accuracy of the
data points. Another method is to again plot the data with connecting lines onto graph
paper or plotted with gridlines. The area of each square is known, so adding up the area
of all of the squares under the curve will also yield the total area. This method is very
tedious and the squares must be small to avoid large errors in area estimation, but it has
been
around
much
longer
than
computers
and
planimeters.
35
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 9 VELOCITY PROFILES IN PIPES
General:
In this laboratory session, we will compare theoretical and experimental velocity profiles
in pipes for turbulent flow situations.
Theory:
Flow in pipes can occur under laminar and turbulent conditions. The transition from
laminar to turbulent flow is a function of the Reynolds number ( Re UD where
U Q A ). Under normal engineering conditions, transition occurs in pipes at Reynolds
numbers of 2000 to 3000. Below 2000, the flow is completely stable and will always be
laminar.
Turbulent flow occurs at Reynolds number greater than 3000. For turbulent flow, theory
and empirical results give us:
m
1/ n
y
y
V Vmax Vmax
R
R
(9.1)
Where Vmax is the velocity at the centerline of the pipe and y and R being defined by
Figure 9.1. Some engineers approximate m as 1/7. Others vary m with the Reynolds
number according to Table 9.1. This lab will use the table.
Table 9.1: Reynolds number versus velocity exponent
Re
4.0 x 103
2.3 x 104
1.1 x 105
1.1 x 106
3.2 x 106
m = 1/n
1/6
1/6.6
1/7
1/8.8
1/10
Remember that the Reynolds number includes a velocity term. This velocity is the
average velocity over the cross section, not the point velocities that are to be compared.
Experimental Procedures:
This lab will use a manometer connected to a stagnation tube to measure pressure
differences at various points through a pipe cross section as shown in Figure 5a.2.
Assuming no energy loss due to the stagnation tube (H1 = H2), Bernoulli's equation can
be inserted to get Equation 9.2.
P1
V P
V
z
g
g
(9.2)
It was previously learned how to evaluate pressure differences from manometer readings,
so the velocity at point 2 can easily be computed for the horizontal pipe system. By
moving the stagnation tube across the pipe, the velocity at various locations across the
pipe can be measured. In this lab, the setup uses a standard water differential manometer.
1 2
Air
h
Q CD A0
2 g h
1 d 4
(9.3)
Here CD 0.82 for this orifice plate, A0 is the orifice plate cross sectional area, h is
the orifice plate manometer reading, and d D0 D is the ratio of orifice plate diameter to
pipe line diameter.
37
The theoretical velocity profile requires a maximum velocity to base its calculations
around. Use the maximum experimental velocity in the theoretical equation. This will
ensure that the two profiles overlay correctly and the shapes of the profiles can be
compared.
To calculate the flow rate using experimental manometer readings along the cross section
shown in Figure 8.3, use Equation 8.4
Q Qi Vavei dAi
Figure 9.3 Schematic for flow rate calculation using manometer readings
38
(9.4)
Data Collection:
Tube position
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2.00
2.00
1.40
Units
in
in
in
in
Vernier reading
(in.)
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
y
(in)
0.05
0.15
0.25
0.35
0.45
0.55
0.65
0.75
0.85
0.95
0.95
0.85
0.75
0.65
0.55
0.45
0.35
0.25
0.15
0.05
39
Manometer reading
(in.)
Calculate the flow rate from the orifice plates differential manometer reading.
Plot experimental and theoretical velocity profiles on the same graph. Remember
to use data points only with no line to indicate the experimental data, and a line
with no point markers for the theoretical.
Fit a power law curve through the experimental data and comment on exponents.
Calculate the flow rate from the experimental readings. Compare this to the flow
rate calculated using the orifice plate.
40
Calculate
Q 2 r V (r ) dr
0
For our data, the location of the reading (y) is the independent variable and the calculated
velocity (V) is the dependent variable. Thinking back to Appendix 3s f ( x) * x , this
essentially makes the f(x) value the velocity and the delta value the distance between
recordings. When rotating this area through 2*pi, you make the simple but incredibly
bad mistake of rotating the area around the radius line (x-axis) instead of the pipe
centerline (y-axis). This error is shown in Figure A4.1.
41
42
An easier method is the Shell or Cylinder method of volumes. This allows our original
differential areas to be used. Again, think about the cylindrical coordinate system. See
Figures A4.3 and A4.4.
43
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 10FLOW R ESISTANCE
General:
The resistance caused by a fluid as it flows along a pipe results in a continuous loss of
energy of the fluid. This laboratory session will determine the energy losses due to flow
resistance for turbulent flow.
Theory:
The energy equation for the flow of viscous fluids between two points in a pipeline is
given by:
V12
P V2
P
z1 1 2 z hL
2g
g
(10.1)
The term hL represents the energy (head) lost (converted to heat) per pound of flowing
fluid due to the viscous nature of the fluid. The energy loss is a function of the pipe size,
velocity of the fluid, length between the two points and viscosity of the fluid. The most
widely used expression relating head loss to the physical properties of the pipeline and
fluid (attributed to Darcy-Weisbach) is
hL f
L V2
D 2g
(10.2)
UD
v
(10.3)
change with Reynolds number. The flow is then said to be fully turbulent. This is where
most civil engineering applications operate, and these friction factors are often used as a
first estimate in iterative solutions.
In 1939, Colebrook developed an implicit equation that can be used to solve for the
friction factor of a pipe. His equation covers hydraulically smooth, hydraulically rough,
and the in-between areas of turbulent flow. Implicit equations require iterative solutions
for the variable of concern because it is on both sides of the equation. See Appendix 5
for a description of the solution of implicit equations. Colebrooks equation is as follows
1
2.51
2.0*log D
3.7 Re* f
f
(10.4)
Experimental Procedure:
This lab will experimentally determine resistance coefficients (f) for the test pipe for
several different flow rates (and therefore several Reynolds numbers) in a setup shown in
Figure 10.1. The head loss can be determined by simplifying Equation. 10.1.
First, turn on the pipe and wait 3 minutes to get steady. Read the pressure difference for
first length of pipe (12). This will give head loss for that flow rate. The procedure
should be repeated for four flow rates. Also, this lab will determine head loss as a
function of length. Set the flow rate to maximum, and record the manometer reading for
different pipe lengths provided in experimental data sheet.
45
Data Collection:
Brass Pipe Diameter:
Mainline Diameter:
Orifice Diameter:
2.00
2.00
1.40
Units
in
in
in
Manometer Reading
(Orifice plate)
(in)
Pipe Length
(ft)
12
12
12
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Manometer
Reading (head loss)
(in)
4
8
12
14
16
18
See run 5
See run 5
See run 5
See run 5
See run 5
Determine the theoretical friction coefficient for each of the flows using the
Moody diagram from textbook.
Determine the theoretical friction coefficient for each of the flows using the
Colebrook equation.
Compare the experimentally determined f value with the two theoretical f values.
Comment on your results. If the experimental f value varies from the theoretical f
values, explain why this might be so.
Make a plot of head loss as a function of flow rate, fit an appropriate curve and
comment on the type of function.
Make a plot of head loss ( hL ) as a function of distance along the pipe using the
5th discharge only, ft a curve and comment on the function.
Do the changes in distance along the pipe and discharge produce expected
resultant head losses? Give your reasons.
46
1
2.51
2.0*log D
3.7 Re* f
f
The friction factor, f, is unknown while the other parameters have been calculated. A
standard solution procedure is as follows:
1) Guess a value for the variable of interest. (f = something)
2) Using the guessed value of f and the known values, solve one side of the equation.
(f = something, e/D = something, Re = something right hand side of the
equation = something)
3) Solve for the variable of interest. (f on the left hand side of the equation =
something)
4) Compare the guessed value of the variable of interest to the one you just
calculated. (fguess ?=? fsomething)
5) If the values are the same within some tolerance margin, the value of the variable
of interest is the one just calculated. If the two values are not close enough, repeat
these steps. The recently calculated variable of interest now becomes your
guessed value. (fsomething fguess; insert this value on right hand side of equation)
47
Group / Individual
Summary / Comprehensive
Due date:
CHAPTER 11 PUMP CHARACTERISTICS CURVE
General:
The objective of this lab is to calculate the pump performance curve for the pump, Ep(Q),
and to compare it to the curve provided with this lab manual.
Theory:
The performance of a pump can be represented graphically by characteristic curve. A
typical characteristic curve shows the total head rise over the pump as a function of pump
discharge.
Experimental Procedure:
A bucket, a submersible aquarium pump, some tubing, stop watch, tape measure and a
measuring cup will supplied in the lab. Measure the flow rate produced by the pump for a
range of heights (at least 9) above the water surface, including the height for which there
is no flow rate
48
Data Collection:
Diameter of Pipe =
Observation Head,
H(cm)
Length of pipe =
Volume Time
of
(sec)
water in
the cup,
(ml)
Q (ml/s)
Outlet
velocity
(cm/s)
Head loss
(cm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Some Specific Questions to Address:
Note that the bucket supplied has a flow rate meter attached. This is for a different lab
and should not be connected during this experiment or used to measure the flow rate.
49
Ep (cm)
50
Group / Individual
In-class calculations will be submitted after lab session
CHAPTER 12 HYDRAULIC JUMP
General:
The hydraulic jump is an open channel phenomenon whereby water (or any liquid)
flowing at a small depth y1 abruptly jumps to a larger depth y2 and continues to flow at
the new depth. The phenomenon is a chaotic, turbulent one and is associated with loss of
energy.
Theory:
Water flowing in open channels will occur in one of two velocity states, subcritical or
supercritical. Supercritical flow is characterized by a high velocity and is relatively
unstable. Subcritical flow has a lower velocity and is stable. A dimensionless ratio
which allows the definition of these conditions is the Froude number, given by:
Fr
V
A
g*
T
V
gym
(12.1)
F1 F2 QV2 QV1
(12.2)
Here F1 and F2 are hydrostatic forces as shown in Figure 6b.1. The conservation of
volume equation of the system gives:
Q V1 A1 V2 A2
51
(12.3)
EGL
hL
V22
2g
V21
2g
y2
F1
y1
F2
Solving the equations 12.2 and 12.3 simultaneously the depth at section 2 can be
calculated:
y1
8q 2
2
gy13
y2
(12.4)
Equation 12.4 can be used to give either jump depth (the conjugate depth) if the other
depth is known. Subscripts can be interchanged if y1 is desired and y2 is known.
Equation 12.4 can also be expressed in terms of the Froude number:
y2
y1
1 1 8Fr12
(12.5)
y1
y2
1 1 8Fr2 2
(12.6)
or
The energy lost in the jump can be determined having solved for the depths by writing
the energy equation between sections 1 and 2
y1
V12
V2
y2 2 hL
2g
2g
52
(12.7)
0.4648
(orifice equation)
(12.8)
Experimental Procedure:
This lab will use a rectangular flume provided with a flow measuring device. By
allowing water under a sluice gate and raising an obstruction at the downstream end of
the flume, we will cause a hydraulic jump to occur at one flow rate. We can then
measure y1, y2, and discharge for the jump Q. So, by using any two of these parameters
(y1, y2, and Q), we can find the third from one using 12.2 and 12.3 and compare the
theoretical value to the measured value.
The selected values for y1 and y2 should be away from the jump where the depth is not
changing. Theoretically, these two depths are the normal channel depths before and after
the jump happens, so they should be taken where they are near constant values on either
side of the jump.
Data Collection:
Units
Orifice Manometer Reading*
Channel width
Upstream depth
Downstream Depth
Required In-Class Calculation Set
This should be done like an extended set of sample calculations with a narrative. Dont
forget to list the equations used before numbers are substituted into it.
1) State known parameters and measured parameters.
2) Calculate Q using both:
Using the estimate of discharge calculated from orifice plate equation and measured y1
and y2 values
3) Calculate the Velocity and Froude Number at each section (Upstream and
Downstream).
4) Calculate the head loss across the jump.
5) State any observations about the results.
53
If the percent difference was less than 2%, finish the calculations with a y1 value 2%
higher than the measured value. If the error was greater than 2%, use the calculated y1
value for the final steps. This will show the sensitivity of the final numbers to errors.
7) Re-calculate velocity and Froude Number at point 1.
8) Re-calculate the head loss across the jump.
9) Comment on your observations and calculations.
54