Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To examine in depth on the validity of Bernoullis theorem when applied to the steady
flow of water in tapered circular duct.
To measure the flow rates and both static and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent
or divergent tube of known geometry for a range of steady flow rate.
To investigate the effect of flow rate on head loss in a flowing system.
To calculate the fluctuation between theoretical velocity head & practical velocity head
Experimental Setup:
Bernoullis Theorem demonstration unit consists of:
Hydraulic Bench
Discharge pipe
Piezometer
Pitot tube
Stop watch
Venture tube with 6 measurement points
Probe for measuring overall pressure (can be moved axially)
Hose connection, water supply
A schematic diagram of the experimental setup is given below in Figure 1
Observed Data:
Room temperature 29C
Water density at 29C= 996 kg/m3 [Franzini & Finnemore, SI mertric edn , Page-571]
Table 01: Observed data in Piezometer and Pitot tube for flow rate-1,2&3
Diameter
Observation
No
Tube
No
of cross
section
Total Head
(mm)
(mm)
Velocity
Head (mm)
Time
(sec)
(kg)
(mm)
Mass of
(Water+
Bucket)
25
320
325
13.9
305
325
20
11.8
290
320
30
10.7
280
315
35
10.0
270
310
40
25
275
285
10
25
345
350
13.9
325
350
25
11.8
300
350
50
10.7
290
345
55
10.0
245
345
100
25
280
295
15
25
365
370
13.9
330
370
40
11.8
300
370
70
10.7
280
365
85
10
320
365
140
25
305
300
25
3.6
30
3.7
30
4.6
30
Calculated Data:
Table 2: Table for calculated data for different head
No of
Volumetric Cross
observations Flow rate
Sectional
Area
Velocity
Theoretical Practical
Velocity
Velocity
Head
Head
Theoretical
Total
Head
490.87
200.32
2.045
322.045
Practical
Total
Head
(from
pitot tube
Reading)
V2/2g+
P2/g +Z
(mm)
H2O
325
V2/2g
(mm)
H2O
V2/2g+
P2/g +Z
(mm)
H2O
151.75
647.98
21.40
20
326.40
325
109.36
899.15
41.21
30
331.21
320
89.92
1093.53
60.94
35
340.94
315
78.53
1251.97
79.89
40
349.89
310
490.87
200.32
2.045
10
277.05
285
490.87
207.12
2.186
347.186
350
151.75
669.99
22.88
25
347.88
350
109.36
929.69
44.05
50
344.05
350
89.92
1130.67
65.16
55
355.16
345
78.53
1294.50
85.40
100
330.41
345
490.87
207.12
2.186
15
282.186
295
490.87
268.23
3.67
368.67
370
151.75
867.69
38.37
40
368.37
370
109.36
1204.02
73.88
70
373.88
370
89.92
1464.29
109.28
85
389.285
365
78.53
1676.47
143.25
140
368.25
365
490.87
268.23
3.67
25
278.67
300
V (mm/s)
V
(mm3)
98300
101670
131670
A
(mm2)
V2/2g
(mm)
H2O
Sample Calculation:
Sample calculation for third observation:
Calculation of volumetric flow rate:
Mass of the bucket with water =4.6 kg
Mass of the empty bucket =0.65 kg
Mass of water, m= 3.95 Kg
Time of flow, t = 30.0 s
m
3.95
30.0
= 0.132 kgs
0.132
996
= 1.31610-4 m3 s = 131670
Velocity calculation:
For diameter, a:
Diameter, D =25.0 103 m
Area, A=
D2
4
= 4.91 10-4 m2
v
=
A
Velocity, V =
1.31610-4
4.9110-4
For diameter, b:
Diameter, D =13.9 10-3 m
Area, A=
D2
4
= 1.5210-4 m2
v
Velocity, V = A =
1.31610-4
1.5210-4
For diameter, c:
Diameter, D =11.810-3 m
Area, A=
D2
4
= 1.0910-4 m2
v
Velocity, V =A =
1.31610-4
1.0910-4
For diameter, d:
Diameter, D =10.710-3 m
Area, A=
D2
4
= 0.89910-4 m2
v
Velocity, V =A =
1.31610-4
0.89910-4
For diameter, e:
Diameter, D =10.010-3 m
Area, A=
D2
4
= 0.78510-4 m2
v
Velocity, V =A =
1.31610-4
0.78510-4
=1.676ms-1 = 1676.47/
For diameter, f:
Diameter, D =25.010-3 m
Area, A=
D2
4
= 4.9110-4 m2
v
Velocity, V =A =
1.31610-4
4.9110-4
v2
(268.02)2
Velocity head =
= 29.811000 m = 3.67 mm
2g
P
v2 P
Total head, H= (
+ +z) = (3.67 +365 ) mm = 368.67 mm
2g g
For cross sectional diameter, b
Velocity head,
v2
=
2g
(865.789)2
29.811000
=38.21 mm
v2
=
2g
(1204.02)2
29.811000
P
= 73.88 mm
v2
=
2g
(1464.29)2
29.811000
= 109.28 mm
v2
=
2g
(1676.47)2
29.811000
= 143.25 mm
v2
=
2g
(268.02)2
29.811000
= 3.66 mm
Result:
The theoretical and experimental values are very much close to each other. So we can say that
the Bernoullis theorem is valid for steady flow of ideal fluids.
Graphical Representation:
Flow Rate vs Head Loss
140000
130000
120000
Flow Rate
110000
100000
90000
1
11
16
Head Loss
Here head loss is actually the difference between theoretical total head that we have got from the
volumetric flow rate and calculated total head that we have got from the manometer levels. It is
evident from the graph that as the flow rate increases the head loss between two different point
also increases. With increase in velocity frictional losses like contraction and expansion at the
converging & diverging path increases. Thats why head loss also increases.
Discussions:
Bernoullis theorem states that, for a frictionless ideal fluid flowing through a system the total energy
entering a system is equal to the total energy coming out of the system. So the assumptions in this
theorem are,
The fluid have to be an ideal one.
Though the experiment was done very carefully and properly, there is some discrepancy in the result.
The total head was not same in different points. The possible reasons are-
Directional velocity fluctuation due to turbulence increase pitot tube readings and
hence we got large value of total head.
A large head loss occurs at the entrance of the pitot tube due to sudden
contraction.
Expansion loss: In sudden expansion there is a state of excessive turbulence. The
loss due to sudden expansion is greater than the loss due to a corresponding
contraction. This is so because of the inherent instability of flow in expansion
where the diverging path of the flow tend to encourage the formation of eddies
within the flow. In converging flow there is a dampening effect on eddy formation
and hence loss is less than diverging flow. It is reflected by the drastic decrease
of total head in following figure .
There was a leak in the venturi tube which induced clogging in the flow and some error
occurred as a result.
The piezometer readings were fluctuating continuously during the experiment due to
unsteady supply of the flowing system by the pump. Since capillarity makes water rise in
piezometer tube, it introduce some error in the calculation of the static head.
However ,it is also have to be noted that there might have been some human (parallax
error while taking reading of manometer levels) and unintentional errors done in the
experiment like misreading stop watch and volume meter which might have given us
some deviated results from the actual results.
Now ,let us talk about some of remedies to eradicate all those discrepancies and
application of Bernoullis theorem:
Recommendations:
However, the results can be improved if some precautions are taken during the
experiment for example the eyes level must be placed parallel to the scale when
manometer readings are taken. Besides that, the valve is also needed to be
controlled slowly to stabilize the water level in the manometer. The human
reaction error while noting the time using a stop watch can be avoided by using
light gates to give out highly accurate results for the time measured.