Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5
Foundation
considerations
In a city development there are several key issues that must
be considered. Neighbouring and adjoining structures may
require permanent or temporary support during the demolition
and reconstruction works. Highways and utilities may similarly
be sensitive to ground movement arising from demolition
and construction activity due to the effect of both short and
long term heave or settlement. The level of the existing
groundwater will also influence the method of retaining wall
construction (see 6.5.4).
The unloading and reloading of the existing sub soils has the
potential to influence a wide area and the amount of heave
and settlement needs to be predicted over time to provide
assurances that neighbouring properties, highways and utilities
will not be impaired. This will require an assessment of the
existing and proposed loading.
The presence of a high groundwater table is an important
consideration with regard to foundation construction.
Construction problems can arise from the ingress of water. The
selection of the method of construction must take account of
the presence of the existing retaining walls and foundations,
the need to limit ground movements and the practical limits on
the structural performance of the walls themselves.
6.5.1
Existing foundations
6.5.3
Groundwater
6.5.2
Made ground
The structure will not be founded on Made Ground as the
proposed basement formation level will likely be in the Kempton
Park Terrace Gravel or below the London Clay horizon. If local
shallow foundations are required then the made ground will
be removed and replaced with a more appropriate formation
material.
6.5.4
Basement box
It is at present understood that the existing basement will be
deepened and extended.
The construction of the proposed basement will present an
engineering challenge likely to require the use of embedded
retaining walls (sheet piling, secant piling or skin walls) to
provide temporary and permanent lateral support to the ground.
Existing neighbouring foundations may complicate these issues
and therefore careful consideration of the construction sequence
will be required to mitigate these risks.
6.5.5
Spread foundations
6.5.6
Piling
6.5.8
Trees
6.5.7
Contamination and foundation
construction
6.6
Construction within
Archaeological
remains
The archaeological sensitivity of the site is unknown and the
Client requires confirmation by the Local Authority and other
releavant bodies, such as Museum Of London Archaeology
(MOLA) as to the impotance of the site. It should be noted
that there is already basement beneath a large portion of the
existing structure which is probably founded in the terrace
gravels and may have voided any remains previously in-situ.
In general, there are engineering principles to reduce the impact
of construction on the archaeological heritage
Heave can take place in a clay soil when moisture content rises.
Swell occurs after the removal of a tree. This can also happen
beneath the building if parts of the tree roots are damaged
during construction works.
7
Environmental
assessment
7.1
Introduction
hhhhh
7.2
Statutory
information
Heavy industries
Electric substations, power stations, gas works, etc.
Chemical plants and facilities utilising aggresive chemicals
Landfill sites, recycling or disposal sites
Railway sidings
Works including finishing processes (plating, painting, etc.)
Fuel storage facilities, garages, etc.
Former mining sites
Ministry of Defence sites
Timber treatment works
Sewer farms or sewage treatment plants
During a site walkover, suspect soils may be identified by sight
and olfactory observations provided the soils are accessible.
Some obvious signs of contamination include, but are not limited
to:
Soil discolouration
Unusual or different soil texture
Unusual odour
Standing water or trench with hydrocarbon sheen
Abandoned industrial waste such as drums or asbestos
sheeting
None of the above was recorded during the site visit, although
it is noted that the majority of areas are currently covered by
hardstanding.
Water:
Statutory controls:
Waste:
the homes are above the action level. BRE document 211:
Radon, Guidance on Protective Measure for New Dwellings
- 1999
7.3
Water quality
fdfdfdfdf
7.4
Contamination from
unexploded bombs
7.5
Radon
tyhtytytytytyty
7.6
Land Contamination
Assessment
The London Bomb Damage maps indicate that bombs did fall
on and around the site giving an elevated risk that UXO will be
found. Common forms of contamination from unexploded bombs
include:
7.6.1
Potential contamination sources
Potential contamination sources and their form (solid, liquid, and
gas) are presented below;
Order Details
Fig. 31: MOD WWII Bomb Damage Map
Order Number:
42870253_1_1
Customer Ref:
3290 - 202-222 King's Road
National Grid Reference: 527310, 178180
A
Slice:
7.6.2
Potential contamination
migration
If potentially polluting activities have taken place historically
at a site, the hazard to human and/or environmental receptors
will be increased if significant pathways are, or were historically
present on or beneath the site along which contaminants
can preferentially migrate. Pathways can be anthropogenic
(artificial) or natural.
7.6.3
Potential receptors
The potential receptors identified could be one of the following
categories:
7.6.2.1
Potential natural pathways
7.6.2.2
Potential anthropogenic pathways
Anthropogenic pathways for contaminant migration can be
present in the form of soakaways, land drains, etc. Leaking
surface water or foul drainage pipes and permeable backfill to
the trenches containing services could also act as preferential
pathways for potential contaminant migration.
Given the anticipated high ground water levels, it is unlikely
that soakaways and other ground infiltration systems were
historically present at the site. It is probable that surface water
and foul water are carried from the site in the public sewage
and highway drainage systems. It should be noted that that
a survey of on-site drains was not undertaken as part of this
investigation.
7.7
Summary and
recommendations
Humans
Property
Controlled Waters
Potential sources
Pathways
Risk
Justification/Mitigation
Direct contact,
ingestion, inhalation
Moderate
Construction workers
Contaminated soils
Direct contact,
ingestion, inhalation
Moderate
Ground gas
Inhalation
Low
Construction workers
Ground gas
Inhalation
Low
Direct contact,
ingestion, inhalation
Medium
Construction workers
Asbestos
Direct contact,
ingestion, inhalation
Medium
Contaminated soils
and ground gas
Migration through
soils
Low
Watercourses
Contaminated soils
and groundwater
Soil leaching
and migration of
contamination
Low
Contaminated soils
and groundwater
Rainfall infiltration,
soil leaching and
migration of
contamination
Low
Human Health
Property
On site structures
Controlled waters