Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document No:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
Revision:
Revision Date:
20 October 2014
Copy No:
IP Security:
Public
Table of Contents
Terminology, Definitions and Abbreviations .......................................................................................... 10
1.0
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 22
1.1
Proponent................................................................................................................................ 22
1.2
Project ..................................................................................................................................... 22
1.3
Location................................................................................................................................... 22
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
2.0
3.0
1.6.1
1.6.2
Requirements .......................................................................................................... 27
1.6.3
1.6.4
1.6.5
Regulatory Framework............................................................................................................ 34
2.2
Location................................................................................................................................... 37
3.2
3.3
Mobilisation ............................................................................................................................. 39
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.6.2
Rock-bolting ............................................................................................................. 42
3.6.3
3.7
3.8
3.9
Pre-commissioning ................................................................................................................. 44
Climate..................................................................................................................... 47
4.1.2
Oceanography ......................................................................................................... 47
Public
Page v
Uncontrolled when Printed
4.2
4.3
5.0
4.1.3
Bathymetry ...............................................................................................................47
4.1.4
Topography ..............................................................................................................48
4.1.5
4.1.6
Biological Environment............................................................................................................49
4.2.1
4.2.2
Fauna .......................................................................................................................64
4.3.2
4.3.3
4.3.4
Commercial Shipping...............................................................................................89
4.3.5
4.3.6
Overview .................................................................................................................................91
5.2
5.3
5.4
Physical Presence.................................................................................................................113
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.4.1
5.4.2
5.4.3
5.4.4
5.5.2
5.5.3
5.5.4
5.5.5
Erosion ...................................................................................................................130
5.5.6
Shipwrecks ............................................................................................................131
5.6.2
5.7.2
Biofouling ...............................................................................................................133
5.7.3
Page vi
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
5.9
5.8.1
5.8.2
5.8.3
5.8.4
5.9.2
5.9.3
5.10.2
5.10.3
6.0
7.0
5.11.1
5.11.2
Loss of Equipment and Materials from Flooding of the Work Area ....................... 158
5.11.3
5.11.4
Fire.........................................................................................................................159
6.2
6.3
6.4
7.2
7.3
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline Documentation ........... 165
7.3.2
7.3.3
7.3.4
7.3.5
7.3.6
7.4
7.5
Public
Page vii
Uncontrolled when Printed
7.5.2
7.6
7.7
8.0
External Auditing....................................................................................................169
Pre-Installation Survey...........................................................................................170
7.6.2
7.6.3
Reporting ...............................................................................................................................171
7.7.1
7.7.2
7.7.3
7.7.4
7.8
7.9
References .....................................................................................................................................176
Appendix 1
List of Tables
Table 1-1 Requirements of this Plan .........................................................................................................27
Table 2-1 Western Australian Legislative Requirements ..........................................................................34
Table 2-2 Commonwealth Legislative Requirements ................................................................................35
Table 3-1 Indicative Schedule of Activities ................................................................................................46
Table 4-1 Vegetation Associations Identified in the Intertidal Zone ..........................................................55
Table 4-2 Protected Dolphin Species that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline .................65
Table 4-3 Protected Whale Species that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline ...................66
Table 4-4 Protected Marine Turtles that are Likely to Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline .......68
Table 4-5 Proximity of Turtle Nesting Beaches in the Great Sandy and Passage Islands Groups to
the DomGas Pipeline Route .................................................................................................69
Table 4-6 Protected Sharks that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline ................................73
Table 4-7 Avifauna Species Observed in Proximity to the DomGas Pipeline Route in the Great
Sandy and Passage Islands Groups ....................................................................................74
Table 4-8 Protected Avifauna that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline .............................78
Table 5-1 Risk Levels and Risk Tolerability1 .............................................................................................93
Table 5-2 Risk Register .............................................................................................................................95
Table 5-3 Potential Stressors to Marine Turtles During Installation of the DomGas Pipeline .................112
Table 5-4 Potential Spill Scenarios..........................................................................................................151
Table 5-5 Spill Response Capability........................................................................................................153
Table 6-1 Objectives, Performance Standards and Relevant Documentation ........................................161
Table 7-1 Incident Reporting Requirements ............................................................................................173
Page viii
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
List of Figures
Figure 1-1 Location of the Greater Gorgon Area ...................................................................................... 23
Figure 1-2 Location of the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline .............................. 24
Figure 1-3
Figure 1-4 Deliverable Development, Review, and Approval Flow Chart ................................................. 32
Figure 3-1 Location of the DomGas Pipeline ............................................................................................ 38
Figure 4-1 Benthic Habitat Mapping for the DomGas Pipeline at Barrow Island ...................................... 50
Figure 4-2 Benthic Habitat Mapping along the DomGas Pipeline between Barrow Island and the
Mainland ............................................................................................................................... 51
Figure 4-3 Benthic Habitat Mapping for the DomGas Pipeline near the Mainland Shore-Crossing ......... 52
Figure 4-4 Photographs of Vegetation Associations Identified in the Intertidal Zone ............................... 58
Figure 4-5 DomGas Pipeline Vegetation Mapping within the Intertidal Zone ........................................... 63
Figure 4-6 Flatback Turtle Internesting Tracks from Barrow Island for 20072011 near the DomGas
Pipeline Route ...................................................................................................................... 70
Figure 4-7 Remnants of Ballast Rock from Maceys Wreck amongst Mangroves near the DomGas
Pipeline Shore-crossing ....................................................................................................... 84
Figure 4-8 Cultural Heritage Sites along the DomGas Pipeline Route within the Intertidal Zone ............. 86
Figure 4-9 Conservation Areas within the Region of the DomGas Pipeline ............................................. 88
Figure 5-1 Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix .......................................................................... 92
Figure 5-2 Marine Disturbance Footprint for the DomGas Pipeline ........................................................ 111
Figure 5-3 Indicative Anchoring Touch-Down Distance and Seabed Disturbance ................................. 120
Figure 5-4 Typical 8-point Mooring Pattern for Shallow Water and Deep Water Pipelay Barges........... 120
Figure 5-5 Indicative Anchoring Areas near Barrow Island ..................................................................... 121
Figure 5-6 Indicative Anchoring Areas near the Mainland Shore-Crossing ............................................ 122
Figure 5-7 Typical Mooring Pattern for the Deep Water Pipelay Barge near Coral at the Barrow
Island Jetty ......................................................................................................................... 124
Figure 5-8 Typical Mooring Pattern for the Deep Water Pipelay Barge at Coral Pinnacle near
Barrow Island...................................................................................................................... 125
Figure 5-9 Typical Mooring Pattern for the Deep Water Pipelay Barge at Coral Pinnacle along
Offshore DomGas Pipeline Route ...................................................................................... 126
Figure 5-10 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 200 m3 Diesel Spill at KP 0
during Winter Months .........................................................................................................142
Figure 5-11 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 2.5 m3 Fuel Oil Spill at KP 25
during Winter Months .........................................................................................................143
Figure 5-12 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 200 m3 Fuel Oil Spill at KP 25
during Winter Months .........................................................................................................144
Figure 5-13 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 2.5 m3 Diesel Spill at KP 50
during Winter Months .........................................................................................................145
Figure 5-14
Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 200 m3 Diesel Spill at KP 50
during Winter Months .........................................................................................................146
Public
Page ix
Uncontrolled when Printed
ABU
ADIOS
AEMT
AFC
AHD
AIC
ALARP
AMOSC
AMSA
APASA
APIA
APPEA
AQIS
ARI
AS
Australian Standard
ASBU
ASS
ASSMP
Page 10
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
At risk
ATV
Avifauna
Bathymetric
Benthic
Biocide
Biofouling
Biomass
BOD
Bombora
BRUV
Bund
Caisson
CAMBA
Cetacean
CFCs
Chlorofluorocarbons
CH4
Methane
Chevron Australia
CITES
CO
Carbon monoxide
CO2
Carbon dioxide
Public
Page 11
Uncontrolled when Printed
Construction
CPMM
CS1
Cth
Commonwealth of Australia
DBNGP
DEC
Demersal
DER
Diurnal
Daily
DMP
DomGas
Domestic Gas
DoT
DotE
DPaW
Easement
Ebb Tide
The period between high tide and the next low tide in which the
sea is receding.
Ecological Element
EIS/ERMP
EMP
Page 12
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Endemic
Environmental Harm
EP Act
EPA
EPBC Act
Commonwealth Environment
Conservation Act 1999
EPBC Reference:
2003/1294
EPBC Reference:
2005/2184
EPBC Reference:
2008/4178
EPCM
ERT
Flood Tide
The period between low tide and the next high tide in which the
sea is rising.
g/m2
Geotextile
GIS
Greenhouse Gases
Ground Truth
ha
Hectare
Habitat
Public
Protection
and
Biodiversity
Page 13
Uncontrolled when Printed
Hatchling
HCFC
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons
HES
Hot Work
Hydrocarbons
Hydrotest
IBC
IMO
ISO
IUCN
JAMBA
JHA
KJVG
km
Kilometre
KP
Kilometre Point
kVa
Kilovolt-ampere
Litre
Light Attenuation
Littoral
A shore; the zone between high tide and low tide; of, or related to
the shore, especially the seashore.
LNG
Page 14
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Metre
m/s
m2
Square metres
m3
Cubic metres
Macroalgae
Macro-invertebrates
Management Triggers
Marine Disturbance
Footprint
Marine Facilities
LNG Jetty
MARPOL
Material Environmental
Harm
MDF
Public
Page 15
Uncontrolled when Printed
Megafauna
MEPC
Metrology
mg/L
mm
Millimetre
MOF
MOPP
MSDS
MTPA
NDT
Non-destructive Testing
Neap Tide
A less than average tide occurring at the first and third quarters of
the moon.
Nearshore
Neritic
The neritic zone, also called the sublittoral zone, is the part of the
ocean extending from the low tide mark to the edge of the
continental shelf, with a relatively shallow depth of <150 m in
north-western Australia.
NIS
Non-indigenous species
nm
Nautical miles
NOx
NTU
NZS
ODS
OE
Operational Excellence
OEMS
OSA
OSMP
Page 16
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
OSRL
Oxygen Scavenger
Ozone Depleting
Substances
Include:
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
Halon
Carbon tetrachloride
Methyl chloroform
Hydrobromofluorocarbons (HBFCs)
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
Methyl bromide
Bromochloromethane (BCM)
PASS
Pelagic
PER
Performance Standards
Pig
PMMC
POWBONS
ppb
Practicable
Public
Page 17
Uncontrolled when Printed
Priority Flora
PVC
Polyvinylchloride
QMS
Recfishwest
Reference Site
Rehabilitation
Reinstatement
ROKAMBA
ROV
ROW
RPS BBG
Seagrass
Serious Environmental
Harm
b)
Sessile
SEWPaC
Former
Commonwealth
Department
of
Sustainability,
Environment, Water, Population and Communities
Page 18
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
S-lay
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
SOPEP
spp.
Species (plural)
Spring Tide
The highest tides in a lunar month, occurring near new and full
moons.
SSC
State Waters
Stinger
Stringing
Substrate
Surficial
TAPL
TBC
To be confirmed
TDF
Public
Page 19
Uncontrolled when Printed
Terrestrial Disturbance
Footprint (TDF)
Terrestrial Facilities
Topsides
TPH
Turbidity
UN
United Nations
Vegetation Association
VOC
WA
Western Australia
WAFIC
WAPET
WAPET Landing
Water Winning
Wet buckle
Page 20
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Wetsides
Public
Page 21
Uncontrolled when Printed
1.0
Introduction
1.1
Proponent
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd (Chevron Australia) is the proponent and the person taking the action
for the Gorgon Gas Development on behalf of the following companies (collectively known as
the Gorgon Joint Venturers):
pursuant to Statement No. 800 and EPBC Reference: 2003/1294 and 2008/4178.
Chevron Australia is also the proponent and the person taking the action for the Jansz Feed
Gas Pipeline on behalf of the Gorgon Joint Venturers, pursuant to Statement No. 769, and
EPBC Reference: 2005/2184.
1.2
Project
Chevron Australia proposes to develop the gas reserves of the Greater Gorgon Area (Figure
1-1).
Subsea gathering systems and subsea pipelines will be installed to deliver feed gas from the
Gorgon and JanszIo gas fields to the west coast of Barrow Island. The feed gas pipeline
system will be buried as it traverses from the west coast to the east coast of the Island where
the system will tie in to the Gas Treatment Plant located at Town Point. The Gas Treatment
Plant will comprise three Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) trains capable of producing a nominal
capacity of five Million Tonnes Per Annum (MTPA) per train. The Gas Treatment Plant will also
produce condensate and domestic gas. Carbon dioxide (CO2), which occurs naturally in the
feed gas, will be separated during the production process. As part of the Gorgon Gas
Development, Chevron Australia will inject the separated CO2 into deep formations below
Barrow Island. The LNG and condensate will be loaded from a dedicated jetty offshore from
Town Point and then transported by dedicated carriers to international markets. Gas for
domestic use will be exported by a pipeline from Town Point to the domestic gas collection and
distribution network on the mainland (Figure 1-2).
1.3
Location
The Gorgon gas field is located approximately 130 km and the JanszIo field approximately
200 km off the north-west coast of Western Australia. Barrow Island is located off the Pilbara
coast 85 km north-north-east of the town of Onslow and 140 km west of Karratha.
The domestic gas pipeline (DomGas pipeline) extends approximately 60 km offshore from the
LNG Jetty on the east coast of Barrow Island to the mainland shore-crossing, approximately
90 km north-east of Onslow and 120 km south-east of Karratha. On the mainland, the DomGas
pipeline extends parallel and adjacent to the existing Apache easement, through a 12 km
intertidal zone and an 18 km onshore area to a meter station and then approximately 1.5 km to
the tie-in to the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline (DBNGP).
Page 22
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Public
Page 23
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 1-2 Location of the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline
Page 24
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
1.4
Environmental Approvals
The initial Gorgon Gas Development was assessed through an Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Review and Management Programme (EIS/ERMP) assessment
process (Chevron Australia 2005, 2006).
The initial Gorgon Gas Development was approved by the Western Australian State Minister for
the Environment on 6 September 2007 by way of Ministerial Implementation Statement No. 748
(Statement No. 748) and the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment and Water
Resources on 3 October 2007 (EPBC Reference: 2003/1294).
In May 2008, under section 45C of the Western Australian Environmental Protection Act 1986
(EP Act), the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) approved some minor changes to the
Gorgon Gas Development that it considered not to result in a significant, detrimental,
environmental effect in addition to, or different from, the effect of the original proposal
(EPA 2008). The approved changes are:
In September 2008, Chevron Australia sought both State and Commonwealth approval through
a Public Environment Review (PER) assessment process (Chevron Australia 2008) for the
Revised and Expanded Gorgon Gas Development to make some changes to Key Proposal
Characteristics of the initial Gorgon Gas Development, as outlined below:
addition of a five MTPA LNG train, increasing the number of LNG trains from two to
three
expansion of the CO2 Injection System, increasing the number of injection wells and
surface drill locations
extension of the causeway and the Materials Offloading Facility (MOF) into deeper
water.
The Revised and Expanded Gorgon Gas Development was approved by the Western Australian
State Minister for the Environment on 10 August 2009 by way of Ministerial Implementation
Statement No. 800 (Statement No. 800). Statement No. 800 also superseded Statement
No. 748 as the approval for the initial Gorgon Gas Development. Statement No. 800 therefore
provides approval for both the initial Gorgon Gas Development and the Revised and Expanded
Gorgon Gas Development, which together are known as the Gorgon Gas Development.
Amendments to Statement No. 800 Conditions 18, 20 and 21 under Section 46 of the EP Act
were approved by the Western Australian State Minister for the Environment on 7 June 2011 by
way of Ministerial Implementation Statement No. 865 (Statement No. 865).
However,
implementation of the Gorgon Gas Development will continue to be in accordance with
Statement No. 800.
On 26 August 2009, the then Commonwealth Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the
Arts issued approval for the Revised and Expanded Gorgon Gas Development (EPBC
Reference: 2008/4178) and varied the conditions for the initial Gorgon Gas Development
(EPBC Reference: 2003/1294).
Since the Revised and Expanded Gorgon Gas Development was approved, further minor
changes have also been made and/or approved to the Gorgon Gas Development and are now
also part of the Development. Further changes may also be made/approved in the future. This
Plan relates to any such changes, and where necessary this document will be specifically
revised to address the impacts of those changes.
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 25
Uncontrolled when Printed
The Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline was assessed via Environmental Impact Statement/Assessment
on Referral Information (ARI) and EPBC Referral assessment processes (Mobil Australia 2005,
2006).
The Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline was approved by the Western Australian State Minister for the
Environment on 28 May 2008 by way of Ministerial Implementation Statement No. 769
(Statement No. 769) and the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment and Water
Resources on 22 March 2006 (EPBC Reference: 2005/2184).
This Plan covers the Gorgon Gas Development as approved under Statement No. 800 and as
approved by EPBC Reference: 2003/1294 and EPBC Reference: 2008/4178.
1.5
This Plan has been prepared to ensure that the installation and pre-commissioning of the
DomGas pipeline as described in Section 3.0 is conducted in a manner that protects
environmental values and reduces impacts to the environment as far as practicable.
The scope of this Plan covers the installation of the DomGas pipeline, offshore from the LNG
Jetty on the east coast of Barrow Island to the Australian mainland shore-crossing, and within
the intertidal zone on the mainland.
Onshore installation of the DomGas pipeline and meter station is addressed in the Mainland
Onshore Domestic Gas Pipeline Environmental Management Plan (Chevron Australia 2011a, as
amended from time to time).
1.6
Petroleum Legislation
This Plan is presented for approval/acceptance under the Western Australian (WA) Petroleum
(Submerged Lands) Act 1982.
This Plan is also required under Condition 7 of the DomGas Onshore Pipeline Licence (PL 92)
and Condition 7 of the DomGas Offshore Pipeline Licence (TPL/24).
1.6.1.2
This Plan is required under Condition 23.1 of Statement No. 800, which is quoted below:
23.1) Prior to the commencement of construction of the Feed Gas Pipeline System and
Domestic Gas Pipeline respectively, the Proponent shall prepare and submit to the Minister
an Offshore Gas Pipeline Installation Management Plan (the Plan) that meets the objectives
set out in Condition 23.3 and the requirements set out in Condition 23.4, as determined by
the Minister.
1.6.1.3
This Plan satisfies the requirements of Condition 16.1 of EPBC Reference: 2003/1294 and
2008/4178, which is quoted below:
16.1) Prior to commencement of installation of the Feed Gas Pipeline System in State
waters and Domestic Gas Pipeline respectively, the person taking the action must submit to
the Minister, for approval, an Offshore Gas Pipeline Installation Management Plan (the
Plan) that meets the objectives and requirements set out in this Condition.
Page 26
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
1.6.2 Requirements
The requirements of this Plan, as stated in Statement No. 800, EPBC Reference: 2003/1294
and 2008/4178, are listed in Table 1-1.
EPBC
Reference:
2003/1294
and
2008/4178
Condition
No.
Requirements
Section
Reference in this
Plan
23.2
Section 1.6.4
23.4 (i)
Section 5.0
23.4 (ii)
Section 5.0
23.4 (iii)
Section 6.0
23.5 (i)
Section 5.5.3
23.5 (ii)
Section 5.5.1.1
23.5 (iii)
Sections 5.4.1,
5.4.2, and 5.4.3
23.5 (iv)
Section 7.6
23.5 (v)
Section 5.5.2
23.5 (vi)
Section 5.5.2
23.5 (vii)
23.5 (viii)
Section 5.9.3
23.5 (ix)
Section 7.6.2
3.2.1
Section 4.2.2
3.2.2
Sections 5.4.1,
5.4.2, and 5.4.3
Public
Page 27
Uncontrolled when Printed
Ministerial
Condition
Condition
No.
Section
Reference in this
Plan
Requirements
3.2.3
Sections 5.4.1,
5.4.2, and 5.4.3
3.2.4
Not a requirement
3.2.5
Not a requirement
3.2.6
Not a requirement
3.2.7
Section 7.7
16.2
Section 1.6.4
16.4 (I)
Section 5.0
16.4 (II)
Section 5.0
16.4 (III)
Section 6.0
16.5 (I)
Section 5.5.3
16.5 (II)
Section 5.5.1.1
16.5 (III)
Sections 5.4.1,
5.4.2, and 5.4.3
16.5 (IV)
Section 7.6
16.5 (V)
Section 5.5.2
16.5 (VI)
Section 5.5.2
16.5 (VII)
16.5 (VIII)
Section 5.9.3
16.5 (IX)
Section 7.6.2
Page 28
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Any matter specified in this Plan is relevant to the Gorgon Gas Development only if that matter
relates to the specific activities or facilities associated with that particular development.
Public
Page 29
Uncontrolled when Printed
This Plan
Figure 1-3
Note: Figure 1-3 refers to all Plans required for Statement No. 800. The Plans are only relevant to EPBC Reference: 2003/1294 and 2008/4178, if required for the conditions of those
approvals.
Page 30
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Independent Reviewers: Mark Bailey, Director, Oceanica, reviewed this Plan and his
comments were be incorporated or otherwise resolved.
Western Australian Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP): DMP have reviewed
draft revisions of this Plan along with the feedback of the independent reviewers. DMPs
comments have been incorporated or otherwise resolved.
Figure 1-4 shows the development, review and approval process for this Plan.
Additionally, consultations and/or notifications have been undertaken with the following
stakeholders, and will continue as required:
Apache Energy
Austral Fisheries
Shire of Roebourne
Public
Page 31
Uncontrolled when Printed
Scoping and
Development of
Deliverable
Resolution of DEC,
SEWPaC and DMP
Review Comments by
Independent Expert
Reviewer (if required)
Draft Deliverable
Issue
Revise
Comments
Draft Deliverable
Issue
Revise
Comments
Draft Deliverable
Issue
Report
Issue
Finalise Deliverable
Report
Final deliverable Issued for Ministerial (DEC, SEWPaC and DMP) Approval
Page 32
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
1.7
Section 2.0 summarises the legislative framework and relevant legislation applicable to
the proposed installation activities.
Section 4.0 summarises the existing environment in the vicinity of the proposed
installation activities.
Section 5.0 assesses the environmental risk associated with the proposed installation
activities.
Section 7.0 details the implementation strategy to manage the impacts of the proposed
installation activities.
Public
Page 33
Uncontrolled when Printed
2.0
2.1
Regulatory Framework
This section briefly summarises the legal framework applicable to the proposed installation
activities. Key State and Commonwealth legislative requirements are outlined in Table 2-1 and
Table 2-2.
Coverage
Administering
Authority
Aboriginal Heritage
Act 1972
Department of
Indigenous Affairs
Conservation and
Land Management
Act 1984
Department of
Environment and
Conservation
Environmental
Protection Act 1986
Department of
Environment and
Conservation
Maritime
Archaeology Act
1973
Western Australian
Maritime Museum
Petroleum
(Submerged Lands)
Act 1982
Department of Mines
and Petroleum
Pollution of Waters
by Oil & Noxious
Substances Act
1987
Department of Transport
Western Australian
Marine (Sea
Dumping) Act 1981
Department of Transport
Wildlife
Conservation Act
1950
Department of
Environment and
Conservation
Page 34
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
International Convention
Enacted
Administering
Authority
Environment
Protection and
Biodiversity
Conservation
Act 1999
(EPBC Act)
1992 Convention on
Biological Diversity and
Agenda 21
Convention on International
Trade in Endangered
Species of Wildlife and Flora
1973 (CITES)
JapanAustralia Migratory
Birds Agreement 1974
(JAMBA)
ChinaAustralia Migratory
Birds Agreement 1986
(CAMBA)
Republic of KoreaAustralia
Migratory Birds Agreement
2006 (ROKAMBA)
Convention on Wetlands of
International Importance
especially waterfowl habitat
1971 (Ramsar Convention)
International Convention on
Whaling 1946
Convention on the
Conservation of Migratory
Species of Wild Animals
(Bonn Convention) 1979
Department of
the Environment
(DotE)
Environment
Protection
(Sea Dumping)
Act 1981
DotE
Historic
Shipwrecks
Act 1976
Convention on Conservation
of Nature in the South Pacific
1976
AustraliaNetherlands
Agreement concerning old
Dutch Shipwrecks 1972
Convention on Protection of
Underwater Cultural Heritage
2001
DotE
Navigation Act
1912
Department of
Infrastructure,
Transport
Ozone
Protection &
Synthetic
Greenhouse
Gas
Management
Act 1989
Montreal Protocol
United Nations (UN)
Framework Convention on
Climate Change 1992
DotE
Legislation
Public
Page 35
Uncontrolled when Printed
Legislation
Protection of
the Sea
(Harmful Antifouling
Systems) Act
2006
International Convention
Enacted
Coverage
Administering
Authority
Department of
Infrastructure,
Transport
Protection of
the Sea
(Prevention of
Pollution from
Ships) Act
1983
Department of
Infrastructure,
Transport
Quarantine Act
1908
Department of
Agriculture,
Fisheries and
Forestry
2.2
Codes of Practice
Codes that have been taken into consideration in preparing this Plan include the Australian
Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) Code of Environmental Practice
(APPEA 2008) and the Australian Pipeline Industry Association (APIA) Code of Environmental
Practice (APIA 2009). The Codes represent good industry practices in the petroleum industry.
Page 36
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
3.0
Description of Activities
3.1
Location
The DomGas pipeline will be a 20-inch diameter dry gas export line that will supply domestic
gas from the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline into the Dampier to
Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline.
The DomGas pipeline route includes:
an offshore pipeline section approximately 59.4 km long from the LNG Jetty on the east
coast of Barrow Island to the Australian mainland shore-crossing
an onshore pipeline section approximately 19.8 km long from the High Water Mark,
cross country to tie in to the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline south of
Compressor Station 1 (this component is addressed in the Mainland Onshore Domestic
Gas Pipeline Environmental Management Plan [Chevron Australia 2011a, as amended
from time to time]).
The offshore pipeline route traverses from the east coast of Barrow Island, in a south-easterly
direction to the mainland shore-crossing, approximately 90 km north-east of Onslow and 120 km
south-west of Karratha. From the mainland landfall, the pipeline route runs parallel and
adjacent to the existing Apache easement and the twin Sales Gas pipelines (see Figure 3-1).
Pipeline installation activities and locations along the offshore and intertidal pipeline routes are
described in Kilometre Points (KPs), where:
the offshore pipeline route extends from Offshore KP 0, at the Barrow Island LNG Jetty,
to Offshore KP 59.4, near the mainland shore-crossing
the intertidal pipeline route extends from Onshore KP 0 (Offshore KP 59.4), at the
mainland shore-crossing, to Onshore KP 12, at the High Water Mark.
Offshore pipelay activities are described as Shallow and Deep Water Pipelay, where:
Shallow Water Pipelay is from Offshore KP 48.4 to KP 59.4 at the mainland shorecrossing
Deep Water Pipelay is from Offshore KP 0 at the Barrow Island LNG Jetty to Offshore
KP 48.4.
Public
Page 37
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 38
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
3.2
Activity Overview
Installation of the DomGas pipeline includes these activities, which are described in the sections
following:
mobilisation of vessels, equipment, goods, materials, line pipe, and personnel to site
offshore pipelay:
rock-bolting
rock installation
pre-commissioning.
3.3
Mobilisation
To support the DomGas pipeline installation activities, vessels, equipment, goods, materials,
line pipe, and personnel will be mobilised to the site from overseas and local support bases.
Temporary pipe storage facilities may be located within the north-west region of Western
Australia, such as at Dampier, from which line pipe can be delivered to the intertidal zone and
offshore (if temporary storage of pipe is required).
Key vessels to be mobilised to site include a Shallow Water Pipelay Barge and a Deep Water
Pipelay Barge. These vessels will undertake pipelay and stabilisation activities, operating on 8point mooring and supported by anchor handling vessels.
Other ancillary vessels to support pipeline installation activities may include:
survey vessels
cargo vessels
crew boats
The current basis of design is to use the Shallow Water and Deep Water Pipelay Barges to
undertake trenching, jetting and rock-bolting activities (described in Section 3.6), following
offshore pipelay (described in Section 3.5). The Deep Water Pipelay Barge is also proposed to
be used as the accommodation support vessel for shallow water pipelay.
For contingency, in the event of schedule delays or breakdown of the Deep and Shallow Water
Pipelay Barges, alternative vessels for stabilisation and/or accommodation could be used if
required. A rock installation vessel may also be used if required (refer to Section 3.6).
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 39
Uncontrolled when Printed
Initially, construction personnel for the Shallow and Deep Water Pipelay Barges will be
mobilised from local support bases (e.g. Dampier). Subsequent crew transfers will then be via
crew boat to the Shallow Water Pipelay Barge, and via helicopter to the Deep Water Pipelay
Barge.
3.4
Pipeline Surveys
Geophysical and geotechnical surveys of the offshore DomGas pipeline route have been
undertaken for engineering and planning purposes. During construction, pre-lay, as-laid, and
as-built pipeline surveys will be undertaken along the offshore DomGas pipeline route.
Pre-lay surveys will be undertaken before commencing pipelay activities to confirm bathymetry
along the pipeline route and to identify any debris or other obstructions to pipelay. Pre-lay
surveys will also verify the location of the Apache pipelines and other existing facilities near the
pipeline route.
As-laid surveys will be undertaken following pipelay to ensure that the pipeline is adequately
supported and that it has been laid to the required alignment.
As-built surveys will be undertaken following the completion of all pipeline installation works.
Pre-lay, as-laid, and as-built surveys will be undertaken using side scan sonar and an echo
sounder. Remotely operated vehicle (ROV) mounted video and obstacle avoidance sonar may
be used at areas of interest.
3.5
Offshore Pipelay
Shallow and deep water pipelay will be undertaken predominantly using conventional S-lay
techniques.
Welding, non-destructive testing (NDT), and field joint coating of the pipeline will be undertaken
onboard the Shallow and Deep Water Pipelay Barges. Pipe support rollers and tensioners will
exist along the pipeline firing line and through pipe line-up, welding, NDT and field joint coating
stations.
There will be a continual cycle of preparing pipe joints, welding pipe joints, performing NDT on
the welds, repairing welds as necessary, applying field joint coating, and moving the Pipelay
Barge forward, one pipe joint at a time, along the pipeline route.
The DomGas pipeline will be laid on the seabed using stinger and roller support systems, which
can pivot and be adjusted to suit the pipelay profile.
Tensioners will be used to maintain the appropriate tension in the pipeline and will pay out one
joint at a time as the Pipelay Barge moves forward. The tension will be monitored to ensure that
the pipelay profile is maintained and that the pipeline is not overstressed or buckled.
A buckle detector may be connected via a wire cable to the inside of pipeline and be pulled
along as the Pipeline Barge moves ahead during pipelay. The buckle detector may be used to
verify that no buckling of the pipeline occurs.
Air divers and/or a ROV will be used to carry out regular inspections of the pipeline and stinger.
Page 40
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
At KP 48.4, the Shallow Water Pipelay Barge will lay down the pipeline for the Deep Water
Pipelay Barge to pick up and complete the tie-in.
3.6
For primary stabilisation, the DomGas pipeline will have concrete weight coating along the
offshore pipeline route (and in the intertidal zone from Onshore KP 0 to 0.3). For secondary
stabilisation, trenching, jetting, rock-bolting and potentially rock installation will be undertaken.
Public
Page 41
Uncontrolled when Printed
3.6.2 Rock-bolting
Rock-bolting of the DomGas pipeline will be undertaken from approximately Offshore KP 0 to
KP 38 following deep water pipelay.
Up to 1600 rock bolts will be installed either side of the pipeline. Each rock bolt consists of a
pair of piles connected by a steel frame. These are to be installed along the pipeline at
appropriate spacing to hold the pipeline in place on the seabed.
Rock bolts within the bellmouth at KP 38 will curve away from the pipeline centreline on both
sides, at a specified design radius. This will ensure that potential lateral movement of the
pipeline, when transitioning out from the fully restrained rock-bolted region, is controlled and
does not result in unacceptable pipe stresses. A second bellmouth may also be required at
KP 48 to control the pipeline stresses in the same manner, when it transitions out from the
trenched region. This will be confirmed at the completion of detailed engineering (also refer to
Section 3.6.3).
For the main rock-bolting region, minimum spacing is estimated to be approximately 10 m and
maximum spacing is approximately 40 m. For the bell mouth(s), the minimum spacing is
approximately 6 m.
For the installation of rock bolts, rock-bolt drilling rigs will be mobilised on the Deep Water
Pipelay Barge and/or Stabilisation Vessel. The rock-bolting rig will be positioned over the
pipeline (or adjacent to the pipeline in the bellmouth section) with diver assistance. Rock bolts
will then be drilled into the seabed rock, and the interlinking chain or beam connected (where
applicable). The rock bolt target drill depth will be less than 5 m. The rock-bolting rig will then
be repositioned to the next location along the pipeline route and repeat the process, until all
rock-bolting is complete.
During the drilling of rock bolts, grout will be used to fill the rock bolts and cement the rock bolts
into the seabed rock, filling any cavities in the drilled rock. Grout may also be used for free span
correction identified during pre-lay and as-laid pipeline surveys (as required), with grout bags
installed by divers beneath the pipeline.
From approximately KP 38.0 to KP 48.4, the DomGas pipeline will be laid directly on the
seabed.
the
the
the
the
Page 42
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
3.7
The Deep Water Pipelay Barge will install the riser for the DomGas pipeline on the Barrow
Island LNG jetty at KP 0.
Riser clamps will be pre-installed on the legs of Jetty Caisson T6. The riser and tie-in spool will
be assembled on the deck of the Deep Water Pipelay Barge, after metrology of the pipeline and
riser clamps is completed. Subsequently, the laid pipeline end will be lifted to the surface
alongside the Barge to remove the temporary head installed during pipelay.
The riser and tie-in spool will be lifted together using the Barges derrick crane and then welded
to the pipeline. The pipeline, riser and spool will be lowered to the seabed while positioning the
riser in the clamps. Divers will confirm that the riser is in location and will then close and tighten
all clamps.
After the completion of riser installation, concrete mattresses and pipeline protective casing will
be installed. Approximately 15 concrete mattresses will be installed at approximately KP 0 at
the expansion leg of the riser, with each concrete mattress measuring approximately 5 m long
and 3 m wide. Divers will monitor the lifting and positioning of the concrete mattresses, and will
disconnect the mattress installation frame from the mattresses once in position.
3.8
DomGas pipeline installation within the intertidal zone will extend from Onshore KP 0 (Offshore
KP 59.4), at the mainland shore-crossing, to approximately Onshore KP 12, at the High Water
Mark.
Pipeline installation within the intertidal zone on the mainland will be undertaken using
specialised equipment, such as low ground pressure, swamp-tracked equipment and/or a flatbottom barge from which equipment can be mobilised.
Prior to commencement of clearing and grading for intertidal pipeline installation, surveys will be
undertaken to clearly identify and mark:
pipeline centreline
Clearing will then be undertaken to establish a pipe storage area at approximately KP 12, and
the pipeline ROW. Clearing activities within mangrove and samphire areas will endeavour to
limit soil disturbance (e.g. scrub-rolling, slashing, cutting or other methods that avoid uprooting
mangroves), where practicable.
A stringing yard will be established at approximately KP 10.65 on the bare intertidal flats for
stringing of line pipe, welding, NDT, and field joint coating, and to assist with the transfer of
continuous pipe strings into the intertidal zone.
Pipeline trenching will be undertaken from KP 0 to KP 12, with trench excavation scheduled
around the tides. Trench spoil material will be handled, treated, and stockpiled in accordance
with an approved Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan (refer to Section 5.5.4).
Public
Page 43
Uncontrolled when Printed
The trench will be excavated in segments and will use natural weirs and/or locks to flood the
trench and prevent water loss at low tide. Water will be pumped from lower trench segments to
higher trench segments as required, to ensure that all trench segments are flooded and to
prevent trench collapse.
Welded pipeline strings will be floated in the flooded trench and towed out from the stringing
yard to the onshore/offshore shore-crossing tie-in point. Mobile tie-in crews will complete
welding, NDT, and field joint coating for the tie-ins.
From KP 0.8 to KP 0, temporary guide piles may be installed during trenching activities to
support the pipe as it is pulled towards the offshore tie-in point around the curved alignment in
this section. Temporary posts with polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipe sleeves may also be installed
along the trench for the extent of the intertidal zone so as to prevent pipe strings from floating
out of the trench during high tide.
Once the pipeline is in position, it will be lowered into the trench, then backfilling will be
completed. Prior to lowering in of the pipeline, the trench will be inspected to ensure that it is
free from fauna.
Trench breakers will be installed around the pipeline within the trench to prevent erosion and
washout of backfill from the trench. The trench breakers will be installed at 20 m intervals at the
mangrove shore-crossing from approximately KP 0 to KP 1, and at a maximum separation
distance of 250 m for the remainder of the intertidal zone. The trench breakers will be
constructed using polyurethane foam, pipe sacks, or similar material.
Mechanical protection will also be installed around the pipeline for protection of the pipeline
coating. The mechanical protection will be a plastic or polyethylene mesh that is wrapped
around the pipeline prior to backfilling.
Upon completion of backfilling, the ROW will be cleared of all remaining construction debris for
site reinstatement. Site reinstatement works will include reinstating to natural ground contours,
and respreading soil and vegetation across the ROW and at the pipe storage area (where
applicable).
3.9
Pre-commissioning
Pre-commissioning of the DomGas pipeline will be undertaken once the onshore, intertidal, and
offshore sections have been installed and tie-ins between the sections have been completed.
(Note: Pre-commissioning activities do not include the introduction of domestic gas to the
pipeline.)
Pre-commissioning activities for the DomGas pipeline will include:
water winning
gauging
dewatering
drying
purging.
Page 44
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
The water winning spread will consist of a suction hose connected to submersible lift pumps and
a filter skid. For water winning, the suction hose will be lowered onto the seabed and the lift
pumps will pump sea water through the hose to the filter skid. The sea water will be filtered to a
maximum particle size of 50 m and pumped into a break tank.
Flooding pumps will pump sea water from the break tank into the pipeline, with a chemical
injection pump dosing the sea water with oxygen scavenger, biocide, and tracer dye. Flooding
and cleaning of the pipeline will be undertaken from Barrow Island to the mainland using
pipeline inspection gauges (pigs) propelled through the pipeline by the chemically treated sea
water.
Gauging will be undertaken during flooding and cleaning, using gauging pigs propelled through
the pipeline with chemically treated sea water. Should the preliminary gauging plate show any
signs of damage, debris, or other obstructions, it will be removed and any dents or buckles will
be located and repaired.
After gauging the pipeline, pressure testing (hydrotesting) will be undertaken. During the
hydrotesting, there will be a period for temperature stabilisation of the flooding and testing
medium. If a leak occurs during pressure testing, pressurisation will cease and the leak will be
located. The pressure inside the pipeline will be reduced to ambient pressure and the leak will
be repaired. The hydrotesting operation will recommence until the pipeline passes the pressure
test.
Following pressure testing, the pipeline will be dewatered to the mainland, with the chemically
treated sea water disposed of offsite or to an onshore evaporation pond located adjacent to the
DomGas meter station and Compressor Station 1 of the Dampier to Bunbury Pipeline.
The construction and management of an evaporation pond is addressed in the Mainland
Onshore Domestic Gas Pipeline Environmental Management Plan [Chevron Australia 2011a, as
amended from time to time].
The DomGas pipeline, from the mainland DomGas meter station to Barrow Island, will then be
dried and purged with nitrogen gas, ready for commissioning.
During pre-commissioning activities, tracking of pigs through the pipeline will be undertaken
using intrusive (mechanical), acoustic, and/or electromagnetic techniques, or through the use of
radioactive isotopes attached to the pigs.
Public
Page 45
Uncontrolled when Printed
3.10
Activity Schedule
DomGas pipeline offshore and intertidal installation activities (excluding pre-lay survey) are
estimated to take approximately seven months, from April to October 2012. Table 3-1 lists the
proposed schedule of activities. This schedule represents the current basis of design and is
indicative only.
Start Date
Completion Date
Duration
Mobilisation to site
April 2012
April 2012
1 month
Pre-lay survey
February 2012
February 2012
1 month
As-laid survey
September 2012
September 2012
1 month
As-built survey
October 2012
October 2012
1 month
August 2012
August 2012
1 month
May 2012
May 2012
1 month
August 2012
September 2012
2 months
Rock-bolting
June 2012
July 2012
2 months
Rock installation
November 2012
November 2012
1 month
August 2012
August 2012
1 month
May 2012
July 2012
3 months
Pre-commissioning
October 2012
October 2012
1 month
Page 46
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
4.0
4.1
Physical Environment
4.1.1 Climate
The southern portion of the North West Shelf, including Barrow Island, is characterised by an
arid, subtropical climate.
The summer season occurs from October to March, with mean daily maximum temperatures
averaging 34 C and mean daily minimum temperatures averaging 20 C. The winter season
occurs from June to August, with mean daily maximum temperatures of 26 C and mean daily
minimum temperatures of 17 C (Chevron Australia 2005).
During summer, winds from the south-west and west dominate, with wind speeds up to
16.2 m/s. During winter, winds from the east, south, and south-west dominate, with wind
speeds up to 19.4 m/s (Kellogg Joint Venture Gorgon [KJVG] 2008).
April, May and September are considered transitional months during which either the summer or
winter weather regime may dominate, or conditions vary between the two (Chevron Australia
2005).
The historic annual average rainfall for Barrow Island is 320 mm. However, rainfall varies
significantly from year to year and is dependent on rain-bearing low-pressure systems,
thunderstorm activity, and the passage of tropical cyclones (Chevron Australia 2005).
Tropical cyclone activity occurs throughout the region from November to April. An average of
four cyclones pass within 400 nm of Barrow Island each year (MetOcean Engineers 2006), and
cyclones often cross the mainland coast at Mardie Station, near the intertidal pipeline route.
4.1.2 Oceanography
The waters between Barrow Island and the mainland are sheltered from deep ocean swells by
Barrow Island, the shallow underwater ridges between Barrow Island and the mainland, and the
island archipelago along the Mary Anne Passage (Asia Pacific Applied Science Associates
[APASA] 2010).
There is a large tidal range at Barrow Island and at the mainland shore-crossing, with tides
varying approximately 3 to 4 m between highs and lows (APASA 2009). The tides are
semidiurnal, with two daily high tides and two low tides (APASA 2009).
The large tidal range generates strong tidal currents at Barrow Island and at the mainland
shore-crossing (APASA 2010). Strong currents flow through the Barrow Island Channel, which
separates Barrow Island and the Lowendal Islands, flowing eastwest with each ebbing/flooding
tide (APASA 2009).
4.1.3 Bathymetry
Water depths along the offshore DomGas pipeline route between Barrow Island and the
mainland are less than 16 m.
From the Barrow Island LNG jetty tie-in, water depths generally increase from approximately
6 m to 16 m depth between Offshore KP 0 and KP 48.
From Offshore KP 48 to the mainland shore-crossing (at Offshore KP 59.4), water depths
generally decrease from approximately 8 m to less than 1 m depth (DOF Subsea 2009).
Public
Page 47
Uncontrolled when Printed
4.1.4 Topography
The intertidal DomGas pipeline route features extensive intertidal flats that are inundated up to
the High Water Mark (at approximately KP 12) on the highest astronomical tides. From
Offshore KP 59.4/Onshore KP 0 to the fringing mangroves at approximately Onshore KP 0.5,
elevation increases to approximately 2.5 m AHD (Australian Height Datum).
For the remainder of the intertidal zone, elevation remains close to 2.5 m AHD, with the
exception of where the pipeline route intersects small creek tributaries (from approximately KP 3
to KP 4) and dune systems near the High Water Mark (from approximately KP 11 to KP 12).
red to brown silty clay and sandy clay, with gravel in some layers
Variable amounts of shell fragments are found in these soils (Golder Associates 2010).
Potential acid sulfate soils (PASS) have been identified within the intertidal zone during field
surveys (Golder Associates 2010). PASS contain sulfides in one or more soil horizons. These
sulfides can oxidise when exposed to air through excavation or drainage, generating sulfuric
acid. This can lead to increased acidity of soils and groundwater, mobilisation of toxic heavy
metals, and corrosion of buildings and infrastructure.
Public
4.2
Biological Environment
Public
Page 49
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 4-1 Benthic Habitat Mapping for the DomGas Pipeline at Barrow Island
Page 50
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Figure 4-2 Benthic Habitat Mapping along the DomGas Pipeline between Barrow Island
and the Mainland
Public
Page 51
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 4-3 Benthic Habitat Mapping for the DomGas Pipeline near the Mainland ShoreCrossing
Page 52
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Benthic habitats near the mainland shore-crossing of the DomGas pipeline are similarly
characterised as unvegetated or bare sand. The highest diversity of benthic habitats and
assemblages (coral, macroalgae, and non-coral benthic macro-invertebrates) was recorded
around the offshore islands that had fringing coral reefs and/or isolated patch reefs. Mixed
coral communities was the dominant coral habitat type recorded, with coral cover ranging
between medium (i.e. 1050% cover) and dense (5175% cover) (Chevron Australia 2012a,
as amended from time to time).
A summary of benthic habitats for the DomGas pipeline is provided in the subsequent sections.
Detailed description of benthic habitats is provided in the Coastal and Marine Baseline State
and Environmental Impact Report: Domestic Gas Pipeline (Chevron Australia 2012a, as
amended from time to time).
4.2.1.1
Surveys undertaken in the waters around Barrow Island have identified 196 species of hard
corals in 48 genera, and eight soft coral genera from the suborder Alcyoniina (Chevron Australia
2012a, as amended from time to time). Hard corals adjacent to the DomGas pipeline route
include occasional coral bomboras (Porites, Montipora), supporting hydroids, sea whips,
gorgonians and scattered small soft corals (Turbinaria) (Chevron Australia 2005).
Coral communities at pinnacle locations along the DomGas pipeline route support medium (10
50%) to dense (5175%) coral cover, with large Porites spp., foliose and encrusting corals (e.g.
acroporids, Montipora spp., and faviids) (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to
time).
Coral communities around offshore islands and isolated reefs near the mainland shore-crossing
of the DomGas pipeline are typical of naturally turbid nearshore environments in the Pilbara
region. During surveys, Turbinaria, Favites, Platygyra, Goniopora and Lobophyllia were the
most abundant genera recorded (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
These coral communities near the mainland shore-crossing are considered to be reasonably
tolerant to turbidity, sedimentation, and seasonal cyclone activity in the area (high winds, large
swells and extreme turbidity). Large encrusting and solid dome-shaped coral colonies are
known to withstand substantial wave impact (Done 1992, Fabricius et al. 2008). The absence
of more delicate branching corals, which is expected in cyclone-prone areas, suggests that
cyclone activity and wave impacts are important in defining these communities (Chevron
Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
4.2.1.2
Benthic macro-invertebrates along the DomGas pipeline route are generally sparsely distributed
and relatively homogenous across broad areas of similar substratum in the waters off the east
coast of Barrow Island, with distinct assemblages observed on the different substrate types
(sand or soft sediment and limestone pavement). During surveys, benthic macro-invertebrate
assemblages recorded included ascidians, hydroids, sea whips, scatter small corals (e.g.
Turbinaria sp., Montipora sp.) and sponges (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to
time).
Near the mainland shore-crossing of the offshore DomGas Pipeline route, sessile benthic
macro-invertebrate assemblages are generally associated with the outer extremities of reef
systems surrounding the offshore islands; in particular, in areas with high currents. These
assemblages are characterised by diverse sponge/octocoral (including sea fans and sea whips)
gardens and mainly occur on sections of reef covered by a veneer of soft sediment. Species
recorded in these areas included sponges, gorgonians and sea whips, and bryozoans,
interspersed with occasional turbulariid and faviid corals (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended
from time to time).
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 53
Uncontrolled when Printed
During marine baseline surveys, sessile and mobile benthic macro-invertebrates were recorded
at very low densities on unvegetated soft sediments in the nearshore region (Chevron Australia
2012a, as amended from time to time).
Habitat surveys on the broad intertidal sand flat seaward of the mangroves at the mainland
shore-crossing identified a number of sparse faunal assemblages of echinoderms, molluscs,
crustaceans, and other invertebrates, including nemerteans, gastropods, digitate sponges and
small sand dollars (Chevron Australia 2005, URS 2009). Within the mangroves, fauna also
included red fiddler crabs (Uca), occasional portunid crabs including mud crabs (Scylla serrata),
mud skippers (Periopthalmus vulgaris), mud lobsters (Thalassina anomala), crawling
gastropods, and rock oysters (Saccostrea) (Chevron Australia 2005).
4.2.1.3
Macroalgae
Macroalgal assemblages represent the most extensive ecological element in the waters off the
east coast of Barrow Island, with percentage cover and biomass generally highest on areas of
shallow limestone pavements and lowest on soft sediments (Chevron Australia 2012a, as
amended from time to time).
The outer part of the limestone platform off the east coast of Barrow Island is dominated by
macroalgal assemblages with sparse sessile taxa, including mixed Phaeophyceae (Sargassum
spp., Dictyopteris spp. and Padina spp.), and mixed Rhodophyta (Halimeda cuneata and
Udotea spp.) (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
Isolated patches of macroalgae occur along the offshore DomGas pipeline route in water depths
greater than 14 m. These patches are dominated by Caulerpa spp. (URS 2009).
Near the mainland shore-crossing of the DomGas pipeline, macroalgal assemblages are
associated with fringing reefs surrounding the offshore islands, typically characterised by
medium density algal cover (2575%) with Sargassum spp. often the dominant taxa recorded.
Areas of intertidal platform support sparse macroalgal cover (525%) (Chevron Australia
2012a, as amended from time to time).
Elevated turbidity and wave action associated with cyclones and severe weather events can
potentially impact macroalgal assemblages. However, no widespread losses of macroalgal
assemblages were recorded during surveys between seasons, indicating their resilience to
cyclonic disturbance (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
4.2.1.4
Seagrass
Seagrass assemblages are located in soft sediment habitats and on veneers of sand overlying
limestone pavement in the waters off the east coast of Barrow Island. These seagrass
assemblages are generally small sparse (5% cover) patches rather than distinct beds.
Halophila spinulosa is the most common species recorded (Chevron Australia 2012a, as
amended from time to time).
During marine baseline surveys, seagrass on the limestone pavement on the east coast of
Barrow Island was most commonly small patches of Halophila ovalis, mixed with macroalgae
and benthic macro-invertebrates (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
Near the mainland shore-crossing of the offshore DomGas pipeline route, seagrass
assemblages are present over a broad area. However, percentage cover is low, with seagrass
typically present as small (<10 m2) sparse (<5% cover) patches rather than continuous
extensive seagrass beds (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
Page 54
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
4.2.1.5
During flora and vegetation surveys for the DomGas onshore pipeline and meter station, the
following vegetation associations were identified within the intertidal zone:
four mangrove vegetation associations along the coastline, tidal inlets and creek lines
two hummock grassland vegetation associations near the sandy plains and islands at
the High Water Mark.
These vegetation associations are all located within the Littoral land system that features
quaternary coastal mud, silty loam and Aeolian sand that has formed saline coastal mudflats,
samphire flats, mangroves with shallow tidal creeks, saline slopes marginal to mudflats, dunes
and sandy plains (Van Vreeswyk et al. 2004, as referenced by Astron Environmental Services
2010).
Table 4-1 describes the vegetation associations identified within the intertidal zone.
Photographs of each vegetation association are presented in Figure 4-4, and vegetation
mapping within the intertidal zone is shown in Figure 4-5.
Broad Floristic
Formation
Open to closed
woodland of mangrove
along coastline and tidal
inlets
Vegetation Association
Code
Description
Lm1
Lm2
Lm3
Open woodland of
mangrove along
creekline
Ltc1
Scattered to low
shrublands of samphire
on saline flats
Ltf1
Ltf2
Ltf3
Ltf4
Lpi2
Lpi4
Hummock grassland
sometimes with open
Acacia shrubland on
sandy plains and islands
* Weed Species
(Source: Astron Environmental Services 2010)
Public
Page 55
Uncontrolled when Printed
Within the ten vegetation associations, a total of 47 taxa representing 16 families and 34 genera
were recorded during flora and vegetation surveys. No Declared Rare Flora or EPBC Act listed
species were recorded in these vegetation associations (Astron Environmental Services 2010).
The dominant mangrove species recorded within the proposed DomGas ROW was Avicennia
marina subsp. marina. Other mangrove species identified included Rhizophora stylosa and
Ceriops tagal.
Further mangrove surveys were undertaken as part of marine baseline surveys, extending north
and south of the pipeline route and including reference sites. The results of these surveys are
described in the Coastal and Marine Baseline State and Environmental Impact Report:
Domestic Gas Pipeline (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
The previous clearing and disturbance of mangroves from the installation of the Apache Sales
Gas lines in 1992 and 1998 was evident during survey works. Rehabilitation of mangroves is
ongoing within the Apache easement, adjacent to the proposed DomGas ROW.
The samphire vegetation associations are dominated by Tecticornia species. During vegetation
surveys, three Tecticornia specimens collected could not be identified to the species level. One
specimen was sterile (VL2558B-01), located within the Lm3, Ltc1, Ltf1 and Ltf2 vegetation
associations. Two specimens (VL2558B-03 and VL2558B-09), located within the Ltc1 and Ltf3
vegetation associations, are potentially a new taxon.
The taxon is considered to be part of the T. halocnemoides sens. lat. complex, which is
ubiquitous around salt lakes across the continent (Astron Environmental Services 2010). It is
likely that there are many potentially new species within this group.
In general, all vegetation associations were assessed as being in excellent condition, with more
than 80% native flora composition, less than 5% weed coverage, and with most vegetation
structure intact (Astron Environmental Services 2010, using a vegetation condition assessment
scale adapted from Keighery 1994 and Kaesehagen 1995).
Within the two hummock grassland vegetation associations, these weed species were identified:
Mesquite is a Declared Plant under the Agriculture and Related Resources Protection Act 1976
(WA), and is a Weed of National Significance. Mardie Station has the largest infestation of
Mesquite in Australia (CRC for Australian Weed Management 2003). There are ongoing efforts
to control and reduce the spread of Mesquite by the Pilbara Mesquite Management Committee
(PMMC), CITIC Pacific Mining Management (CPMM), and other third parties who access
Mardie Station.
Page 56
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 57
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 58
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 59
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 60
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 61
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 62
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Figure 4-5 DomGas Pipeline Vegetation Mapping within the Intertidal Zone
Public
Page 63
Uncontrolled when Printed
4.2.2 Fauna
4.2.2.1
Marine Mammals
4.2.2.1.1
Dolphins
Bottlenose dolphins are abundant over the Pilbara inshore region and may occur along the
proposed offshore DomGas pipeline route and near the mainland shore-crossing (Chevron
Australia 2005).
The regional distribution of other dolphin species is poorly known, and, while many species may
occur in the region, most are likely to be transients or occasional visitors (Chevron Australia
2005).
Table 4-2 details protected dolphin species that may occur in the vicinity of the DomGas
pipeline.
4.2.2.1.2
Dugongs
Dugongs (Dugong dugon) are considered Specially Protected under Schedule 4 of the Wildlife
Conservation Act 1950 (WA) and are listed as migratory species under the EPBC Act.
Dugongs (Dugong dugon) occur throughout shallow waters, typically 5 m to 10 m, between
offshore islands and the mainland. They may periodically visit the area of the offshore DomGas
pipeline route to feed on ephemeral seagrass meadows along the mainland coast (Chevron
Australia 2005). However, no extensive seagrass habitats were identified along the DomGas
pipeline route during marine baseline surveys and this area is not expected to be a significant
habitat for dugong.
4.2.2.1.3
Whales
While many whale species may occur in the Pilbara region, most are likely to be transient or
occasional visitors (Chevron Australia 2005).
Humpback Whales, a prominent visitor of west coast Barrow island, and other whale species
are likely to be infrequent visitors to the shallow, inshore coastal waters between Barrow Island
and the mainland. Most whale species are more abundant in deeper waters.
Table 4-3 lists whale species that may occur in the vicinity of DomGas pipeline.
Page 64
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Table 4-2
Pipeline
Scientific
Name
Protected Dolphin Species that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas
Common
Name
Status
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Delphinus
delphis
Common
Dolphin
Grampus
griseus
Risso's
Dolphin,
Grampus
Sousa
chinensis
Indo-Pacific
Humpback
Dolphin
P4
C
M
Stenella
attenuata
Spotted
Dolphin,
Pantropical
Spotted
Dolphin
Tursiops
aduncus
Indian
Ocean
Bottlenose
Dolphin,
Spotted
Bottlenose
Dolphin
Tursiops
aduncus
(Arafura/
Timor Sea
populations)
Spotted
Bottlenose
Dolphin
C
M
Tursiops
truncatus s.
str.
Bottlenose
Dolphin
Public
Page 65
Uncontrolled when Printed
Table 4-3
Pipeline
Scientific
Name
Protected Whale Species that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas
Common
Name
Status
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
C
M
Balaenoptera
edeni
Brydes
Whale
Balaenoptera
musculus
Blue Whale
1
EN
C
E
M
Eubalaena
australis
Southern
Right
Whale
1
VU
C
E
M
Megaptera
novaeangliae
Humpback
Whale
1
VU
C
M
V
Orcinus orca
Killer
Whale,
Orca
C
M
Page 66
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
4.2.2.2
Marine Reptiles
4.2.2.2.1
Marine Turtles
Four species of marine turtles are likely to occur near the DomGas pipeline, including Green
Turtles, Flatback Turtles, Hawksbill Turtles, and Loggerhead Turtles. Table 4-4 identifies
marine turtles that may occur in the vicinity of the DomGas pipeline and their habitat.
Barrow Island is a regionally important nesting area for Green Turtles and Flatback Turtles.
Green Turtles nest predominantly on the sandy west coast beaches of Barrow Island and mate
and forage in nearshore waters during the summer breeding season. Flatback Turtles nest
predominantly on the mid-east coast beaches of Barrow Island, which are located either side of
the LNG jetty and tie-in for the DomGas pipeline (Chevron Australia 2005).
Hawksbill Turtles also nest at low densities on beaches around Barrow Island, primarily on the
north east coast of the island (Chevron Australia 2005).
Green Turtles, Flatback Turtles and Hawksbill Turtles nest on, and forage in the nearshore
waters of, islands within the Great Sandy and Passage Island groups (Pendoley et al. 2003).
Table 4-5 shows turtle species that are known to nest on beaches of the Great Sandy and
Passage Islands groups, within approximately 25 km of the DomGas pipeline route. Turtle
nesting beaches at Middle Passage Island (approximately 12 km away) and Sholl Island (24 km
distant) are considered to be regionally significant Hawksbill Turtle rookeries due to the high
density of Hawksbill Turtles observed nesting at these islands (Pendoley et al. 2003).
Mangroves at the mainland shore-crossing are habitat for juvenile Green Turtles, and posthatchling Flatback Turtles may potentially occur here (Chevron Australia 2013, as amended
from time to time). No suitable habitat for turtle nesting exists at the mainland shore-crossing
(RPS Bowman Bishaw Gorham [RPS BBG] 2006). Coastal waters between Barrow Island and
the mainland are used by:
Loggerhead Turtles and Leatherback Turtles may be present near the DomGas pipeline.
However, Loggerhead Turtles have low abundance in Western Australian waters and nest on
the Muiron Islands off Exmouth and at Dirk Hartog Island in Shark Bay. Leatherback Turtles are
regular visitors to the region, but are not known to nest in Western Australian waters (Chevron
Australia 2005).
In general, the shoulder and peak nesting periods for marine turtles around Barrow Island, the
Great Sandy and Passage Islands are:
Further information regarding marine turtles is provided in the Long-term Marine Turtle
Management Plan (Chevron Australia 2013, as amended from time to time).
Public
Page 67
Uncontrolled when Printed
Table 4-4 Protected Marine Turtles that are Likely to Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas
Pipeline
Scientific
Name
Common
Name
Status
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Caretta
caretta
Loggerhead
Turtle
1
EN
E
M
Chelonia
mydas
Green Turtle
1
VU
V
M
Eretmochelys
imbricata
Hawksbill
Turtle
1
VU
V
M
Natator
depressus
Flatback
Turtle
1
VU
V
M
Page 68
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Table 4-5 Proximity of Turtle Nesting Beaches in the Great Sandy and Passage Islands
Groups to the DomGas Pipeline Route
Island
Angle Island
Flatback Turtles
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
Flatback Turtles
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
12
Long Island
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
15
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
12
Flatback Turtles
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
4.5
Passage Island
Flatback Turtles
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
3.5
Pup Island
Hawksbill Turtles
Round Island
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
20
Sholl Island
Green Turtles
Hawksbill Turtles
24
Hawksbill Turtles
Public
Page 69
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 4-6 Flatback Turtle Internesting Tracks from Barrow Island for 20072011 near
the DomGas Pipeline Route
Page 70
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
4.2.2.2.2
Sea Snakes
The seas of tropical Australia support significant and diversified sea snake fauna, with a strong
endemic component. Of the 55 species of sea snake recorded worldwide, 32 species are
recorded from tropical Australia and nearly 50% of these are endemic (Cogger 2000). The
extensive mangroves along the mainland coast also provide important habitat for sea snakes.
Sea snakes are highly mobile and can cover large distances; however, many species are
restricted to relatively shallow coastal waters. Cogger (1975) stated that most sea snakes have
shallow benthic feeding patterns and are rarely found in depths exceeding 30 m. However, very
little is known about the distribution of the individual species of sea snakes in the region.
There are 14 protected species of sea snakes listed under the EPBC Act that may occur in the
vicinity of the DomGas pipeline (SEWPaC 2011):
Hydrophis ornatus
4.2.2.3
Fish
Fish within the North West Marine Region, including within the vicinity of the DomGas pipeline,
are tropical species that are typically found within the Indian Ocean and western Pacific Ocean
(Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts [DEWHA] 2008).
Two species of shark listed under the EPBC Act may occur in the vicinity of the DomGas
pipeline route (refer to Table 4-6). The worlds largest fish, the Whale Shark, congregates
annually off Ningaloo Reef, approximately 150 km south-west of Barrow Island and are
occasional visitors to the Barrow Island area (Chevron Australia 2005).
Pipefish, pipehorses, and seahorses are widely distributed in Western Australia, but the
distribution of individual species within the region is little known (Chevron Australia 2005).
There are 31 protected species of pipefish listed under the EPBC Act that may occur in the
vicinity of the DomGas pipeline (SEWPaC 2011):
Public
Page 71
Uncontrolled when Printed
Doryrhamphus multiannulatus, Hippocampus histrix and Phoxocampus belcheri are the only
listed species that have been recorded in the Montebello/Barrow Islands region (Chevron
Australia 2005, DEC 2007). The distribution of the other protected species is known only from a
few records from the Pilbara region (Chevron Australia 2005).
Demersal fish surveys using stereo Baited Remote Underwater Stereo-Video (BRUV), cast and
seine netting techniques have identified different demersal fish assemblages that characterise
the different habitat community-types on the east coast of Barrow Island and at the mainland
end of the DomGas pipeline route (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time).
During surveys, fish assemblages associated with coral communities were found to be the most
diverse. Coral communities on the east coast of Barrow Island are characterised by high
species richness, including small Damselfish, schooling small Trevally, Snapper, Cod, Grouper
and Emperor. Coral communities near the mainland are characterised by a variety of species
including Damselfish, Surgeonfish, Butterflyfish, and Emperor (Chevron Australia 2012a, as
amended from time to time).
Page 72
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Table 4-6 Protected Sharks that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline
Scientific
Name
Common
Name
Status
Species Habitat
1,2
WA
Cth
Pristis clavata
Dwarf
Sawfish,
Queensland
Sawfish
P1
Rhincodon
typus
Whale Shark
V
M
4.2.2.4
Avifauna
The seabird population of the Pilbara region includes migratory and resident seabirds.
Generally, migratory species visit the Pilbara from the northern hemisphere or close to the
equator and pass through the region on their way southward, or they may stay in the Pilbara
region until ready to journey back to breed (Chevron Australia 2005). Resident species remain
in the Pilbara region throughout the year, but may move around within the region.
The Montebello/Lowendal/Barrow Island region has significant rookeries for 15 seabird species,
including the largest breeding colony of Roseate Terns in WA, which is located on the
Montebello Islands. Double Island, 5 km off the east coast of Barrow Island, is a regionally
significant rookery for Bridled Terns and a locally significant rookery site for the Wedge-tailed
Shearwater (Chevron Australia 2005).
Many migratory shorebirds are likely to exist within the intertidal zone and may occur near the
DomGas pipeline route. These species are largely restricted to the tidal flats and mangroves
near the shore-crossing (RPS BBG 2006). During field surveys, numbers of migratory and
wading birds observed along the proposed DomGas line were low to moderate, with no major
roosting concentrations (RPS BBG 2006).
Public
Page 73
Uncontrolled when Printed
Migratory and resident seabirds also inhabit the islands of the Great Sandy and Passage
Islands Groups. Nesting species on the islands include Caspian Terns, Crested Terns, Eastern
Reef Egrets, Fairy Terns, Ospreys, Wedge-tailed Shearwaters, and White-bellied Sea Eagles
(Pendoley et al. 2003).
Table 4-7 details avifauna species that have been observed within approximately 25 km of the
DomGas pipeline route in the Great Sandy and Passage Islands groups.
Table 4-8 details protected avifauna species that may occur within the vicinity of the offshore
and intertidal DomGas pipeline route.
Table 4-7 Avifauna Species Observed in Proximity to the DomGas Pipeline Route in the
Great Sandy and Passage Islands Groups
Island
Angle Island
Great Sandy
Island
Long Island
Scientific Name
Common Name
Arenaria interpres
Ruddy Turnstone
Charadrius mongolus
Eascus magnirostrus
Falco cenchroides
Australian Kestrel
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Heteroscelus brevipes
Grey-tailed Tattler
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Pandion haliaetus
Osprey
Phalacrocorax varius
Pied Cormorant
Sterna bergii
Arenaria interpres
Crested Tern
Ruddy Turnstone
Artamus leucorhynchus
White-breasted Woodswallow
Charadrius mongolus
Eascus magnirostrus
Egretta sacra
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Puffinus pacificus
Wedge-tailed Shearwater
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Sterna nereis
Arenaria interpres
Artamus leucorhynchus
Fairy Tern
Ruddy Turnstone
White-breasted Woodswallow
Charadrius mongolus
Eascus magnirostrus
Eremiornis carteri
Spinifexbird
Page 74
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Distance from
DomGas Pipeline
Route (approx km)
12
15
Island
Middle
Passage
Island
North Sandy
Island
Passage
Island
Scientific Name
Common Name
Egretta sacra
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Heteroscelus brevipes
Grey-tailed Tattler
Larus novaehollandiae
Ardea novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
White-faced Heron
Arenaria interpres
Ruddy Turnstone
Artamus leucorhynchus
White-breasted Woodswallow
Cacatua pastinator
Little Corella
Charadrius mongolus
Egretta sacra
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Pandion haliaetus
Osprey
Pelecanus conspicillatus
Australia Pelican
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Sterna dougallii
Artamus leucorhynchus
Roseate Tern
White-breasted Woodswallow
Falco cenchroides
Australian Kestrel
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Sterna nereis
Fairy Tern
Zosterops lutea
Yellow White-eye
Artamus leucorhynchus
White-breasted Woodswallow
Egretta sacra
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Sterna dougallii
Roseate Tern
Public
Distance from
DomGas Pipeline
Route (approx km)
12
4.5
3.5
Page 75
Uncontrolled when Printed
Island
Pup Island
Round Island
Scientific Name
Common Name
Charadrius mongolus
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Heteroscelus brevipes
Grey-tailed Tattler
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Pandion haliaetus
Osprey
Phalacrocorax varius
Pied Cormorant
Puffinus pacificus
Wedge-tailed Shearwater
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Sterna nereis
Fairy Tern
Zosterops lutea
Yellow White-eye
Arenaria interpres
Ruddy Turnstone
Artamus leucorhynchus
White-breasted Woodswallow
Corturnix ypsilophora
Brown Quail
Eascus magnirostrus
Falco cenchroides
Australian Kestrel
Geopelia humeralis
Bar-shouldered Dove
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Pelecanus conspicillatus
Australia Pelican
Phalacrocorax varius
Pied Cormorant
Puffinus pacificus
Wedge-tailed Shearwater
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Zosterops lutea
Yellow White-eye
Page 76
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Distance from
DomGas Pipeline
Route (approx km)
20
Island
Sholl Island
Solitary Island
South
Passage
Island
Scientific Name
Common Name
Artamus leucorhynchus
White-breasted Woodswallow
Cacatua pastinator
Little Corella
Cinclorhamphus cruralis
Brown Songlark
Circus assimilis
Spotted Harrier
Eascus magnirostrus
Egretta sacra
Falco cenchroides
Australian Kestrel
Geopelia humeralis
Bar-shouldered Dove
Haemotopus fuliginosus
Sooty Oystercatcher
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Heteroscelus brevipes
Grey-tailed Tattler
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Lichmera indistincta
Brown Honeyeater
Numenius phaeopus
Whimbrel
Pandion haliaetus
Osprey
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Arenaria interpres
Ruddy Turnstone
Charadrius mongolus
Eascus magnirostrus
Egretta sacra
Falco cenchroides
Australian Kestrel
Haemotopus ostralegus
Pied Oystercatcher
Heteroscelus brevipes
Grey-tailed Tattler
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian Tern
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Numenius phaeopus
Whimbrel
Puffinus pacificus
Wedge-tailed Shearwater
Sterna bergii
Crested Tern
Todirhampus sancta
Sacred Kingfisher
Ardea novaehollandiae
White-faced Heron
Charadrius mongolus
Egretta sacra
Haliaeetus leucogaster
White-bellied Sea-Eagle
Heteroscelus brevipes
Grey-tailed Tattler
Larus novaehollandiae
Silver Gull
Sterna dougallii
Roseate Tern
Distance from
DomGas Pipeline
Route (approx km)
24
Public
Page 77
Uncontrolled when Printed
Table 4-8 Protected Avifauna that may Occur in the Vicinity of the DomGas Pipeline
Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Actitis hypoleucos+
Common
Sandpiper
Found in estuaries, tidal flats, mangroves, rivers, wetlands and salt flats
Breeds from the British Isles to Siberia and migrates to Australia in July before returning to breeding
grounds by April
Apus pacificus
Fork-tailed Swift
Arenaria
interpres+ o
Ruddy Turnstone
Found on tidal reefs, pebbly, sandy and muddy shores, and tidal flats
Breeds in the high Arctic and migrates to Australia in August before returning to breeding grounds
by May
Bubulcus ibis
(Ardea ibis)
Cattle Egret
Calidris acuminata
Sharp-tailed
Sandpiper
Calidris alba
Sanderling
Calidris canutus
Red Knot
Calidris ferruginea
Curlew Sandpiper
Calidris ruficollis
Red-necked Stint
Page 78
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Calidris subminuta
Long-toed Stint
Found on the margins of wetlands, tidal flats and weedy tide lines
Breeds in Siberia and migrates to Australia by August before returning to breeding grounds by May
Calidris tenuirostris
Great Knot
Charadrius
leschenaultii+
Greater Sand
Plover
Found on tidal flats, estuaries, salt marshes, beaches, mangroves and bare paddocks
Breeds from Turkey to southern Siberia and migrates to Australia by August before returning to
breeding grounds by June
Charadrius
mongolus o
Lesser Sand
Plover, Mongolian
Plover
Charadrius
veredus
Oriental Plover,
Oriental Dotterel
Found in open plains, bare country, ploughed land, claypans, inland swamps and tidal flats
Breeds in Mongolia and northern China and migrates to Australia in September before returning to
breeding grounds by April or May
Chlidonias
leucopterus
White-winged Black
Tern
Egretta alba
(Ardea alba)
(Ardea modesta)
Egretta sacra+ o
Glareola
maldivarum
Oriental Pratincole
Haliaeetus
leucogaster o
White-bellied SeaEagle
Found on islands, on coasts, estuaries, wetlands, large rivers and large inland lakes
Aerial hunter for fish, snakes, birds and medium-sized mammals
Public
Page 79
Uncontrolled when Printed
Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Heteroscelus
brevipes+ o
Grey-tailed Tattler
Hirundo rustica
Barn Swallow
Hydroprogne
caspia+ o
(Sterna caspia)
Caspian Tern
Found in coastal waters, beaches, tidal flats, larger rivers, lakes and wetlands
Occurs commonly throughout much of Australia
Limosa
lapponica+
Bar-tailed Godwit
Found in estuaries, tidal flats, rivers, inland lakes and flooded pasture
Breeds in Siberia and Alaska and migrates to Australia between August and October before
returning to breeding grounds by May
Limosa limosa
Black-tailed Godwit
Macronectes
giganteus
Southern GiantPetrel
E
M
Found in Antarctic to subtropical waters, usually below latitude of 60 S in the south-east Indian
Ocean
Throughout the colder months, juveniles and adults disperse widely, extending to the Tropic of
Capricorn (23 S) and sometimes beyond these latitudes
Merops ornatus
Rainbow Bee-eater
Found in open woodlands, sand ridges, riverbanks, beaches, dunes, cliffs and mangroves
Occurs all year round in the tropics, with a southward migration in early spring before returning
north in autumn
Numenius
madagascariensis+
Eastern Curlew
3
P4
Numenius
phaeopus+ o
Whimbrel
Page 80
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Onychoprion
anaethetus (Sterna
anaethetus)
Bridled Tern
Pandion
haliaetus+ o
Osprey
Plegadis falcinellus
Glossy Ibis
Found in well-vegetated wetlands, wet paddocks and pasture, floodplains and occasionally saline
wetlands and mudflats
Migrates in response to rains but is most common in northern and eastern Australia
Pluvialis fulva
Pacific Golden
Plover
Pluvialis
squatarola+
Grey Plover
Puffinus pacificus o
Wedge-tailed
Shearwater
Sterna albifrons
Little Tern
Sterna dougallii o
Roseate Tern
Sterna hirundo
Common Tern
Public
Page 81
Uncontrolled when Printed
Status
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Habitat
WA1,2
Cth3
Thalasseus
bengalensis o
(Sterna
bengalensis)
Lesser Crested
Tern
Tringa glareola
Wood Sandpiper
Found on the muddy margins of wetlands, mudflats, mangroves and salt marshes
Breeds from northern Eurasia to Siberia and migrates to Australia by September before returning to
breeding grounds by May
Tringa nebularia+
Common
Greenshank
Found in estuaries, tidal flats, mangroves, rivers, wetlands and salt marshes
Breeds from Scotland to Siberia and migrates to Australia between August and October before
returning to breeding grounds by June
Tringa stagnatilis
Marsh Sandpiper
Xenus cinereus+
Terek Sandpiper
Found in estuaries, tidal mudflats, mangroves, shores, reefs and salt marshes
Breeds from Finland to north-eastern Siberia and migrates to Australia by August before returning
to breeding grounds by May
Page 82
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
4.2.2.5
Introduced Fauna
Introduced species or feral species that may occur on Mardie Station, and that may exist in the
intertidal zone, include (RPS BBG 2006):
These introduced species have heavily impacted on native fauna species on the mainland,
including at Mardie Station, through predation, competition for food and shelter, and by
destroying habitat and spreading diseases.
4.3
Socio-economic Environment
Native Title
Currently there are two registered Native Title claims that overlap the DomGas pipeline route at
the mainland shore-crossing and within the intertidal zone:
Chevron Australia has established heritage agreements with both claimant groups to allow for
the installation of the DomGas pipeline. Heritage surveys have been undertaken by both
claimant groups to identify archaeological and ethnographic sites of cultural significance.
4.3.1.2
During heritage surveys, two archaeological sites were identified near the High Water Mark
within the intertidal zone (see Figure 4-8). These sites have been identified as Artefacts or
Scattered Artefacts and installation of the DomGas pipeline within this area, including the
establishment of the pipe storage area and stringing yard, will avoid disturbance of these sites.
Two archaeological sites, Hadson Midden 1 and Hadson Midden 2, have also been identified to
the north of the Apache easement. These sites are not close to the DomGas pipeline easement
but any disturbance of these sites will also be avoided.
No ethnographic sites were identified during heritage surveys for the DomGas pipeline.
4.3.1.3
Shipwrecks
Shipwrecks of historic interest and all shipwrecks older than 75 years are protected under the
Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976 (Cth), while pre-1900 shipwrecks are protected under the
Maritime Archaeology Act 1973 (WA).
No shipwrecks have been identified along the offshore DomGas pipeline route during searches
of databases of the Western Australian Maritime Museum (URS 2009) and during geophysical
and marine baseline surveys (URS 2009).
However, near the DomGas shore-crossing is Maceys Wreck (Australian Interaction
Consultants [AIC] 2009). Maceys Wreck is an unidentified shipwreck (circa 1880) discovered
during construction of the Hadson (now Apache) pipeline in 1991 (McCarthy 1991). Maceys
Wreck was most likely used for pearling during the late nineteenth century and was washed
ashore during a cyclone (McCarthy 1991).
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 83
Uncontrolled when Printed
Mangrove roots and trees have grown through the remnant material from Maceys Wreck (see
Figure 4-7). Remnants of granitic ballast rock, fragments of an iron water tank, pickle bottle
shards, cement-based conglomerates, wire rigging fragments, and eroded pearl shells from
Maceys Wreck span a distance of approximately 21 m along the shoreline (McCarthy 1991). It
is likely that other material (e.g. chain, fastenings, timber and anchors) from the wreck were
salvaged by European settlers and Aborigines for use in the pearling industry during the late
nineteenth century (McCarthy 1991).
Maceys Wreck is of cultural heritage significance as it is one of the few tangible remains of the
late nineteenth century pearling industry in north-west Australia (McCarthy 1991). The DomGas
pipeline has been realigned to avoid disturbance of Maceys Wreck and to allow for safe
construction away from Apaches easement (see Figure 4-8).
Figure 4-7 Remnants of Ballast Rock from Maceys Wreck amongst Mangroves near the
DomGas Pipeline Shore-crossing
Page 84
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 85
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 4-8 Cultural Heritage Sites along the DomGas Pipeline Route within the Intertidal
Zone
Page 86
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
These conservation areas are managed by the Western Australian DPaW (see Figure 4-9).
The Barrow Island Nature Reserve is a Class A Nature Reserve under the Conservation and
Land Management Act 1984 (WA), reserved for the purposes of conservation of flora and fauna.
Barrow Island is home to 22 endemic species of mammal, reptile, bird, and subterranean fauna
and supports regionally and nationally significant rookeries for threatened Green and Flatback
Turtles (DEC 2011).
The Montebello Islands Conservation Park is a Class A Conservation Park and includes an
archipelago of small islands, which are very irregular, with convoluted coastlines, lagoons,
channels, intertidal embayments, barrier and fringing coral reefs, and shallow limestone
platforms (DEC 2007).
The Montebello Islands Marine Park and the Barrow Island Marine Park are vested as marine
parks due to the presence of high ecological values and the reliance of the primary social
values (e.g. pearling, nature-based tourism, recreational and commercial fishing) on the
maintenance of these ecological values. The remainder of the Barrow Island area is vested as
a Marine Management Area on the basis of the different balance of ecological and social values
(DEC 2007).
The DomGas pipeline route passes through the Barrow Island Marine
Management Area near Barrow Island.
The Great Sandy Islands Nature Reserve encompasses more than 30 islands, including the
Passage Islands, off the Pilbara coast near the DomGas pipeline shore-crossing. The islands
are approximately 1035 km off the mainland coast (LeProvost Environmental 2008). The
North Sandy Island Nature Reserve is a Class A Nature Reserve and is also located within the
Passage Islands chain. Both the Great Sandy Islands Nature Reserve and the North Sandy
Island Nature Reserve extend to the low water mark of the islands and include the intertidal
areas of the islands.
The DomGas pipeline traverses through the Coastal Margin from Exmouth Gulf to Cape
Preston, which is an Indicative Place on the Register of National Estate. It has been nominated
for the Register of National Estate as an important representation of intact tidal flats and
mangrove thicket of the north-west coast of Western Australia; it contains important habitat for
juveniles of many marine species, important bird habitat, and a dugong colony is present
(SEWPaC 2011a).
The Coastal Margin from Exmouth Gulf to Cape Preston is approximately 120 000 ha in area,
extending north-east and south-west of Onslow and comprising saline coastal flats between
Giralia Bay, Exmouth Gulf, and Cape Preston, inshore from the Mary Anne group of islands
(SEWPaC 2011a). This area is not a defined conservation area under State or Commonwealth
legislation and the DomGas pipeline only traverses through a limited area of the Coastal Margin
from Exmouth Gulf to Cape Preston.
Public
Page 87
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 4-9 Conservation Areas within the Region of the DomGas Pipeline
Page 88
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Beche-de-mer Fishery. This fishery harvests beche-de-mer, which are also known as
sea cucumbers or trepang. Beche-de-mer Fishery operations are primarily based in the
northern half of Western Australia, from Exmouth Gulf to the Western Australia/Northern
Territory border. The beche-de-mer are harvested by hand by diving and/or wading
through shallow waters.
Mackerel Managed Fishery. This fishery extends from the West Coast Bioregion to the
Western Australia/Northern Territory border. The target species within this fishery is
Spanish Mackerel.
Onslow Prawn Managed Fishery. This fishery harvests mainly Tiger Prawns from
inshore areas, with a lesser catch of King, Banana and Endeavour Prawns further
offshore.
Pearl Oyster Fishery. This fishery is the only remaining significant wild-stock fishery for
pearl oysters in the world and operates in the shallow coastal waters along the North
West Shelf. The pearls are harvested by hand by diving, with the Silver-lipped Pearl
Oyster as the target species.
Pilbara Fish Trawl (Interim) Managed Fishery. This fishery occupies the waters north of
latitude 2135S and between longitudes 114936E and 120E.
Pilbara Line Fishery. This fishery can operate anywhere within Pilbara Waters from the
North West Cape (2156S), north to longitude 120E.
Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery. This fishery lies north of latitude 2144S and between
longitudes 11496E and 12000E.
The target species within the Pilbara Fish Trawl (Interim) Managed Fishery, Pilbara Line Fishery
and Pilbara Trap Managed Fishery include Bluespotted Emperor, Rosy Threadfin Bream,
Brownstripe Snapper, Crimson Snapper, Red Emperor, Saddletail Snapper, Goldband Snapper,
Spangled Emperor, Frypan Snapper and Rankin Cod (Fletcher and Santoro 2010).
The area of the DomGas pipeline route, including within the Pilbara Fish Trawl Managed
Fishery, is permanently closed to trawling activities as this area is classified under the
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) criteria as a marine protected area.
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 89
Uncontrolled when Printed
Aquaculture development in the North Coast Bioregion is dominated by the production of pearls.
Pearl farms are located along the Kimberley coast (particularly in the Buccaneer Archipelago),
in Roebuck Bay, and at the Montebello Islands (Fletcher and Santoro 2010).
Page 90
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
5.0
5.1
Overview
Chevron Australia has prepared the HES Risk Management: ASBU Standardized OE Process
(Chevron Australia 2007, as amended from time to time) to assess and manage health,
environment and safety (HES) risks, which it internally requires its employees, contractors, etc.
to comply with.
A number of environmental risk assessments have been completed for the Gorgon Gas
Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline. A strategic risk assessment was undertaken
during the preparation of the Draft EIS/ERMP to determine the environmental acceptability of
the Development, and to identify key areas of risk requiring mitigation (Chevron Australia 2005).
This original assessment was then reviewed as part of the development of the Gorgon Gas
Development Revised and Expanded Proposal PER (Chevron Australia 2008), in light of the
changes to the Gorgon Gas Development (described in Section 1.4). The outcomes of these
assessments have been reviewed and considered during the preparation of this Plan.
Additional detailed risk assessments have been undertaken for specific scopes of work within
this Plan, using Chevrons RiskMan2 Procedure (Chevron Corporation 2008, as amended from
time to time).
The main components of the RiskMan2 risk assessment methodology include:
Hazard Identification: Identifying potential hazards that are applicable to Gorgon Gas
Development activities and determining the hazardous events to be evaluated.
Hazard Analysis: Determining the possible causes that could lead to the hazardous
events identified; the consequences of the hazardous events; and the safeguards and
controls currently in place, or required, to mitigate the events and/or the consequences.
Risk Evaluation: Evaluating the risks using the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization
Matrix (Figure 5-1). The risk ranking is determined by a combination of the expected
frequency of the hazard occurring (likelihood) and the consequence of its occurrence.
Note that when assessing the consequence no credit is given to the hazard controls.
Hazard controls are taken into account in determining the likelihood of the event.
Residual Risk Treatment: Reviewing the proposed management controls for each of
the risks identified and proposing additional controls or making recommendations, if
required.
The risk assessments were undertaken in accordance with the following standards:
For this Plan, the RiskMan2 risk assessment methodology was used to assess risks from
pipeline installation activities and identify management measures in accordance with
Conditions 23.4 and 23.5 of Statement No. 800 and Conditions 16.4 and 16.5 of EPBC
Reference: 2003/1294 and 2008/4178.
Inherent risk was determined based on a no-controls scenario. In doing so, it was possible to
identify the effectiveness of the controls that will be implemented on the risk ranking (the
residual risk). Using the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1), identified
risks are categorised into four groups, which determine the level of response and effort in
managing the risks.
Public
Page 91
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
The risk-ranking categories (see Table 5-1) have been used in the development of this Plan to
determine whether the residual risks were acceptable or whether further mitigation was
required.
Table 5-1 Risk Levels and Risk Tolerability1
Risk Level
Description
Intolerable
1, 2, 3, 4
7, 8, 9, 10
Note: The term tolerable is synonymous to the term acceptable used in the AS/NZS on Environmental Risk
Management (Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand 2006)
Risks that have a risk level of 7, 8, 9 or 10 are considered to be 'low', with no further risk
reduction required (as per Table 5-1). However, at management/team discretion, additional risk
mitigation measures are included to reduce impacts from pipeline installation activities as far as
practicable and to achieve world-class performance.
Based on the outcomes of the risk assessments completed to date, the following key risk
categories and environmental aspects have been identified:
Physical presence:
fauna interaction
artificial light
Installation activities:
erosion
site reinstatement
Cultural heritage:
shipwrecks
Public
Page 93
Uncontrolled when Printed
ballast water
biofouling
Discharges to sea:
deck drainage
cooling water
Disposal of wastes:
hydrotest water
Atmospheric emissions:
combustion emissions
dust
Unplanned events:
fire.
Table 5-2 provides a register for each of these risk categories, including inherent risk,
management and mitigation measures and residual risk.
The subsequent sections describe each of the risk categories.
In accordance with
Condition 23.4 (i) and 23.4 (ii) of Statement No. 800 and Condition 16.4 (i) and 16.4 (ii) of EPBC
Reference: 2003/1294 and 2008/4178, the subsequent sections describe both:
Management measures to reduce the impacts from pipeline installation activities as far
as practicable
Page 94
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Fauna injury/mortality
Fauna interaction
(vehicle strike)
Fauna injury/mortality
Fauna interaction
(personnel/
equipment)
Fauna injury/mortality
Physical
Presence
Fauna interaction
(vessel strike)
Physical
Presence
Physical
Presence
Residual
Risk
C
Public
Page 95
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
C
Physical
Presence
Fauna interaction
(trenching in the
intertidal zone)
Fauna injury/mortality
Physical
Presence
Artificial light
Disturbance of fauna,
altering foraging and
breeding activities
Lighting will be managed in accordance with the Longterm Marine Turtle Management Plan
Physical
Presence
Disturbance of fauna
behaviour resulting in
possible displacement
from areas
Masking of biologically
important sounds
Temporary or
permanent reductions
in hearing sensitivity
Physical impact on
burrows and habitats
from vibration
Page 96
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
C
Physical
Presence
Interference with
other users
Installation vessels
create obstacle to
other vessel
movements
Restricted access to
work areas
Installation
Activities
Disturbance of
benthic habitats
(direct loss during
pipeline installation)
Installation
Activities
Disturbance of
benthic habitats
(dropped objects)
Disturbance and/or
loss of benthic
habitats
Installation
Activities
Disturbance of
benthic habitats and
other vegetation
(unauthorised
disturbance)
Disturbance and/or
loss of benthic
habitats and other
vegetation
Public
Page 97
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
C
Installation
Activities
Anchoring and
mooring
Disturbance to seabed
and/or benthic habitat
Installation
Activities
Turbidity and
sedimentation
(trenching and
jetting)
Disturbance and/or
loss of benthic
habitats from
increased turbidity in
the water column
and/or smothering
during sedimentation
Fauna injury/mortality
Disturbance of marine
fauna
Page 98
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
C
Installation
Activities
Turbidity and
sedimentation
(rock-bolting)
Disturbance and/or
loss of benthic
habitats from
increased turbidity in
the water column
and/or smothering
during sedimentation
Fauna injury/mortality
Disturbance of marine
fauna
Installation
Activities
Turbidity and
sedimentation
(rock installation)
Disturbance and/or
loss of benthic
habitats from
increased turbidity in
the water column
and/or smothering
during sedimentation
Fauna injury/mortality
Disturbance of marine
fauna
Installation
Activities
Turbidity and
sedimentation
(thruster wash)
Disturbance and/or
loss of benthic
habitats from
increased turbidity in
the water column
and/or smothering
during sedimentation
Disturbance of marine
fauna
Installation
Activities
Disturbance of
PASS
Oxidisation of sulfides
Page 99
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
Increased acidity of
soils and groundwater
Mobilisation of heavy
metals
Loss of benthic habitat
and vegetation
Installation
Activities
Erosion
Installation
Activities
Site reinstatement
Poor site
reinstatement
Poor revegetation
Loss of fauna habitat
Loss of biodiversity
Establishment of
introduced flora
species
Increased erosion and
siltation of water
courses
Increased
Page 100
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
C
maintenance and
rehabilitation
requirements
Cultural
Heritage
Shipwrecks
Disturbance of
shipwrecks
Loss of archaeological
data and cultural
heritage values
10
Cultural
Heritage
Indigenous heritage
sites
Disturbance of
indigenous heritage
sites and artefacts
Damage and/or loss of
artefacts
Loss of cultural
heritage values
10
Public
Page 101
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
Ballast water
Competition with
native fauna and flora
for resources such as
food and shelter
Introduction of disease
and pathogens
Detrimental impacts to
aquaculture and
fisheries
Predation of fauna
Reduction of native
biodiversity
Possible
crossbreeding with
native fauna
Alteration of natural
habitats
Introduction of
NIS
Biofouling
Competition with
native fauna and flora
for resources
Introduction of disease
and pathogens
Detrimental impacts to
aquaculture and
fisheries
Predation of native
fauna
Reduction of native
Page 102
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
C
biodiversity
Possible
crossbreeding with
native fauna
Alteration of natural
habitats
Introduction of
NIS
Introduction and/or
spread of weeds
Loss of biodiversity
Loss of native flora,
vegetation and fauna
habitat
Soil erosion
Reduced availability of
water resources
Reduced access for
native fauna and stock
to water
Damage to animal
hooves and vehicle
tyres from Mesquite
thorns
Increased numbers of
feral animals, through
provision of refuges in
dense Mesquite
thickets
Discharges to
Sea
Deck drainage
Localised pollution of
the water column
leading to adverse
impacts to marine life
Public
Page 103
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
Sewage, greywater
and putrescible
wastes
Increased nutrient
availability and
biological oxygen
demand (BOD)
Loss of visual amenity
10
Discharges to
Sea
Equipment and
Machinery Space
Localised pollution of
the water column
leading to adverse
impacts to marine life
10
Discharges to
Sea
Cooling water
Localised pollution of
the water column
10
10
Disposal of
Wastes
Non-hazardous and
hazardous waste
Page 104
Uncontrolled when Printed
Fauna
injury/mortality
from ingestion or
entanglement
Soil and/or water
contamination
Damage to and
smothering of benthic
habitat and vegetation
Attraction of pests and
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
seabirds
Generation of odour
from inappropriate
storage
Disposal of
Wastes
Welding and
coating debris
Disposal of
Wastes
Hydrotest water
Atmospheric
Emissions
Combustion
emissions
Public
Page 105
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
10
Ozone depleting
substances
Degradation of the
ozone layer
Atmospheric
Emissions
Dust
Adverse impacts to
human health
Reduced visual
amenity
Damage to vegetation,
in the event of
substantial deposition
on foliage
Disturbance of fauna
Unplanned
Events
Page 106
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
grounding)
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
Shoreline pollution
Disruption to fishing
Unplanned
Events
Unplanned
Events
Public
Page 107
Uncontrolled when Printed
Environmental
Aspect
Category
Unplanned
Events
Consequence/
Impact
activities and
maintenance)
Oiling of birds
Shoreline pollution
Soil and/or water
contamination
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
Unplanned
Events
Unplanned
discharge of
chemically treated
water (wet buckle)
Page 108
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
Category
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Environmental
Aspect
Consequence/
Impact
Inherent Risk
C
Residual
Risk
Unplanned
discharge of
chemically treated
water (hydrotest
leak)
Unplanned
Events
Fire
Damage to vegetation
Fauna injury/mortality
Note:
Public
Page 109
Uncontrolled when Printed
5.2
The Marine Disturbance Footprint (MDF) for the DomGas pipeline includes:
the Marine Facilities Footprint, which are the areas of the seabed associated with the
physical footprint of the DomGas Pipeline, including rock bolts, rock installation and
concrete mattresses
the extent of the surrounding seabed in which the planned installation and operation
activities could be expected to disturb the seabed. This encompasses an area
extending 100 m on both sides of the pipeline alignment (i.e. a 200 m-wide corridor)
the areas of the seabed and the ecological elements that may be affected by temporary,
localised increases in Suspended Sediment Concentrations (SSC) and sedimentation
rates generated by nearshore trenching and jetting activities (the Trenching and Jetting
MDF)
the areas of the seabed within the indicative anchoring areas that will be directly
impacted by anchoring (anchors, wire and chain sweep) (discussed in Section 5.5.2).
A detailed description of areas of Material or Serious Environmental Harm and the MDF for the
DomGas pipeline is provided in the Coastal and Marine Baseline State and Environmental
Impact Report: Domestic Gas Pipeline (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to
time).
Material or Serious Environmental Harm due to the construction or operation of the DomGas
pipeline within the intertidal zone, may also occur within the Terrestrial Disturbance Footprint
(TDF) for the DomGas pipeline.
The TDF concept is outlined within the Terrestrial and Subterranean Baseline State and
Environmental Impact Report (Chevron Australia 2012a, as amended from time to time). T
environmental aspects, impacts and mitigation measures outlined in subsequent sections for
construction in the intertidal zone are applicable to the TDF concept and obligations.
Page 110
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 111
Uncontrolled when Printed
5.3
Potential impacts to marine turtles from the Gorgon Gas Development, including during
installation of the DomGas pipeline, are identified and described in the Long-term Marine Turtle
Management Plan (Chevron Australia 2013, as amended from time to time).
Marine turtle life stages, primarily Green, Flatback and Hawksbill Turtles that are potentially at
risk from the Gorgon Gas Development include:
eggs
Table 5-3 describes potential stressors to marine turtles during the installation of the DomGas
pipeline and references the subsequent sections within this Plan, which address management
of each of these aspects.
Table 5-3
Pipeline
Stressor
Description
Relevant Section
in the Plan
Vessel Movement
5.4.1.1
Seawater Intake
5.4.1.3
Light
5.4.2
Noise and
Vibration
5.4.3
Turbidity and
Sedimentation
Spills and Leaks
5.5.3
5.11.1
Note: Adapted from Long-term Marine Turtle Management Plan (Chevron Australia 2013, as amended from time to
time).
Page 112
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
5.4
Physical Presence
Vessel Movement
Vessel movements have the potential to result in marine fauna vessel strikes, which can cause
serious harm and injury, or in the worst case, mortality. Slow-moving species, such as various
whale species, dugongs and marine turtles, are most susceptible to vessel strikes, as they have
restricted capacity to rapidly alter course or direction. The ability of these species to avoid an
approaching vessel decreases with increasing vessel speed (Chevron Australia 2012b, as
amended from time to time).
In general, during installation activities for the DomGas pipeline, the Pipelay Barges will be
stationary or move very slowly (<0.5 knots). Therefore, the risk of marine fauna vessel strike
from these vessels whilst undertaking installation activities is considered low.
There is a greater risk of marine fauna vessel strike when vessels are in transit and moving at
greater speeds. These vessels may include pipe supply vessels in transit to site, survey
vessels, cargo vessels, and crew boats. Anchor Handling Vessels may also move at greater
speeds during anchor running activities.
To reduce the risk of marine fauna vessel strike as far as reasonably practicable, these
measures will be implemented:
If marine fauna are spotted, installation vessels moving at speeds greater than five knots
will adjust their speed and direction to avoid impacting the animal, where practicable.
Caution zones around cetaceans will be established for the installation activities,
consistent with Part 8 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation
Regulations 2000.
Marine fauna observers will closely monitor and record fauna behaviour when fauna are
observed in the vicinity of or approaching the installation vessels.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to marine fauna from vessel
strikes is low and no further risk reduction is required in accordance with the Chevron Integrated
Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Marine megafauna (whales, dolphins, dugongs, turtles, Whale Sharks) sighting observations will
be recorded and reported to DotE in annual compliance reporting and on request. Any detected
injury or fatality of marine fauna will be reported in accordance with Section 7.7.4.
5.4.1.2
The movement of vehicles and equipment during construction and installation activities in the
intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) presents a risk to fauna through vehicle strike, which
may result in fauna injury or mortality.
To reduce this risk as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Vehicles travelling along the ROW will be restricted to designated speed limits.
Public
Page 113
Uncontrolled when Printed
Dead fauna will be moved away from worksites (including the ROW) if it is appropriate
and safe to do so.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to fauna from vehicle and
equipment movement is low and no further risk reduction is required in accordance with the
Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Any detected injury or fatality of fauna will be reported in accordance with Section 7.7.4.
5.4.1.3
Fauna interaction with personnel and equipment during both offshore and intertidal installation
activities presents a risk to fauna.
Marine fauna may become entangled in lines used for mooring or anchoring, or lines used to
deploy equipment. Marine fauna may also become entrained during seawater intakes for water
winning near Barrow Island.
During clearing and earthworks in the intertidal zone, smaller, slow-moving, or less mobile fauna
may be crushed by advancing machinery or by destruction of their habitat.
To reduce these risks as far as reasonably practicable the measures outlined in Sections
5.4.1.1 and 5.4.1.2 and listed below will be implemented:
All worksite personnel and visitors will be inducted regarding the proper response to
wildlife encounters (including interaction with fauna, littering, feeding fauna, approaching
fauna, and unexpected fauna encounters).
The seawater intake for water winning will be fitted with screens and the intake velocity
limited to a maximum of 0.1 m/s to minimise the entrainment of marine fauna.
Inspections of cleared areas will be made as soon as possible after clearing, and Fauna
Handlers will be called in if displaced or injured animals are found.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to fauna from interaction with
personnel and equipment is low and no further risk reduction is required in accordance with the
Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Records will be kept of dead, injured, captured, or entrapped fauna and will be reported in
accordance with Section 7.7.
5.4.1.4
Trenching activities in the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) may lead to the injury and/or
mortality of marine and other fauna. Marine fauna, such as fish, may come into the trench on
an incoming tide and become stranded on the outgoing tide. Other fauna may fall into the
trench, leading to injury and/or mortality. Fauna that become stranded in the trench become
easy prey for predators. Fauna that are unable to swim may drown when the trench is flooded.
Fauna may also be buried from trench collapse or during backfilling.
To reduce these risks as far as reasonably practicable, the measures outlined in Sections
5.4.1.2 and 5.4.1.3 and listed below will be implemented:
The open trench (from Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) will be inspected twice daily for fauna in
the morning and late afternoon when tides allow, where practicable, and prior to
stringing and/or lowering in of pipe to the flooded trench and backfilling.
Fauna exit structures and/or escape ramps will be constructed at regular intervals to
enable fauna to exit the trench, where practicable.
Page 114
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Crossings will be installed across open trenches at regular intervals to enable fauna to
cross the trench, where practicable.
The use of fauna exit structures and/or escape ramps will be reviewed during trenching
activities to ensure that risks to fauna are minimised and adaptive management measures are
undertaken, if required.
Fauna found in trenches will be removed by Fauna Handlers in accordance with fauna handling
procedures, where practicable. The removal of fish or other fauna from the flooded trench may
not be safe or practicable, and may cause additional stress to the fauna.
With the implementation of the above measures for trenching, the residual risk to fauna from
trenching activities is low and no further risk reduction is required in accordance with the
Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
extent to which light spills into areas that are significant for breeding and foraging
resilience of the fauna populations that are affected (Chevron Australia 2005).
Within the areas potentially affected by the proposed activities, the marine fauna most sensitive
to the effects of artificial lighting are marine turtles. Elevated light levels on nesting beaches
can be detrimental to marine turtles because it could disrupt visual cues and alter behaviour in
these species, including behaviours such as:
deter females from nesting (Salmon 2003, cited in Chevron Australia 2013)
slow swimming, and aggregation of hatchlings around lit vessels and in-water structures,
leading to increased predation risks (Kebodeaux 1994, cited in Chevron Australia 2013).
Turtle nesting beaches that have been identified close to the DomGas pipeline route occur on
the east coast of Barrow Island, near the jetty tie-in, and on sandy beaches of the Great Sandy
and Passage Island groups (Pendoley et al. 2003).
Table 4-5 shows turtle species that are known to nest on beaches of the Great Sandy and
Passage Islands groups, within approximately 25 km of the DomGas pipeline route.
Turtle nesting beaches at Middle Passage Island (approximately 12 km away) and Sholl Island
(24 km distant) are considered to be regionally significant Hawksbill Turtle rookeries, due to the
high density of Hawksbill Turtles observed nesting at these islands (Pendoley et al. 2003).
Mangroves at the mainland shore-crossing are also habitat for juvenile Green Turtles, and posthatchling Flatback Turtles may potentially occur here (Chevron Australia 2013, as amended
from time to time).
Public
Page 115
Uncontrolled when Printed
To reduce the impact of lighting on turtles and other marine fauna, lighting will be managed in
accordance with the Long-term Marine Turtle Management Plan (Chevron Australia 2013, as
amended from time to time).
The duration of DomGas pipeline installation activities is limited to approximately six to seven
months. Activities close to Barrow Island, including deep water pipelay, rock-bolting, riser
installation, and pre-commissioning will take approximately four to five months. Activities close
to the Great Sandy and Passage Island groups, including shallow water pipelay and jetting, and
will take approximately two to three months.
Due to the short duration of DomGas pipeline construction activities, particularly vessel lighting
close to nesting beaches at Barrow Island and the Great Sandy and Passage Island groups, the
residual risk to marine turtles and other fauna from artificial lighting is low. No further risk
reduction is required in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix
(Figure 5-1).
Note: With reference to turtle nesting periods, the timing of installation activities will be
confirmed following detailed design and scheduling. Current scheduling of installation activities
(from April to October 2012) is outside the cyclone period and avoids key turtle nesting periods
(see Section 4.2.2.2).
masking biologically important sounds (e.g. sound cues from prey or predators)
The impacts of noise on different fauna species is dependent on the distance from the source,
frequency, vibration, intensity, and persistence of noise, as well as the hearing, vocalisations
and other biological characteristics of the organism (Richardson et al. 1995).
Noise and vibration will be generated during DomGas pipeline installation by:
vessel operations
intertidal trenching
rock-bolting
rock installation
pre-commissioning activities
helicopter transfers.
Trenching, jetting and rock-bolting activities will be undertaken progressively along the
proposed pipeline route; therefore, noise generated by these activities in any one area should
only be short-term.
Page 116
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Pre-commissioning activities will generate noise at the Barrow Island jetty tie-in location with the
operation of pre-commissioning equipment, including pumps and compressors. The operation
of this equipment may occur 24 hours a day during pre-commissioning activities, lasting
approximately three to four weeks.
It is likely that DomGas installation activities will have a short-term behavioural impact on fauna
in the local area, with fauna temporarily vacating the immediate area and returning to normal
behaviour when the activities cease.
To reduce the risk to fauna from noise and vibration as far as reasonably practicable, these
measures will be implemented:
Equipment covers, mufflers and other noise suppression equipment will be maintained
and will be in good working order at all times.
Engines and/or equipment will not be left in stand-by or running mode unnecessarily.
Helicopter height will be maintained during transit, in accordance with Part 8 of the
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000.
Residual risk to fauna from noise and vibration is low due to the short duration of noisegeneration activities and with the implementation of these measures. No further risk reduction
is required in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.5
Installation Activities
DomGas pipeline installation, including installation of the pipeline, rock bolts and rock
installation, will result in the direct loss of seabed and benthic habitat where the pipeline is laid.
The offshore DomGas pipeline route has been located to avoid coral and other sensitive benthic
habitats between Barrow Island and the mainland (see Section 4.2.1).
The DomGas pipeline route at the mainland shore-crossing and within the intertidal zone has
been located adjacent and parallel to the existing Apache easement, with a curved alignment
away from the Apache easement to allow for safe installation and to avoid disturbing Maceys
Wreck (see Figure 4-8). The location of the DomGas pipeline route close to the Apache
easement was designed to avoid disturbing other areas along the mainland coastline.
Public
Page 117
Uncontrolled when Printed
Within the intertidal zone (from KP 0 to KP 12) the DomGas pipeline will be buried within a 30 m
ROW. Up to 3.5 ha of mangroves and 9 ha of samphires will be cleared to allow for pipeline
installation.
The calculated area loss for mangroves and samphires is greater than the original area loss
calculations provided in the Draft EIS/ERMP for the Gorgon Gas Development, which were
2.3 ha of mangroves and 3.5 ha of samphires (Chevron Australia 2005). This is due to the
realignment of the pipeline route to avoid disturbing Maceys Wreck and due to updated
mapping of vegetation from field surveys (see Section 4.2.1.5 and Figure 4-5).
Management and mitigation measures to ensure that the clearing of mangroves is restricted to
designated areas are discussed in Section 5.5.1.3.
Following the completion of installation, pre-commissioning, and site reinstatement activities, a
mangrove restoration plan/program will be implemented by Chevron Australia.
5.5.1.2
During DomGas pipeline installation activities and vessel transit, disturbance to benthic habitats
may occur from dropped objects. To reduce this risk as far as reasonably practicable, these
measures will be implemented:
Pipeline installation activities will take place within the approved pipelay corridor and
MDF.
Residual risk to benthic habitats from dropped objects is low and no further risk reduction is
required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.5.1.3
Disturbance of benthic habitats (mangroves and samphires) and other vegetation could occur
from unauthorised clearing or vehicle and/or equipment movement outside the designated
areas, resulting in further loss of these habitats. Clearing outside designated areas could result
in Material or Serious Environmental Harm, which is outside the MDF and TDF. To reduce the
risk of clearing outside designated areas, ground and vegetation disturbance procedures will be
developed by the contractor/s and Chevron Australia prior to commencement of intertidal
construction activities to manage clearing activities, including:
checking the surveyed area against Approved For Construction (AFC) work plans and
drawings
certification and close-out to ensure all steps have been completed to minimise clearing
impacts.
To reduce the risk of disturbance to benthic habitats and other vegetation as far as reasonably
practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Signage and/or boundary markers will be in place along the ROW, where appropriate.
Page 118
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Vehicle movements will be minimised as far as practicable (e.g. using buses to transfer
personnel to the worksite).
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk of unauthorised disturbance to
benthic habitats is low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron
Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Any unauthorised clearing of benthic habitats or other habitats shall be reported to the DPaW
and DER in accordance with Section 7.7.
Public
Page 119
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 5-4 Typical 8-point Mooring Pattern for Shallow Water and Deep Water Pipelay
Barges
Anchoring of pipe supply vessels, cargo barges, accommodation vessels and other ancillary
vessels (see Section 3.3) may also occur to support pipeline installation activities. In general,
anchoring points for these vessels shall be located within indicative anchoring areas (shown in
Figure 5-5 and Figure 5-6).
Anchoring points for pipe supply vessels and cargo barges may also be located approximately
every 5 km along the pipeline route. These anchoring points are proposed to be located outside
the 8-point mooring pattern for the Shallow and Deep Water Pipelay Barges to avoid
interference with pipelay activities and to minimise risk to the laid pipeline.
In poor weather conditions, sea state, and/or in an emergency, additional sites may also be
used for anchoring at the discretion of the Vessel Masters to provide better safety of the vessels
and their crew. These sites may include more sheltered locations around the islands of the
Passage Islands group and approved anchoring sites/moorings near Barrow Island.
Page 120
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 121
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 122
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Pre-lay surveys will be undertaken and these will assist in determining suitable anchoring
locations (see Section 3.4). Anchoring points for pipe supply vessels, cargo barges,
accommodation vessels, and other ancillary vessels will avoid coral habitat areas.
Where coral habitats occur within the indicative anchoring areas for pipeline installation,
particularly near Barrow Island (see Figure 5-5), anchoring procedures will be developed by the
contractor/s prior to the commencement of offshore construction activities to limit impacts to
coral habitat, including the use of a start-up anchor or clump weight to initiate pipelay.
Figure 5-7, Figure 5-8 and Figure 5-9 show typical mooring patterns within coral habitat areas
near the Barrow Island Jetty and at coral pinnacle locations. The engineering design of the
typical mooring patterns has endeavoured to avoid anchor placement near identified coral
habitats and to avoid extension of mooring lines above coral habitat areas, where practicable.
Due to the location and size of the coral pinnacle along the offshore DomGas pipeline route
(refer to Figure 5-9), two mooring lines may extend above the coral pinnacle at this location at
any one time.
To reduce risks from anchoring as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be
implemented:
Anchoring procedures to minimise the impacts from anchoring and wire/chain sweep will
be developed.
Coral habitat mapping will be used to clearly identify coral habitat areas during
engineering design and for incorporation into anchoring drawings and procedures.
Coral habitat within indicative anchoring areas will be identified and marked within vessel
navigation systems on the Deep Water Pipelay Barge and the associated Anchor
Handling Vessels.
Buoys will be attached to mooring lines used above coral habitat areas where there is
sufficient water depth, where practicable.
ensuring all the rigging used for running anchors is certified, in good working condition
and fit-for-purpose
regular inspection of anchor lines to ensure they are in good working condition
monitoring of anchor tension to ensure anchors are holding and not dragging
use of tide, current, wind and other data to determine the appropriate sequence for
running anchors and to ensure anchoring operations suit the conditions and activities
being undertaken.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk associated with anchoring and
mooring activities is low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the
Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix.
Public
Page 123
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 5-7 Typical Mooring Pattern for the Deep Water Pipelay Barge near Coral at the
Barrow Island Jetty
Page 124
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Figure 5-8 Typical Mooring Pattern for the Deep Water Pipelay Barge at Coral Pinnacle
near Barrow Island
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 125
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 5-9 Typical Mooring Pattern for the Deep Water Pipelay Barge at Coral Pinnacle
along Offshore DomGas Pipeline Route
Page 126
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
5.5.3.1
Trenching and jetting activities for DomGas pipeline installation will generate turbidity and
sedimentation within the MDF. Trenching and jetting will mobilise sediments into the water
column, initially with the physical movement and suspension of material from the trench and/or
underneath the laid pipeline, and with subsequent resuspension of fine particles with strong tidal
currents. Sedimentation will occur in the immediate area and surrounds, as particles fall out of
the water column and are deposited on the seabed. (Refer to Section 3.6.1 for a description of
trenching and jetting activities.)
Conservative modelling of offshore trenching and jetting activities has been undertaken, where
trenching and jetting activities were modelled to occur consecutively (excluding the intermediary
period of pipelay) (APASA 2010).
Modelling shows that there are negligible turbidity impacts due to jetting the small offshore
sections along the pipeline route, and that the turbidity plume generated is confined to the
nearshore region, generally within 5 km of the pipeline route (APASA 2010).
During trenching (KP 57.0 to KP 59.4), concentrations of 10 mg/L above background are limited
to within 2 km of pipeline trench, with the relatively low mobilisation rate of the excavator.
However, due to the presence of fine sediments nearshore, suspended and resuspended
particles in the water column accumulate as excavating continues (APASA 2010).
Mobilisation of sediments by jetting (KP 48.4 to KP 57.0) is significantly higher than excavating,
resulting in a more rapidly expanding plume nearshore, with concentrations of 25 mg/L above
background limited to approximately 5 km from the pipeline route. Due to large tidal currents,
fine sediments remain suspended in the water column for the duration of jetting activities
(APASA 2010).
Modelling predicts that sediments generated during trenching and jetting activities remains in
the nearshore tidal zone, effectively trapped by tidal cycling and the wetting and drying cycles of
the tidal flats (APASA 2010). Course material (74 m and greater) settles within minutes of
being suspended by excavation and jetting activities. However, finer material disperses further
and deposition of material may occur within the mouth of the creek directly to the north of the
pipeline route shore-crossing (APASA 2010).
During jetting of the offshore sections (KP 26.0 to KP 27.0 and KP 23.8 to KP 24.5), there is no
significant turbidity plume. Modelling shows concentrations of 2 mg/L above background only
occur for one to two days throughout trenching and jetting activities (APASA 2010).
Construction activities within the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12), including clearing of
mangroves, trenching and backfilling, may also generate turbidity and sedimentation associated
with tidal flow in and out of the intertidal zone. Turbidity generated from these activities is likely
to remain with the intertidal zone and nearshore region, with sediments trapped within the large
intertidal zone and nearshore tidal zone.
Public
Page 127
Uncontrolled when Printed
The short-term increase in turbidity during trenching, jetting and construction activities within the
intertidal zone is unlikely to have a significant impact on benthic habitats. The nearshore
environment, mangroves, and intertidal flats are tidally dominated. There are strong tidal
currents, large tidal ranges, and naturally highly turbid waters with active sediments trapped
within creeks or estuaries (APASA 2010).
Field surveys within the nearshore region have indicated ambient SSC in the range of 5
30 mg/L in surface waters and 20100 mg/L in bottom waters (Chevron Australia 2012a, as
amended from time to time). Natural events, such as cyclones and large rainfall events, often
result in large outflows of sediment-rich water from creek systems.
The coral communities present are also typical of naturally turbid nearshore environments in the
Pilbara and are reasonably tolerant to turbidity and sedimentation (see Section 4.2.1.1).
Due to the short duration of disturbance activities and the benthic habitats present, long-term
impacts from the generation of turbidity and sedimentation is not anticipated.
To reduce risks to benthic habitats and fauna from trenching and jetting as far as reasonably
practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Clearing of mangroves and other vegetation will be restricted to designated areas (see
Section 5.5.1.3).
Site reinstatement procedures for activities occurring in the intertidal zone (Onshore
KP 0 to KP 12) will be developed by the contractor/s and implemented as soon as
practicable following competition of construction and pre-commissioning activities (see
Section 5.5.6).
With the implementation of the above measures and given the naturally turbid environment,
residual risk from trenching and jetting is low and no further risk reduction is required, in
accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.5.3.2
Rock-bolting
Rock-bolting activities for DomGas pipeline installation will generate turbidity and sedimentation
through rock debris and discharge of grout during the drilling of rock bolts. These impacts are
expected to be localised and temporary, within close proximity to each rock bolt. Average
drilling time for each rock bolt is expected to be approximately two hours.
To reduce risks to benthic habitats and fauna from rock-bolting as far as reasonably practicable,
these measures will be implemented:
Rock-bolt design will be fit-for-purpose for the geotechnical conditions along the pipeline
route.
Grout and/or cement used during drilling of the rock bolts will be approved through
Chevron Australias chemical approval process, with the aim of selecting the least
hazardous materials.
Page 128
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
With the implementation of the above measures, residual risk from rock bolting is low and no
further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization
Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.5.3.3
Rock Installation
Rock installation may generate turbidity and sedimentation from the momentum of the rock as it
is placed on the seabed, generating suspension of sediments. These impacts are expected to
be localised and temporary, within close proximity to the rock installation locations.
Rock installation activities will take approximately two to four weeks.
To reduce risks to benthic habitats and fauna from rock installation as far as reasonably
practicable, these measures will be implemented:
The quantity of rock placed on the DomGas pipeline and surrounding seabed will be
controlled by limiting the volume of rock located in each compartment on the Rock
Installation Vessel.
With the implementation of the above measures, residual risk from rock installation is low and
no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk
Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.5.3.4
Thruster Wash
Thrusters may be used on support vessels (such as anchor handling tugs, pipe supply vessels,
and survey vessels) to maintain vessel position amidst waves, currents and winds. Thruster
wash has the potential to increase turbidity and sedimentation, particularly in shallow waters.
However, as pipeline installation activities will move along a predefined path, only short-term
impacts from thruster wash are expected in any one location. Therefore, no significant
environmental impacts are anticipated and the residual risk is assessed as low. No further risk
reduction is required in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix
(Figure 5-1).
Public
Page 129
Uncontrolled when Printed
Management measures for reducing potential risks associated with the disturbance of PASS will
be detailed in an Acid Sulfate Soil Management Plan (ASSMP). The ASSMP will be developed
in conjunction with the DER and will detail:
With the development and implementation of an ASSMP, the residual risk to the environment
due to the disturbance of PASS is low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance
with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.5.5 Erosion
Installation of the DomGas pipeline in the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) may lead to
erosion along the pipeline route. Clearing of mangroves at the shore-crossing is likely to
expose soils to erosion and create a preferential flow path, allowing accelerated flow of water
with the incoming tide moving inland along the pipeline route. Within the pipeline trench,
preferential flow may occur along the pipeline route due to the presence of the pipeline, the
changed soil profile, and increased porosity of the soil.
Due to increased water flow along the pipeline route and within the pipeline trench, erosion and
siltation of creek lines that intersect the pipeline route may occur. If unmanaged, erosion and
siltation may lead to further impacts to benthic habitats and other vegetation along the pipeline
route, poor reinstatement, and increased rehabilitation requirements.
To reduce these risks as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Clearing of mangroves and other vegetation will be restricted to designated areas (see
Section 5.5.1.3).
Methods that avoid uprooting mangroves (i.e. rolling or slashing/cutting) will be used
during clearing, where practicable.
Temporary erosion control measures will not prevent or unnecessarily restrict water
flows from creeks or gullies.
Trench-breakers will be installed for erosion control and to prevent trench collapse,
where practicable.
Site reinstatement procedures for activities occurring within the intertidal zone (KP 0 to
KP 12) will be prepared by the contractor/s and implemented as soon as practicable.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to the environment from erosion is
low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk
Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Public
poor revegetation
loss of biodiversity
To reduce these risks as far as practicable, the following measures will be implemented for
installation activities occurring within the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12):
All waste will be removed from within DomGas construction areas and disposed of to
approved facilities.
The area will be re-contoured to the natural profile and erosion control works will be
installed, where practicable.
Temporary artificial drainage, erosion, and sediment control measures will be removed.
Any fencing removed during DomGas construction activities will be replaced, where
appropriate.
Vehicle and equipment access to reinstated areas will be restricted, where practicable.
5.6
5.6.1 Shipwrecks
The installation of the DomGas pipeline has the potential to cause adverse physical impact to
historic shipwrecks. Direct physical contact with a shipwreck site may destroy the ships
remains and disturb the site context, resulting in the loss of archaeological data and cultural
heritage values.
No shipwrecks have been identified along the offshore DomGas pipeline route during searches
of databases of the Western Australian Maritime Museum (URS 2009) and during geophysical
and marine baseline surveys (URS 2009).
However, near the DomGas shore-crossing is Maceys Wreck (see Section 4.3.1.3). The
DomGas pipeline has been realigned to avoid disturbing Maceys Wreck and to allow for safe
construction away from Apaches easement (see Figure 4-8).
To further reduce the risk of disturbing Maceys Wreck as far as reasonably practicable, these
measures will be implemented:
The residual risk of disturbance to Maceys Wreck is low with the implementation of these
measures and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated
Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 131
Uncontrolled when Printed
Should any other shipwrecks or cultural heritage material be discovered during pipeline
installation, this will be reported in accordance with legislative requirements and as described in
Section 5.6.2.
Any heritage material that is uncovered during construction will be managed in accordance with
State and Commonwealth legislative requirements. To reduce risks to any heritage material
that may be uncovered during construction as far as reasonably practicable, these measures
will also be implemented:
All construction work in the immediate vicinity of the material will cease until further
notice from Chevron Australia and indigenous cultural heritage monitors onsite.
Reasonable efforts to protect the material and secure the site will be made. The
material will not be moved or further disturbed; buffer zones or temporary barriers may
be established, where practicable.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to indigenous heritage sites is low
and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk
Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Page 132
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
5.7
competition with native fauna and flora for resources such as food and shelter
alteration of natural habitats (Chevron Australia 2010a, as amended from time to time).
The Chevron Quarantine Management System (QMS) (Chevron Australia 2012c, as amended
from time to time) is in place to prevent the introduction/proliferation of non-indigenous terrestrial
species and marine pests to Barrow Island and surrounding waters.
Marine Quarantine Zonation is used as a management tool to specify fit-for-purpose quarantine
requirements for any marine vessels operated for the purpose of the Gorgon Gas Development
entering the waters surrounding Barrow Island during the construction phase of the project.
Marine vessels approaching Barrow Island will be subjected to progressively more stringent
quarantine requirements in each defined zone, as described in the Phase 4 Marine Quarantine
Zonation for Barrow Island (Chevron Australia 2008a, as amended from time to time).
Marine vessels operating outside the Barrow Island Marine Quarantine Zonation will be required
to conform to the requirements of AQIS Australian Ballast Water Management, including:
Given the stringent requirements that vessels must adhere to, the residual risk of introducing
exotic marine organisms to the region from the discharge of ballast water is low. No further risk
reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix
(Figure 5-1).
5.7.2 Biofouling
Biofouling refers to the attachment of marine organisms to any part of a vessel (including the
hulls, rudders, propellers, and other hull appendages) or fluid filled spaces/niches (such as sea
chests and engine cooling pipes), or any equipment attached to or on board the vessel.
Biofouling may also introduce non-indigenous marine species to the DomGas pipeline
installation area.
To reduce the risk of marine pest translocation and introduction via biofouling as far as
reasonably practicable, a desktop quarantine compliance risk assessment will be undertaken to
determine the risk posed by each vessel being used for pipeline installation activities. The risk
assessment will consider:
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 133
Uncontrolled when Printed
If a vessel is deemed a high risk, inspections for exotic species (and cleaning where required)
will be undertaken prior to the vessel arriving at site.
Marine vessels entering the Barrow Island Marine Quarantine Zonation will be required to
comply with specific wetside and topside requirements, as described in the Phase 4 Marine
Quarantine Zonation for Barrow Island (Chevron Australia 2008a, as amended from time to
time).
Topside quarantine requirements include:
ensuring all vessels topsides and equipment are free of vermin, pests, animals, plants,
and plant and animal material
Given these measures, the potential for introducing exotic marine organisms to the region is
low. Thus, the residual risk associated with biofouling is low and no further risk reduction is
required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
soil erosion
During DomGas pipeline installation in the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12), the
introduction and spread of weeds may occur during clearing and earthworks, and by personnel,
equipment and vehicle movement on site. Weeds may also be introduced through the import of
fill and backfill material (if required).
To reduce the risk of introduction and spread of weeds, site-specific weed hygiene management
procedures will be developed by the contractor/s prior to commencement of intertidal
Page 134
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
With these measures in place, the residual risk of introduction or spread of weeds due to
pipeline installation activities in the intertidal zone is low. No further risk reduction is required, in
accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Following completion of installation, pre-commissioning, and site reinstatement activities, a
weed monitoring plan/program will be implemented by Chevron Australia. The weed monitoring
plan/program will detail timeframes for monitoring and proposed mitigation measures within the
DomGas easement for any project-attributable introduction or spread of weeds. The weed
management plan/program will be integrated with weed management strategies of the Pilbara
Mesquite Management Committee and the Department of Agriculture and Food.
5.8
Discharges to Sea
High standards of housekeeping will be maintained in all areas, including keeping the
area litter-free.
Only limited and fit-for-purpose hazardous and dangerous materials will be kept on
vessels and such materials will be stored and handled in accordance with relevant legal
requirements and industry standards.
Maintenance activities on vessels that have the potential to result in leaks or spills will be
contained.
Spill containment and recovery equipment will be provided where spills are possible;
such equipment will be maintained to ensure that it is readily available and in working
condition.
In the event of a spill or leak on deck, spilled materials will be cleaned and removed prior
to any deck wash-down activities.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to the marine environment from
deck wash is low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron
Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Public
Page 135
Uncontrolled when Printed
operability and performance. Waste management plans and procedures will be developed by
the contractor/s prior to commencement of offshore or intertidal construction activities and
implemented.
The risk to the environment from discharge of sewage, greywater and putrescibles is considered
low.
With the implementation of the above measures, residual risk from sewage, greywater and
putrescible wastes is low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the
Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.9
Disposal of Wastes
hazardous solid wastes, such as empty drums, batteries, hydrocarbon- and chemicalcontaminated materials (e.g. filters and rags)
hazardous liquid wastes, such as cleaning products, acids, solvents, epoxy liquids,
excess or spent chemicals, paints, used lubricating oils, and waste oil
Sewage, greywater and putrescible wastes generated offshore may be discharged at sea (see
Section 5.8.2).
Page 136
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
attraction of pests and seabirds resulting from inappropriate storage or disposal of food
scraps
The disposal of wastes to onshore landfill sites or treatment facilities also results in an
incremental increase in the rate at which those facilities reach their storage capacity, in turn
resulting in an incremental increase in land disturbance.
To reduce these risks as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Waste management plans and procedures will be developed by the contractor/s prior to
commencement of offshore or intertidal construction activities and implemented.
Spill kits and adequate bins for separation and segregation of wastes shall be available.
Storage of fuels, oils, solvents and other chemicals shall be in appropriate facilities (e.g.
with containment and/or bunding).
Domestic rubbish such as food wrapping, garbage and sanitary waste shall be stored in
designated areas, until removal offsite to approved waste facilities.
Waste storage containers will be covered/closed at all times to prevent spillage and
fauna access.
Solid wastes will be removed from site, as required, for disposal at approved waste
facilities.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk to the environment from disposal
of non-hazardous and hazardous waste is low and no further risk reduction is required, in
accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) requirements for use and disposal of welding and
coating materials will be adhered to, where practicable.
Public
Page 137
Uncontrolled when Printed
The residual risk to the environment with the implementation of these measures is low and no
further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization
Matrix (Figure 5-1).
The evaporation pond will be of a sufficient size to accommodate stormwater and will be
lined with an impervious polyethylene liner/membrane.
With these measures in place, the residual risk from disposal of hydrotest water is low and no
further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization
Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Unplanned discharge of chemically treated water is discussed in Section 5.11.3.
5.10
Atmospheric Emissions
Vessels will comply with the regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships
contained in Annex VI of the MARPOL Convention.
All vehicles and equipment will be operated and maintained to ensure optimum
efficiencies, in accordance with the manufacturers recommendations.
Fuel use within the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) will be reduced as far as
practicable by implementing measures to minimise the number of vehicle movements,
such as using buses for personnel transfer, limiting the number of light vehicles available
Page 138
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Vessels will comply with the requirements for ODS specified in Regulation 12 of
Annex VI of MARPOL 73/78, including the prohibition of deliberate release of ODS.
Personnel handling ODS will be certified and hold the necessary permits and licenses
required under the Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management
Regulations 1995.
The use of ODS in new refrigeration systems will be avoided, where practicable. Any
systems containing ODS that require recharging or replacement will be exchanged to an
ozone-friendly system, wherever such options are available.
The requirements for recording and reporting the use and disposal of ODS under the
Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Regulations 1995 will be
adhered to, including reporting the release of any ODS (e.g. from firefighting or
refrigeration systems).
While no routine discharges are expected from firefighting or refrigeration systems, any
discharge can contribute (on a minor scale) to ozone layer degradation. The likelihood of
leakage occurring within the systems is only remotely possible given the controls in place to
manage emissions. Therefore, the residual risk is low and no further risk reduction is required,
in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.10.3 Dust
Dust has the potential to adversely impact human health, visual amenity, vegetation (if there is
substantial deposition on foliage), and fauna in the immediate area.
Dust may be generated along the ROW in the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) from
vehicle and equipment movement, and trenching and stockpiling activities. However, the tidal
wetting of soils within the intertidal zone is expected to greatly reduce generation of dust from
these activities. Dust impacts from trenching activities are also likely to be short-term in any
given area, as trenching activities advance along the ROW.
To reduce risks associated with generation of dust as far as reasonably practicable, these
measures will be implemented:
Vehicle movements will be minimised as far as practicable (e.g. using buses to transfer
personnel to the worksite).
Vehicles travelling along the ROW will be restricted to designated speed limits.
Public
Page 139
Uncontrolled when Printed
With these measures in place, the residual risk to the environment from dust is low and no
further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization
Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.11
Unplanned Events
5.11.1.1
Quantitative hydrocarbon spill risk modelling was undertaken to assess oil spill risks to nearby
sensitive receptors during construction. Spill scenarios modelled included these potential
refuelling incidents:
an instantaneous spill of 2.5 m3 of fuel oil at KP 25, between Barrow Island and the
mainland
an instantaneous spill of 2.5 m3 of marine diesel at KP 50, near the mainland shorecrossing.
Spill scenarios representative of a vessel collision, grounding, or fuel tank rupture were also
modelled:
a 200 m3 spill of fuel oil, with a leak duration of six hours, at KP 0, at the Barrow Island
jetty tie-in
a 200 m3 spill of fuel oil, with a leak duration of six hours, at KP 25, between Barrow
Island and the mainland
a 200 m3 spill of marine diesel, with a leak duration of six hours, at KP 50, near the
mainland shore-crossing.
For each scenario, modelling was carried out for an autumn transitional month (April), winter
months (May to August), and early summer months (September to December). Within each
season, 100 simulations of spill events were undertaken using randomly selected periods of
winds and currents. All modelled simulations of spill events were then combined to calculate
the rate of contact (at defined thresholds), probability, and minimum time for oil to travel to given
locations (APASA 2011).
The defined thresholds used in modelling were based on the Bonn Agreement oil visibility scale
for surface slicks and films:
A threshold of 10 ppb was used for entrained oil following French (2000).
For a spill at KP 0, modelling showed that repeated circulation of surface slicks and films within
the strong tidal currents of the Barrow Island channel is likely to occur. Slicks are likely to
Page 140
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
migrate north and south with the prevailing tide and be drawn back into the channel on the
reverse tide (APASA 2011). Due to the prevailing wind conditions, these slicks may spread
from the channel towards the Lowendal and Montebello Islands in early summer and autumn, or
accumulate on Barrow Island during winter (APASA 2011).
For a fuel oil spill of 200 m3 at KP 0, it is very likely that surface slicks and films >0.15 g/m2
would contact Barrow Island, particularly a 56 km section of the coast adjacent to KP 0.
Surface slicks and films may also contact the Lowendal Islands and the Montebello Islands
(APASA 2011). Entrained fuel oil >10 ppb is also likely to occur in the nearshore waters of
Barrow Island, the Lowendal Islands, and the Montebello Islands. Entrained fuel oil >10 ppb
may also occur in the nearshore waters of islands along the mainland coast (Arlie Island,
Thevenard Island, Serrurier Island, and the Passage Islands).
At KP 25, modelling showed surface slicks and films of fuel oil are likely to migrate north-east or
south-west over open water, associated with prevailing tidal currents (APASA 2011). For a
2.5 m3 spill of fuel oil, there is low probability for surface slicks or films >0.15 g/m2 to reach
Barrow Island or inshore islands. Entrained fuel oil is also likely to be localised to within
approximately 12 km of the spill site, with a low probability of reaching nearshore island waters
(APASA 2011).
For a 200 m3 spill of fuel oil at KP 25, surface slicks or films >0.15 g/m2 may contact Barrow
Island, the Lowendal Islands, and the Montebello Islands, and a number of nearshore islands
along the mainland coast north and south of the pipeline route (APASA 2011). Entrained fuel oil
concentrations >10 ppb are likely to occur in the nearshore waters off the south coast of Barrow
Island, at the Montebello Islands, and at islands along the mainland coast (Passage Islands,
Sandy Islands and Mary Anne Islands groups, Airlie Island and Thevenard Island) (APASA
2011).
At KP 50, modelling showed that surface slicks and films of marine diesel migrate onshore and
offshore with the flooding and ebbing tide, while undergoing drift with the prevailing wind
(APASA 2011). During autumn and summer months drift is most likely to be towards the northeast, and during winter the drift towards the south-west (APASA 2011).
For a 2.5 m3 spill of diesel at KP 50, surface films >0.15 g/m2 may contact the Passage Island
shoreline, South Passage Island, Angle Island, Middle Passage Island, Solitary Island, North
Sandy Island, Long Island, Round Island, and Pup Island, depending on the seasonal wind
conditions. Diesel films may also contact a 1520 km section of the mainland coast near the
pipeline (APASA 2011). Entrained diesel concentrations >10 ppb are most likely to occur close
to the tidal axis around the release point (APASA 2011).
For a 200 m3 spill of diesel at KP 50, surface films >0.15 g/m2 are very likely to contact the
surrounding islands, particularly Passage Island, South Passage Island, Solitary Island, and
Angle Island. Other islands within the Passage Island Group are also at risk of contact, and
diesel films may contact a 5060 km section of the coast (APASA 2011). Entrained diesel
concentrations >10 ppb are very likely to occur in waters surrounding Passage Island, South
Passage Island, Solitary Island, Angle Island, North Sandy Island, Middle Passage Island, Long
Island, and Round Island, and extend 45 km along the mainland coast (APASA 2011).
Figure 5-10 to Figure 5-14 show the areas at risk of contact from surface films >0.15 g/m2 under
each of the scenarios modelled during the winter months (APASA 2011). These figures do not
show the extent of any one spill event, which would be significantly smaller, but represent a
summary of the 100 simulations of spill events modelled (APASA 2011).
Public
Page 141
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 5-10 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 200 m3 Diesel Spill
at KP 0 during Winter Months
(Source: APASA 2011)
Page 142
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Figure 5-11 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 2.5 m3 Fuel Oil Spill
at KP 25 during Winter Months
(Source: APASA 2011)
Public
Page 143
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 5-12 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 200 m3 Fuel Oil
Spill at KP 25 during Winter Months
(Source: APASA 2011)
Page 144
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Figure 5-13 Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 2.5 m3 Diesel Spill
at KP 50 during Winter Months
(Source: APASA 2011)
Public
Page 145
Uncontrolled when Printed
Figure 5-14
Predicted Probability of Surface Films >0.15 g/m2 from a 200 m3 Diesel Spill
at KP 50 during Winter Months
(Source: APASA 2011)
5.11.1.2
Major marine oil spills predominantly occur from the accidental damage of vessels, such as from
vessel collisions or unintentional grounding of construction vessels.
Vessel collisions may occur due to high vessel density within construction areas (such as within
the Barrow Island Port), interaction with third-party vessels outside project control, and as a
result of operational error (e.g. night-time activities with poor lighting).
Unintentional grounding may occur due to construction works occurring in shallow water depths
and/or unchartered waters, poor weather and sea state, engine and equipment failure, and
operational error.
These events are normally considered remote. However, installation vessels working close to
the mainland coast during installation of the DomGas pipeline will be working in shallow water
Page 146
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
depths, and the shallow water installation barge will be grounded intentionally during
construction activities.
To reduce the risk of vessel collisions and unintentional grounding as far as reasonably
practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Notice to Mariners will be posted to alert fishing and other vessels in the area.
Maritime standards and procedures will be adhered to, including maintaining specific
lights configuration and radar/watch.
Personnel responsible for navigation and communications will be fully trained and
competent.
Vessels working within the nearshore area will be selected carefully (e.g. with the ability
to be grounded and refloated).
Tidal and water current data will be used to determine safe working conditions for
installation activities.
Installation vessels will carry on board a Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan
(SOPEP) in accordance with MARPOL requirements. As part of the SOPEP, sufficient
equipment (e.g. sorbents, etc.) will be carried on board to deal with an on-deck oil spill.
There will be a tiered response to spills in accordance with Chevron Australias Marine
Oil Pollution Plan (MOPP) for the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas
Pipeline (Chevron Australia 2009d, as amended from time to time).
The MOPP is designed to ensure a rapid and appropriate response in the unlikely event of an
oil spill and provides guidance on:
coordination of external resources through the Australian Marine Oil Spill Centre
(AMOSC), Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA), or the WA Department of
Transport (DoT).
As the likelihood of vessel collision or unintentional grounding, which results in a spill or leak, is
considered remote, and, given the measures in place, the residual risk associated with a major
oil spill is low. No further risk reduction is required in accordance with the Chevron Integrated
Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.11.1.3
Refuelling Incident
Spillage of diesel and fuel oil may occur during refuelling operations due to equipment failure
(e.g. rupture of loading hose) or human error. Fuel spills, such as those that occur during
vessel refuelling, are infrequent events that generally involve small volumes.
To reduce the risk of spillage from refuelling operations as far as reasonably practicable, these
measures will be implemented:
Personnel will be trained in their roles, functions and responsibility, including emergency
response, prior to refuelling or fuel transfer.
Public
Page 147
Uncontrolled when Printed
Dry break couplings and breakaway couplings will be used, which are fit-for-purpose, are
used within their design life limits, and are regularly checked for damage to prevent
leaks.
Continuous visual monitoring of hoses, couplings and flow gauges will be undertaken
during refuelling.
For refuelling activities in the intertidal zone (Onshore KP 0 to KP 12), there will be designated
refuelling areas, where practicable, and drip trays/containment will be used during refuelling
activities.
With the implementation of the above measures, residual risk from refuelling activities is low and
no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk
Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.11.1.4
Spills and leaks may occur during general construction activities as a result of equipment failure,
during maintenance, and/or from inadequate storage.
To reduce the risks of equipment failure as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will
be implemented:
Operational limitations for installation activities (e.g. sea state for rock-bolting) will be
defined.
To reduce the risk of spills and leaks as far as reasonably practicable, the measures outlined in
Section 5.9.1, and the following measures specific to activities in the intertidal zone, will be
implemented:
Regular servicing of vehicles and equipment will be undertaken with appropriate spill
and waste management measures in place, including the use of spill containment
equipment (e.g. bunding, use of drip trays), availability of spill kits and adequate bins for
separation and segregation of wastes.
All major maintenance and washing of vehicles and equipment will be conducted at
designated maintenance areas, where practicable, that are identified in construction
drawings.
The proposed location for maintenance and washdown of vehicles and equipment is within a
main office, laydown and workspace area near CS1, in the onshore section of DomGas pipeline
installation (refer to the Mainland Onshore Domestic Gas Pipeline Environmental Management
Plan [Chevron Australia 2011a, as amended from time to time]).
Page 148
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
With the implementation of the above measures, the residual risk from spills and leaks during
general construction activities is low and no further risk reduction is required, in accordance with
the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.11.1.5
This section has been included in Revision 2 of this document to satisfy changes to the
Petroleum Pipelines (Environment) Regulations 2012, specifically Regulation 15(8) which states
that:
The implementation strategy must include an oil spill contingency plan that
(a) sets out details of the following
(i)preparations to be made for the possibility of an oil spill;
(ii)emergency response arrangements to be implemented if an oil spill occurs;
(iii)recovery arrangements to be implemented if an oil spill occurs;
(iv)current oil spill trajectory modelling that applies to the pipeline activity; and
(b) requires the operator to conduct tests of the emergency response arrangements set out in the
oil spill contingency plan at specified intervals; and
(c) describes the tests mentioned in paragraph (b).
The majority of the offshore DomGas pipeline construction is complete reducing the risk of spills
significantly. The remaining scope includes:
The information provided in the following section is specific to the reduced scope listed above
and is in addition to rather than superseding the information provided in the previous sections
5.11.1.1 to 5.11.1.4.
A summary of potential spill scenarios based on the remaining scope is detailed in Table 5-4.
Source control
Monitoring and evaluation
Public
Page 149
Uncontrolled when Printed
Spill response capabilities are focused on the credible (diesel) spill scenarios outlined.
Measures that are not considered appropriate such as physical break-up, application of
dispersant, offshore containment and recovery have not been included.
Estimated response timeframes are provided for in the summary of spill capabilities, however, it
is noted that actual response timeframes may be dependent on tidal conditions and accessibility
to the intertidal zone, shoreline, islands and surrounding shallow water areas.
Emergency response drills within the intertidal zone during construction are undertaken
approximately every 6 months. Vessel emergency response drills are conducted in accordance
with the relevant vessel safety management system.
Page 150
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Source
Type
Scenario
Probability
Additional Information
Survey /
monitoring
vessel
Fuels (diesel /
unleaded petrol)
and lubricants
Seldom
Survey /
monitoring
vessel
Fuels (diesel /
unleaded petrol)
Seldom
Survey /
monitoring
vessel
Fuels (diesel /
unleaded petrol)
Unlikely
Public
Page 151
Uncontrolled when Printed
Machinery /
equipment
working in
the
intertidal
zone
Occasional
Machinery /
equipment
working in
the
intertidal
zone
Machinery /
equipment
working in
the
intertidal
zone
Page 152
Uncontrolled when Printed
Diesel
Seldom
Diesel
Damage to machinery
resulting in loss of
containment
Unlikely
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Purpose/Intent
Equipment
Personnel
Response Timeframe
Demonstrated Capability
Termination Criteria
SOURCE CONTROL
Single Point Control
Vessel crew
Site construction team
Vessel crew
Site construction team
Pumping facilities
Spill kits available onboard
vessels
Spill kits available with machinery
/ equipment working in the
intertidal zone
Support vessel / tenders available
during marine monitoring
Support machinery / equipment
available during works in the
intertidal zone
Vessel crew
Site construction team
As above
As above
Sampling equipment
Support vessel / tenders available
during marine monitoring
Support machinery / equipment
available during works in the
intertidal zone
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Perth Environment Team
Environmental
Consultants
Support personnel
Spill information
Modelling contractor
Oil Spill Response Limited
(OSRL)
AMOSC
ADIOS
As above
Satellite imagery
As above
Public
Page 153
Uncontrolled when Printed
Activity
Purpose/Intent
Equipment
Personnel
Response Timeframe
Demonstrated Capability
Termination Criteria
FIELD ASSESSMENT
Marine Vessel Surveillance
Vessel crew
1 Observer per vessel
Marine Monitoring
Environmental Scientists
Aerial Surveillance
Aircraft
Pilot
1 Trained Observer per
aircraft
Spill response personnel
Identification of actual
trajectory of a spill based on
real time metocean
conditions
1 Buoy Deployment
Operator
1 Asset Emergency
Management Team
(AEMT) member
1 x Trained Geographic
Information System (GIS)
operator
As above
Sampling equipment
Access to laboratory
2 TPH (Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbon) meter on Barrow
Island
As above
OPERATIONAL MONITORING
Rapid or Oiled Shoreline
Assessment (OSA)
1 OSA-trained person
as team lead
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Barrow Island
Environment Team
Trained ERT personnel
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Perth Environment Team
GIS Support personnel
As above
Assessment of Wildlife
Activity
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Barrow Island
Environment Team
Support personnel
Assessment of Efficiency of
Hydrocarbon Response
To provide information on
the efficiency and
effectiveness of response
Communications
DomGas Site
Environment Team
24 hours
Page 154
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Activity
Purpose/Intent
Equipment
Personnel
Response Timeframe
strategies, to enable
adaption/refinement of
response if required
Demonstrated Capability
Termination Criteria
consultants
Communications
1 week
Execution of OSMP
Components
Vessels
Vehicles
Aircraft
Logistics, transport and access to
monitoring locations
Sampling and monitoring
equipment
Land/sea booms
Support vessel / tenders available
during marine surveys
Support machinery / equipment
available during works in the
intertidal zone
ERT
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Barrow Island
Environment Team
Vessel crew
Site construction team
Shoreline Cleanup
ERT
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Vessel crew
Site construction team
Support personnel
Supplementary aid from
Wheatstone Projects,
external providers/mutual
aid if required
As above
Trained personnel
Support personnel
Location is identified
Oiled Wildlife kits stored on
Barrow Island and at Dampier
Port
~200 m2 area
Oiled Wildlife kit
Shade
Waste receptacles
Vehicles
Public
Page 155
Uncontrolled when Printed
Activity
Purpose/Intent
Equipment
Personnel
Response Timeframe
Demonstrated Capability
Termination Criteria
terminated.
Fauna Exclusion
DomGas Site
Environment Team
Support personnel
As above
Hazing / Deterrents
Note: Hazing of fauna can
only be conducted under the
authority of a licence issued
under the Wildlife
Conservation Act.
DomGas Site
Environment team
Barrow Island
Environment Team
Support personnel
As above
40 pet carriers
Oiled Wildlife kit
As above
Immediate Treatment of
Fauna to Remove Oil at
Holding Area
As above
DomGas Site
Environment team
Barrow Island
Environment Team
Support personnel
Trained personnel
Contracts in place for vessel and
aircraft
Vehicles available
As above
Treatment of Fauna to
Remove Oil at Oiled Wildlife
Response Centre
72 hours
As above
Identification of Appropriate
External Rehabilitation
Facilities
Environmental specialists
72 hours
As above
Disposal of Carcasses
Waste receptacles
Plastic bags
Support personnel
As above
Page 156
Uncontrolled when Printed
Vessels
Vehicles
Aircraft
40 pet carriers
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Activity
Purpose/Intent
Equipment
Personnel
Response Timeframe
Demonstrated Capability
Termination Criteria
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Identify and Forecast
Wastes
Communications
DomGas Site
Environment team
Designated Waste
Coordinator
Establishment of Initial
Collection Area
Location is identified
Personnel trained
As above
As above AND
All generated waste is securely
contained in appropriate
receptacles at an approved
location, and labelled with its
origin, type, quantity and
classification
As above AND
All generated waste is securely
transported in appropriate
receptacles to approved locations,
and labelled with its origin, type,
quantity and classification
Waste contractor
72 hours
As above AND
All generated waste is securely
delivered in appropriate
receptacles to an approved final
disposal facility AND
The carrier/transporter provides
Chevron Australia with a copy of
the receipt/certificate issued by
the approved disposal facility on
accepting the final waste delivery
Public
Page 157
Uncontrolled when Printed
5.11.2
Loss of equipment and materials may occur during installation activities in the intertidal zone
(Onshore KP 0 to KP 12) due to use of inappropriate equipment or inadequate work
procedures, which result in bogging of equipment and failure to retrieve equipment before the
incoming tide. The loss of equipment and materials may result in spills and leaks of
hydrocarbons and other chemicals.
To reduce this risk as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be implemented:
Specialised equipment and/or supporting equipment (e.g. geotextile mats) will be used
for working in the intertidal zone, where practicable.
Tidal constraints will be addressed in scheduling and planning installation activities in the
intertidal zone.
With the implementation of these measures, the residual risk is low and no further risk reduction
is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
If damage to the DomGas pipeline occurs during installation, a buckle may occur that leads to
localised collapse of the pipeline. If the buckle is substantial, the pipeline wall may fracture,
allowing sea water to flood the pipeline. To repair or replace the damaged section, the pipeline
will need to be dewatered and recovered to the pipelay vessel.
In the event of a wet buckle, unplanned discharge of chemically treated water used for flushing
the pipeline may occur. The chemically treated water may contain small quantities of dye,
oxygen scavenger, and biocide.
Using anchored Pipelay Barges reduces the risk of a wet buckle occurring. To reduce this risk
to as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be implemented:
A pre-lay survey will be undertaken to identify seabed features or other constraints which
may impact pipeline installation.
Weather, tidal and water current data will be used to determine safe working conditions
for installation activities.
With the implementation of these measures, it is unlikely that a wet buckle will occur during
pipeline installation; therefore, the residual risk is low. No further risk reduction is required, in
accordance with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.11.3.2
Unplanned discharge of chemically treated water may occur during hydrotesting because of a
leak in the pipeline. The chemically treated water will contain small quantities of dye, oxygen
Page 158
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
scavenger, and biocide. Key areas where a leak may occur include at the start-up and pipeline
end location, at tie-ins, and at the welds between line-pipe.
To reduce these risks as far as reasonably practicable, the measures identified in Section
5.11.3.1 and listed below will be implemented:
Welding will be undertaken by tested and qualified welders in accordance with Chevron
Australia approved welding procedures developed by the contractor/s prior to
commencement of pipelay.
Non-destructive testing (NDT) will be undertaken by tested and qualified technicians and
will verify weld integrity in accordance with Chevron Australia approved NDT procedures
developed by the contractor/s prior to commencement of pipelay.
Certified and tested equipment will be used for hydrotesting (pumps, hoses and fittings).
With the implementation of these measures, it is unlikely that a leak during hydrotesting will
occur; therefore, the residual risk is low. No further risk reduction is required, in accordance
with the Chevron Integrated Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
5.11.4 Fire
During construction and installation activities, fires may start as a result of:
poor housekeeping
To reduce the risk of fire as far as reasonably practicable, these measures will be implemented:
All personnel will undertake an induction prior to commencing work that will include fire
management requirements and restrictions on smoking. Smoking will only be allowed in
designated areas.
Work procedures and Job Hazard Analyses (JHAs) will be implemented for activities that
may pose a fire risk (e.g. clearing, welding, soldering, and cutting)
Mobile refuelling will be undertaken with appropriate fire equipment and mitigation
measures in place.
With the above measures in place, residual risk of fire caused by construction and installation
activities is low. No further risk reduction is required, in accordance with the Chevron Integrated
Risk Prioritization Matrix (Figure 5-1).
Public
Page 159
Uncontrolled when Printed
6.0
6.1
Overview
This section summarises the environmental objectives, performance standards, and relevant
documentation that have been developed as part of a systematic approach to the management
of environmental risks. Specific objectives, performance standards, and documentation will be
used to assess the overall environmental performance for the Gorgon Gas Development and
Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline against the stated environmental objectives.
Table 6-1 details the objectives, performance standards, and documentation that relate to this
Plan. These will provide input into the Environmental Performance Reports required under
Condition 5 of Statement No. 800, and Condition 4 of EPBC Reference: 2003/1294 and
2008/4178.
6.2
Objectives
Chevron Australia is committed to conducting activities associated with the Gorgon Gas
Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline in an environmentally responsible manner, and
aims to implement best practice environmental management as part of a program of continual
improvement. To meet this commitment, objectives have been defined that relate to the
management of the identified environmental risks for the Gorgon Gas Development. These
objectives are those in Condition 23.3 of Statement No. 800, Condition 16.3 of EPBC
Reference: 2003/1294 and 2008/4178, and where necessary, additional, more specific
objectives have been developed.
Table 6-1 details the objectives specific to this Plan.
6.3
Performance Standards
Performance standards are the measures Chevron Australia will use to assess whether or not it
is meeting its objectives. For each objective and element of each objective, Chevron Australia
has described a matter (description) that will be measured, and a quantitative target or, where
there is no practicable quantitative target, a qualitative target, which is to be measured against
when assessing whether the objective has been met. These targets have been developed
specifically for assessing environmental performance. Failure to meet a target may indicate that
an objective may not have been met and there may be a need for management action or review
of this Plan.
The performance standards specific to this Plan are detailed in Table 6-1.
6.4
Relevant Documentation
Chevron Australia has defined the relevant documentation that contains information about
whether the performance standards have been met.
Table 6-1 details the relevant documentation specific to this Plan.
Page 160
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Evidence/Relevant
Documentation
Objectives
Description
Reduce the impacts
of pipeline
installation activities
on the Terrestrial
and Marine
Disturbance
Footprints as far as
practicable
Ensure that pipeline
installation activities
do not cause
Material or Serious
Environmental Harm
outside the
Terrestrial and
Marine Disturbance
Footprints
associated with the
facilities
Target
Consultation log
Complaint records
Incident and investigation
reports
Public
Page 161
Uncontrolled when Printed
Performance Standards
Evidence/Relevant
Documentation
Objectives
Description
Target
Page 162
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Document No:
Revision Date:
Revision:
G1-NT-PLNX0000696
20 October 2014
3
Performance Standards
Evidence/Relevant
Documentation
Objectives
Description
Target
contaminants
Public
reports
Post-construction weed
monitoring program
Fauna handling and site
inspection records
Incident and investigation
reports
Page 163
Uncontrolled when Printed
7.0
Implementation
7.1
Environmental Policy
7.2
7.2.1 Overview
Section 1.6.3 and Figure 1-3 of this Plan show the hierarchy of environmental management
documentation within which this Plan exists. The following sections describe each level of
documentation in greater detail.
HES Risk Management Process (Chevron Australia 2007, as amended from time to
time): Process for identifying, assessing and managing HES, operability, efficiency and
reliability risks related to the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline.
Page 164
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
7.2.3 Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline Documentation
7.2.3.1
In addition to this Plan, a number of other plans and reports have been (or will be) developed for
the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline that are required under State
and/or Commonwealth Ministerial Conditions (see Figure 1-3). These documents address the
requirements of specific conditions and provide standards for environmental performance for the
Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline.
7.2.3.2
Public
Page 165
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 166
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
7.3
7.3.1 Overview
A well-delineated chain of command has been established for the Gorgon Gas Development
and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline (see Figure 7-2). A summary of the environmental responsibilities
for key personnel is provided in the following sections.
ensuring the Construction Contractors workforce is made aware of the Gorgon Gas
Development HES requirements
ensuring all construction activities are planned and managed to minimise HES impacts,
meet all legislative and HES requirements, and the project goals, objectives and targets
ensuring activities are planned and managed to minimise environmental impacts, and to
meet the objectives, standards and targets detailed in this Plan
ensuring required environmental plans and procedures are developed, maintained, and
implemented
Public
Page 167
Uncontrolled when Printed
participating in and adhering to all HES instructions, procedures, plans and activities.
Gorgon
Development
Director
Gorgon Upstream
Construction
Manager
Gorgon Onsite
HES
Representative
Gorgon
Environmental
Team Leader
Gorgon
Upstream Onsite
Supervisor
Contractor
Onsite Project
Manager
Offsite Personnel
Contractor
Onsite Personnel
Subcontractor
Onsite Personnel
Onsite Personnel
7.4
All personnel (including contractors and subcontractors) are required to attend environmental
inductions and training relevant to their role on the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed
Gas Pipeline. Training and induction programs facilitate the understanding personnel have of
their environmental responsibilities, and increase their awareness of the management and
protection measures required to reduce potential impacts on the environment.
Chevron Australia has prepared the ABU Competency Development Process (Chevron
Australia 2010d, as amended from time to time) to deal with the identification and assessment
Page 168
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
of required competencies for environmental roles, which it internally requires its employees,
contractors, etc. to comply with.
Environmental training and competency requirements for personnel, including contractors and
subcontractors, are maintained in a Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline
HES training matrix.
7.5
annual compliance audits for the Offshore DomGas Pipeline Installation Management
Plan.
environmental
(Note: Contractor environmental management plans and procedures will be aligned with the
Offshore DomGas Pipeline Installation Management Plan).
Under EPBC Reference: 2003/1294 and 2008/4178, Condition 24 also requires that the person
taking the action must maintain accurate records of activities associated with or relevant to the
conditions of approval and make them available on request by DotE. Such records may be
subject to audit by DotEand used to verify compliance with the conditions of approval.
Public
Page 169
Uncontrolled when Printed
audit. Audit criteria must be agreed to by the Minister and the audit report must address the
criteria to the satisfaction of the Minister.
7.6
Page 170
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
7.7
Reporting
Public
Page 171
Uncontrolled when Printed
a record of all reportable incidents that occurred during the calendar month
a record of all recordable incidents that occurred during the calendar month
all material facts and circumstances concerning the incidents that are known or
uncovered by reasonable search or enquiry
any action taken to avoid or mitigate any adverse environment impacts of the incidents
the corrective action that has been taken, or is proposed to be taken, to prevent similar
incidents.
Public
Reporting to
DMP:
0419 960 621 (24 hours)
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
DMP:
0419 960 621 (24 hours)
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
Timing
Immediately on
occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written
report as soon as
practicable after the
occurrence (within 3
days)
Immediately on
occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written
report as soon as
practicable after the
occurrence (within 3
days)
Uncontrolled escape or
ignition of petroleum or other
flammable or combustible
material causing a potentially
hazardous situation
Spillage of hydrocarbons or
other material that affects a
ground surface area
exceeding 100 m2
DPaW:
sro.bwi@dpaw.wa.gov.au
Within 48 hours of
detection/observation
DER
industryregpilbara@der.wa.gov.au
Any Material or Serious Environmental
Harm outside the Terrestrial or Marine
Disturbance Footprints
DPaW:
sro.bwi@dpaw.wa.gov.au
Within 48 hours of
detection/observation
DotE:
1800 110 395
post.approval@environment.gov.au
DER
industryregpilbara@der.wa.gov.au
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 173
Uncontrolled when Printed
Incident
Significant Impacts detected by the
monitoring program for matters of
National Environmental Significance
Reporting to
DotE
1800 110 395
post.approval@environment.gov.au
Within 48 hours of
detection/observation
DMP:
0419 960 621 (24 hours)
Immediately on
occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written
report as soon as
practicable after the
occurrence (within 3
days)
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
DPaW
sro.bwi@dpaw.wa.gov.au
Within 48 hours of
detection/observation
DMP:
0419 960 621 (24 hours)
Immediately on
occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written
report as soon as
practicable after the
occurrence (within 3
days)
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
DotE
1800 110 395
post.approval@environment.gov.au
Within 24 hours of
detection/observation
DMP:
0419 960 621 (24 hours)
Immediately on
occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written
report as soon as
practicable after the
occurrence (within 3
days)
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
petroleum.environment@dmp.wa.gov.au
7.8
Timing
DMP:
0419 960 621 (24 hours)
DMP
Immediately on
occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written
report as soon as
practicable after the
occurrence (within 3
days)
Monthly (not later than
15 days after the end of
the calendar month)
Documentation and records for the Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline
(including this Plan) will be managed in accordance with the OE Information Management
Process (Chevron Australia 2008c, as amended from time to time). This Process includes
requirements for ensuring that documents, procedures, records and other information are
current and accessible.
Documentations and records for the purpose of this Plan include:
Page 174
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
written reports (including monitoring, audit and review reports) about environmental
performance, or about the implementation strategy, under the Plan
records of emissions and discharges into the environment made in accordance with the
Plan
7.9
Public
Page 175
Uncontrolled when Printed
8.0
References
Asia-Pacific Applied Science Associates. 2009. Hydrotest Discharge Water Simulation Study.
Unpublished report prepared for Chevron Australia Pty Ltd, January 2009.
Asia-Pacific Applied Science Associates. 2010. Oil Spill Risk Assessment for the DomGas
Pipeline Installation. Unpublished report prepared for Chevron Australia Pty Ltd, May
2011.
Asia-Pacific Applied Science Associates. 2011. Sediment Fate Modelling of Gorgon Project
DomGas Pipeline Trenching and Jetting. Unpublished report prepared for Chevron
Australia Pty Ltd, February 2010.
Astron Environmental Services. 2010. DomGas Pipeline Flora and Vegetation Survey Phase 2.
Unpublished report prepared for Chevron Australia Pty Ltd, August 2010.
Australian Interaction Consultants. 2009. Preliminary Advice of Chevrons proposed DOMGAS
Pipeline at Mardie Station, Western Australia. Unpublished reported prepared for the Y&M
and Chevron Australia, September 2009.
Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association. 2008. Code of Environmental
Practice. Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association, Canberra,
Australian Capital Territory.
Australian Pipeline Industry Association Ltd. 2009. Code of Environmental Practice Onshore
Pipelines. Australian Pipeline Industry Association Ltd, Canberra, Australian Capital
Territory.
Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service. 2008. Australian Ballast Water Management
Requirements - Version 4. Available from:
http://www.daff.gov.au/aqis/avm/vessels/ballast/austrlain_ballast_water_management_req
uirements_-_version_4 [Accessed 6 Dec 2010].
BHP Billiton. 2006. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Pyrenees Development WA-155P, WA-12-R. BHP Billiton, Perth, Western Australia.
Chevron Australia. 2005. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Review and
Management Programme for the Proposed Gorgon Gas Development. Chevron Australia,
Perth, Western Australia.
Chevron Australia. 2006. Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Review and
Management Programme for the Proposed Gorgon Gas Development. Chevron Australia,
Perth, Western Australia.
Chevron Australia. 2006a. Hazardous Communication: ABU Standardised OE Process.
Chevron Australia, Perth, Western Australia. (OE-03.16.01)
Chevron Australia. 2007. HES Risk Management. ASBU Standardized OE Process. Chevron
Australia, Perth, Western Australia. (OE-03.01.01)
Chevron Australia. 2008. Gorgon Gas Development Revised and Expanded Proposal Public
Environmental Review. Chevron Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Chevron Australia. 2008a. Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline Phase 4
Marine Quarantine Zonation for Barrow Island. Chevron Australia, Perth, Western
Australia. (G1-NT-PPRX0000009)
Page 176
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Public
Page 177
Uncontrolled when Printed
Cogger, H.G. 2000. Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia. 6th ed. Reed New Holland, Sydney.
CRC for Australian Weed Management. 2003. Weed Management Guide: Mesquite Prosopis
Species. Weeds of National Significance Series. Commonwealth Department of
Environment and Heritage.
Department of Environment and Conservation. 2007. Management Plan for the
Montebello/Barrow Islands Marine Conservation Reserves 20072017. Adopted by the
Marine Parks and Reserves Authority; Marine Management Plan No. 55. Department of
Environment and Conservation, Perth, Western Australia.
Department of Environment and Conservation. 2011. Barrow Island Nature Reserve and the
Gorgon Project. Available from: http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/content/view/6382/2183/
[Accessed 30 May 2011].
Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water Populations and Communities. 2011. EPBC
Act Protected Matters Report. Coordinates: -20.7926 S, 115.46131 E, to -21.3256 S,
115.91459 E, Buffer: 2.0 km. Report created 26/05/11.
Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water Populations and Communities. 2011a. Place
Details. Coastal Margin Exmouth Gulf to Cape Preston, Onslow, WA, Australia. Available
from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgibin/ahdb/search.pl?mode=place_detail;place_id=17918 [Accessed 30 May 2011].
Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water Populations and Communities. 2011b.
Species Profile and Threats Database. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgibin/sprat/public/sprat.pl [Accessed 28 May 2011].
Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. 2008. North-west Marine
Bioregional Plan Bioregional Profile: A Description of the Ecosystems, Conservation
Values, and Uses of the North West Marine Region. Available from:
http://www.environment.gov.au/coasts/mbp/publications/north-west/bioregionalprofile.html [Accessed 15 Dec 2009].
DOF Subsea. 2009. Domgas Pipeline Geophysical Survey Results Report. Unpublished
report prepared for Chevron Australia, Perth, Western Australia, March 2009.
Done, T. 1992. Constancy and Change in some Great Barrier Reef Coral Communities: 1980
1990, American Zoology, 32: 655662.
Environmental Protection Authority. 2008. Change to Gorgon Gas Development on Barrow
Island Nature Reserve Statement No. 748. Approval under Section 45C of the
Environmental Protection Act 1986. Approval letter issued 21 May 2008, EPA Ref: DEC
Doc 48104. Perth, Western Australia.
Fabricius, K., Death, G., Poutinen, M., Done, T., Cooper, T. and Burgess, S. 2008. Disturbance
Gradients on Inshore and Offshore Coral Reefs Caused by a Severe Tropical Cyclone,
Limnology and Oceanography, 53: 690704.
Fletcher, W.J. and Santoro, K. (eds). 2010. State of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
Report 2009/10. Department of Fisheries, Western Australia.
French, D.P. 2000. Estimation of Oil Toxicity Using an Additive Toxicity Model. In: Proceedings
23rd Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar, June 1416, 2000,
Vancouver, Canada, Emergencies Science Division, Environment Canada, Ottawa,
Canada.
Page 178
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Golder Associates 2010. DomGas Pipeline Alignment, Western Australia, Acid Sulfate Soil
Investigation. Unpublished report prepared for Chevron Australia, January 2010.
Kaesehagen, D. 1995. Bushland Corridor Mapping, Invasive weeds and regenerating
ecosystems in Western Australia. In. G. Burke (ed). Murdoch, Western Australia.
Keighery, B.J. 1994. Bushland Plant Survey. A guide to plant Community Survey for the
Community Wildflower Society of WA (Inc.), Nedlands, Western Australia.
Kellogg Joint Venture Gorgon. 2008. Materials Offloading Facility Coastal Process Impact
Study for the Gorgon Project Barrow Island LNG Plant. Kellogg Joint Venture Gorgon,
Perth Western Australia.
LeProvost Environmental Pty Ltd. 2008. Sino Iron Project Marine Management Plan. Prepared
for CITIC Pacific Mining Management Pty Ltd on behalf of Mineralogy Pty Ltd, in
association with GEMS, URS Australia and CITIC Pacific Mining Management Pty Ltd.
December 2008.
McCarthy, M. 1991. Maceys Wreck: An Unidentified Wreck in the Mangroves at Mardie Station.
Wreck Inspection Report No. 51, WA Maritime Museum, Fremantle, June 1991.
MetOcean Engineers Pty Ltd. 2006. Final MetOcean Design Criteria Gorgon MOF and Revised
Export Jetty. Unpublished report (R1279) prepared for Chevron Australia, September
2006.
Mobil Australia Resources Limited. 2005. Referral of a Proposal to the Environmental Protection
Authority under Section 38(1) of the Environmental Protection Act Jansz Feed Gas
Pipeline. 7 February 2005, Mobil Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Mobil Exploration and Producing Australia Pty Ltd. 2006. Referral of Proposed Action Jansz
Feed Gas Pipeline. [Referral under EPBC Act to Department of Environment, Water,
Heritage and the Arts]. 17 June 2005, Mobil Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Nord Stream AG. 2009. Nord Stream Espoo Report: Chapter 9 Impact Assessment and
Mitigation Measures. Available from:
http://www.envir.ee/orb.aw/class=file/action=preview/id=1093994/Chapter+9+Impact+ass
essment+and+mitigation+measures.pdf [Accessed September 2010].
Pendoley, K., Long, V. and Stanley, F.J. 2003. Onslow to Cape Preston Coastal Islands Survey,
October November 2003. Unpublished report to Tap Oil, Perth, Western Australia.
Pendoley, K.L. 2005. Sea Turtles and the Environmental Management of Industrial Activities in
North West Western Australia. PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.
Richardson, W.J., Greene, Jr. C.R., Malme, C. and Thomson, D.H. 1995. Marine Mammals and
Noise. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
RPS Bowman Bishaw Gorham. 2006. Terrestrial Fauna and Shorebird Surveys of the Gorgon
Domestic Gas Pipeline Route. Unpublished report prepared for Chevron Australia.
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. 2004. ISO 14001:2004 Environmental
Management Systems Requirements with Guidance for Use. Sydney,
Australia/Wellington, New Zealand.
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. 2006. HB 203:2006 Environmental Risk
Management Principles and Process. Sydney, Australia/Wellington, New Zealand.
Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Printed Date: 26 November 2014
Public
Page 179
Uncontrolled when Printed
Page 180
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Appendix 1
Item
No.
Commitment Register
Sections
Commitment
Timing
5.4.1.1
During
construction
5.4.1.1
During
construction
5.4.1.2
During
construction
5.4.1.3
During
construction
5.4.1.4
During
construction
Public
Page 181
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
5.4.1.4
During
construction
5.4.1.4
During
construction
5.4.2
During
construction
5.4.3
During
construction
10
5.4.4
Prior to and
during
construction
11
5.4.4
Prior to and
during
construction
12
5.5.1.1
During
construction
13
5.5.1.2
During
construction
Page 182
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
14
5.5.1.3
During
construction
15
5.5.1.3
During
construction
16
5.5.2
During
construction
17
5.5.2
During
construction
18
5.5.2
During
construction
Public
Page 183
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
19
5.5.2
During
construction
20
5.5.3.1
During
construction
21
5.5.3.2
During
construction
Page 184
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
hazardous materials.
22
5.5.3.3
During
construction
23
5.5.4
Prior to and
during
construction
24
5.5.5
During
construction
25
5.5.6
During
construction
Public
Page 185
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
26
5.5.6
During
construction
27
5.6.1
During
construction
28
5.6.2
During
construction
29
5.6.2
During
construction
30
5.6.2
During
construction
Page 186
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
31
5.7.1
During
construction
32
5.7.1
During
construction
33
5.7.2
Prior to and
during
construction
34
5.7.2
During
construction
35
5.7.2
During
construction
36
5.7.3
To reduce the risk of introduction and spread of weeds, sitespecific weed hygiene management procedures will be developed
by the contractor/s prior to commencement of intertidal
construction activities and implemented. Imported fill material shall
be free of weeds and contaminants.
Prior to and
during
construction
37
5.7.3
During and
post
construction
38
5.8.1
During
construction
Public
Page 187
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
39
5.8.2
During
construction
40
5.9.1
During
construction
41
5.9.2
During
construction
42
5.9.3
Prior to and
during
construction
Page 188
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
43
5.10.1
During
construction
44
5.10.2
During
construction
45
5.10.3
During
construction
Public
Page 189
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
46
5.11.1.2
During
construction
47
5.11.1.3
During
construction
48
5.11.1.3
During
construction
49
5.11.1.4
During
construction
Page 190
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
to implementation.
50
5.11.1.4
Prior to and
during
construction
51
5.11.1.5
During
construction
52
5.11.2.1
During
construction
Public
Page 191
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
pipelay.
53
5.11.2.2
During
construction
54
5.11.3
During
construction
55
7.5.2
During
construction
56
7.6.2
During
construction
57
7.6.3
During
construction
58
7.6.3
During
construction
59
7.7.2
During
construction
Page 192
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
7.7.3
During
construction
61
7.7.3
During
construction
62
7.7.4
During
construction
63
Table 7-1
Offshore Incidents:
Escape or discharge into the sea of petroleum and water
(petroleum concentration exceeding 50 mg/L)
Escape or discharge exceeding 80 L of petroleum
(concentration not greater than 50 mg/L)
Uncontrolled escape or ignition of petroleum or flammable
or combustible material causing a potentially hazardous
situation
The average petroleum concentration escaped or
discharged over each 24-hour period exceeds 30 mg/L
unless otherwise approved
Will be reported to DMP immediately on occurrence (within
2 hours), then a written report as soon as practicable after the
occurrence (within 3 days).
During
construction
64
Table 7-1
During
construction
65
Table 7-1
During
Public
Page 193
Uncontrolled when Printed
Item
No.
Sections
Commitment
Timing
detection/observation.
construction
66
Table 7-1
During
construction
67
Table 7-1
During
construction
68
Table 7-1
During
construction
69
Table 7-1
During
construction
70
Table 7-1
During
construction
71
Table 7-1
During
construction
Page 194
Uncontrolled when Printed
Public