Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-What is best for us?, with the presumption on immigration policies justifiable to those who live in country.
-Political theorist Chandran Kukathas, Modern states are like clubs that are reluctant to accept new members unless they can
be assured that they have more to gain by admitting people than they have by keeping them out. All about advantages can
the state gained from immigration.
- What is beneficial for one segment may not be for others
- George Borjas view on immigration.
- Immigration may benefit some American but at the same time, it is at the expense of others.
- it creates a situation of Winner and Loser, especially in labor market
- Law of regulating immigration raise social science questions welfare system,
-moral question: how can we define borders.
- Something related to Immigration constraint, discretionary immigration and also illegal immigration
Cosmopolitan Egalitarianism:
(should not give different treatments to ppl of different races , sexes etc. becoz these features are not related to morality)
Everyone should be put under the same scope for moral consideration
e.g. The Dutch did not do anything to have a better life than others > it just happened, Dutch are just luckier than others
(*Clarification of terms:
Membership in a state:
- IS morally arbitrary (like race, sex, ethnicity) i.e. it is not due to any moral reasons (We did not do anything to be born in a
certain state)
- IS NOT morally irrelevant i.e. membership in a state implies moral obligations to follow in order to be a member)
2.
Libertarianism
Freedom and Humanity
Though liberals suggest that the insiders interests should be protected, but border control is actually harmful to both the
insiders and the excluded outsiders interests
e.g. Suppose a farmer from the United States wanted to hire workers from Mexico. The government would have no right to
prohibit him from doing this. To prevent the Mexicans from coming would violate the rights of both the American farmer and the
Mexican workers to engage in voluntary transactions. (Carens 1987: 253)
(Thus violate individual rights)
3. Democratic views
Democratic principles (justification to all the coerced) are incompatible with unilateral border control
i.e.itwouldbeimpermissibleforastatetoforciblyrestrictoutsiderswithoutfirstgivingtheseoutsidersasaytodecidewhetherornottoadoptthisrestrictive
immigrationpolicy.
4. Utilitarianism
Restricting immigration may undermine economic efficiency no full use of external labor force, give away potential economic
opportunities
Discretionary Immigration
-immigration of people who are not entitled to immigrate
- goes beyond what states are morally required to do.
- Discretionary immigration will be discharged the obligation/ Non-discretionary one aims at making a full-member of the
society.
- Michael Blake: Partial citizenship, but it has a concern on ppl will be exploitative, contribute to unjust global order
Immigration
An argument to support legalizing illegal immigrants
Law motion of adverse possession
Open occupation of property by people who do not own it, GIVEN THAT THE OWNER LNOW OF THE SITUATION
Become the mainstay of parts of the economy
Create pressure to facilitate adjustment of status for illegal immigrants