Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Role and impact of mega-events and attractions on regional and national tourism development
resolutions
Tyrrell Marris
Article information:
To cite this document:
Tyrrell Marris, (1987),"The Role and impact of mega-events and attractions on regional and national tourism development
resolutions", The Tourist Review, Vol. 42 Iss 4 pp. 3 - 12
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb057975
Downloaded on: 13 October 2015, At: 15:47 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 1264 times since 2006*
Leo Jago, Larry Dwyer, Geoffrey Lipman, Daneel van Lill, Shaun Vorster, (2010),"Optimising the potential of megaevents: an overview", International Journal of Event and Festival Management, Vol. 1 Iss 3 pp. 220-237 http://
dx.doi.org/10.1108/17852951011078023
Kostas Karadakis, Kiki Kaplanidou, George Karlis, (2010),"Event leveraging of mega sport events: a SWOT
analysis approach", International Journal of Event and Festival Management, Vol. 1 Iss 3 pp. 170-185 http://
dx.doi.org/10.1108/17852951011077998
Judith Mair, Michelle Whitford, (2013),"An exploration of events research: event topics, themes and emerging trends",
International Journal of Event and Festival Management, Vol. 4 Iss 1 pp. 6-30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17582951311307485
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:478385 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
First: Definitions
Beginning as we must with the question of what
is a mega-attraction and more especially a megaevent, we can see that there is more than one
way of defining i t . One way is by volume, another
is by some money measure, and a third way is in
psychological terms:
Volume
= 1 million visits
Capital Cost = Ca $ 500 m DM 750 m
FFr 2,500 m
) "Must See"
Reputation = ) "Muss miterlebt werden"
) "II faut absolument voir"
A definition by of volume could stipulate that,
for instance, at least one million visitors attend.
A value definition could be the amount of revenue
to the locality or alternatively, as suggested here,
the capital cost of constructing facilities. The
third definition suggested is psychological, derived from the feelings of tourists going to the
event or attraction. If it is so important that it
is on their "must see" list of things to v i s i t , then
that makes it a mega-attraction or event.
We need not take just one definition, we can use
some mixture according to what is most suitable.
Second: Motives
It is obvious that there are many motives for
staging a mega-event. That is the second main
point. Several contributions have stressed that
it is not merely for economic reasons or just to
stimulate a flow of tourists that government, or
local populations, put so much time and effort
into these major tourist phenomena. As this next
chart shows we can have much wider motives for
staging an event.
Harmony and Progress
Eintracht und Entwicklung zum Besseren
L'Accord et le Progrs
= amount, quality
= other industries: amount
= other industries: quality
= environment, conservation
= family links, habits
= traditions, creeds
= pride, reputation
= local, national, world-wide
Sixth: Overall
Let me pull together some of these strands from our
discussions and our papers, into a sixth idea.
An overall impression must be, as we conclude this
Congress, that we really knew more about mega-events
and mega-attractions than we realised. However perhaps we still need a more general framework on which
to hang our thoughts. Drawing on what has gone before
let us illustrate a mega-event or attraction like this.
Despite the problems of measurement of each impact I suggest that the main question is not so
much: how can we measure these impacts.
Probably the real question is, having measured
all we can: how do we combine such varied
measurements together to reach a final sum.
That problem is represented by this equation.
Putting such varied impacts together is
extremely difficult.
Fifth: Strategies
Turning to strategies, which is our f i f t h point,
it is good to see how often contributors have
shown that impacts can be made more positive.
There are helpful lists of do's and don'ts. A
definite conclusion must be that well-informed
planning and scientific study of these megaevents can improve the result, even if we cannot
measure it exactly. The work of our Congress
should therefore be of positive benefit to strategies.
But there could remain a dilemma sometimes, because the strategy for getting the maximum local
benefit will not necessarily generate the maximum
national benefit.
Summarising the strategies for improvement, many
of the suggestions are in effect to make mega-events
more like mega-attractions and to make attractions
more like events. For instance, there are suggestions designed to prolong the positive effects of
events so that they extend both before and after
the peak activity. So they become more like a permanent attraction. Similarly for attractions, the
ideas are to make them more like news-worthy
events, by announcing some new development
such as a centenary or other short term opportunity.
The picture is not yet complete. Now that there are several
really large attractions for the tourist, we need some symbol
to represent them all: to join them together in one vivid
image. What should it be?
Because of course I am developing on the interesting ideas
put forward by Hu Yangzhou let me illustrate the need for
a symbol with this.
1st is a picture of a bronze head from thousands of years
ago, yet only recently discovered in China. On such discoveries, we now know, mass tourism may be founded.
Of c o u r s e , t h a t is a v e r y s i m p l i f i e d view o f how t h e
f a c i l i t i e s from mega-events o r a t t r a c t i o n s can be
made u s e f u l .
Volume ( n o m b r e )
Cot (en capitaux,
p a r exemple)
Renomme
S e v e n t h : Final
So let me f i n i s h w i t h o u r s e v e n t h p o i n t . We must
remember t h e o t h e r p a r t o f o u r Congress h e r e i n
C a l g a r y . A p a r t t h a t is j u s t as i m p o r t a n t as o u r
p a p e r s ; j u s t as i m p o r t a n t as o u r d i s c u s s i o n s .
For we have seen h e r e , a l s o , the m a g n i f i c e n t
reality of the construction of a mega-event. The
actual s e r v i c e s i n the m a k i n g . T h e actual c o n c r e t e p o u r e d . S u r e l y we were all most impressed
b y t h e v a s t amount t h a t has a l r e a d y been
achieved h e r e , i n p r e p a r a t i o n f o r the C a l g a r y
Winter Olympic Games n e x t y e a r . F r a n k K i n g ,
c h a i r m a n o f t h e o r g a n i z i n g committee f o r these
games, t o l d us o f t h e i r i d e a l : to leave as a
legacy " t h e s t a r t o f a l i f e - t i m e o f o p p o r t u n i t y " .
Dear colleagues, I propose t h a t o u r f i n a l c o n c l u s i o n must b e : t o wish o u r hosts h e r e i n
C a l g a r y a v e r y s u c c e s s f u l 1988: a t r u l y ' K i n g ' sized e v e n t .
Rsolutions
1 million de v i s i t e u r s (mga)
$ can.
500'000'000.-DM
750'000'000.-FF
2'500'000'000.-" M u s t see"
"Muss m i t e r l e b t w e r d e n "
" I I f a u t absolument v o i r "
2) M o t i f s
II est c l a i r q u ' u n e foule de motifs se cache d e r r i r e la
mise s u r pieds d ' u n vnement " m g a " . (Ces motifs f o n t
l'objet d u p o i n t numro d e u x ) .
D a n s p l u s i e u r s a r t i c l e s ou c o n t r i b u t i o n s de la p r e s s e , il
a p p a r a i t q u e les a u t o r i t s ou les populations d ' u n lieu
t o u r i s t i q u e n ' o n t pas i n v e s t i l e u r temps et l e u r s e f f o r t s
p o u r des raisons u n i q u e m e n t commerciales ou encore p o u r
augmenter le nombre des t o u r i s t e s . Comme I'explique le
p r o c h a i n t a b l e a u , les motifs p o u r m e t t r e en a v a n t u n
vnement sont bien p l u s complexes:
rdiges p a r T y r r e l l M a r r i s , L o n d r e s ( G r a n d e
B r e t a g n e ) ( O r i g i n a l en anglais)
Je v o u d r a i s c l o r e c e t t e sance an v o q u a n t les
sept p o i n t s essentiels de n o t r e o e u v r e en commun ,
y c o m p r i s la p r o p o s i t i o n d ' u n e s o l u t i o n :
1) D f i n i t i o n s
En t o u t p r e m i e r l i e u , p e n c h o n s - n o u s s u r la d f i n i t i o n des e x p r e s s i o n s " a t t r a c t i o n mga" et t o u t
p a r t i c u l i r e m e n t "vnement m g a " . Vous v e r r e z
q u ' i l y a p l u s i e u r s manires de les i n t e r p r t e r :
D ' a b o r d , il y a Ie v o l u m e , p u i s l'aspect f i n a n c i e r et e n f i n Ie f a c t e u r p s y c h o l o g i q u e . Le tableau
c i - d e s s o u s v o u s en dnombre les p o s s i b i l i t s :
3) Impacts
Eu g a r d au g r a n d nombre de motifs e x i s t a n t s , nous p o u vons nous r e n d r e compte q u ' i l y a a u t a n t d ' i m p a c t s . Le
tableau c i - a p r s i l l u s t r e h u i t impacts d i f f r e n t s . Comme
l e u r s r p e r c u s s i o n s o n t des cts t a n t p o s i t i f s q u e
n g a t i f s , nous p o u r r i o n s en f a i t f a i r e tat de seize
facteurs:
Tourisme
Economie
Technique
Physique
Social
Culturel
Psychologique
Politique
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
montant, qualit
a u t r e s i n d u s t r i e s : montant
autres i n d u s t r i e s : qualit
environnement, conservation
relations familiales, coutumes
t r a d i t i o n s , croyances
o r g u e i l , renomme
local, n a t i o n a l , mondial
4) Evaluations
En e f f e t , l ' a p p r c i a t i o n d ' u n nombre d'impacts si i m p o r tant reprsente un formidable dfi pour notre savoir
s c i e n t i f i q u e . II est i m p r e s s i o n n a n t de v o i r , d ' a p r s les
t r a v a u x effectus dans le c a d r e de ce c o n g r s , combien s ' l v e n t les d i f f r e n t e s mthodes et a t t i t u d e s p o u r
p r o c d e r a u x v a l u a t i o n s , commencer p a r les calculs
classiques tels q u e c e u x des cots et b n f i c e s , p u i s
les t e c h n i q u e s de m u l t i p l i c a t i o n , e t c . II reste p o u r t a n t
le problme d u t e m p s . C'est t y p i q u e , c a r en r a l i t nous
d e v r i o n s comparer la s i t u a t i o n actuelle comportant u n
vnement "mga" avec une a u t r e - p l u s t h o r i q u e sans cet v n e m e n t . Quelle s e r a - t - e l l e dans u n q u e l conque moment f u t u r ? Qu'en e s t - i l sans l'vnement?
En d p i t de la d i f f i c u l t d ' v a l u e r chaque i m p a c t , je
propose q u e la q u e s t i o n p r i n c i p a l e ne soit pas celle
d u "comment p o u v o n s - n o u s m e s u r e r ces impacts?"
La v r a i e q u e s t i o n s e r a i t p l u t t : "comment combiner
l'ensemble de r s u l t a t s si d i v e r s p o u r a b o u t i r u n
c h i f f r e f i n a l ? " , une fois q u e toutes les estimations
possibles s e r o n t r u n i s . La p r q u a t i o n s u i v a n t e en
c e r n e le p r o b l m e .
II est bien s u r extrmement compliqu de combiner
a u t a n t d'impacts d i f f r e n t s .
5) S t r a t q i e s
En passant n o t r e cinquime p o i n t , c ' e s t - - d i r e aux
s t r a t g i e s , j ' a i constat avec p l a i s i r q u e nos c o l l a b o r a t e u r s o n t maintes fois dmontr comment r e n d r e les i m pacts p o s i t i f s . II e x i s t e cet e f f e t des listes p r a t i q u e s
s u r ce q u ' i l f a u t f a i r e ou ne pas f a i r e . Une conclusion
d f i n i t i v e s e r a i t Ia p l a n i f i c a t i o n base s u r de solides i n formations et l'tude s c i e n t i f i q u e pousse en v u e d'aml i o r e r les r s u l t a t s de ces vnements " m g a " , mme s'il
n'est pas possible d ' o b t e n i r des c h i f f r e s p r c i s . N o t r e
c o n g r s d o i t donc a p p o r t e r les lments p r o p i c e s
l'laboration desdites s t r a t g i e s .
P o u r t a n t u n dilemme p e u t s u r g i r : la s t r a t g i e u t i l i s e
p o u r g a g n e r u n maximum de bnfices p o u r la localit
n ' e n g e n d r e r a pas forcment le mme avantage s u r
l'chelle n a t i o n a l e .
D ' a i l l e u r s , de nombreuses s u g g e s t i o n s v i s a n t l'ensemble
des s t r a t g i e s p r o g r e s s i s t e s r i s q u e n t de t r a n s f o r m e r des
vnements "mga" en a t t r a c t i o n s "mga" et l ' i n v e r s e ,
c ' e s t - - d i r e que l'on t e n t e r a , p a r exemple, de p r o l o n g e r
a r t i f i c i e l l e m e n t les e f f e t s p o s i t i f s d'vnements "mga"
a u - d e l de l e u r sommet ( a v a n t et a p r s ) , ce q u i en f e r a i t p r a t i q u e m e n t des a t t r a c t i o n s p e r m a n e n t e s . De mme,
une ide de mieux r e n t a b i l i s e r des a t t r a c t i o n s "mga"
consiste en la mise s u r pieds de q u e l q u e n o u v e a u t
b r v e chance, u n c e n t e n a i r e p a r exemple.
6) Rcapitulation
E n f i n , le d e r n i e r c i t t o u c h e au plan p o l i t i q u e .
Rappelons-nous que la p o l i t i q u e p e u t se l i m i t e r au n i v e a u local ou alors se r p e r c u t e r s u r
t o u t Ie p a y s , v o i r e le c o n t i n e n t ou mme le
monde e n t i e r .
Pour composer mon sixime p o i n t , j ' a i rassembl quelquesuns des fits c o n d u c t e u r s de n o t r e d i s c u s s i o n et de nos
crits.
7) Epilogue
J'en arrive au septime et dernier point. Evoquons
l'autre partie de notre congrs ici Calgary!.
C'est tout aussi important que nos travaux, discussions
et rapports.
Nous avons eu l'occasion d'assister une ralit p r o d i gieuse: la ralisation d'un vnement "mga" dont les
formes se concrtisent sous nos yeux. Nous ne pouvons
qu'tre impressionns par l'normit de ce qui a dj t
achev en vue des Jeux olympiques d'hiver 1988
Calgary. Frank King, prsident du comit d'organisation de ces jeux, s'est confi nous: leur dsir tous
c'est de lguer leur ville l'oeuvre d'une vie entire,
l'hritage d'un vnement vraiment colossal...
Mes trs chers collgues, j'aimerais adresser un ultime
mot nos htes de Calgary: que l'anne 1988 porte les
fruits de leurs efforts et que les Jeux olympiques
Calgary soient couronns de succes'.
Resolutionen
redigiert von Tyrrell Marris, London/Grossbritannien
(Original in englischer Sprache)
Erstens: Definitionen
Z u n c h s t mssen w i r die F r a g e k l r e n , was als G r o s s anlass z u bezeichnen i s t , u n d w i r k n n e n f e s t s t e l l e n ,
dass es mehr als eine D e f i n i t i o n s m g l i c h k e i t g i b t .
Eine M g l i c h k e i t b e s t e h t d a r i n , das Volumen z u g r u n d e
zu l e g e n , eine a n d e r e , das Geld als Massstab z u n e h m e n , eine d r i t t e M g l i c h k e i t b e r c k s i c h t i g t p s y c h o l o gische B e d i n g u n g e n . Die nachfolgende Tabelle v e r a n s c h a u l i c h t diese M g l i c h k e i t e n .
Volumen
Kapitalkosten
= 1 M i l l i o n Besucher
= c a . $ 500 M DM 750 M
F F r . 2'500 M
B e k a n n t h e i t s - ) "Muss m i t e r l e b t w e r d e n "
grad
= ) " M u s t See"
) " I I f a u t absolument v o i r "
Eine a u f das Volumen bezogene D e f i n i t i o n k n n t e b e i spielsweise eine Teilnahme v o n mindestens e i n e r M i l lion B e s u c h e r n b e d i n g e n . Eine W e r t d e f i n i t i o n k n n t e
die Ertragshhe f r den entsprechenden O r t oder a n d e r e r s e i t s , wie h i e r v o r g e s c h l a g e n , die f r den Bau
der Anlagen erforderlichen Kapitalkosten darstellen.
Die d r i t t e v o r g e s c h l a g e n e D e f i n i t i o n ist p s y c h o l o g i scher N a t u r u n d w i r d v o n den G e f h l e n d e r
T o u r i s t e n , d i e zu einem Anlass g e h e n , a b g e l e i t e t .
Wenn d i e s e r Anlass so w i c h t i g i s t , dass e r a u f i h r e r
"muss m i t e r l e b t w e r d e n " - L i s t e a u f g e f h r t i s t , d a n n
s p r i c h t man von einem G r o s s a n l a s s .
Wir mssen n i c h t n u r eine D e f i n i t i o n z u g r u n d e l e g e n , s o n d e r n knnen d i e jeweils passende w h l e n .
Zweitens: Motive
O f f e n s i c h t l i c h g i b t es v i e l e G r n d e , ein G r o s s e r e i g nis z u v e r a n s t a l t e n . Dieses ist d e r zweite H a u p t p u n k t . Einige B e i t r g e haben b e t o n t , dass n i c h t
n u r konomische E r w g u n g e n o d e r die F r d e r u n g
des T o u r i s m u s d a f r a u s s c h l a g g e b e n d s i n d , dass
eine R e g i e r u n g o d e r r t l i c h e B e v l k e r u n g e n s o v i e l Zeit u n d K r a f t i n solche G r o s s v e r a n s t a l t u n g e n
i n v e s t i e r e n . Wie aus d e r f o l g e n d e n Tabelle e r s i c h t l i c h i s t , k n n e n auch umfassendere M o t i v a t i o n e n
dazu Anlass g e b e n .
E i n t r a c h t u n d E n t w i c k l u n g zum Besseren
Harmony and Progress
L ' A c c o r d et le Progrs
Dieser B e i t r a g entstammt d e n w e r t v o l l e n B e m e r k u n gen eines E n t w i c k l u n g s l a n d e s .
Die f o l g e n d e n B e m e r k u n g e n w u r d e n einer allgemein e r gehaltenen M o t i v a t i o n s b e r s i c h t , die in einem
f r h e r e n A r t i k e l z i t i e r t w u r d e , entnommen:
" O b w o h l d i e V e r a n s t a l t e r a n e r k a n n t e soziale
u n d konomische A r g u m e n t e v o r b r i n g e n ,
f h r e n doch ganz o f f e n s i c h t l i c h P r e s t i g e g r n d e zu p o l i t i s c h e n Entscheiden b e z g lich Grossanlssen."
Deshalb mssen d i e j e n i g e n von u n s , d i e dem F r e m -
d e n v e r k e h r ein besonderes I n t e r e s s e e n t g e g e n b r i n g e n
o d e r s i c h e i n g e h e n d e r mit W i r t s c h a f t s - u n d F i n a n z f r a gen a u s e i n a n d e r s e t z e n , dem p o l i t i s c h e n u n d sozialen
U m f e l d , i n n e r h a l b dessen diese g e w a l t i g e n F r e m d e n v e r k e h r s s t r m e ausgelst w e r d e n , besonderes A u g e n m e r k
schenken.
Drittens: Auswirkungen
A u f g r u n d d e r v i e l f l t i g e n M o t i v a t i o n e n , die zweifellos
v o r h a n d e n s i n d , w i r d u n s n u n b e w u s s t , dass eine h n l i c h v i e l f l t i g e A n z a h l A u s w i r k u n g e n v o r h a n d e n sein
muss. Die folgende Tabelle v e r s u c h t a c h t v e r s c h i e d e n e
A u s w i r k u n g e n a u f z u z e i g e n . Da jede sowohl p o s i t i v e als
auch n e g a t i v e W i r k u n g e n h a t , k n n t e man s a g e n ,
dass sechzehn F a k t o r e n z u b e r c k s i c h t i g e n s i n d .
Touristischer Aspekt
Wirtschaftlicher Aspekt
Technischer Aspekt
Physischer Aspekt
Sozialer A s p e k t
= Menge, Qualitt
= a n d e r e I n d u s t r i e n : Menge
= a n d e r e I n d u s t r i e n : Qualitt
= Umwelt, E r h a l t u n g
= familire B i n d u n g e n ,
Gewohnheiten
Kultureller Aspekt
= T r a d i t i o n e n , Glaubensbekenntnisse
Psychologischer Aspekt = Stolz, Bekanntheitsgrad
Politischer A s p e k t
= ortsgebunden, national,
weltweit
zeigt zwei Gesichtspunkte auf. Innerhalb der gastgebenden Region werden der Stolz oder das Selbstbewusstsein beeinflusst. Unter den Gsten erhht
sich das Bewusstsein in Bezug auf den Bekanntheitsgrad und die Reputation des Gastgeberlandes.
Der letzte aufgefhrte Einfluss ist politischer Nat u r , wobei dieser auf lokaler oder nationaler Ebene wirksam werden kann, sogar auf einem gesamten
Kontinent oder vielleicht weltweit.
Sechstens: Zusammenfassung
Lassen Sie mich einige Gedanken, die wie rote Fden
durch unsere Diskussionen und Darlegungen f h r t e n ,
in einer sechsten Idee zusammenfassen.
Nach Beendigung des Kongresses drngt sich uns als
Gesamteindruck die Tatsache auf, dass wir tatschlich
mehr Kenntnisse ber Grossveranstaltungen und
-attraktionen hatten als uns bewusst war. Wir bentigen jedoch sicherlich einen noch weiter gespannten Rahmen, um unsere Gedanken einfliessen lassen zu knnen.
Mit Hilfe unserer erworbenen Kenntnisse wollen wir
ein Grossereignis folgendermassen darstellen:
Vermutlich muss die richtige Frage folgendermassen lauten, nachdem wir alles uns mgliche gemessen haben: Wie knnen wir so unterschiedliche
Messungen miteinander in Verbindung bringen,
um zu einem Endergebnis zu gelangen. Dieses
Problem wird durch die folgende Gleichung verdeutlicht.
Es ist ausserordentlich schwierig, so mannigfache Einflsse miteinander zu verbinden.
Fnftens: Strategien
Wenn wir uns unserem fnften Punkt, den Strategien, zuwenden, ist es gut zu bemerken, wieviele Autoren aufgezeigt haben, dass Einflsse
positiver gestaltet werden knnen. Es stehen
hilfreiche Listen mit 'so sollte es gemacht werden 1 und 'so sollte es nicht gemacht werden' zur
Verfgung. Eine klare Schlussfolgerung ist die,
dass gute Planungen und wissenschaftliche Analysen dieser Grossanlsse das Resultat verbessern knnen, auch wenn wir nicht zu genauen
Messungen in der Lage sind. Unsere Kongressarbeit sollte daher diesen Strategien in positiver Weise dienen.
Aber es knnte zuweilen ein Dilemma zurckbleiben, weil die Strategie, die einen grsst-
group on
Es handelt sich um ein Bild eines Jahrtausende a l ten Bronzekopfes, den man gerade vor kurzem in
China gefunden hat. Wie uns nun bekannt ist, kann
der Massentourismus auf derartigen Funden aufgebaut werden.
Selbstverstndlich ist dies eine sehr vereinfachte
Ansicht darber, wie aus den Einrichtungen von
Grossveranstaltungen Nutzen gezogen werden
kann.
Die Hauptfolgerung dieses Kongresses, so schlage
ich vor, sollte darin bestehen, dass weiterhin Expertisen hinsichtlich bestmglicher Ausntzung
eines so riesigen Fremdenverkehrsphnomens u n ternommen werden. Diese Studien sollten sowohl
das Marketing als auch die Entwicklung beinhalten; sie werden mit professioneller Integritt
durchgefhrt und sollten verffentlicht werden.
Siebtens: Schlussfolgerung
Lassen Sie mich mit dem siebten Punkt schliessen.
Wir mssen auch nicht die andere Seite unseres
Kongresses hier in Calgary vergessen. Eine Seite, die genauso wichtig ist wie unsere Referate;
genauso wichtig wie unsere Diskussionen.
Denn wir haben auch die fantastische Wirklichkeit
in Bezug auf die Vorbereitung eines Grossanlasses
miterlebt; wir haben die Arbeiten vor Ort beobachtet. Selbstverstndlich hat uns die enorme Summe,
die bisher zusammengebracht worden ist, um die
Olympischen Winterspiele 1988 vorzubereiten, sehr
beeindruckt. Frank King, der Prsident des Organisationskomitees dieser Spiele, fasst deren Sinn
wie folgt zusammen: Die Spiele sollten "den Beginn
einer lebenslnglichen Chance" als Vermchtnis
hinterlassen.
Liebe Kollegen, ich schlage vor damit zu schliessen, dass wir unseren Gastgebern in Calgary ein
sehr erfolgreiches 1988, einen wirklich 'Kingsized1 Anlass, wnschen.
10
1. Definitions
2. Impact
3. Marketing
4. Methods of enhancing the benefits and
reducing the negative effects
1. Definitions
The problem of how to define mega-events and megaattractions and the link between the two was considered.
It was noted that events are attractions and hence the
relevant distinction should be between site attractions
and event attractions. These attractions can be classified as natural, man-,made or socio-cultural, and the
determination of whether or not an attraction is mega
may be influenced by its Classification. For example,
a natural mega-attraction such as the Victoria Falls in
Zimbabwe would still be regarded as a mega-attraction
even if political circumstances caused a substantial
reduction in visitor numbers. By contrast, if people
stopped going to Disneyland it would no longer be a
mega-attraction.
Attractions exert a gravitational influence on visitor
flows to particular destinations, and this gravitational
influence should be emphasised and thus the definitions
of mega-events and mega-attractions given in the basic
report by Brent Ritchie and Ju Yangzhou should be
modified accordingly. It was also feit that the ability
to attract worldwide publicity noted in the paper by
Karl Socher and Paul Tschurtschenthalter should appear
in the definition.
Established methodologies exist for evaluating site
attractions, but event attractions are more difficult
to deal w i t h , and hence it was decided that attention
should be focussed primarily on events. The distinguishing feature of events is the temporary nature of
the growth in visitor numbers.
A special report by H. Bos, C. Van der Kamp and Jac
Zorn entitled 'Events in Holland' addressed the definitional problem, and concluded that an event should
possess 3 characteristics:
1. It is an organised happening
2. It has some purpose
3. It is temporary in nature
These authors also presented a list of possible criteria
for further Classification, such as visitor numbers, adrnission price, target group, and so on.
2. Impact
The problem of how to evaluate the impact of megaevents before they take place was highlighted. Costbenefit analysis is an established methodology that
can be applied to this area, but a major difficulty
in carrying out such an evaluation is how to forecast the outcome. A range of possible future values
for the various quantitative factors may be tried in
the analysis to yield, say, an optimistic, a most
likely and a pessimistic outcome. This could then
be supplemented by an analysis of the qualitative
costs and benefits. It was also noted that most of
the existing literature on evaluating the impact of
mega-events relates to ex-post evaluations rather
than ex-ante evaluations based on forecasts.
3. Marketing
A special report by Joseph Kurtzman and John Zauhar
entitled 'New Vistas in Marketing Mega-Events' dealt
with the concept of composites. A polarisation activity,
such as a mega-event, which draws people, is made up
of composites, and whereas marketing has traditionally
been directed towards the polarisation activity itself,
the authors suggest that it should be targeted more towards the composites. For example, the composites expected from tourists attending the Olympic Games will
vary according to generating country, and thus culture
should be taken into account in marketing to different
groups of potential tourists.
The group feit that event organisers tend to be production oriented, and it would be preferable if proper market research were done in order to meet consumer
wishes.
The concept of product life cycle was considered in the
context of mega-events. Events usually Start at the local level, and may progress to achieve regional, national,
and eventually international importance. The last stage
is necessary in order to be classed as a mega-event. In
order to take an event into the mega category commercialisation, Organisation and marketing are essential
ingredients.
1. Methods of enhancinq the benefits and reducing the
negative effects
The objectives behind Staging mega-events vary according
to the type of event and host population. Thus some costs
and benefits will be specific to particular events and locations whereas others will be common to all events. The
views of the Community need to be taken into account in
order to fully understand the costs and benefits. Opportunity costs may also be relevant in certain cases; it is
necessary to examine whether similar objectives could have
been achieved at less cost by taking on an alternative project.
11
Conclusion
The group devoted most of its attention to the
Problems of defining mega-events/mega-attractions and their impacts. Had time permitted it
was feit that f r u i t f u l discussions would have
resulted from further study of the other two
aspects of the Conference theme. In conclusion,
an appropriate historical perspective on megaattractions was provided in a report by Gary
Kines entitled 'Mega-Project Thinking: The
Growth of Tourism and the Canadian Pacific
Railway in Banff National Park, 1885-1930'.
1. Eine Bewertung der Auswirkungen von Grossveranstaltungen auf die nationale und regionale touristische Entwicklung ist in dieser generellen A r t und Weise nicht mglich.
2. Wird ber eine spezielle Grossveranstaltung
an einem bestimmten Ort diskutiert, so ist
es unbedingt notwendig, die unterschiedlichsten Auswirkungen in einer frhen Planungsphase zu analysieren, zu bewerten und
gegeneinander abzuwgen (wie in unserem
methodischen Ansatz aufgezeigt).
12
1. Martin Mller. 2015. What makes an event a mega-event? Definitions and sizes. Leisure Studies 1-16. [CrossRef]
2. Ying Deng, S. W. Poon. 2014. Positioning mega-event flagships from Performing Arts Center of Expo 2010 to MercedesBenz Arena. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 10, 233-250. [CrossRef]
3. Maria Della Lucia. 2013. Economic performance measurement systems for event planning and investment decision making.
Tourism Management 34, 91-100. [CrossRef]
4. Ying Deng, S.W. Poon. 2013. Meeting sustainability challenges of megaevent flagships. Engineering, Construction and
Architectural Management 20:1, 46-62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
5. Ljudevit Prani, Lidija Petri, Liljana Cetini. 2012. Host population perceptions of the social impacts of sport tourism events
in transition countries. International Journal of Event and Festival Management 3:3, 236-256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
6. Ying Deng, S.W. Poon. 2012. Expo 2010 Shanghai China: a signature chapter of the Huangpu Riverfronts Trilogy. Journal
of Place Management and Development 5:2, 174-191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
7. Alex M. Deffner, Lois Labrianidis. 2005. Planning culture and time in a mega-event: Thessaloniki as the European city of
culture in 1997. International Planning Studies 10, 241-264. [CrossRef]
8. P.R. Emery. 2002. Bidding to host a major sports event. International Journal of Public Sector Management 15:4, 316-335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]