Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IlocosProfessionalandTechnicalEmployersUnion(IPTEU)
G.R.No.193798
September9,2015
PERALTA,J.
FACTS:
1. OnJuly9,2007,IlocosProfessionalandTechnicalEmployeesUnion(IPTEU)filedaverifiedPetition
forcertificationelectionseekingtorepresentabargainingunitconsistingofapproximatelytwentytwo
(22) rankandfile professional and technical employees of CocaCola Bottlers Philippines, Inc.
(CCBPI)IlocosNortePlant.
2. CCBPIprayedforthedenialanddismissalofthepetition,arguingthattheSalesLogisticsCoordinator
andMaintenanceForemanaresupervisoryemployees,whiletheeight(8)FinancialAnalysts,five(5)
QualityAssuranceSpecialists,MaintenanceManagerSecretary,TradePromotionsandMerchandising
Assistant(TPMA),TradeAssetControllerandMaintenanceCoordinator(TACMC),SalesInformation
Analyst(SIA),SalesLogisticsAssistant,ProductSupplyCoordinator,Buyer,InventoryPlanner,and
InventoryAnalystareconfidentialemployees;hence,ineligibleforinclusionasmembersofIPTEU.
3. Convincedthattheunionmembersarerankandfileemployeesandnotoccupyingpositionsthatare
supervisory or confidential in nature, MediatorArbiter Florence Marie A. GacadUlep granted
IPTEUSpetition.
4. In the Preelection Conference, CCBPI and IPTEU mutually agreed to conduct the certification
electiononSeptember21,2007.Onelectionday,onlysixteen(16)ofthetwentytwo(22)employees
intheIPTEUlistvoted.However,novoteswerecanvassed.CCBPIfiledandregisteredaProtest
questioningtheconductandmechanicsoftheelectionandaChallengetoVotesonthegroundthatthe
votersaresupervisoryandconfidentialemployees.
5. Byagreement,thepartiesmetfortheopeningandcountingofthechallengedvotes.CCBPIfileda
motionfor inhibition,which the MediatorArbiter verbally denied onthe grounds that it was not
verifiedandwouldcauseunduedelayontheproceedingsastherearenootherMediatorsArbitersin
theRegion.Thepartieswereinformedthattheiragreementtohavetheballotsopenedcouldnotbind
theMediatorArbiter.Instead,theyweredirectedtosubmitadditionalevidencethatwouldaidinthe
resolutionofthechallengedvotes.
6. TheMediatorArbiterdeniedCCBPIschallengetothe16votes.Shefoundthatthevotersarerank
andfileemployeesholdingpositionsthatarenotconfidentialinnature.Consequently,thechallenged
voteswereopenedandcanvassed.Aftergarnering14outofthe16votescast,IPTEUwasproclaimed
asthesoleandexclusivebargainingagentoftherankandfileexemptworkersinCCBPIIlocosNorte
Plant.
7. CCBPIelevatedthecasetotheSOLEarguing,amongothers,thattheHonorablepublicappelleeerred
indenyingthechallengetothesixteen(16)actualvoters,andsubsequentlydeclaringthatprivate
appelleeisthesoleandexclusivebargainingagentoftherankandfileexemptemployees.
8. TheappealofCCBPIwasdenied. TheSOLEheldthatevenifthe16challengedvotersmayhave
accesstoinformationwhichareconfidentialfromthebusinessstandpoint,theexerciseoftheirrightto
selforganizationcouldnotbedefeatedbecausetheircommonfunctionsdonotshowthatthereexista
confidentialrelationshipwithintherealmoflaborrelations.
9. CCBPIfiledbeforetheCAapetitionforcertiorari.Itreiterated,amongothers,thatthesixteen(16)
voters are not eligible for Union membership because they are confidential employees occupying
confidentialpositions.
10. TheCAdeniedthepetition.CCBPIfiledamotionforreconsideration,whichwasalsodenied;hence,
thispetition.
ISSUE: Whetherornotthe16voterssoughttobeexcludedfromtheappropriatebargainingunitare
confidentialemployees.