Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Limbona vs Mangelin
Facts:
* Petitioner was appointed member of the
Sanguniang Pampook, Regional Autonomous
Government and was later elected Speaker
of the Regional Legislative Assembly.
* Congressman Datu invited petitioner in his
capacity as Speaker of the Assembly for
consulations and dialogues on the recent
and present political developments and
other issues affecting Regions IX and XII
hopefully resulting to chart the autonomous
governments of the two regions as
envisioned and may prod the President to
constitute
immediately
the
Regional
Consultative Commission as mandated by
the Commission.
* Consistent with the said invitation,
Petitioner addressed all Assemblymen that
there shall be no session in November as
our presence in the house committee
hearing of Congress take (sic) precedence
over any pending business in batasang
pampook .
* In defiance of Petitioners advice, the
Assembly held a meeting on November 2,
1987, and unseated Limbona from his
position. Limbona prays for the session to be
declared null and void and that he still be
declared Speaker of the Regional Assembly.
* Pending the case, the SC also received a
resolution from the Assembly expelling
Limbonas membership.
Issue:
1. Whether or not the expulsion is valid?
2. Whether or not the courts of law have
jurisdiction
over
the
autonomous
governments or regions. What is the extent
of self-government given to the autonomous
governments of Region XII
Held:
1. No. the November 2 and 5, 1987 sessions
are declared invalid since at the time
Limbona called the recess, it was not a
settled matter whether or not he could do
so. Secondly, the invitation by the House of
Representatives Committee on Muslim
3. Lina vs Pano
Respondent Tony Calvento was appointed
agent of PCSO to install Terminal OM 20 for
the operation of lotto. He asked Mayor
Calixto Cataquiz, Mayor of San Pedro,
Laguna, for a mayor's permit to open the
lotto outlet but was denied by virtue of
ordinance passed by the Sangguniang
Panlalawigan of Laguna which prohibits
Lotto outlets in the province.
Respondent Calvento filed a complaint for
declaratory relief before RTC and a petition
to require Mayor Cataquiz to issue a
business permit for the operation of a lotto
outlet and to annul or declare as invalid the
said ordinance.
Respondent judge Pano
petitions of Calvento.
granting
the
permit based
1. Rights to life
4. Privacy of families
2. Rights to health
3. Freedom of expression and speech
5. Academic freedom
6. Due process of law
7. Equal protection and
8. Against involuntary servitude.
4. Imbong vs Ochoa
FACTS
On December 21, 2012, the Republic Act
(R.A.) No. 10354, otherwise known as the
Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive
Health Act of 2012 (RH Law), was enacted
by Congress.
14 petitions and 2 petitions-in-intervention
were filed by petitioners praying for the
declaration
of
the
RH
Law
as
unconstitutional on the grounds, as alleged
by the petitioners, that it violates:
5. Dadole vs COA
DOCTRINE:
the President can only interfere in the affairs
and activities of a local government unit if
he or she finds that the latter has acted
contrary to law. This is the scope of the
Presidents supervisory powers over local
government units. Hence, the President or
any of his or her alter egos cannot interfere
in local affairs as long as the concerned local
government unit acts within the parameters
of the law and the Constitution.
FACTS:
In 1986, the RTC and MTC judges of
Mandaue City started receiving monthly
allowances of P1,260 each through the
yearly appropriation ordinance enacted by
the Sangguniang Panlungsod of the said city.
In 1991, Mandaue City increased the
amount to P1,500 for each judge.
On March 15, 1994, the Department of
Budget and Management (DBM) issued the
disputed Local Budget Circular No. 55 (LBC
55) which provided that:
XXX the local government units under the
Local Government Code to provide for
additional allowances and other benefits to
national
government
officials
and
employees assigned in their locality, such
additional allowances in the form of
honorarium
at
rates
not
exceeding
ISSUES:
a. whether LBC 55 of the DBM is void for
going beyond the supervisory powers of the
President and for not having been published
b.
whether
the
yearly
appropriation
ordinance enacted by the City of Mandaue
that provides for additional allowances to
judges
contravenes
the
annual
appropriation laws enacted by Congress.
HELD:
share common
exclusive
attributes
is
within
the
provinces,
cities,
municipalities
and
geographical areas connote that region is
to be made up of more than one constituent
unit. The term region used in its ordinary
sense means two or more provinces. This is
supported by the fact that the thirteen (13)
regions into which the Philippines is divided
for administrative purposes are groupings of
contiguous provinces. Ifugao is a province
by itself. To become part of a region, it must
join other provinces, cities, municipalities,
and geographical areas. It joins other units
because of their common and distinctive
historical and cultural heritage, economic
and social structures and other relevant
characteristics.
The
Constitutional
requirements are not present in this case.
Article III, Sections 1 and 2 of Republic Act
No. 6766 provide that the Cordillera
Autonomous Region is to be administered by
the Cordillera government consisting of the
Regional Government and local government
units. It further provides that:
SECTION 2. The Regional Government shall
exercise powers and functions necessary for
the proper governance and development of
all provinces, cities, municipalities, and
barangay or ili within the Autonomous
Region . . . From these sections, it can be
gleaned that Congress never intended that a
single
province
may
constitute
the
autonomous region. Otherwise, we would be
faced with the absurd situation of having
two sets of officials, a set of provincial
officials and another set of regional officials
exercising their executive and legislative
powers over exactly the same small area.
City
did
not
meet
the
population
requirement so Semas contention is
untenable. On the other hand, ARMM cannot
validly create the province of S. Kabunsuan
without first creating a legislative district.
But this can never be legally possible
because the creation of legislative districts
is vested solely in Congress. At most, what
ARMM can create are barangays not cities
and provinces.
11. MIRANDA VS. AGUIRRE
G.R. No. 133064 September 16 1999
FACTS: 1994, RA No. 7720 effected the
conversion of the municipality of Santiago,
Isabela, into an independent component
city. In July 4th, RA No. 7720 was approved
by the people of Santiago in a plebiscite.
1998, RA No. 8528 was enacted and it
amended RA No. 7720 that practically
downgraded the City of Santiago from an
independent
component
city
to
a
component city. Petitioners assail the
constitutionality of RA No. 8528 for the lack
of provision to submit the law for the
approval of the people of Santiago in a
proper plebiscite.
Respondents defended the constitutionality
of RA No. 8528 saying that the said act
merely reclassified the City of Santiago from
an independent component city into a
component city. It allegedly did not involve
any creation, division, merger, abolition, or
substantial alteration of boundaries of local
government units, therefore; a plebiscite of
the people of Santiago is unnecessary. They
also questioned the standing of petitioners
to file the petition and argued that the
petition raises a political question over
which the Court lacks jurisdiction.
ISSUE: Whether or not the Court
jurisdiction over the petition at bar?
has
Issue:
Whether the qualified registered voters of
the entire province of Nueva Ecija or only
those in Cabanatuan City can participate in
the plebiscite called for the conversion of
Cabanatuan City from a component city into
an HUC.
Held:
1. Sec. 453 of the LGC should be interpreted
in accordance with Sec. 10, Art. X of the
Constitution. The power to create, divide,
merge, abolish or substantially alter
boundaries
of
provinces,
cities,
municipalities or barangays, which is
pertinent in the case at bar, is essentially
legislative in nature. The framers of the
Constitution have, however, allowed for the
delegation of such power in Sec. 10, Art. X
of the Constitution
as long as (1) the criteria prescribed in the
LGC is met and (2) the creation, division,
merger,
abolition
or
the
substantial
alteration of the boundaries is subject to the
approval by a majority vote in a plebiscite.
With the twin criteria of standard and
plebiscite satisfied, the delegation to LGUs
of the power to create, divide, merge,
abolish or substantially alter boundaries has
become a recognized exception to the
doctrine of non-delegation of legislative
powers.
Likewise, legislative power was delegated to
the President under Sec. 453 of the LGC
quoted earlier, which states:
Section 453. Duty to Declare Highly
Urbanized Status. It shall be the duty of
the President to declare a city as highly
urbanized within thirty (30) days after it
shall have met the minimum requirements
prescribed in the immediately preceding
Section, upon proper application therefor
and ratification in a plebiscite by the
qualified voters therein.
In this case, the provision merely authorized
the President to make a determination on
whether or not the requirements under Sec.
452
of the LGC are complied with. The provision
makes it ministerial for the President, upon
invalid
for
non-compliance
with
minimum population requirement.
the
Issue:
Held:
Any law duly enacted by Congress carries
with
it
the
presumption
of
constitutionality.24 Before a law may be
declared unconstitutional by this Court,
there must be a clear showing that a
specific provision of the fundamental law
has been violated or transgressed. When
there is neither a violation of a specific
provision of the Constitution nor any proof
showing that there is such a violation, the
presumption of constitutionality will prevail
and the law must be upheld. To doubt is to
sustain.25
There is no specific provision in the
Constitution that fixes a 250,000 minimum
population that must compose a legislative
district.
The second sentence of Section 5(3), Article
VI of the Constitution, succinctly provides:
Each city with a population of at least two
hundred fifty thousand, or each province,
shall have at least one representative.
The provision draws a plain and clear
distinction between the entitlement of a city
to a district on one hand, and the
entitlement of a province to a district on the
other. For while a province is entitled to at
least
a representative,
with nothing
mentioned about population, a city must
first meet a population minimum of 250,000
in order to be similarly entitled.
The use by the subject provision of a comma
to separate the phrase each city with a
population of at least two hundred fifty
thousand from the phrase or each
province point to no other conclusion than
that the 250,000 minimum population is
only required for a city, but not for a
province. 26