Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRITERIA
Identification of issues
4 (Excellent)
3 (Good)
SCORE
2 (Satisfactory)
1 (Poor)
0 (Missing or no
show or plagiarism)
Acceptable issues
Vague issues identification and Missing or no show
identification but lack of less than 2 issues identified.
or plagiarism.
evidence to support and 2
issues identified.
Comprehensive analysis.
(Uses evidence appropriately
and sufficiently, providing
sufficient evidence and
explaination to convince)
TOTAL
12
Total Marks
40
Missing or no show
or plagiarism.
Excellent coherence of ideas. Good coherence of ideas. Some coherence of ideas. No coherence of ideas.
(Have a chain of reasoning or (Have a logical progression
progression of ideas)
of ideas)
Missing or no show
or plagiarism.
Excellent presentation.
(Precise words, sentence
structured, and focus.almost
entirely free of spelling,
punctuation and
grammatical error)
Missing or no show
or plagiarism.
WEIGHT
Good presentation.
(Accurate words,clear
sentence, may have
awkward or ineffective
sentences.contain a few
grammatical errors)
Moderate presentation.
(relatively vague and
general words,
inappropriate language,
wordy sentences,
unfocused, repetitive or
confusing.contain several
grammatical errors)
Poor presentation.
(Vague,ungrammatical
sentences, monotonous
sentence structured. Many
grammatical errors and a few
major grammatical errors)
Copyright 2012 Centre of Information Technology Studies, FSKM, UiTM. All rights reserved.