You are on page 1of 2

Translate

Showing translation for To determine which fluid should be routed through the shell side and
which fluid on the tubeside, consider the following factors. These factors are discussed in
detail in Refs. [5,26,27]. Corrosion: Fewer corrosion-resistant alloys or clad components are
needed if the corrosive fluid is placed on the tubeside. Fouling: This can be minimized by
placing the fouling fluid in the tubes to allow better velocity control; increased velocities tend
to reduce fouling. Cleanability: The shell side is difficult to clean; chemical cleaning is
usually not effective on the shellside because of bypassing and requires the cleaner fluid.
Straight tubes can be physically cleaned without removing the tube bundle; chemical cleaning
can usually be done better on the tubeside. Temperature: For high-temperature services
requiring expensive alloy materials, fewer alloy components are needed when the hot fluid is
placed on the tubeside. Pressure: Placing a HP fluid in the tubes will require fewer costly HP
components and the shell thickness will be less. Pressure drop: If the pressure drop of one
fluid is critical and must be accurately predicted, then that fluid should generally be placed on
the tubeside. Viscosity: Higher heat transfer rates are generally obtained by placing a viscous
fluid on the shellside. The critical Reynolds number for turbulent flow in the shell is about
200; hence, when the flow in the tubes is laminar, it may be turbulent if the same fluid is
placed on the shellside. However, if the flow is still laminar when in the shell, it is better to
place the viscous fluid only on the tubeside since it is somewhat easier to predict both heat
transfer and flow distribution [27]. Toxic and lethal fluids: Generally, the toxic fluid should
be placed on the tubeside, using a double tubesheet to minimize the possibility of leakage.
Construction code requirements for lethal service must be followed. Flow rate: Placing the
fluid with the lower flow rate on the shellside usually results in a more economical design
and a design safe from flow-induced vibration. Turbulence exists on the shellside at much
lower velocities than on the tubeside.
Translate instead To determine which fluid should be routed through the shellside and which
fluid on the tubeside, consider the following factors. These factors are discussed in detail in
Refs. [5,26,27]. Corrosion: Fewer corrosion-resistant alloys or clad components are needed if
the corrosive fluid is placed on the tubeside. Fouling: This can be minimized by placing the
fouling fluid in the tubes to allow better velocity control; increased velocities tend to reduce
fouling. Cleanability: The shellside is difficult to clean; chemical cleaning is usually not
effective on the shellside because of bypassing and requires the cleaner fluid. Straight tubes
can be physically cleaned without removing the tube bundle; chemical cleaning can usually
be done better on the tubeside. Temperature: For high-temperature services requiring
expensive alloy materials, fewer alloy components are needed when the hot fluid is placed on
the tubeside. Pressure: Placing a HP fluid in the tubes will require fewer costly HP
components and the shell thickness will be less. Pressure drop: If the pressure drop of one
fluid is critical and must be accurately predicted, then that fluid should generally be placed on
the tubeside. Viscosity: Higher heat transfer rates are generally obtained by placing a viscous
fluid on the shellside. The critical Reynolds number for turbulent flow in the shell is about
200; hence, when the flow in the tubes is laminar, it may be turbulent if the same fluid is
placed on the shellside. However, if the flow is still laminar when in the shell, it is better to
place the viscous fluid only on the tubeside since it is somewhat easier to predict both heat
transfer and flow distribution [27]. Toxic and lethal fluids: Generally, the toxic fluid should
be placed on the tubeside, using a double tubesheet to minimize the possibility of leakage.

Construction code requirements for lethal service must be followed. Flow rate: Placing the
fluid with the lower flow rate on the shellside usually results in a more economical design
and a design safe from flow-induced vibration. Turbulence exists on the shellside at much
lower velocities than on the tubeside.
Untuk menentukan cairan harus disalurkan melalui sisi shell dan yang cairan pada tubeside,
mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor berikut. Faktor-faktor ini dibahas secara rinci pada
referensi. [5,26,27].
Korosi: sedikit paduan tahan korosi atau komponen berpakaian yang diperlukan jika cairan
korosif ditempatkan pada tubeside tersebut.
Fouling: ini dapat diminimalkan dengan menempatkan cairan fouling di tabung untuk
memungkinkan kontrol kecepatan yang lebih baik; meningkat kecepatan cenderung
mengurangi fouling.
Cleanability: Sisi shell sulit dibersihkan; pembersih kimia biasanya tidak efektif pada sisi
shell karena melewati dan membutuhkan cairan pembersih. tabung lurus dapat secara fisik
dibersihkan tanpa menghapus bundel tabung; pembersih kimia biasanya dapat dilakukan
lebih baik pada tubeside tersebut.
Suhu: Untuk layanan suhu tinggi membutuhkan bahan paduan mahal, komponen paduan
sedikit diperlukan ketika cairan panas ditempatkan pada tubeside tersebut.
Tekanan: Menempatkan cairan HP di tabung akan membutuhkan lebih sedikit komponen HP
mahal dan ketebalan shell akan kurang.
Pressure drop: Jika penurunan tekanan dari salah satu cairan sangat penting dan harus
diprediksi secara akurat, maka cairan yang umumnya harus ditempatkan pada tubeside
tersebut.
Viskositas: tinggi kecepatan transfer panas umumnya diperoleh dengan menempatkan cairan
kental pada sisi shell tersebut. Jumlah Reynolds penting untuk aliran turbulen di shell sekitar
200; karenanya, ketika aliran dalam tabung adalah laminar, mungkin turbulen jika cairan
yang sama ditempatkan pada sisi shell tersebut. Namun, jika aliran tersebut masih laminar
ketika di shell, lebih baik untuk menempatkan cairan kental hanya pada tubeside karena itu
agak lebih mudah untuk memprediksi baik perpindahan panas dan distribusi aliran [27].
Beracun dan mematikan cairan: Umumnya, cairan beracun harus ditempatkan pada tubeside,
menggunakan tubesheet ganda untuk meminimalkan kemungkinan kebocoran. persyaratan
kode konstruksi untuk layanan mematikan harus diikuti.
laju aliran: Menempatkan cairan dengan laju alir rendah pada sisi shell yang biasanya
menghasilkan desain yang lebih ekonomis dan desain yang aman dari getaran alirandiinduksi. Turbulensi ada pada sisi shell di kecepatan yang jauh lebih rendah dari pada
tubeside tersebut.
Google Translate for Business:Translator ToolkitWebsite TranslatorGlobal Market Finder
Turn off instant translationAbout Google TranslateMobileCommunityPrivacy &
TermsHelpSend feedback

PENEMPATAN FLUIDA

You might also like