Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Multinational organization tends to have more cultural combinations as it has people
from different regions and countries; therefore it likely to have more differences and conflicts
amongst the working personals due to their attachment with different culture. In this study
only one problem i.e. communication problem, arising in an MNC due to existence of people
from different cultures will be discussed.
It is important in all communication that the message is properly sent by the sender
and received by the receiver equally god (Greenberg, 2004). Minimizing of physical and
psychological barriers especially in cross-cultural communication is more important as the
chances of error increase in this case.
There are also significant differences across cultures in the ways and the extent to
which people communicate (Jay Kandampully, 2001). Efforts would be made through this
case study to find out and analyze the vital uniqueness of cross cultural communication
problems through an analysis of real cases in daily communication amongst different cultural
people working in a multinational company (Toyota Motors, Pakistan). Problem they face in
communicating their point of view and understanding others would be seen here with some
suggestions at the end to improve upon as well. Managing the effective communication
amongst the colleagues within an environment where people from different culture work is
always been a point of concern for leading company. To improve upon and have a cordial
working atmosphere is must to get the maximum output. Through this study an effort will be
made to find out the gray areas of the communication in a cross cultural environment,
analyzing the means to highlight the weakness and then suggesting measures to improve
upon.
Issues to be discussed
To analyse the data collected on the topic mentioned above for its validity.
multi-cultural environment.
To conclude by giving Recommendations for betterment and future prosperity.
Methodology
This research approach is an in-depth explanatory single-case study. The reason for
selecting an explanatory rather than an explanatory research design is the practice being
carried out in Toyota Motors to resolve the day-to-day human communication issues arising
in a cross cultural environment. For this reason, an explanatory case study seems
appropriate, as the aim is not to test theoretical propositions, but to highlight the successful
practices in vogue which may be helpful to other industries and organization in bringing
better in the same area.
The study will be qualitative, efforts would be made for qualitative data collection
through primary and secondary sources, using website of the organization under study,
through review of literature available on the subject and the reading material provided during
course of study.
The reason for selecting such organization is to analysis and examines the crosscultural communications dynamics that arise in a huge automobile industry.
Data Collection and Analysis
The collection of data was not an easy task to do as the company did not allow access
everywhere and to every individual as a matter of company policy. Effort was made to collect
data through interview of different people; for this purpose I conduct a total of 6 interviews
which were main source of data collection. These all interviews were of the people having
different tires in the organization, like (i) General Manager Operations (ii) Manager
Administration, (iii) Deputy Manager Security and Surveillance, (vi) Supervisor Production,
(v) Helper Electrical Department and (vi) Supervisor Staff welfare Canteen. The interviews
were conducted between April and May, 2014. The interviews were held in a semi-structured
manner and in real working environment. The average interview time with each member was
approximately 15 minutes to 20 minutes. In addition to the primary data, data is also
collected through internet, literature available on the subject and the course material issued to
the students.
In order to analyzing the collected data first the interview transcriptions, personal
notes, and secondary data had to be classified and organized according to some key
dimensions like department, working affiliation of the interviewing employees, position in
the companys hierarchy, assigned role in the project. While in the second step the data was
coded keeping in mind the main issues to be discussed in the research. The third step
consisted of integrating and interpretations of the data and documenting the case for drafting.
The identification of critical issues of the communication problems in a multi-cultural
organization was guided with the help of observations and data collected which helped this
research to a logical conclusion.
Motor reflects powerfully by actions at the forefront of activities that help preserve and
improve the environment, building close and cooperative relationships with individuals and
organizations involved in environmental preservation. Toyota Motor also unceasingly
refining the companys own environment management system and discouraging events that
have a negative impact. Toyota Motor is an ISO 14001 and 9002 certified company (Toyota,
2014).
Few of the actions taken are reflected bellow:
To recycle water used for plantation, a wastewater treatment plant has been installed
Cultural difference between Japanese, Thais, etc. and Pakistanis is the major
communicational barrier. Pakistan is a culturally rich country which possesses diversified
culture varying from region to region. Labour working in the plant of Toyota Motor
represents mostly rural background. The labour force has different culture, temperament of
work, physical status and language. Managers have to use different techniques to
communicate the task to the labour and they have to use different techniques to get the work
done.
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
relationship.
Employees may be taught to take the things at face value rather than as
8)
9)
10)
messages leave confusions that if you actually mean what you say.
The key of getting the successful communication is to be an active listener;
11)
Conclusion
In this paper, I have considered the communication between Pakistani and Japanese
and different clans of Pakistani colleague. Context plays vital role in any conversation
therefore it is highly recommended to understand it properly (Gleser GC, 1981). Especially
when we are engaged in a situation where there are cross cultural conversations going on,
understanding the difference and thorough knowledge of contexts is unavoidable.
The effective communication is managed within an environment where folks from
different ethos work is always been a worry companies like Toyota. To maintain conducive
working environment Toyota has devised different ways which are highlighted in this study.
Action Plan
Recommendation
Action
Action
Benefits from
Understanding of
completed by
Management
implementation
Enhanced Message
and staff
understanding
communication gap
Maintaining a modernized
be inculcated
Staff be kept
Management
and staff
changing social
environment
difference.
Contribution in making
Better work-
environment healthier
environment would
increase output
Friendly
increasing output
This will support
Management
Management
Healthy working
environment in the
consolidated
organization
management on a
Adherence of safety
global scale.
Safe working
be implemented
rules
must adhere
environment, increased
Management
production.
It helps in creating
Social support
contribution
actions
Understanding each-others
Better
Management
locals
It can contribute to
context
understanding of
and staff
effectiveness of
culture
Understanding of
Staff
communication
Better understanding of
culture
Focused task
Staff and
culture
Increased efficiency
Clear messages
management
Staff and
and effectiveness
Reduce confusion
Clarity of task
management
Staff and
management
Clarity of thought
Staff and
Help in removal of
and assignment
management
physical and
environment
barriers
distractions while
engaging in a cross
cultural
communication.
Bibliography
Gleser GC, G. B. W. C., 1981. Gleser GC, Green Prolonged Psychosocial Effects of
Disaster: A Study of Buffalo Creek, New York: Academic Press.
Greenberg, P., 2004. CRM at the Speed of Light: Essential Customer Strategies
for the 21st Century. s.l.:McGraw Hill Professional .
Jay Kandampully, C. M. B. A. S., 2001. Service Quality Management in Hospitality,
Tourism, and Leisure. Haworth Hospitality Press. .
Ji, H. L. & Ajai, S. G., 2014. Managing Multibusiess firm: A comparision between
Korea Chaebols and diversified U.S. firm. Journal of World Business, 48(4),
pp. 443-454.
Peppers, D., 2010. Managing Customer Relationships: A Strategic Framework.
s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.
Toyota, 2014. Toyota Motors. [Online]
Available at: http://www.toyota-indus.com
[Accessed 15 July 2014].