2013 9

2016 6

GDP
20%

870
22

Abstract
Nomadic herding is taking significant position in the Mongolian economic. The livestock
products contribute around 20 percent of the countrys gross domestic product. Meat and meat
products demands had increased according to world population growth. Mongolia is required to
export meat with national brand of meat products which is a few of the nomadic herding.
Mongolian nomadic livestock had completely depended on weather and natural
resources. These are become a cause of lost advanced and modern breeding technology.
Mongolian traditional nomadic herding already hadnt meet current demand of world. Herders
are completely depended on weather condition. Supplying meat products are limited by this
approach. Therefore there are not possible to supply meat constant period. Mongolia has used
the diet about 8.7 million head of livestock a year by directly. In the diet of 220 thousand tons of
meat are processed using industrial methods.
This dissertation work had focused on analyzing supply and demand of meat and meat
products and situation of export finding problems of meat and meat products market in the
Mongolia. There are included hygiene standards, food safety and distortion caused by meat
products trade system. This dissertation work covered basic way to solve these problems.
Key words: Mongolia, meat and meat products, nomadic, export, supply and demand

1.1

1.2

1.2.1

1.2.2

1.3

1.3.1

1.3.2

1.4

1.4.1

1.4.2

1.4.3

1.5

1.5.1

1.5.2

1.5.2.1

1.5.2.2

1.5.2.3

10

2.1

10

2.2

10

2.3

10

2.4

11

12

3.1

12

3.2

16

3.3

18

3.4

20

3.5

22

25

4.1

25

4.2

31

4.3

32

4.4

33

4.5

33

34

5.1

34

5.2

34

5.3

35

38

6.1

38

6.2
7
7.1

39
41
41

7.2

43

44

46

47

1990
96%

1.
1.1


1.2
GDP
20%

870
22
2000 20002002

1.3

1.3.1
G.Shirnen 1974
6

Ya.Oyuntungalag 1995

N.Nansalmaa
1998


C.Badarch 2006

Ts.Yadamsuren 1996

1.3.2
S.HansonBarriers to agricultural exports from developing countries2001

S.FanResearch productivity and output growth in Chinese agriculture1997
Ulrich Livestock production in Mongolia2005
3
(2004),,
,
(2004)(CMS
),,
":,
2002

2003

1.4
1.4.1

2000-2003
12.5

870 22
2.6 2001
10% 1.8
25-30%35-40%10-15%15-20%
1

2008

/
1.4.2

83,7

2009

2010

2011

2012

100,0

73,5

75,4

80,7

2010
1989 1989 10.9%57.8%2009
5.9% 43.8% 11-13%
38% 75%
2-2.2 36%
80% 11
14.5%
6.6 1-6 7-12
15-30 7 4
2016 2 5540MNT, 6905 MNT 4860 MNT
4190 MNT
2

2008

2009

2013/2012

2010 2011 2012 2013

22.13 26.44 20.44 20.80 22.04 23.82 107.4%

1.20

2.14

1.47

1.56 1.64 2.21 134.7%

1.03

1.79

2.38

1.06 0.37

0.3 81%

1.4.3

1
1

27%

22%

20%

18%

0%

7%
5%
5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

2 0-4
2

2%
7%
7%
8%
8%
9%
9%
10%
11%
13%
15%
0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

1.5
1.5.1
GDP
20%

870
22
2000 20002002

1.5.2

1.

1.5.2.1

1.5.2.1

1.5.2.2
""""

1.5.2.3

quantitative analysis method


2
2.1

1959 (J. Vanek)

2.2
(securities market)

2.3

 (LAC)

2.4
(David Ricardo)


3
3.1
40
30

4500-5000

19
20

3 2004 2010

3 2015 2014

 3 %

2012

2013

2014

2015

2012

2013

2014

2015

207.8

209.9

213.4

216.7

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

10

16.8

16.7

15.0

14.2

8.1

8.0

7.0

6.6

11-30

23.4

22.5

20.3

19.9

11.3

10.7

9.5

9.2

31-50

17.8

17.1

15.8

15.5

8.6

8.1

7.4

7.1

51-100

32.9

31.4

29.4

29.3

15.8

15.0

13.8

13.5

101-200

48.5

47.0

46.8

46.2

23.3

22.4

22.0

21.3

201-500

50.5

53.1

58.1

60.1

24.3

25.3

27.2

27.7

501-999

14.3

17.1

21.1

23.1

6.9

8.2

9.9

10.6

1000-

3.0

4.1

5.6

7.0

1.5

1.9

2.6

3.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

1499
15002000
2000

, %

50-55

249

13,70%

52-54

247

21,20%

52-54

41

27,40%

39-40

33

18,40%

55-60

414

11,70%

3.2

470

5 100

B2

B5

VC C

VE E

CA

MG

FE

122
20.1
4.6
.1
0
28
1.1
74.1
.25
2.2
0
1.42
84
526
115.8
5
41
5.1

17
5 25%

3163.3
3059.1
2893.2
2770.5
3000 2648.4
3500

2500 2408.9
2000

2800

2660.8
2619.4
2239.5
2186.9
2114.8
2029.1
2005.3
2330.4
1968.9
1920.3
2221.3 2112.9
2191.8 1989.9

1500
1000
500
0

2000 2003

4 2014

3.3

20.35

21.31

2.15

3.50

1.16

1.05

75.47

7 100

VC C

VE E

CA

122
20.2

2.3
1.2
0
6
1.1
74.1
0
0.35
58
284
53.6
9

5 2014

3.4

] 12.3%

62.2

19.53

16.59

0.78

2559.0

1.5

61.3

21.44

17.56

0.82

2655.4

2.5
56.0
26.1
17.44
0.82
3253.0
3.5
53.8
28.7
16.83
0.87
3416.8
4.5
51.0
32.6
15.6
0.8
3701.1
28.8% A B
23-35%
20
62.6% 19.6% 16.6%,

7 2014

3.5

10 1
1 2

5 6
36%
9 MNT

10 2014


42%

2.4

2.4

2-2.2

5%

11 MNT

16.1%
0.6%
3.9%
3.7%

2.3%

43.9%

3.5%

20.6%

2.3%

11-13% 75%
2-2.2
80%
1-6 7

4
4.1

 156.65

1.5
1.5
2008 8.3
22.31 8.3 25.81
38% 25% 20% 15% 3%

Y = 106.133 - 0.007312*x
R - squared = 0.285
T - Statistic

24.976

-1.893

-
-

Y = 72.254 + 0.308*x
R-squared= 0.595
t-Statistic

9.381

3.638

-
-
12

13

35
30
25

28.9

31.06

24.58

22.6

20

20.44

19.93

18.39

17.07

2004

2005

2006

15.34

15

19.12

22.31

10
5
0

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2007

2008

2000 31.06 2000-2003

2003 15.34 7
9.1%2002 84.2%
22.2% 21.2% 27.4%
18.4% 13.7% 11.7%

14

 15

. 9

4 326,12
1 525,90
2 482,46
2 821,35
2 117,32
153,26
397,04
1 061,86
1 914,15
1 918,40
3 229,32
293,12
3 491,25
1 638,42
1 829,84
1 659,55
3 371,72
2 557,09
2 378,04
4 322,04
2 508,05
45
996,30

251,23
87,3
149,3
162,53
124,05
8,77
22,12
64,45
114,55
107,73
178,44
16,79
197,98
103,3
107,01
93,82
194,26
140,71
138,34
246,7
145,01
2 654,39

9,7
7,7
7,1
7
4
1,4
2,1
2,4
8,51
4
5,8
2,94
23
3,4
4
4,63
8,6
8,1
6,4
16,1
8,3
145,1
8

GDB

0,45
2,9

1,1
3

0,68

0,3

13,4
3

9,7
8,15
10
7
4
1,4
3,1
2,4
11,51
4
5,8
3,62
23
3,4
4
9,6
8,6
8,06
6,7
16,1
8,3

16,6%
25,5%
25,4%
27,9%
8,9%
30,0%
7,5%
15,0%
31,7%
16,5%
10,8%
0,7%
48,4%
9,4%
5,1%
14,8%
27,1%
21,8%
15,8%
31,7%
22,5%

158,44

20%

10

1
4

1
1
2
1
2
2
6
1
2
1

2
1
1

1
1
1

1
2

1
2

4
3
1

2
2
1

6
3

2
1
3

2
7
3
0
2
8
2
2
3
2
0
2
2
0
7
7
2
2
8
6
0

10
2000
11

1-5
9
11
2
3
1

6-8
21
19
5
2
2

9-10
31
27
5
6
4

11-12
35
29
9
7
5

12

32

32

85

40

2015 5.4%

 2.5-3 11-13%

38%
16
45

40

40
35

31

30

26

25

22
18

20
15
10

42

12

10

5
0
1-5

6-8

9-10

11-12

40%25%30% 5%
90
260 40%
10-20%

2020 7 315
45 82
41 20 42
82 30

4.2
2.2

17 2012

4.3

 18

19

4.4

2007

23.1 2015
34.3

80

2015
2493.34 27.34%
4.5
75%

2008 91.2
2005 80.4 126
2008 88.8 92.6

2008 12 4
4.5 6 2014 91.2
24.2 889.3 14.5%

5
5.1
2015 5860
2010 1.3 99
2015
2108.44 252 2.8

 95%

115.6

1500

5.2
98%

2011 274 2012 113 2013 141.3

2013 22.4
1.1%

5.3

2014 2008 38%

168%

 9-12
24

20

1082.25
264

3879.34

7072.8

21 2000 2007

2.5 2010
43 31 19

 22 2006 2014

26763.4

30000.0
25000.0
18039.0

20000.0
15000.0
11699.0

11029.1

10347.5

10166.0

10000.0
5000.0
0.0
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

3102.3

3001.0

2012

2013

1702.2
2014 I-X

13

2010

199.3

9,5

8.7

4%

2011

183.9

10,1

7.8

4%

2012

170.7

13,2

11.7

7%

2013

191.2

19,8

10.9

6%

2014

223.1

16,8

10.3

5%


23

6
6.1

800
25

30 10%
20

4 9

2014 2008
425-444%
C.Handsuren 2001
78.5%

6.2

80%

 HACCP

7
7.1

,,

7.2

GDP
20%

870
22
2000 20002002


1. .[J],1999
2. . 2009[J]. . 2005(24)
3. . [J]. . 2004(12)
4. ,,,. [J]. .
2004(11)
5. .[M]. , 2004
6. .[M]. , 2004
7. ,,.
[J]. . 2006(02)
8. . [D].
2005
9. . [D]. 2003
10.

,. [J]. .

2002(S1)
11.

. [J]. ().

2001(02)
12.

. [D]. 2005

13.

www.baidu.com

14.

http://epub.cnki.net/kns/brief/default_result.aspx

15.

Ya.Oyuntungalag Ph.D

16.

2002

17.

3. Bat-Erdene, Ts The Economics of Herder Households Sogoo

1995

Nuur 2004
18.

Baldandash,L and Nyamaa, Ya Possibilities of Increasing Meat

Output of Mongolian Breed of Sheep 1978

19.

5. Navaanchimed, M Experiences on Feeding Heifers Intensively

for Meat Purposes 1973

20.

Mongolian Statistical Yearbook, National Statistical Office of

Mongolia, Various issues

21.

www.1212.mn

22.

www.nso.mn

23.

1-2 . .

24.

, ,

25.
26.

www.mofa.gov.mn
, ,

27.

.mn

A
B
3.
A
B
C
4
A
B
5
A10 MNT B. 10 ~20 MNT C. 20 ~30 MNT D. 30 MNT
6.

1
2

7




8.
A
B.
C.
9. ?