There is no form of mental activity so universal in its visible manifestations as that which we call the Will. And, likewise, there is none so generally misunderstood and so little understood as the Will. When we come to consider the nature of the Will we find ourselves confronting a score of definitions, theories and beliefs. In fact, it almost may be said that to each and every individual the word Will has a different meaning, or a different shade of meaning. Ask yourself what you mean when you say the Will; then ask a few of your friends and associates, and see how widely varying are the answers and definitions. While we shall ever try to avoid philosophical hair-splitting, in this series of books on The New Psychology, nevertheless we find from time to time that we must come to some sort of clear understanding with our readers regarding the meaning of certain terms; and in order to do so we must analyze those terms and consider the views of the best authorities regarding them. And this course is especially needed in the case of the term before us The Will. What is The Will? Passing by the philosophical conceptions of Will, in the sense of a universal acting mind, as postulated by Schopenhauer, von Hartmann, Nietsche and others, and confining ourselves The Will 6 closely to the psychological acceptation of the term, let us consult the various authorities. A leading American dictionary defines Will as follows: The determination or choice of one possessing authority; discretionary pleasure, command, decree; also Arbitrary power, disposal, or authority, absolute power to control determine or dispose, also Strong wish or inclination, desire, intention, disposition, pleasure; also: That which is strongly desired or wished for as He had his will. The same authority gives the following note regarding the philosophical meaning of the term: Though the word will has often been used, as it popularly is, in two senses (I) the power of the mind which enables a person to choose between two courses of action; and (II) the actual exercise of that power strict reasoners separate these meanings, calling the former will and the latter volition. Will in this limited sense is that mental power or faculty by which, of two or more objects of desire or courses of action presented to it, it chooses one, rejecting the other or others. To what extent this power of selection is arbitrary, or is the result of necessity, has been for ages a subject of controversy. The division of the mental powers which came down from antiquity, and was most generally adopted by the philosophers, were the powers belonging to the understanding, and those belonging to the will. Reid adopted it, although considering it not quite logical. Under the will he says, we comprehend our active powers and all that lead to action or influence the mind to act, such as appetite, passions, affections. Brown considered this classification as very illogical, considering that the will was not in any way opposed to the intellect, but exercised in the intellectual department an empire almost as wide as that which was allotted to itself. We reason he says, and plan and invent, at least as voluntarily as we esteem or hate, or hope or fear. The term Active Powers used by Reid is a synonym for the Will. In order to see still further the confusing uses of this word, consider the definitions of the same authority of the term used as a verb: To determine by an act of choice; to form a wish or