Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ben Henderson
CAS 138T
14 April 2016
Comprehensive Sexual Education
Sexual Education is a topic that teenagers never really want to
hear at 8 a.m. on a Monday morning, especially when it is coming from
one of their teachers. Sexual intercourse, puberty, and all of the other
topics that sexual education entails excites nearly every student in
middle school and high school. The subject may be is even more
titillating when discussing it with teachers than with their parents.
Luckily, all teenagers do not have to hear those words because not all
public schools in the United States teach sexual education. These
lucky students are being denied the education that could prove
pivotal in making life-changing decisions in their lives. The type of
information learned in sexual education programs ranges from
abstinence to contraceptive use to abortion. The state of Pennsylvania
should require comprehensive sexual education programs to be taught
in all public schools.
At this time, only 22 states and the District of Columbia require
public schools to include some sexual education in their curriculum,
and some states even mandate HIV education (NCSL). Yet not even all
of these schools teach a comprehensive sexual education, meaning
that the program would not only teach students how to say no and to
practice abstinence, but it would also teach them about
contraceptives, like condoms and birth control. The most common
program taught focuses only on abstinence, which has been proven to
show no real benefits. According to Advocates for Youth, abstinenceonly programs have shown negative impacts on youths willingness to
use contraception, including condoms, to prevent negative sexual
health outcomes related to sexual intercourse (Advocates for Youth).
According to the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the
United States (SIECUS), these abstinence-only programs do not
result in a decrease of teen pregnancy: the exact issue it is attempting
to prevent. In comparison programs that do include comprehensive
sexual education have resulted in a decrease in teen pregnancy
(SIECUS).
Pennsylvania is among those states that do not require sexual
education in public schools curriculums (Smothers, fusion.net). Sexual
education provides crucial information for young adults, but the
lessons are often overlooked and undervalued. In Pennsylvania alone,
unintended pregnancies composed of 53% of all pregnancies in 2010.
Looking more specifically to the age range that sexual education would
directly affect, 49 of every 1,000 women in Pennsylvania were
pregnant teenagers aged 15-19 in 2010 (guttmatcher.com).
since the mid-1990s (Sedgh, Science Direct). Wind cites Sedgh that
countries like Switzerland have long-established sex education
programs, free family services and low-cost emergency contraception
(Wind). Certainly, sexual education still remains as one of the defining
factors for reducing teen pregnancy.
Justification
Comprehensive sexual education programs have various
benefits. It is well documented that they reduce the amount of
unwanted teen pregnancies and the amount of sexually transmitted
infections. The Journal of Adolescent Health conducted a study in 2008,
and they found that although 15-24-year-olds represent only 25% of
the sexually active population, they account for nearly one-half of all
new sexually transmitted infections (Kohler). The Journal of
Adolescent Health concluded that when taught the comprehensive
sexual education program, teenagers were less likely to report teen
pregnancy than those who received no formal sex education (Kohler).
Furthermore, they found that students who were taught abstinenceonly programs did not result in any changes in vaginal intercourse,
but comprehensive sex education was marginally associated with a
lower likelihood of reporting having engaged in vaginal intercourse
(Kohler). According to Advocates for Youth, out of the students that
were taught comprehensive sexual education, forty percent of them
the program (NCSL). Californias new law also includes an exception for
parental opposition.
Policy Recommendation
Pennsylvania is one of the few states that does not require public
schools to teach any sort of sexual education, let alone a
comprehensive sexual education. The state government needs to
adopt legislation that would require its public schools to do so within
their curriculum. It must be a comprehensive sexual education that
includes contraceptive education because, as previously discussed,
abstinence-only programs are not successful at decreasing the rates
of teen pregnancy or the contraction of sexually transmitted infections.
Pennsylvania government should realize that such legislation
would benefit young people and all taxpayers across the state because
research has shown the marked improvements and benefit
experienced by other states and countries once they have
implemented similar programs. Particularly in light of the fact that the
United States has the highest rate of teen pregnancy in the world, the
importance of sexual education can no longer be denied.
In summary, implementing a comprehensive sexual education in
Pennsylvania would create a safer present and future for students
because it would provide them with the information necessary to make