Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARKANSAS
STATE CRIME
LABORATORY
F IREARMS & T OOLMARK
Q UALITY M ANUAL
Executive Director:
Kermit B. Channell, II
6.2.1
Visual Examination..................................................................................................... 43
6.2.2
Microscopic Examination ........................................................................................... 44
6.2.3
Infrared (IR) Photographic Examination .................................................................... 46
6.2.4
Haemo-Sol Cleaning of Bloodstains........................................................................... 48
6.2.5
Diphenylamine Test .................................................................................................... 49
6.2.6
Modified Griess Test................................................................................................... 50
6.2.7
Sodium Rhodizonate Test ........................................................................................... 52
6.2.8
Dithiooxamide (DTO) Test......................................................................................... 54
6.2.9
Distance Determination Test Pattern Production........................................................ 56
6.2.10
Gunshot Residue (GSR) Pattern Without a Gun......................................................... 57
6.3
Tool Mark Identification Protocol ...................................................................................... 59
6.3.1
Examination and Physical Classification Tool ........................................................ 59
6.3.2
Examination and Physical Classification Tool Mark............................................... 60
6.3.3
Subclass Characteristics.............................................................................................. 60
6.3.4
Trace Material Examination ....................................................................................... 61
6.3.5
Test Standards............................................................................................................. 62
6.3.6
Microscopic Comparison ............................................................................................ 63
6.3.7
Magnesium Smoking .................................................................................................. 64
6.3.8
Casting ........................................................................................................................ 65
6.4
Serial Number Restoration Protocol ................................................................................... 66
6.4.1
Serial Number Restoration.......................................................................................... 66
6.5
Fracture Match Protocol ..................................................................................................... 70
6.5.1
Fracture Match ............................................................................................................ 70
6.6
Range of Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 73
6.6.1
Firearms Range of Conclusions .................................................................................. 73
6.6.2
Toolmarks Range of Conclusions............................................................................... 73
6.7
Work Sheets ........................................................................................................................ 75
6.7.1
Firearm Work Sheets: ................................................................................................. 75
6.7.2
Fired Bullet Work Sheet: ............................................................................................ 75
6.7.3
Discharged (Expended) Cartridge Case Work Sheet:................................................. 76
6.7.4
Firearms Worksheets .................................................................................................. 76
Section 7.0 Calibration and Maintenance: ..................................................................................... 78
7.1
Calibration Standards.......................................................................................................... 78
7.1.1
Comparison Microscope: ............................................................................................ 78
7.1.2
Stereo Microscope: ..................................................................................................... 78
7.1.3
Measuring Projection Microscope: ............................................................................. 79
7.1.4
Stage Micrometer........................................................................................................ 79
7.1.5
Balances/Scales........................................................................................................... 79
7.1.6
IBIS / NIBIN............................................................................................................... 79
7.1.7
Trigger Pull Devices ................................................................................................... 79
7.1.8
Digital Caliper/ Dial Caliper....................................................................................... 80
7.1.9
Rectangular Gage Blocks (0.050 inches, 0.200 inches, 0.400 inches and 1.000
inches) 80
Section 8.0 Proficiency Testing: .................................................................................................... 82
Section 9.0 Case Records............................................................................................................... 83
9.1
Examination Documentation .............................................................................................. 83
9.2
Technical and Administrative Review................................................................................ 83
Section 10.0
Testimony Review .................................................................................................. 84
Section 11.0
Audits...................................................................................................................... 85
Section 12.0
Complaints .............................................................................................................. 86
Section 13.0
Miscellaneous ......................................................................................................... 87
Section 14.0
APPENDIX............................................................................................................. 88
14.1 Glossary .............................................................................................................................. 88
14.2 Abbreviations...................................................................................................................... 88
Section 1.0
Introduction
The purpose of this Quality Manual is to establish general guidelines for the handling of firearms,
tool mark evidence, serial number evidence; the examination of firearms evidence, tool mark and
serial number evidence; the reporting of firearms, tool mark and serial number results; and the
response to court commitments.
Goal
It is the goal of firearm examiners to insure the quality, integrity, and accuracy of the examination
and analysis of firearm and tool mark evidence through the implementation of a Quality Assurance
Program and to:
1. Provide such services to law enforcement agencies, attorneys, and courts in criminal matters
in accordance with the policies of the laboratory.
2. Provide expert witnesses for criminal judicial proceedings in accordance with the policies of
the laboratory.
Objective
It is the objective of the Quality Assurance Program to:
1. Monitor, on a routine basis, the examinations and analyses of the firearms examiners by
means of quality control standards and proficiency tests.
2. Verify that all section protocols and procedures are within established performance
criteria, that the quality and validity of the analytical data are maintained and that the raw
data gathered provides a sound foundation for reliable conclusions.
3. Ensure that problems are noted and that corrective action is taken and documented.
Section 2.0
The position requires a minimum of a four year degree from an accredited college or university with
a major in forensic science, criminalistics, or in a physical or natural science and five years of
professional experience as a Firearms Examiner in a forensic laboratory.
2.2.2
Firearms Examiner
A four year degree from an accredited college or university with a major in forensic science,
Criminalistics, or in a physical or natural science and one year of professional experience as a
Firearms Examiner in a forensic laboratory or identification division. In addition, completion of the
Association of Firearms and Toolmark (AFTE) Training Program, The Arkansas State Crime
Laboratory Firearms Examiner Training Program or a comparable program from another forensic
laboratory or institution is required.
2.2.3
Individuals with a four year degree from an accredited college or university with a major in forensic
science, Criminalistics or in a physical or natural science and a broad knowledge and background in
firearms is recommended.
Section 3.0
Facilities
The Firearms section consists of six office areas, two microscope examinations room, GSR/Serial
number restoration room, tool room, bullet recovery room, indoor firing room, firearms reference
library and a NIBIN firearm processing room.
3.1 Security
Access to all of the office areas, microscope examination room, tool room, bullet recovery room,
indoor firing range and a NIBIN firearm processing rooms require a key for access twenty four hours
a day.
The firearm reference library is accessed by entry through evidence receiving where a log is
maintained regarding entry and exit.
Section 4.0
Evidence Handling
4.1 Scope:
Evidence must be preserved to prevent significant change or alteration during the examination
through the completion of analysis. Evidence must be kept secure and the chain of custody must be
maintained once an examiner from the Firearms Section has assumed custody of that evidence.
4.2 Classification:
Items submitted or received through the use of a laboratory submission form will be treated as
evidence. Ammunition components which have been test fired through firearms for the purpose of
examination or entry into the NIBIN computer database will be identified and treated as reference
material requiring the identification of the appropriate laboratory case number on the outside
package or inside information card.
4.3 Basis:
In order to maintain the security, chain of custody and to prevent change, all evidence must be stored
under proper seal, in the proper packaging and in a secure area.
Be aware of all the sections and testing that involves the evidence. Take the necessary
precautions to preserve the integrity of the evidence.
Descriptions of evidence containers, sealing, initials (this includes both outer and inner
packaging) and evidence that is to be examined will be recorded in the case notes. Any
discrepancies should be noted.
When evidence containers are opened for examination, opening through the seals of other
individuals who handled the evidence should be avoided, if at all possible.
When evidence containers are opened for examination, the contents should be inventoried.
This inventory should be matched to the Crime Laboratory Submission Sheet.
Discrepancies shall be noted in the examiners notes. If deemed necessary, the submitting
officer or agency will be notified. All case-related communication will be documented on an
ASCL-FORM-06 Agency Contact Form.
Evidence in progress may be stored in lockable cabinets, the tool room, the GSR/Serial
number restoration room, and the ammunition storage room. Evidence must be kept in one
of these locations for overnight storage.
Each piece of evidence or its most appropriate proximal container must bear the following
identifiers:
1.
2.
3.
Examiners initials
If reusing the original container is impractical, a new evidence container may be used. It
shall also be marked and sealed according to laboratory procedures and the original evidence
packaging shall be maintained, either inside the second evidence container or complete
documentation along with a picture of original packaging. Documentation of the change in
packaging along with description must be entered into the case file for future reference.
The evidence will be returned to Evidence Receiving in a timely manner after completion.
All pertinent information about the evidence will be recorded in the examiners notes. Case
documentation must be sufficient to allow a technical peer review to be conducted.
Section 5.0
Validation
Section 6.0
Analytical Procedures
Introduction
This section provides standard procedures for tests and examinations performed by the forensic
firearms and tool marks examiner. These procedures may involve hazardous materials, operations
and equipment. These procedures do not purport to address all of the safety problems associated
with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of these procedures to establish appropriate safety and
health practices and determine the applicability and normal limitations prior to use. Proper caution
must be exercised and the use of personal protective equipment must be considered (see ASCL
Health and Safety Manual for safety requirements). Personal protective equipment includes, but is
not limited to: lab coats, latex or nitrile gloves, safety glasses, and hearing protection devices. The
examiner must consider the practicality and/or desirability to wear some form of bullet resistant
clothing. Proper caution should include strict adherence to the ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
The initial examination of any firearm will include the completion of a firearm worksheet.
This worksheet will include the manufacture data, if available, of the firearm and will serve
as a source to document the condition of the firearm as received and any tests performed to
or with the firearm.
The firearm worksheet may also include determining the following when appropriate:
o Location and type of trace evidence
o Caliber/Gauge
o Make/Model
o Serial Number
o Firing Mechanics
o Type of Action
o Safeties
o Operating Condition
o Trigger Pull
o Rifling Characteristics
o Barrel Length
o Overall Length
o Any other data as per Appendix 4.
6.1.2
Firearms evidence in the laboratory environment must be handled correctly and treated with respect.
Occasionally, loaded firearms are received in evidence for a particular examination. These, of
course, need very special handling. All firearms must be treated as though they are loaded. This
rule cannot be over stressed and must be followed at all times, whether its in the evidence receiving
area, firearms section, test firing area or in court. Safe firearm handling within the laboratory
environment corresponds with safe firearm handling in general. The only way to prevent accidents
is to practice safety at all times.
Prior to any examination, regardless of which section is receiving the firearm, a competent
individual must ascertain the loaded or unloaded condition of the firearm. This process must
be accomplished before the firearm is received by the laboratory.
Test firing or any examination of the firearm that utilizes live ammunition, or a live
ammunition component, will only be performed in designated test firing areas.
A firearm will not be placed in the evidence vault or returned to any agency in either a loaded
condition or prior to its loaded or unloaded condition being checked.
6.1.2.2 REFERENCES
A Guide to Firearms Safety, A Safety and Educational Publication of the National Rifle
Association, May 1994.
Technical Protocols for the Handling of Firearms and Ammunition, FBI, June 1992.
6.1.3
It is the responsibility of the firearm examiner to ensure that all appropriate safety function checks
are performed on a firearm or item of ammunition prior to test firing. The following is a list of
safety checks, which shall be considered. The examiner must be mindful that individual case
situations may require a more extensive function test process than that which is listed here.
Deciding whether or not a firearm can be safely test fired from the normal hand held position
o Is the chamber/bore clear?
o Are there any signs of cracks or weaknesses in major parts of the firearm; such as the
frame, slide or barrel?
o Does the firearm function, lock-up or dry fire as you would expect it to?
o Is the correct ammunition being utilized?
Muzzle Loaders.
o Does the chamber/barrel appear sound?
o Do the percussion nipples have oversize flash holes?
o If a black powder firearm is received in the loaded condition, it must have the bullet
and charge removed. It may then be properly loaded prior to test firing.
o Is this an "original" muzzleloader or a modern reproduction? "Originals" must
always be remote fired.
Trigger pull is defined as the amount of force, which must be applied to the trigger of a firearm to
cause sear release. This examination can provide vital information regarding the mechanical
operating condition of the firearm. The trigger pull of a firearm can be obtained utilizing standard
trigger weights, which make contact with the trigger at a point where the trigger finger would
normally rest.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Standard Trigger Weights
o Spring Gauge
examiner must also take into consideration the potential for damage of a centerfire
firearm and may wish to use a dummy cartridge in this instance as well.
6.1.4.3 REFERENCES
Gamboe, Tom, "MAFS Firearms Workshop: Trigger Pull Methods," AFTE Journal, Vol. 18,
No. 3, p. 77.
Rios, Ferdinand and Thorton, John, "Static vs. Dynamic Determination of Trigger Pull,"
AFTE Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, p. 84.
6.1.5
Barrel length is defined as the distance between the end of the barrel and the face of the closed
breechblock or bolt for firearms other than revolvers. On revolvers, it is the overall length of the
barrel including the threaded portion within the frame. Barrel length normally should include
compensators, flash hiders, etc., if permanently affixed. Overall length of a firearm is defined as the
dimension measured parallel to the axis of the bore from muzzle to a line at right angles to the axis
and tangent at the rearmost point of the butt plate or grip. Removable barrel extensions, poly
chokes, flash hiders, etc., are not part of the measured barrel length or overall length. Care must be
taken if any object is placed down the barrel to help expedite the measurement. Only a non-marring
item may be placed down the barrel, and only after all other tests are performed.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Ruler (and/or)
o Tape Measurer (and/or)
o Non-marring Dowel
Measure the distance from the breech end of the barrel to the muzzle, excluding the cylinder.
This measurement can be done directly or by placing a non-marring item down the barrel,
marking the distance from the breech end of the barrel to the muzzle and measuring this item.
Measure the distance from the breech face in a closed and locked position to the muzzle.
This measurement can be done directly or by placing a non-marring item down the barrel,
marking the distance from the breech end of the barrel to the muzzle and measuring this item.
Measure the distance from the butt to the muzzle. Measurement shall be made parallel to the bore
and recorded in inches.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
o Measurements obtained should be considered only approximations based on the
device used to obtain the measurements.
6.1.5.2 REFERENCES
The Proper Method for Measuring Weapons, AFTE Journal, Vol.14, No. 3, p. 10.
6.1.6
Rusty firearms or those found in water, etc. may be submitted for examination. Immediate attention
must be given to these firearms to prevent further damage to the firearm. The examiner should
instruct an agency recovering the firearm in a fluid such as water, to submit the firearm in a
container of the fluid. If this is not practical, the agency can be instructed to immediately and
thoroughly spray the firearm with a water-displacing product such as WD-40 or other similar
product to prevent further deterioration. It should be noted that the firearm might be too rusted to be
functional. Any firearm that cannot be unloaded must be examined in an area designated for firing
firearms (preferably a range).
An examiner must take all necessary steps to insure that the firearm is unloaded. If it cannot
be readily verified to be unloaded it must be examined in an area designated for the firing of
firearms. Determining whether or not a firearm is unloaded may necessitate a complete
disassembly or in some cases, destruction (e.g. cutting)
The examiner must determine to what extent restoring the firearm is necessary (i.e., for test
firing, for recovering manufacturer information, serial number, etc.).
Periodically check the firearm until the firearm functions, or the desired information is
recovered. Clean the firearm with gun cleaning solvent, cleaning patches and cloth. Care
must be taken if any object is placed down the barrel. Only a non-marring item should be
placed down the barrel.
6.1.6.2 REFERENCES
6.1.7
Denio, Dominic, "Making a Rusted Gun Functional," AFTE Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, p. 29
A silencer or sound suppressor is any device attached to the barrel of a firearm designed to reduce
the noise of discharge. Silencers can be commercially produced or homemade. They are typically
tubular metal devices, but may vary in shape or form.
After an initial examination, a report can be issued that the device is, or is characteristic of, a
silencer or sound suppression device.
In many instances the noticeable reduction in sound between the firing of the firearm with
the device attached vs. the firing of the firearm without the device is sufficient to determine
that the device is a sound suppressor.
6.1.7.2 REFERENCES
Silencers - A Review And A Look At The State Of The Art," AFTE Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2,
p. 668.
Crum, Richard A. and Owen, Edward M., "Silencer Testing," AFTE Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2,
p. 433.
6.1.8
A firearms examiner may be called upon to examine a firearm to determine if the firearm will
malfunction. Many of these cases will deal with the question: "Will the firearm fire without pulling
the trigger?" In these instances it should be the goal of the examiner to acquire a detailed account of
the incident by thoroughly examining and testing the firearm. Examinations may include external
and internal observations, or striking or dropping the firearm in attempts to duplicate the incident as
reported. The examiner should attempt to conduct his/her examinations in a manner so as not to
alter the firearm. However, there may be occasions when damage may occur. Any change to the
firearm must be specifically documented in the examiners notes.
o Cocked/Uncocked
o Safety position
o Loaded/Unloaded
o Cartridge Position
o Stuck Cartridges/Discharged Cartridge Cases
o Presence and/or location of flares
Visual Abnormalities:
o Barrel (loose, etc.)
o Receiver (condition)
o Slide (condition)
o Parts broken or missing especially:
The ejector or
The extractor
o Correct assembly
, , Full Cock, Seating check (any false seating positions, pull off/push off,
etc.)
Condition of safeties
o Action Check
Document ID: FA-DOC-01
Revision Date: May 6, 2010
o Check feeding
Magazine
Carrier or lifter
Feed Ramp
o Slamfire
Check for any inherent quirks known about the particular firearm based on
literature or case data.
Care should be exercised when the force to be used in testing could alter or damage internal
parts and their working relationship(s). Damage caused by the examiner may prevent the
examiner from determining the cause of the reported malfunction.
Action (Internal)
o Hammer Notch(s)
Worn
Burrs
Dirt, etc.
o Sear
Worn
Broken
Burrs, etc
Broken
Altered,etc
6.1.8.2 REFERENCES
Thompson, Roger C., "Firearms Malfunction Worksheets," AFTE Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, p.
100.
6.1.9
A Firearms Reference Library, File or Collection is maintained by the laboratory for various
scientific reasons, to include:
To provide exemplar firearms for various scientific testing purposes which might otherwise
compromise an evidence firearm.
To provide a source of firearms parts for the temporary repair of evidence firearms for testfiring purposes.
To provide a resource for the identification of firearms parts recovered at a crime scene.
To provide a resource for the location and style of firearm serial numbers.
The FIREARM LOG may be produced electronically by spreadsheet. The following data
columns may be used in the firearm log books. It is suggested that these columns be kept in the
same order as listed below with the log number being the first entry on the left side of the
spreadsheet.
Document ID: FA-DOC-01
Revision Date: May 6, 2010
LOG NUMBER:
o Assigned by the receiving laboratory at the time of receipt of the firearm.
DATE RECEIVED:
o Date received at the laboratory.
AGENCY or SOURCE:
o The agency or person transferring control of the firearm to the laboratory.
CALIBER:
o Caliber or gauge of the firearm.
MANUFACTURER:
o Make, brand and manufacturer, if known.
MODEL:
o Model number(s) and/or name.
TYPE:
o Type of action.
FINISH:
o Finish on firearm.
BARREL LENGTH:
o The barrel length of the firearm.
SERIAL NUMBER:
o The serial number as stamped on the firearm. NONE if the serial number does not
exist or cannot be found. OBLIT if the serial number has been obliterated.
COMMENTS:
o Notes regarding transfers, destruction, location case numbers, etc.
It is recommended that a receipt be issued for every firearm received for the reference library or
destruction utilizing a standardized form. The respective log number assigned to each firearm
should be recorded on this form. These forms should be maintained in some reasonable order.
Firearms reference library should be displayed and maintained in such a manner as to prevent the
firearms deterioration and to facilitate their inventory, safety and control.
All firearms received for reference or disposal should have their assigned log number inscribed on
the frame and/or receiver. Furthermore, all firearms placed in the reference library should be tagged
in such a manner so as to display that firearms location within the collection.
It is recommended that a system, whether it be a card file, or a computer data base also be
maintained. This will facilitate cross-referencing the collection between various fields.
Great care must be given if the section decides to maintain only a computer database. The historical
archive that a Log provides and the difficulty to alter records within a Log must be considered.
6.1.9.2 REFERENCES
A test fire information card will be filled out to include the ASCL case #, item # and
identifying information (if available) for the test firearm. The test fire information card will
be stored with the test fired bullets and cartridge cases.
The examiner should consider marking the bullet and cartridge case of each test shot with
the;
o Full or abbreviated laboratory case number and
o Full or abbreviated item number and/or
o examiner's initials.
If the examiner does not, or is unable to, mark the test fired bullet/cartridge case with the
above information, then the package containing the test fires and information card will be
sealed and initialed.
The examiner should consider indexing and sequencing each shot and perform these
functions if necessary.
The examiner should consider the number of cartridges being loading into the firearm during
the initial testing of the firearm.
o Place firearm in device. It is recommended that the examiner first dry-fire the firearm
in the remote firing device before using live ammunition.
o Activate the remote device while standing behind a protective shield or while
standing at a safe distance away from the firearm.
o Obtain fired tests.
6.1.10.2 REFERENCES
Newquist, Andrew M., New Bullet Recovery System, AFTE Journal, February 1973, p.9.
Molnar, S., A Novel Bullet Recovery Method, AFTE Newsletter, 16, p.17.
Bullet and Cartridge Case Recovery, AFTE Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, p.75.
McBrayer, William S., "What? Another Water Tank and Bullet Stop!", AFTE Journal, Vol.
10, No. 2, p.90.
Biasotti, A. A., "Vise/Rest for Remote Firing," AFTE Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, p.16.
6.1.11 Downloading
Due to the limitations of a firearms identification section's bullet recovery devices, it may be
necessary to reduce or change the powder load of the cartridge in order to obtain a velocity suitable
for safely collecting test standards for comparison purposes. Even with a reduced load, it may be
necessary to fire the firearm remotely.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Balance / Scale
If appropriate powder is not available, a reduced load using 50% of the original powder can be used.
It should be noted that great care must be taken when performing this type of downloading. 50%
downloading CANNOT be used with slow burning powders. 50% downloading CANNOT be used
with many non-canister powders.
When utilizing downloaded ammunition it is imperative that the examiner checks the barrel for
obstructions between each firing. The bullet, cartridge case, or shotshell of each test shot should be
marked appropriately.
6.1.11.2 REFERENCES
Lyman Reloading Handbook for Rifle, Pistol and Muzzle Loading, Lyman Gun Sight
Products, Middlefield, Conn., 1971.
Commercial firing pin testing devices are available for shotguns and may be used.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Calipers/Micrometer
o Measuring Projector
Compare the base diameter of the evidence bullet directly with known fired test standards.
Measure the base diameter of the evidence bullet using a measuring device and compare this
measurement with known measurements published in reference literature.
Determine the number and widths of the lands and grooves and compare to Appendix G,
Table 6, of the AFTE Glossary (current edition is available on the AFTE website).
Physical characteristics of the evidence bullet, such as weight, bullet shape, composition,
nose configuration, and number and placement of cannelures, may aid in caliber
determination.
Lutz, Monty C. and Ward, John G., "Determination of Bullet Caliber From an X-ray," AFTE
Journal, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 168.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Measuring Projection Scope
o Comparison microscope
o Software for the Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Ruler/Micrometer
o Rotate the micrometer, thereby moving the fired bullet laterally, until the next anchor
point is reached and record the measurement in thousandths of an inch or to the
appropriate measurement standard for the local laboratory.
o Repeat this procedure for the groove impression.
o For specific operating instructions on the instrument utilized, consult the operator's
manual.
Both stages must be using the same magnification level (objective setting) and
be in focus.
o Align the image of the measurement gap (opening) of the micrometer with the image
of the appropriate land impression being measured and record the measurement to the
nearest hundredth or thousandth of an inch or appropriate measurement.
o Repeat the above utilizing the groove impression.
o Measure the distance between both anchor points of a land impression and record the
measurement to the nearest hundredth or thousandth of an inch or appropriate
measurement.
o Repeat the above utilizing the groove impression.
6.1.14.2 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
It may be necessary to measure several of each land and groove impression in order to record a
reliable measurement.
6.1.14.3 REFERENCES
Walsh, J. F., "Accuracy, Speed and Conversion in Rifling Measurements," AFTE Journal,
Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 50.
PREPARATION
o Cartridge Case The examiner should consider marking the sides of the cartridge
case to indicate where the extractor and/or ejector markings are for proper alignment.
o Bullet - Mount the bullet in the designated holder with a glue gun as outlined in the
IBIS Training Course student handbook.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Remote Data Acquisition System (RDAS).
Test fired bullet and cartridge case reference samples will be maintained in a
secure area accessible by Firearms Section personnel. Archived material will
be stored in a secure area in the ASCL Annex.
A test fire information card will be filled out to include the ASCL case #, item # and
identifying information (if available) for the test firearm. The test fire information card will
be stored with the test fired bullets and cartridge cases.
The examiner should consider marking the bullet and cartridge case of each test shot with
the;
o Full or abbreviated laboratory case number and
o Full or abbreviated item number and/or
o examiner's initials.
If the examiner does not, or is unable to, mark the test fired bullet/cartridge case with the
above information, then the package containing the test fires and information card will be
sealed and initialed.
Cartridge Case Using the RDAS, open the BRASSCATCHER software and enter the
specimen information as outlined in the RDAS operators manual or the IBIS Training
Course student handbook.
Bullet Using the RDAS, open the BULLETPROOF software and enter the specimen
information as outlined in the RDAS operators manual or the IBIS Training Course student
handbook.
o Any evidence bullet selected for entry into NIBIN must have at least one clear and
distinct land engraved area and must have sufficient individual characteristics to be
able to affect a match.
o Any evidence cartridge case selected for entry into NIBIN must have sufficient
individual characteristics within the firing pin impression and/or within the breech
face marks on the primer to affect a match.
o If there are more than one matching evidence bullets and/or cartridges cases suitable
for entry into NIBIN, the examiner should select the best one for entry or, if
necessary, more than one if different individual characteristics reproduce better on
different tests.
o Any information about the identification of evidence bullets/cartridge cases to each
other and the selection of certain specimens for entry into NIBIN must be
documented within the case notes.
For Firearms requests, a notification of entry into the NIBIN system will be included in the
examiners report.
For Operation Shutdown requests, a NIBIN Evidence Evaluation Form (FA-FORM-05) will
be completed and attached to evidence that has been processed/evaluated for entry into the
NIBIN system.
6.1.15.2 REFERENCES
6.1.16.3 REFERENCES
Walsh, J. F., "Accuracy, Speed and Conversion in Rifling Measurements," AFTE Journal,
Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 50.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Micrometer
o Caliper
o Measuring Projector
Manufacturers data can be determined by locating information stamped into the wad or by
comparing the wad to known laboratory standards.
Microscopic examination may reveal striations suitable for identification of the wad back to
the shotgun that fired it.
If evidence shotshells are submitted, it may be necessary to disassemble one for the
determination of gauge size or manufacturer.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Micrometer
o Caliper
o Measuring Projector
Visual/Microscopic Comparison
o Determine the total number of pellets received.
o Determine the composition of the pellets.
o Determine the number of pellets suitable for comparison purposes. Make note if
pellet sizes all appear to be similar in size. If several different sizes are present,
determine each specific size.
o Compare laboratory standards of known shot sizes side by side with the evidence
pellets until a known shot size is determined. A stereo microscope may aid in this
determination. This can be done one size at a time or several sizes at a time;
however, if more than one size is used at a time, care should be taken not to mix up
the shot.
o Record findings on worksheet.
Comparison by Weight
6.1.18.2 REFERENCES
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Micrometer
o Caliper
o Measuring Projector
o Scale/Balance
6.1.19.1 PROCEDURE or ANALYSIS
A worksheet will be filled out according to the appropriate Appendices. This may include noting the
following:
The caliber.
6.1.19.2 REFERENCES
Howe, Walter, J., Laboratory Work Sheets AFTE NEWSLETTER NUMBER TWO,
August 1969, p.13.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Micrometer
o Caliper
o Measuring Projector
o Scale/Balance
Caliber
Ignition System
o Centerfire
o Rimfire
o Other
o Ejector
o Resizing Marks
o Chamber Marks
o Anvil Marks
o Magazine Marks
o Ejection Port Markings
o Other Marks
6.1.20.2 REFERENCES
Howe, Walter, J., Laboratory Work Sheets AFTE NEWSLETTER NUMBER TWO,
August 1969, p.13.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
o Micrometer
o Caliper
o Measuring Projector
o Scale/Balance
Gauge/Bore/Caliber
Ignition System
o Centerfire
o Rimfire
o Other
6.1.21.2 REFERENCES
Howe, Walter, J., Laboratory Work Sheets AFTE NEWSLETTER NUMBER TWO,
August 1969, p.13.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
Select the correct objective (magnification) setting and ensure that the objectives are locked
in place.
The illumination (lights) used must be properly adjusted. Oblique lighting is usually
preferred.
If a firearm is included as part of the evidence, compare the test shots produced from this
firearm to determine what microscopic characteristics are reproducing.
Compare unknown fired evidence to either another piece of unknown fired evidence or a
known standard by placing the unknown fired evidence on one stage and the other piece of
unknown fired evidence or known standard on the other stage.
If an identification is not initially made, the examiner should consider the following factors:
o Angle of lights
o Type of lights
o The need for additional known standards
o The position of the evidence, the tests or both
o The possibility of using magnesium
A sufficient disagreement of class and/or individual characteristics will lead the examiner to
the conclusion that both items (evidence and tests) did not originate from the same source.
A lack of suitable microscopic characteristics will lead the examiner to the conclusion that
the items are not suitable for comparison.
6.1.23.3 REFERENCES
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
o Stereo Microscope
Examine the fired evidence visually and microscopically for any trace material and record in
notes.
If the trace material is not going to be retained for further examination, proceed with the
following steps that are applicable.
o For evidence containing blood, tissue or other biohazards, soak the evidence for at
least one (1) minute in a 10% bleach solution.
o Remove loose material by rinsing the fired evidence with methanol or water.
o Remove plaster by rinsing the fired evidence with methanol or water.
o Remove paint by soaking the fired evidence in methanol or acetone.
6.1.24.2 REFERENCES
Howe, Walter, J., Laboratory Work Sheets AFTE NEWSLETTER NUMBER TWO,
August 1969, p.13.
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
Visual Examination
OTHER RELATED PROCEDURES
o Microscopic Examination
Data regarding these physical effects and visible residues must be included in the examiners notes.
6.2.1.2 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
If the observations do not support a contact shot finding, a working hypothesis will be
formed based on the above observations. This hypothesis will be utilized in the comparison
procedure.
6.2.1.3 REFERENCES
Anon., (1970). Gunshot Residues and Shot Pattern Test, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin,
Vol. 39, No. 9, p.7.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Stereo Microscope
Data regarding these physical effects and visible residues must be included in the examiners notes.
6.2.2.2 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
If the observations do not support a contact shot finding, a working hypothesis will be
formed based on the above observations. This hypothesis will be utilized in the comparison
procedure.
6.2.2.3 REFERENCES
Anon., (1970). Gunshot Residues and Shot Pattern Test, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin,
Vol. 39, No. 9, p.7.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o This procedure may also involve hazardous materials to include evidence that may be
contaminated with a biohazard. This procedure does not purport to address all of the
safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this
procedure to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
o Proper caution to include strict adherence to the Biological Hygiene Plan in the
ASCL Health and Safety Manual must be exercised.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Sony DSCF828 Digital camera
o Hoya R-72 Infrared filter
o Incandescent light source
Data regarding these physical effects and visible residues must be included in the examiners notes.
6.2.3.2 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
If the observations do not support a contact shot finding, a working hypothesis will be
formed based on the above observations. This hypothesis will be utilized in the comparison
procedure.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o This procedure may also involve hazardous materials to include evidence that may be
contaminated with a biohazard. This procedure does not purport to address all of the
safety problems associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this
procedure to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
o Proper caution to include strict adherence to the Biological Hygiene Plan in the
ASCL Health and Safety Manual must be exercised.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
o If needed, consult the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each
chemical.
PREPARATION
o Prepare a 2% weight/volume Haemo-Sol solution
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
Place the bloodstained clothing in a shallow tray covering the effected area with the Haemosol solution.
Let soak, undisturbed for 8-12 hours. Carefully pour off Haemo-sol solution and air dry.
Filter solution if necessary.
With careful treatment, the blood should be removed and the underlying residues should be
visible.
6.2.4.3 REFERENCES
6.2.5
AFTE Journal (Vol26, Num. 1, Jan 1994), GUNSHOT RESIDUE TESTING OF BLOOD
STAINED GARMENTS; Hueski, E.
Diphenylamine Test
The Diphenylamine test (DPA) is used independently and/or in conjunction with other tests in range
determination. The DPA test utilizes a morphological and color chemistry reaction to indicate the
presence of cellulose and nitrates. The DPA test reacts with cellulose to produce a morphological
change resulting in a significant swelling to the granule and to produce a dark greenish-blue to
nearly black color reaction This test can effectively be used in determining the physical presence of
discharged gunpowder particles including the determination of entrance versus exit holes and the
presence of gunshot residues.
It should be noted that if multiple chemical examinations are going to be performed on an item they
must follow a specific order.
o First-
Acetone
o Second-
Diphenylamine
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
o If needed, consult the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each
chemical.
PREPARATION
o Refer to Firearms and Tool Marks Section Chemicals and Reagents Log for
instructions on preparing specific chemicals and reagents.
o Diphenylamine Solution:
o 100% Acetone.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
Place one to two drops of acetone onto the granule; observe the swelling of the granule from
one to two times its original size and becoming semi-translucent.
Place one to two drops of Diphenylamine solution onto the swollen particle; observe the
color reaction.
A dark greenish-blue color reaction, corresponding to the swollen area tested, constitutes a
positive reaction for nitrates.
6.2.5.3 REFERENCES
Steinberg, M., Leist, Y., and Tassa, M., A New Field Kit for Bullet Hole Identification,
Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 169.
Fiegel, F. and Anger, V., (1972). Spot Tests in Inorganic Analysis, 6th Ed., Elsevier
Publishing Co., New York, New York.
Jungreis, Ervin. V75,(1985), Spot Test Analysis; Clinical, Environmental, Forensic and
Geochemical Applications; Wiley-Interscience Publishing, New York
6.2.6
The Modified Griess test is used independently and/or in conjunction with other tests in range
determinations. It utilizes a color chemistry reaction to help distinguish obscure or faint gunpowder
patterns. This test detects nitrites, a product of the incomplete burning of gunpowder, by reacting
with acetic acid to form nitrous acid. This acid combines with alpha-naphthol and produces an
orange-red color reaction.
It should be noted that if multiple chemical examinations are going to be performed on an item they
must follow a specific order.
o First-
Modified Griess
o Second-
Dithiooxamide
o Third-
Sodium Rhodizonate
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
o If needed, consult the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each
chemical.
PREPARATION
o Refer to Firearms and Tool Marks Section Chemicals and Reagents Log for
instructions on preparing specific chemicals and reagents.
o Sensitized Blank
o Acetic Acid Solution
o Nitrite Test Strips
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
o Place the sensitized blank (photo paper - emulsion side down or sensitized filter
paper) over the area to be tested.
o Soak a piece of nitrite free cheesecloth or filter paper with the acetic acid solution,
and place this over the reverse side of the evidence.
o Apply heat and pressure with an iron until the acetic acid solution treated paper is dry.
Dillon, John, The Modified Griess Test: A Chemically Specific Chromophoric Test for
Nitrate Compounds in Gunshot Residues, AFTE Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, p.248.
Anon., (1970). Gunshot Residues and Shot Pattern Test, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin,
Vol. 39, No. 9, p.7.
Fiegel, F. and Anger, V., (1972). Spot Tests in Inorganic Analysis, 6th Ed., Elsevier
Publishing Co., New York, New York.
6.2.7
The Sodium Rhodizonate is used independently and/or in conjunction with other tests in range
determinations. The Sodium Rhodizonate utilizes a color chemistry reaction that is specific for lead
and can effectively be used in determining the physical characteristics of bullet holes including the
determination of entrance vs. exit holes. Fired bullets passing through clothing and/or other objects
often leave traces of lead around the bullet hole. This lead transfer comes from the surfaces of the
bullet, the barrel and/or the primer residue. This lead transfer can be in the form of minute particles,
a fine coating of powder particles or a fine cloud of vaporized lead. At times this lead transfer is an
obvious ring or wipe around the hole but is more often invisible.
It should be noted that if multiple chemical examinations are going to be performed on an item they
must follow a specific order.
First-
Modified Griess
Second-
Dithiooxamide
Third-
Sodium Rhodizonate
Approved By: Executive Director/Scientific Operations Director
Page 52 of 88
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
o If needed, consult the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each
chemical.
PREPARATION
o Refer to Firearms and Tool Marks Section Chemicals and Reagents Log for
instructions on preparing specific chemicals and reagents.
o Sodium Rhodizonate Solution
o Hydrochloric Acid Solution
o Buffer Solution
o Acetic Acid Solution
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
o An alternative set of Standards & Controls for the Sodium Rhodizonate test consists
of utilizing cotton swabs dampened with a 5% Hydrochloric acid solution. One of the
treated swabs is rubbed against a piece of known lead. This swab is then processed
with the Sodium Rhodizonate test to insure that the test is reacting properly. Another
treated swab is rubbed on the item to be tested. This must be well away from any
holes examined. This swab is then processed with the Sodium Rhodizonate test to
insure that the item being tested will not produce a false positive.
Repeat this process on all holes/areas to be tested. Both sides of a hole should be tested if
there is a question of entrance vs. exit.
Dillon, John, The Modified Griess Test: A Chemically Specific Chromophoric Test for
Nitrate Compounds in Gunshot Residues, AFTE Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, p.248.
Anon., (1970). Gunshot Residues and Shot Pattern Test, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin,
Vol. 39, No. 9, p.7.
Fiegel, F. and Anger, V., (1972). Spot Tests in Inorganic Analysis, 6th Ed., Elsevier
Publishing Co., New York, New York.
6.2.8
The Dithiooxamide (DTO) test is used independently and/or in conjunction with other tests in range
determination. The DTO test utilizes a color chemistry reaction to indicate the presence of copper.
The DTO test reacts with copper to produce a dark greenish-gray to nearly black color reaction. It
should be noted that the DTO test will also react with cobalt, leaving an amber color reaction, and
nickel, leaving an violet color reaction. This test can effectively be used in determining the physical
characteristics of bullet holes including the determination of entrance vs. exit holes. Fired bullets
passing through clothing and/or other objects often leave traces of copper around the bullet hole.
This copper transfer comes from the surfaces of a copper containing bullet and/or the barrel of the
firearm. This copper transfer can be in the form of minute particles, a fine coating of powder
particles or a fine cloud of vaporized copper. At times this copper transfer is an obvious ring or wipe
around the hole but is more often invisible.
It should be noted that if multiple chemical examinations are going to be performed on an item they
must follow a specific order.
First-
Modified Griess
Second-
Dithiooxamide
Third-
Sodium Rhodizonate
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
o If needed, consult the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each
chemical.
PREPARATION
o Refer to Firearms and Tool Marks Section Chemicals and Reagents Log for
instructions on preparing specific chemicals and reagents.
o Dithiooxamide Solution
o Ammonia Solution
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
o An alternative set of Standards & Controls for the DTO test consists of utilizing
cotton swabs dampened with the ammonia solution. One of the treated swabs is
rubbed against a piece of known copper. This swab is then processed with the DTO
test to insure that the test is reacting properly. Another treated swab is rubbed on the
item to be tested. This must be well away from any holes examined. This swab is
then processed with the DTO test to insure that the item being tested will not produce
a false positive.
Place the ammonia treated filter paper over the hole to be tested.
Place a second piece of filter paper over the first and apply moderate pressure for
approximately 5 seconds.
Remove both pieces of filter paper and place 3 drops of the Dithiooxamide Solution to the
tested area of the filter paper.
Repeat this process on all holes to be tested. Both sides of a hole should be tested if there is a
question of entrance vs. exit.
Lekstrom, J.A. and Koons, R.D., Copper and Nickel Detection on Gunshot Targets by
Dithiooxamide Test, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 31, No.4, p. 1283.
Steinberg, M., Leist, Y., and Tassa, M., A New Field Kit for Bullet Hole Identification,
Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 169.
Fiegel, F. and Anger, V., (1972). Spot Tests in Inorganic Analysis, 6th Ed., Elsevier
Publishing Co., New York, New York.
6.2.9
PREPARATION
o Test Target Media
The test media for shot pellet test patterns is an appropriate sized piece of
poster board, cardboard or heavy paper.
Obtain and review the required information from related laboratory case files and/or Medical
Examiners Office files.
Tests should be shot in increasing or decreasing range increments until a range of distance is
established that reproduces the gunshot residue or shot patterns on the suspect item.
Anon., (1970). Gunshot Residues and Shot Pattern Test, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin,
Vol. 39, No. 9, p.7.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Stereo Microscope
Obtain and review the required information from the related laboratory case files and/or the
Medical Examiners Office files.
Process each item of evidence with the procedures previously outlined as applicable.
Document or record on worksheets the significant GSR pattern information for each item of
evidence.
Indicative of/ Consistent with the Discharge of a Firearm (non-contact). The presence of all
or any of the following:
o Vaporous Lead (smoke)
o Particulate Metals (shavings of lead, copper, brass)
o Unburned Gunpowder (morphology)
o Melted, Adhering Gunpowder
o Presence of residues confirmed to be GSR
If the observations support a non-contact shot finding, a working hypothesis will be formed
based on the above observations. This hypothesis will be utilized in the interpretation
procedure.
6.2.10.3 REFERENCES
Anon., (1970). Gunshot Residues and Shot Pattern Test, F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin,
Vol. 39, No. 9, p.7.
The initial examination of a tool will include the completion of a general laboratory worksheet. This
worksheet will include the physical description of the tool. It will also serve as a source to document
the condition of the evidence as received and any tests or comparisons performed with the tool.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Stereo Microscope
A laboratory worksheet utilized for a tool examination should be filled out which may
include noting the following.
o If any trace material is present.
o The class characteristics of the tool
o The type of tool
o The brand name of tool
o The size of the tool
o The condition of the tool
o Type of tests conducted (if any)
o The medium used for testing
6.3.1.2 REFERENCES
6.3.2
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
In order to compare a questioned tool mark with a suspect tool, it is necessary to evaluate the tool
mark. This evaluation will consist of a physical evaluation and classification of the tool mark. This
evaluation will help determine what course the rest of the examination should take. The basic
objective in evaluating a questioned tool mark is to determine the suitability and classification of the
tool mark.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Stereo Microscope
If the tool mark is suitable for comparison, then the examination may continue.
If the tool mark has the same class characteristics as the suspect tool, then the examination
may continue.
6.3.2.3 REFERENCES
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
Tools and tool marks recovered during an investigation may contain trace material transferred from
the crime scene. This trace material may be in the form of blood, tissue, plaster, paint, hairs, fibers,
glass, etc. If trace evidence is present, the examiner should consider contacting the appropriate
section to determine if further examination of the trace material is necessary. Removal of trace
material may also be necessary to allow the proper examination and testing of a tool.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
Examine the tool or tool mark visually and microscopically for any trace material and record
in notes.
Remove material being careful not to damage the tool or tool mark.
If the trace material is not going to be retained for further examination, proceed with the
following steps that are applicable.
o For evidence containing blood, tissue or other biohazards, soak the evidence for at
least one (1) minute in a 10% bleach solution.
o Remove loose material by rinsing the tool or tool mark with methanol or water.
o Remove plaster by soaking the tool or tool mark in a 15% acetic acid solution.
6.3.5
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
Test Standards
In order to compare a questioned tool mark with a suspect tool, test standards or marks are usually
made with the suspect tool. The basic objective in preparing test standards is to attempt to duplicate
the manner in which the tool was used to produce the evidence or questioned tool mark.
Test standards created using a suspect tool are to be treated as reference material only. If a test
standard is used for comparison purposes at a later date, it will be documented on the examiners
report as being a reference standard previously created using the suspect tool and retained at the
Arkansas State Crime Laboratory.
Tool mark test standards will be maintained in a reference collection in a secure area accessible by
Firearms Section personnel. Archived material will be stored in a secure area in the ASCL Annex.
A test standard information card will be filled out to include the ASCL case #, item # and identifying
information (if available) for the suspect tool. The test fire information card will be stored with the
test standards.
The examiner should consider marking the tool mark test standards with the;
examiner's initials.
If the examiner does not, or is unable to, mark the test standards with the above information, then the
package containing the test standards and information card will be sealed and initialed.
PREPARATION
o Test Media:
The initial test media should be soft enough to prevent alterations of the tools
working surface.
Subsequent tests might require the use of a harder test media to better
reproduce the tool marks.
A systematic approach should be used for the production of test marks or standards.
Consideration should be given to the following:
o Areas of recent use on the tool in question.
o Direction of use and angle of the tool in relation to the surface being marked.
o Indexing of test standards/marks.
6.3.5.2 REFERENCES
6.3.6
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
Microscopic Comparison
In order for an examiner to identify a toolmark back to the tool that produced it, a microscopic
comparison utilizing a comparison microscope must be performed. The comparison microscope
allows the examiner to place the evidence on one side of the microscope and the known standard on
the other side. This procedure may also be used to compare to unknown toolmarks together to
determine if they were made by a single tool.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Comparison Microscope
o Stereo Microscope
Select the correct objective (magnification) setting and ensure that the objectives are locked
in place. Select the correct set of oculars (eyepieces).
The illumination (lights) used must be properly adjusted. Oblique lighting is usually
preferred.
If an identification is not initially made, the examiner should consider the following factors:
o Angle of lights
o Type of lights
o The need for additional known standards
o The position of the evidence, the tests or both.
o The possibility of using magnesium smoke.
o The possibility of cleaning the tool.
o The possibility that the tool itself has changed
6.3.6.2 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
A lack of suitable microscopic characteristics will lead the examiner to the conclusion that
the items are not suitable for comparison.
6.3.6.3 REFERENCES
6.3.7
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
Magnesium Smoking
Magnesium smoking is a technique of reducing the glare of a shiny object by lightly coating the
surface with fine magnesium smoke. This smoking is traditionally done manually, however a diode
sputtering system used for coating Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) specimens might also be
used.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
PREPARATION
o Cut short strips of magnesium ribbon off the roll.
o Both the roll and the strips should be stored properly based on the NFPA code.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Diode Sputtering System (if used)
The object to be smoked is passed over the smoke generated by the burning magnesium.
If the object collects too much smoke, wipe the smoke off and repeat the process.
The coating should be light enough to see the color of the item smoked through the coating
of smoke.
These techniques simply reduce the glare of an object under examination and are nondestructive, non-invasive techniques.
6.3.7.2 REFERENCES
6.3.8
Janneli, R., and Geyer, G., Smoking a Bullet, AFTE Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 128.
Casting
If an item received for a toolmark examination is too large to be conveniently placed on the
microscopes stages a silicon rubber cast can be made of the toolmarks in question. There are also
occasions when a cast of a toolmark might be received as evidence. In either case, any test standards
made will also have to be cast in order to perform a comparison. Mikrosil, Duplicast or other
types of silicon rubber casting material are similar products and procedurally are equivalent as long
as the manufacturers instructions are followed.
o Microscopic Comparison
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
Consideration must be given to placing identifying marks as well as orientation marks on the
back of the cast.
Casts will be retained with the test standards in the test reference collections.
6.3.8.2 REFERENCES
ANON., Mikrosil Casting Material Information AFTE Journal, Vol.15, No. 2, p. 80.
Barber, D.C. and Cassidy, F.H., A New Dimension with Mikrosil Casting Material,
AFTE Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3, p.328.
Many valuable items manufactured today have serial numbers for identification. These numbers are
usually die stamped. This process produces a compression of the metal or plastic in the area
immediately surrounding and a short distance below the penetration of the die. Serial numbers are
removed and/or obliterated in a variety of ways. The serial number may be restored if the
removal/obliteration is not taken past the previously mentioned compression zone.
It is desirable to remove (polish) the grinding and filing scratches introduced during obliteration.
The Polishing procedure can be effective independently but is more often used in conjunction with
various chemical or heat restoration procedures.
The chemical restoration procedure or sometimes referred to as the chemical or acid etching
procedure is suitable for restoration of serial numbers in metal. The die stamping process is a form
of cold-working metal. A side effect of cold-working is the decrease of that items ability to resist
chemical attack. Therefore the utilization of chemical etching will affect the compressed area of the
obliterated number faster and to a greater degree than the non cold-worked area surrounding it.
The electrochemical technique using the standard chemical etchants is an enhanced form of chemical
restoration, in which the application of a voltage potential assists the oxidation of the specimen. The
utilization of this method will again affect the compressed area of the obliterated number faster and
to a greater degree than the non cold-worked area surrounding it. This procedure is used on
magnetic metal.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
o If needed, consult the appropriate Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for each
chemical.
PREPARATION
o Refer to Firearms and Tool Marks Section Chemicals and Reagents Log for
instructions on preparing specific chemicals and reagents.
o Frys Reagent
o Turners Reagent
o Davis Reagent
o 25% Nitric Acid
o Acidic Ferric Chloride
o Ferric Chloride
o 10% Sodium Hydroxide
INSTRUMENTATION
o Scale/Balance
o Power source
Depending on the extent of the obliteration, continue polishing until the surface is mirror-like
removing all scratches. If the obliteration is severe it may not be possible or desirable to
remove all the scratches.
If characters do not become visible, proceed to the appropriate chemical or heat restoration
procedure.
Determine the serial number mediums physical properties, i.e. magnetic or non-magnetic.
Frys Reagent
Turners Reagent
Davis Reagent
Ferric Chloride
10%Sodium Hydroxide
Apply the chemical solution to the area of obliteration utilizing cotton tip applicators or
swabs that have been moistened with the chemical solution.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
o If any characters become visible note these characters.
o All findings must be verified by a second examiner.
Sufficient notes
6.4.1.6 REFERENCES
Treptow, Richard, S., Handbook of Methods for the Restoration of Obliterated Serial
Numbers, NASA, 1978.
Polk, Donald, E. and Giessen, Bill, C. Metallurgical Aspects of Serial Number Recovery,
AFTE Journal ,Vol. 21, No. 2, p.174.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Laboratory, Serial Number Restoration Handbook,
1999.
Deats, Marcellus. Serial Number Restoration Information. AFTE Journal 12(3): 82-83.
Miller, Ken E., Current Assist for Die Stamp Impression Restoration, AFTE Journal 4(3):
38.
Fracture Match
In order to compare a questioned fracture with suspect evidence, it is necessary to evaluate the
fracture. This evaluation will consist of a physical evaluation and classification of the evidence.
This evaluation will help determine what course the rest of the examination should take. The basic
objective in evaluating a questioned fracture is to determine the suitability and classification of the
evidence. Tool marks recovered during an investigation may contain trace material transferred from
the crime scene. This trace material may be in the form of blood, tissue, plaster, paint, hairs, fibers,
glass, etc. If trace evidence is present, the examiner should consider contacting the appropriate
section to determine if further examination of the trace material is necessary. Removal of trace
material may also be necessary to allow the proper examination and testing of a tool mark. In order
for an examiner to identify a fracture back to another, a microscopic comparison utilizing a stereo
microscope should be performed. The stereo microscope allows the examiner to place the evidence
within the same field. This procedure may also be used to compare two unknown tool marks
together to determine if they were made by an object.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
o Refer to the lab wide ASCL Health and Safety Manual.
o The use of personal protective equipment must be considered to avoid exposure to
any potential hazards.
INSTRUMENTATION
o Stereo Microscope
o Scale/Balance
A systematic approach should be used for the physical examination and classification of
questioned evidence and fracture. Consideration should be given to:
o Physical Characteristics
o Color
o Texture
o Mold Characteristics
o Design Features
o Numbers and Letters
o Fracture Lines
o Surface Properties
6.5.1.2 INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS:
If the fracture evidence is suitable for comparison the examination may continue.
6.5.1.3 PROCEDURE or ANALYSIS TRACE MATERIAL EXAMINATION
Examine the evidence visually and microscopically for any trace material and record in
notes.
If the trace material is not going to be retained for further examination, proceed with the
following steps that are applicable.
o If the trace material is not going to be retained for further examination, proceed with
the following steps that are applicable.
o Remove loose material by rinsing the evidence with methanol or water.
o Remove plaster by soaking the evidence in a 15% acetic acid solution.
o Remove paint by soaking the evidence in methanol or acetone.
The illumination (lights) used must be properly adjusted. Oblique lighting is usually
preferred.
Compare the fracture edges of one evidence sample to the other identifying unique edge
patterns.
If an identification is not initially made, the examiner should consider the following factors:
o Angle of lights
o Type of lights
o The position of the evidence
o The possibility of cleaning the evidence
A lack of suitable microscopic characteristics will lead the examiner to the conclusion that
the items are not suitable for comparison.
6.5.1.6 REFERENCES
DeForest, Gaensslen, and Lee, Forensic Science: An Introduction to Criminalistics, McGrawHill, New York, 1983
6.6
Range of Conclusions
6.6.1
Elimination (Negative)
o The fired evidence in question was not fired with the suspect firearm.
o The fired evidence in question was not fired from the same firearm, firearm not
received.
o The discipline recognizes that an elimination of a firearm by other than class
characteristics is possible but that such an elimination is an exceptional situation.
o If an examiner arrives at an opinion where he/she eliminates a firearm, for any reason,
the examiner must substantiate the reasons supporting his/her opinion and incorporate
them into his/her work notes.
Inconclusive
o The fired evidence in question cannot be identified or eliminated as having been fired
with the suspect firearm.
o The fired evidence in question cannot be identified or eliminated as having been fired
with the same firearm, firearm not submitted.
Unsuitable
o The fired evidence in question is not suitable for comparison purposes.
Unidentifiable
o The evidence in question cannot be identified as being fired evidence.
6.6.2
Elimination (Negative)
o The toolmark evidence in question was not made with the suspect tool.
o The toolmark evidence in question was not made with the same tool, tool not
received.
o The discipline recognizes that an elimination of a toolmark by other than class
characteristics is possible but that such an elimination is an exceptional situation.
Inconclusive
o The toolmark evidence in question cannot be identified or eliminated as having been
made with the suspect tool.
o The toolmark evidence in question cannot be identified or eliminated as having been
made with the same tool, tool not submitted.
Unsuitable
o The toolmark evidence in question is not suitable for comparison purposes.
Unidentifiable
o The evidence in question cannot be identified as being a toolmark.
A firearm work sheet may take on many forms but should minimally contain the following
information:
o Laboratory Case Number
o Caliber/Gauge
o Make
o Model
o Serial Number
o Firing Mechanics
o Type of Action
o Safeties
o Operating Condition
o Trigger Pull
o Rifling Characteristics
o Barrel Length
o Any other information the examiner might find useful.
6.7.2
o Bullet Caliber
o Bullet Weight
o Bullet Morphology
o Bullet Rifling Characteristics
o Physical Condition of the bullet
o Any other information the examiner might find useful.
6.7.3
6.7.4
Firearms Worksheets
The Firearms Section will normally use the Data Extension Forms in the Justice Trax, however,
should the need arise, manual forms may be utilized and scanned into the Justice Trax database.
See Firearms Forms listed on the Controlled Documents (Q-drive) for listings and examples
of manual forms utilized by the Firearms Section.
Section 7.0
All equipment and instrumentation will be maintained in a clean, orderly, and safe condition
If an instrument is not working properly or potential problems are observed, it is the duty of
the analyst to immediately take the appropriate steps to repair/correct the problem or inform
the appropriate person of the problem. Any problem and the action to correct the problem
must be logged in the Firearms Equipment Maintenance and Calibration Record
Instruments that are not working properly must be clearly identified for all employees who
may use that instrument
All maintenance (routine or periodic) and repairs on designated instruments will be recorded
in the logbook
All logbooks will be kept in an area located close to the instrument or equipment and readily
available to each analyst/examiner who utilizes
7.1
Calibration Standards
Comparison Microscope:
Annually (+/- 3 months):
o The comparison microscope will be cleaned and serviced by an outside certified
technician.
o Minor repairs may be done by the examiner.
o A performance check of the measurement software for the microscopes will be
performed (+/- 0.003) using a NIST traceable stage micrometer at least annually.
o These steps will be documented in the instruments maintenance/calibration logbook.
7.1.2
Stereo Microscope:
AS NEEDED:
o The stereo microscope will be cleaned and checked for serviceability.
o Minor repairs may be done by the examiner.
o These steps will be documented in the instruments maintenance/calibration logbook.
7.1.3
7.1.4
Stage Micrometer
Every 5 years (+/- 3 months)
o The stage micrometer will be recertified against a NIST Traceable standard.
o If the micrometer disagrees with the NIST standard by greater than +/- 0.003 than it
shall be removed from service.
o These steps will be documented in the maintenance/calibration logbook.
7.1.5 Balances/Scales
7.1.8
Certified Master Ruler This ruler will be stored separately from the other measuring
rulers used in the Firearms Section.
o Every 5 years (+/- 3 months)
If the Master Ruler disagrees with the NIST standard by greater than +/- 1/32
than it shall be removed from service.
The steel measuring rulers will be checked against the Certified Master Ruler.
If a steel measuring ruler disagrees with the Certified Master Ruler by greater
than +/- 1/16 than it shall be removed from service.
Section 8.0
Proficiency Testing:
Section 9.0
Case Records
Section 10.0
Testimony Review
Section 11.0
Audits
Section 12.0
Complaints
Section 13.0
Miscellaneous
Refer to lab wide ASCL Quality Manual (ASCL-DOC-01) for items not previously
addressed in the Firearms Section Quality Manual (FA-DOC-01).
Section 14.0
APPENDIX
14.1 Glossary
Definitions for firearms terms are located in the published AFTE Glossary.
14.2 Abbreviations