Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Safety First
Agenda
Topic
Presenter
G. Horn
Status
1. Schedule
2. Industry feedback and rule changes
Changes to the CSR-H since 1-Jul-2012
1. General Principles
2. Loads
3. Hull Girder & Local Prescriptive Reqts
4. Direct Strength Analysis
5. Buckling Criteria
6. Fatigue Strength
7. Discussions (Q/A)
Consequence Assessment
1. General, scope and method
2. Oil Tankers, prescriptive and FEM
3. Discussions (Q/A)
4. Bulk Carriers, prescriptive and FEM
5. Discussions (Q/A)
General Discussion (Q/A)
June 2013
G. Horn
P. Baumans
. Be
H. Ocakli
All
Welcome
1July
1Apr.
Harmonised CSR
2
30 Jun.
2010
2011
2012
CSR-H
1st Draft Rules
2013
2014
2015
2016
CSR-H
2nd Draft Rules
GBS to start
application to
oil tanker and
bulker
(1 July 2016)
Welcome
CSR-H Schedule
C66 Approved
Schedule
First draft (External)
1 Jul 2012
Feedback/Re-work
Second draft
1 Apr 2013
Feedback/Re-work
1 Nov 2013
1 Nov 15 Dec 2013
(1.5 months)
IACS Adoption
December 2013
Final clean-up
Release Rules
1 Feb 2014
5
(Website: www.iacs.org.uk)
Technical Background.
the reason being the schedule for the submission of the CSR-H to
IMO for verification of compliance with the IMO Goal Based
Standards.
ABS
Other IACS
documents
(UR, PR, UI, etc.)
References
BV
CSR-H
documents
CCS
RS
A letter +
Individual Tech.
Doc. Package
to IMO
TC Review
Current 2nd Industry Review Period
1 ~ 15 December 2013.
10
Time schedule
Schedule
Knowledge Centre
IACS Organisation
June 2013
12
120
Industry
Answers provided by IACS groups
(HPTs, PMTs, Hull panel, etc )
Questions Received
100
Total 300 Q
80
60
40
Jun 2013
May 2013
Apr 2013
Mar 2013
Feb 2013
Jan 2013
Dec 2012
Nov 2012
Oct 2012
Sep 2012
Aug 2012
Jul 2012
20
13
SG/CSR
(ABS, BV, LR, NK, Rina)
GPG
EG/GBS
CSR
Secretariat
PT/GBS
Hull Panel
(13 members)
CSR
Maintenance
11 Project Teams
CSR-H
June 2013
14
2007
2008
Harmonization
Detail Plan
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Submission to
IMO
for GBS
(Dec 2013)
CSR-H Deliverables
1. Common part
8 Fatigue (DNV)
Total staff: 71
15
Fatigue
Improvement for prescriptive and FE fatigue assessment
Buckling
Improvement of Ch 8, Sec 5, Tab 2 case 2 (Simple support with y)
Improvement of plate buckling - side shell in single side bulk carriers
June 2013
16
Structural redundancy
Technical background is under development
Conclusion: Ship structure, i.e. stiffened panels with scantlings in
accordance with CSR have inherent redundancy and do not need
reinforcement for this purpose
17
Survey
Panel
PT/GBSGAPS
Yes
Yes
(Yes)
Yes
10 Design transparency
(Yes)
Yes
(Yes)
Yes
(Yes)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No.
Functional Req.
1 Design Life
8 Watertight & Weathertight integrity
9 Human element consideration
Reference to IACS
Guidelines
June 2013
18
Envelop
method
removal
SSS BC
modification
Removal of
IMO PSPC
Reduction of
fatigue loads
Reduction of
FE LC
June 2013
Main Modifications :
20
Improvement
June 2013
Protection
against
wire rope
21
Ch 1: Rule General
Principles
Ch 2: General
Arrangement Design
Ch 3: Structural
Design Principles
June 2013
22
June 2013
23
fdc: new coefficient for dry cargo in fatigue fdc = 0.5 used in Pbd in
[2.4.3]
MH and MHD defined for 50% consumables
Steel coils: correction of loads on hopper side by cosh :
Ch 4: Loads
June 2013
24
Sec 1 HG Yielding
Ch 5:
Hull Girder Strength
Ch 6:
Hull Local Scantling
June 2013
Sec 4 Plating
Sec 1 General
25
Ch 7: Direct Strength
Analysis
foremost CH
[2.4.4] Corrugation: dummy rod elements to be modelled at
intersection between flange and web
[2.5.3] Boundary condition of aftmost CH: same as for midship
[2.5.4] End constraint beam characteristics: Area modified
[4.2] Green sea loads on hatch cover to be considered
[4.3.3] Qtarg aft and fwd redefined
[4.4.5] HG Shear force adjustment procedure revisited.
Introduction of Method 1 and Method 2 using SFLC
[4.4.9] Procedure to adjust vertical and horizontal bending
moments outside midship
[5.2.3] Tab 12 harmonised with tab for buckling, for the vertical
corrugated bhd with and w/o lower stool
June 2013
26
[4.1.1] Side shell of single side shell of BC: shorter edge of EPP
considered clamped and x = y = 1
June 2013
27
Ch 8: Buckling
June 2013
Ch 8: Buckling
El. 1
El. 2
El. 3
a
June 2013
El. 4
El. 5
x
29
Ch 9: Fatigue
[4.1.1] Non linear factor introduced i.w.o. the water surface fNL and effective
breadth modified.
[4.2.6] Clarification for relative displacement in stress range.
Tab 4 stress concentration factors revised.
[5.3] Clarification for the methodology to apply in case of alternative design.
June 2013
Material with ReH > 390 MPa or with fatigue performance: S-N Curves to be
considered on a case-by-case basis.
June 2013
31
Ch 1: Bulk Carriers
June 2013
32
What Next?
Consequence assessment
Schedule
Oil tankers
ID
Type
Lpp
Tsc
Dwt
180200
OT-1
VLCC 1
319
60
23
30
318000
25
180000
OT-2
VLCC 2
324
60
21
29
330000
18
25
205000
OT-3
Suezmax1
264
48
17
24
158000
43
15
21
114500
OT-4
Suezmax2
264
50
17
23
163000
248
43
15
20
115000
OT-5
Aframax 1
240
42
15
22
97000
Panamax 1
225
32
14
20
82000
OT-6
Aframax 2
240
44
15
21
103000
BC-7
Panamax 2
223
32
15
20
81000
OT-7
Aframax 3
234
42
15
21
105000
BC-8
Handymax 1
183
32
13
18
53000
OT-8
Panamax1
220
32
15
21
76000
BC-9
Handymax 2
185
32
13
18
57000
OT-9
Panamax2
219
32
15
21
74000
BC-10
Handymax 3
185
32
14
18
48000
OT-10
Handymax1
176
32
13
18
51000
ID
Type
Lpp
Tsc
Dwt
BC-1
Capesize 1
285
46
18
25
BC-2
Capesize 2
284
45
18
BC-3
Capesize 3
293
50
BC-4
Baby Cape 1
240
BC-5
Baby Cape 2
BC-6
34
2012
2012-07-01
2013
2014
1st Hearing
Industry
2013-04-01
2nd Hearing
Industry
2013-11-01
Final draft
Technical Committee
Review
External review period
2013-12-18
IACS Council
Adoption
IACS adoption
Entry into force (T.B.D.)
June 2013
Final CSRH
Submission
2013-12-31
35
Overall situation:
IMO & Harmonised CSR
Industry Review
Jul
2012
1st Presentation
to Industry,
Sept. 2012
Feedback
Rework
Jan
2013
Industry
Review
TC
Jul
2013
Feedback
Rework
Jan
2014
IACS
Council
Adoption
Jul
2014
Submission
36
June 2013
37