1

The Intellectual Trinity of Human Ideation

Omar Alansari-Kreger

There is something rather disparaging about any volume of intellectual discourse. A

writer, scientist, or inventor seldom believes that a bestselling gimmick is a fitting example of
their work. Perceptions of literary brilliance are always relative to an interpretive perspective.
Cognitive introspection goes a long way in clarifying the basis that goes into the cultivation of an
intellectual discipline. An intellectual may spend a tremendous amount of time and effort on
projects in which they cherish as examples of their best work, but once the fruits of their efforts
hit the presses, most go totally unnoticed. In general, people are driven to what is amusing by
virtue of what is potentially entertaining. A culture built on constructs of recreationalism is a
precarious one which is why its adherents demand the constancy of amusement in order to
preserve its shaky foundations. Failure to follow through with the latter ensures certain
destruction; that usually happens once a nation awakens itself out of its sociologically stultifying
slumber.
As long as the masses are appeased, they will remain subserviently oppressed simply
because there is no other alternative that can beg to offer an intellectually substantive
perspective. In such a world, propaganda machines become the harbingers of higher learning
simply because they sociologically manipulate the distribution of human knowledge. That
explains one of the main reasons why oppressive governments around the world have developed
a morbid fear of the internet; in this instance, fear of informational openness serves as the same
reason why authoritative oppressors salivate over potentially controlling the internet. The story
of humankind is signified by the ephemerality of disparity. In one way or another, there is always
some typological crisis that will threaten the promise of providence; the essence of which is
amply summated through the intellectual scarcity of man.
If something in the form of an idea fails to stimulate the curiosity of the human
imagination, it becomes inimically impossible to maintain sociological interest in the basis of an
intellectual perspective; the likes of which is maintained and preserved by minds of enlightened
readership. Unfortunately, thought consciousness demands the lucidity of mind; the essence of
which is measured in our displaced acumen which signifies the origins of ideated sagacity. There
are many different types of intellectuals. Each intellectual is industriously motivated by a distinct
reason to take up the proverbial pen. Some ideate in hopes of proliferating a world of utilitarian
bounty. Others ideate for truth, knowledge, and intellectual constancy in the human condition.
For that reason, the idea of substantiated triumph covers a broad territory which will always be
shrouded in an ambiguous trajectory.
However, an applied effort that motivates the creation of intellectual mind and marrow
must maintain the purity of its originating inspiration. Therefore, ideating for the sake of ideating
is the ultimate path that eventually leads to the comfort of intellectual constancy. We cannot help
but to wonder, how many writers, scientists, and inventors lived and died without being

discovered? What became of their work? Was it all destroyed? Or is it sitting in some
undisclosed repository somewhere accumulating dust? Writers, scientists, and inventors
represent an intellectual trinity that will forever chronicle the development of the human
condition. Each one has the ability to add perspective to the world for better or worse. Yet,
irrespective of the intellectual medium of mind, the fountainhead of all knowledge is situated on
the precipice of the written word! The etymology of all human ideation is broken down into
words which makes the fluidity of intellectual discourse possible.
That reality proves that writers, scientists, and inventors are indeed the true guardians of
knowledge. The trinity of each will forever map the intricate innards of the human mind both
contemporaneously and posthumously.
As a species of dignified beings, we must take great comfort knowing that the historical heritage
of the written word is something that is much greater than the transience of tyrants, technocrats,
and oligarchs.