Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEVELOPMENTS
IN POULTRY
AND SELECTION
BREEDING
M. R. PATCHELL
Massey
University,
Palmerston
North
SUMMARY
The emergence of large scale poultry businesses in some
overseas countries is outlined,. and the development of large
scale private breeding orgamzations
is discussed. Geneticeconomic considerations
and market potential largely determine the type of breeding plan followed. The New Zealand
Random Sample Test is described, and its usefulness in
eval;.lating poultry stocks assessed.
STRUCTURE
Starting
in America, then in Britain
after the war and
latterly in Australia, the poultry industry has developed or
is rapidly developing
into quite a major
industry.
It is
characterized
by very large business
organization,
with
substantial
capital brought
together
through integration,
by the employment
of top-flight scientists
to enable technological
discoveries
to be swiftly
applied,
by organized
marketing
outlets for products
tailor-made
for consumer
demand, all in a situation
of fierce competition.
In 1954, the broiler boom in Great Britain
got under
way after 14 years of feed rationing,
and the consequent
technical
stagnation
of the industry. It was impractical
for
the broiler industry to develop under conditions
of strict
feed rationing.
In America, on the other hand, the reverse
situation applied. The war years gave the American poultry
industry
a great stimulus;
there was a greatly increased
demand for animal products,
and owing to shipping difficulties the export of maize was limited as were exports of
Canadian wheat.
In 1953 the consumption
of chicken per cupitn in Great
Britain was estimated
(Hunt and Clark, 1962) at less than
1 lb per annum and specialized
broiler units were virtually
no,q-existent.
In 1960, seven years later, the annual per
43
44
PATCHELL
capiln consumption
of chicken meat was estimated
by the
British
Chicken Association
at 9 lb and the production
of
broilers
had risen to 100 million
per annum.
Today in
Britain
the annual production
of broilers
is about 220
millions
and per capita consumption
of chicken
meat is
still increasing.
Ninety per cent. of the U.K. broiler production
is in the
hands of no more than one thousand growers. Thus, a few
farmers produce efficiently the entire national requirement
of chicken meat with no help f.rom the taxpayer by way of
subsidies,
in contrast
to some other agricultural
products
in Britain. The success of the broiler industry has been due
largely to vertical
integration,
organized
on big-business
lines.
This pattern is now being followed by the egg production
side of the industry with million-bird
factories being set up.
The egg empire of Eastwood
(1964),
being developed
in
Britain, owns all the land required for the stock, for growing much of the feed and the disposal of manure. It has its
own breeding
and multiplication
farm and hatcheries.
It
manufactures
its own equipment
and has its own processing plants and retail outlets.
The situation
in the U.S.A.
and other Western countries
is very similar.
To compete
and prosper,
th.e individual
broiler
or egg
producer
must first decide, through market research,
the
best market for the product and its potential size. Next, the
whole cycle of operations
from production,
through manufacturing,
processing,
transportation
and merchandizing
must be planned. At evety/stage
advantage
must be taken
of modern technology.
The new poultry industries
depend
on highly specialized research, imvolving new approaches
to
applied poultry genetics,
controlled
environment
housing,
disease control, nutrition,
and to the processing
and marketing of eggs and chicken.
An outstanding
feature
of the poultry
industries
of
America, Great Britain, and recently in Australia, has been
the evolution
of large breeding
organizations.
Since the
mid-1940s it has been the custom for the larger American
breeders
to engage geneticists,
and some of the worlds
leading
animal
geneticists
are now employed
by these
establishments.
The results have been impressive.
Largcscale selection and testing programmes
have been embarked
upon, improved
systems of poultry stock evaluation
have
been developed, and within a few years stock has been so
improved in all-round performance
that commercial
poultrymen can afford to buy chicks only from those organiza-
POULTRY
BREEDING
AND
SELECI-TON
45
METHODS
46
PATCHELL
of broilers,
the essential
principle
consists
of the employment of strain crosses, whereby female lines of relatively
high fecundity,
reasonable
growth rate and conformation
are crossed with male lines with superior growth and conformation
to produce the market bird. The initial promise
from blood typing as a useful .tool in breed improvement
now appears to be waning, and there is now less enthusiasm
for this expensive technique
(Nordskog,
1964).
Because of competition
between breeders and the greater
sophistication
of the chick-buying
public, breeders
have
found it necessary
to increase
the number of factors
for
which they select. This adds greatly to the difficulty of
improving
performance.
In breeding for both broiler and egg production
there is
increasing
awareness
of the importance
of genotypes
environmental
interactions.
Bowman and Powell (1962) of
Thornber
Bros. reported significant
interactions
in 8 week
body weight in broiler chickens,
and Dickerson
( 1960), of
Kimber
Farms, has reported
interactions
with egg lines,
particularly
egg number
and mortality.
Abplanalp
and
Menzie ( 1961) also reported
interaction
effects
for egg
strains from a Swiss co-operat.ive
breeding
unit. Indeed,
Dickerson
(1961) looked critically
at the whole concept of
selection
theory, particularly
the prediction
of response to
selection and the problem of plateau situations.
He outlined
techniques
for the experimental
explanation
of selection
theory in animals.
In discussing
genetic
interaction,
he
presented
the results made up from 79 strains of birds at
each of 13 locations
in one year and 59 strains of birds
at each of 12 locations in another year with a total of 22,494
pullets.
Egg production
data were obtained
at 22 of the
locations
for 19,739 pullets,
and body weights
and egg
quality measurements
were taken at 32 weeks of age at
16 locations
for 15,080, and 12,920 pullets,
respectively.
These figures perhaps illustrate
better than anything else
the scope and size of the testing programmes
and it is quite
likely that current
problems
of selection
in animals
are
being actively studied in these organizations.
The great expansion
of the breeding groups to the stage
where their stock are used in many parts of the world,
covering a large range of environments;:has
resulted in their
being confronted
with this problem of genotype X,environment interaction.
At the same tirne, however, the inte&ti,on
problem
is becoming
evident even within much smaller
geographic
regions, particularly
for traits where environ-
POULTRY
mental factors
et al., 1963).
have
BREEDING
a large
AND
effect
SELECTION
on performance
47
(Hull
48
PATCHELL
In a breeding programme,
the genetic-economic
relationships of traits become important.
Genetic changes in the
parent flock influence
net returns
directly
through chick
costs and indirectly
through
correlated
responses
in the
broiler
progeny.
Hence, there can be a see-saw effect in
which emphasis
on adult body size may favour broiler
growth rate yet reduce egg production
and vice versa. Strain
reviewed these problems
and conand Nordskog
(1962b)
cluded that it was important
th.at breeders should make an
assessment
of the genetic correlations
associated
with their
breeder flocks in order to formulate
breeding programmes
designed to maximize profit.
Another problem is that the commercial
breeder, under
a free enterprise
system, must conduct his operation
with
a view to obtaining
a profit at least in the long run. The
increase
in profit through the application
of a particular
breeding plan will be determined
by the increase in gross
income caused by the genetic improvement
of the stock
less the increase in cost caused by operating
the particular
breeding plan.
A breeding programme
can increase the operators
gross
income through increased
sales of eggs and meat caused
by higher production ; and by more revenue from day-old
chick
sales and/or better
prices
obtained
for a better
quality chick. Skaller (1964) has shown that increased chick
sales, direct or through franchised
hatcheries,
must make
the main contribution
towards not only the cost of a breeding programme,
but towards profit margin as well. Thus,
volume, or rather potential
volume of chick sales, restricts
breeders
of Australia
and New Zealand
because
of the
limited market. With a small market even relatively
simple
breeding schemes may be too costly to operate. Most breeding schemes
require
a definable
minimum
flock size for
th&r efficient operation
and the cost of this flock must be
distributed
over the largest possible number of commercial
chicks sold. This number is set by the reproductive
ability
of the population
and with poultry this is quite considerable. A flock of 1,000 pullets, with a breeding
season of
30 weeks, and an expected 30 daughters
per pullet, should
after two generations
of multiplication
yield 27 million
chicks in the fourth generation.
The closer the actual output
of salable
chicks
to this biological
potential,
the more
profitable
will be the breeding operation.
In Australia and
New Zealand, with limited markets, it is not easy to expand
chick sales to the point where sophisticated
breeding,plans
could be followed,
particularly
breeding
systems such as
TESTING
METHODS
50
PATCH ELI.
a Government
grant, and the Poultry Board is responsible
for financing
the test. By arrangement,
Massey University
runs the test on behalf of the Board, and is aided in this
by an Advisory Committee containing
representatives
of the
Poultry Board, the Department
of Agriculture,
and Massey
University.
Facilities
are available
for testing 25 different
stocks each year.
Eggs are selected at random from the entrants farms by
Poultry Instructors
of the Department
of Agriculture.
The
eggs are incubated
at the Test Unit. At hatching,
one hundred pullet chicks per entrant are selected at random. These
are brooded and reared on an intermingled
system to about
19 weeks of age. At random, 50 pullets per entry are selected
and placed in the laying shed in two pens each containing
25 birds. Full records of production,
mortality,
food consumption and egg quality are kept to 490 days of age. The
results
are made available
to the industry
periodically
throughout
the test.
The organization
of random sample tests in other countries is very smilar to the New Zealand test. Some take in
chicks not eggs, some run to 500 days or longer, and some
increase
the accuracy of the test by testing a larger pullet
sample of up to 100 per entrant:.
The results of a random sample test are published
and
serve as a useful guide, particularly
when compared
over
three or four years, as to where the most promising
stock
is likely to be available.
The accuracy
of the Random
Sample Laying Test is not very great because of the considerable
experimental
error. Only quite large differences
between stocks can be detected, and there is little point in
emphasizing
differences
in ranking based on small differences in performance.
In recent years most of the random sample tests in the
U.S.A. have been collated
and published
after suitable
adjustments
have been made for differences
between tests.
Even so, there is still a very considerable
experimental
error
remaining
in the ranking of stocks based upon test corrected averages.
Both in Iowa and in California
there has been experimentation
with multiple
locatidn
or on-the-farm
random
sample testing of egg production
stocks for the purpose of
obtaining
more reliable
ranking
of stocks under typical
commercial
conditions.
Analyses
by Hill and Nordskog
( 1956) and Nordskog and Kempthorne
(1960), have demonstrated the importance
of real but unpredictable
shifts of
ranking of stocks ,from one location
to another. Although
POULTRY
BHEEDtNG
.4ND
SELECTION
51
multiple
location
random
sample
tests or those using
several types of housing at one test location
have been
examined
in an attempt to reduce the experimental
error
from interaction
between
stocks
and management
procedures, experience
has shown that, despite these precautions, accuracy
in predicting
the ranking
of entries
in
another year, or in another
test, from results within any
one test and year is limited.
Hence, although random sample tests are a considerable
improvement
on the old standard
laying tests, they still
leave much to be desired,
but their development
is an
example
of voluntary
co-operation
between
the poultry
industry, scientists
and governments.
Apart from the difficulties
of ranking
stocks
accurately,
they do provide
a
wealth of factual information
on the performance
of fowls
and also on the success or otherwise of the breeding plans
of the large breeding organizations.
Any breeding plan suggested
by genetic research
must,
finally, be evaluated
in terms of its contribution
to food
production.
REFERENCES
ABPLANALP, H.; MARROU, L. F.; GOTO, E. 1962: Poult.
Sci., 41: 927.
ABPLANALP, H.; ME~TZIE, M. 1961: Brit. Poult. Sci.. 2: 71.
BOWM!IAN, J. C.; CHALLENDER, N. I. 1962: Anim.
Prod., 4: 294.
BOWMAN, J. C.; POWELL, J. C. 1962: Anim. Prod., 4: 319.
DICKERSON, G. 1960: Poult. Sci., 39: 1244 [Abstr.].
1961: Get-111 Plasm Resources.
Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. p. 161.
EASTWOOD, J. B. 1964: Pouft. Frnz. & Pucker, 152 (3919): 15.
GOODWIN, K.; DICKERSON, G. E.; LAMOREU~, W. F. 1960: Biometrical
Genetics.
Pergamon
Press, New York. p. 117.
GOWE, R. S.; ROBERTSON,A. ; LATTER, B. D. H. 1959: Poult. Sci., 38 : 462.
HJLL, J. F.; NORDSKOG, A. W. 1956: Poult. Sci., 35: 256.
HULL, P.; GOM~E, R. S.; SLEN, S. B.; CRAWFORD, R. D. 1963: Genet.
Ass.
Camb.,
4: 370.