Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Results
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Species 1
Species 2
Species 3
Species 4
Species 5
Species 6
Figure 1. Data gathered by another group (2) assigned to the mangrove area. Mangroves are
assigned species 1. Species 2, 3, and 4 different plants which were not identified. Species 5 are
the ipil-ipil plants and species 6 are yellow butterflies.
Transect 1
Mangrove
Transect 2
Grass
Oregano
Transect 3
Porites
Starfish
Figure 2. Data gathered by group 8. As with the previous graph, organisms were counted and
were recorded and was graphed to better visualize. Both graphs show that mangroves are the
most plentiful organism in the area.
35
25
20
15
10
15
6
1
Figure 3. Overall count for organisms found in the sampling area, totaling to 6 transect lines
used for the sampling.
Table 1. Analysis of the data gathered. The species between the 6 samplings were compared. A
computed p-value of 0.721 is shown in the table.
ANOVA
Source
of
Variati
on
Betwe
en
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
SS
df
MS
P-value
F crit
0.5719
81
0.7210
96
2.386
07
19.733
33
3.9466
67
372.6
54
6.9
392.33
33
59
Discussion
0.312
0.688
3.110
After data was compared and exchanged, the mangrove groups computed the overall
Simpsons Index of Diversity, which is an index of dominance and diversity where the closer it is
to 1, the more diverse the species in an area, and Shannons Index, also an index of diversity
where the closer it is to 4, the more rich and even the species are in an area. A Simpsons Index
of Diversity of 0.688 was computed, indicating that the area was diverse. Indicated by the
computed Shannons index of 3.110 is the areas richness and diversity (table 2). The most
dominant species was the mangrove. Better analysis and comparison of the mangrove areas in
Bolinao couldve been done but all of the mangrove groups were assigned to the same area at
Santiago Island. The species from the 6 different samplings/replicates were also compared. A pvalue of 0.721, computed using ANOVA, denotes that at 95% confidence interval, the means of
the species in the 6 replicates were not significantly different.
Supplementary Materials
Table 3. Raw data for ANOVA
SUMMARY
Groups
Count
Row 1
Row 2
Row 3
Row 4
Row 5
Row 6
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups
Total
Sum
10
10
10
10
10
10
SS
13
22
14
10
4
7
df
19.733
33
372.6
5
54
392.33
33
Averag
e
1.3
2.2
1.4
1
0.4
0.7
Variance
10.23333
20.62222
4.266667
4.666667
0.488889
1.122222
MS
P-value
F crit
3.9466
67
6.9
0.5719
81
0.7210
96
2.386
07
59
Table 4. Total species count for the area assigned on Santiago Island.
Ma
ng
Gra
ss
Or
eg
Po
ri
St
ar
Sp
2
Sp
3
Sp
4
Ip
il
Bttr
fly
TOT
AL
G8L
1
G8L
2
G8L
3
G2L
1
G2L
2
G2L
3
TOT
AL
10
13
13
22
14
10
35
15
70
Table 4. Computation for Simpsons Index of Diversity and Shannons Index, where the
summation of 1-P2 is Simpsons Index of Diversity and the summation of PlnP is the Shannons
Index.
n
35.000
n/N
35/70
P
0.500
p^2
0.250
15.000
15/70
0.214
0.046
Orega
no
Porite
s
Starfis
h
SP2
G2
SP3
G2
SP4
G2
Ipil Ipil
5.000
5/70
0.071
0.005
1.000
1/70
0.014
0.000
1.000
1/70
0.014
0.000
1.000
1/70
0.014
0.000
2.000
2/70
0.029
0.001
3.000
3/70
0.043
0.002
6.000
6/70
0.086
0.007
Butter
fly
TOTAL
1.000
1/70
0.014
0.000
70
1.00
0
1.00
0
0.31
2
Mangr
ove
Grass
lnP
PlnP
1.386
3.081
5.278
8.497
8.497
8.497
7.111
6.300
4.913
8.497
1.16
528
0.693
0.660
0.377
0.121
0.121
0.121
0.203
0.270
0.421
0.121
3.11
0