Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Office hours: By appointment. On Wednesdays following many classes Professor Boyle will be
in 3041 during lunch. Details in syllabus.
Class Notes:
I. Survey Results (what they demonstrated):
A. There were lots of ways of looking of law that you felt you had not fully grasped. In
particular, a shortage of theory, history, economic analysis and structured argumentation. Also a
need for integration of material across classes
B. The typical law-school method is to read cases in specific courses that ideally
should expose you to the different doctrinal approaches.
C. This class should outline these different approaches in order to hopefully help you put
them together across classes. If you master them, they will among other things, help you learn
the law better, understand it in context and in historical detail, make sophisticated legal
arguments, and so on.
II. About the class
A. Classes 1 and 2: A history of legal consciousness at warp speed. These classes will
cover the big movements and changes within legal history.
B. Class 3: A 10-page handout on the standard legal arguments and an assignment at the
end of that class. It is a short, ungraded 1-2 page paper involving a hypothetical for which youll
need to generate all the types of arguments you can make.
C. Class 4: Law and economics
D. Class 5: The differing methods of constitutional interpretation/Heller. Are the methods
you choose related to the result you want?
E. Class 6: Exposure to the major theories of jurisprudential thought.
Basic goal of course: to give you a holistic view of the law.
Final exam Feb 24th.
III. The Mensch Article:
A. At different times in American Legal History, you would get different answers to the
question: What does it mean to think like a lawyer?