Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00436-014-4087-2
ORIGINAL PAPER
Received: 26 January 2014 / Accepted: 18 August 2014 / Published online: 28 August 2014
# Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
focused on the gametogony phase using the specific antiEtMIC1 and anti-EtMIC2 MAbs produced in this work. Our
results showed that both EtMIC1 and EtMIC2 proteins are
expressed in all developmental stages including the
gametogony stage. To our knowledge, this is the first report
that the EtMIC1 and EtMIC2 proteins are expressed in the
gametogony stage of E. tenella.
Keywords Eimeria tenella . EtMIC1 . EtMIC2 . MAbs .
Gametogony phase
Introduction
Eimeria tenella, one of seven Eimeria species infecting
chickens, is an obligate intracellular coccidian (phylum
Apicomplexa) parasite which causes a severe form of coccidiosis, an enteric disease that is a major welfare and economic
problem for the poultry industry (Dubremetz et al. 1998; Allen
and Fetterer 2002; Wallach 2010; Cowper et al. 2012). Annual
loss due to coccidiosis is estimated in excess of 500 million
worldwide, which includes the cost of prophylactic in-feed
medication, alternative treatment (if the medication fails), and
losses due to mortality, etc. (Shirley et al. 2007).
Eimeria infection involves multiple stages of attachment
to, invasion, and rapid development in intestinal epithelial
cells of the host. Microneme proteins (MICs) are critical for
motility of the parasite, identification, and binding of host cellsurface proteins, invasion of host cells (Carruthers and Tomley
2008; Cowper et al. 2012), and intracellular survival (Tomavo
et al. 2013). MICs also contribute to parasite gliding motility
and egress from host cells after intracellular replication
(Carruthers and Tomley 2008; Kafsack et al. 2009; Ryan
et al. 2000). Micronemes from sporozoites of E. tenella contain around ten abundant proteins (Kawazoe et al. 1992;
Bumstead and Tomley 2000). One of them, EtMIC1, is a
4152
hybridoma cells were dispensed into five 96-well tissue culture plates, and incubated for 10 to 14 days at 37 C in 5 %
CO2.
To screen for positive hybridoma clones, the purified
EtMIC1 or EtMIC2 protein (2 g/well) was used to coat 96well plates with coating buffer (0.2 mol/L Na2CO3/NaHCO3,
pH 9.6) overnight at 4 C. After washing thrice with washing
buffer (phosphate buffered saline with 0.05 % Tween-20
(PBST)), plates were then blocked with phosphate buffered
saline (PBS) containing 2.5 % nonfat milk powder (Amresco,
USA) overnight at 4 C. The 100 l hybridoma supernatant
was added to each well of the plates and incubated for 1 h at
room temperature (RT). Plates were washed thrice and an
HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Promega, USA) in a
1:2,000 dilution was added and incubated for 1 h at RT. After
washing thrice, freshly prepared TMB (Amresco, USA) substrate solution (0.05 mg/ml) was added into the wells. After
30 min incubation at 37 C, the reaction was stopped by
adding 50 l of stopping solution (3 M sulfuric acid). Then,
absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader
(Bio-Rad, USA).
The hybridoma clones with strong reactivity with the
EtMIC1 or EtMIC2 were re-cloned twice by limited dilution,
and their reactivity was re-confirmed by ELISA. Subcloned
hybridoma cells were cultured in the OPTI-MEM medium
(GIBCO, USA) containing 10 % FBS and weaned gradually
to the serum-free medium (Hybridoma-SFM medium,
GIBCO, USA). Hybridomas were then expanded and the
supernatant was harvested twice a week. Immunoglobulin
classes and subclasses of MAbs were determined using an
IsoQuick Mouse Monoclonal Isotyping Kit (Sigma, USA)
following the manufacturers instruction.
Antibody identification
ELISA was used for detecting the MAb specificity. EtMIC3
and EtAMA1 proteins were employed as control proteins. The
indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and Western immunoblotting assays were performed to identify MAbs for their
specific EtMIC1 or EtMIC2 protein recognitions.
Immunofluorescent staining of E. tenella sporozoites
Sporozoites of E. tenella were obtained from sporulated oocysts following the method described by Sasai et al. (2008).
Freshly excysted sporozoites were incubated in DMEM containing 10 % FBS at 41 C for 1 h. About 10 l sporozoite
suspension was smeared on each slide and air-dried. The
sporozoites on the slides were fixed with 4 % polysorbate
(Labb et al. 2005) for 10 min at RT. The slides were washed
thrice using PBS (pH 7.4) and then blocked with PBS containing 2 % (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min. To
each slide, 50 l of the diluted MAbs were added and
4153
4154
Results
Generation of anti-EtMIC1 and anti-EtMIC2 MAbs
Five mouse MAbs were initially selected on the basis of their
specific binding activity against the recombinant E. tenella
microneme protein EtMIC1 or EtMIC2, as shown in Table 1.
MAbs 1-A1, 1-C4, and 1-H2 were positive reacted with the
EtMIC1 protein, and MAbs 9-B9 and 4-C1 recognized the
EtMIC2 protein. All of the MAbs did not bind the unrelated
antigen EtMIC3 or EtAMA1 that was used as a negative
control. Isotypes of MAbs were also shown in Table 1. All
five MAbs were an IgG1 subclass of antibodies that expressed
light chain. Antibody titer values of the harvested supernatant were measured by a checkerboard pattern with several
coating conjugate concentrations and several antibody dilutions after 15 min incubation with TMB. For convenience,
only the data from a coating antigen concentration of 0.2 g
per well and an antibody dilution of 1:100 were shown in
Table 2.
Identification of anti-EtMIC1 and anti-EtMIC2 MAbs
To test the specificity of five MAbs, the yeast surface display
technique was used. The yeast S. cerevisiae was transformed
with expression vectors carrying either EtMIC1 or EtMIC2
gene. The EtMIC1 or EtMIC2 protein was expressed and
displayed on the yeast surface as designed (Sun et al. 2014b)
when the yeast was cultured. Five MAbs and an FITCconjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody were used
to detect EtMIC1 and EtMIC2 proteins displayed on the yeast
cell surface using immunofluorescent labeling assays. The
results showed the strong immunofluorescence on the cell
Table 1 Isotypes and reactivity of EtMIC1/2 monoclonal antibodies
MAbs
1-A1
1-C4
1-H2
9-B9
4-C11
a
Isotype
IgG1-
IgG1-
IgG1-
IgG1-
IgG1-
Reactivity in ELISAa
EtMIC1
EtMIC2
EtMIC3
AMA1
+
+
+
+
+
Optical density values greater than twice the value of negative control
wells (wells coated with 1 % BSA) were considered reactive (+). Optical
density values less than or equal to twice the value of the negative controls
were considered nonreactive ()
4155
EtMIC1
EtMIC2
(1:100)
1-A1
1-C4
1-H2
9-B9
4-C11
Titer
0.5820.01
0.7260.02
0.5790.02
0.6730.03
0.6120.01
Absorbencies were measured by a checkerboard pattern with several coating conjugate concentrations and several antibody dilutions, and measured after
a 15-min incubation with TMB at 37 C
surface of yeasts with each MAb immuno-stained its corresponding protein (Fig. 1ae) and no immunofluorescence on
the cell surface of yeasts transformed with the empty vector
(Fig. 1f). No immunofluorescence was detected on yeast cells
displaying the EtMIC1 labeled with the anti-EtMIC2 (9-B9)
MAb or yeast cells displaying the EtMIC2 labeled with the
anti-EtMIC1 (1-H2) MAb (Fig. 1gh).
The five MAbs were further tested by immunofluorescent
labeling the EtMIC1 or EtMIC2 protein extracted from sporozoites. Freshly excysted sporozoites were incubated together with the five MAbs generated in this work, respectively for
detecting the specificity of each monoclonal antibody. The
specific reaction and recognition were detected by an FITC or
Fig. 1 The yeast surfacedisplayed EtMIC1 and EtMIC2
proteins were
immunofluorescent-labeled either
with anti-EtMIC1 MAbs (a, b,
and c) or with anti-EtMIC2 MAbs
(d and e). ac 1-A1, 1-C4, and 1H2 antibodies. de 9-B9 and 4C11 antibodies. f Yeast cells
displayed the EtMIC1 labeled
without primary antibody as a
control. g Yeast cells displayed
the EtMIC1 labeled with the antiEtMIC2 (9-B9) MAb as a nonspecific binding MAb control. h
Yeast cells displayed the EtMIC2
labeled with the anti-EtMIC1 (1H2) MAb as a non-specific
binding MAb control
4156
Fig. 2 Immunofluorescence
staining of E. tenella sporozoites
with anti-EtMIC1 MAbs (a, b,
and c) or with anti-EtMIC2 MAbs
(d and e). After incubation with
FITC- or TRITC-conjugated
antibodies, slides were observed
by fluorescence microscopy. ac
1-A1, 1-C4, and 1-H2 antibodies.
de 9-B9 and 4-C11 antibodies.
fg Cells labeled without primary
antibodies as controls. hi Using
anti-His-tag MAbs as irrelevant
MAbs controls
used as negative controls on A4, B3, and C2. Lanes A14 were probed
with anti-EtMIC1 MAbs 1-A1, 1-C4, 1-H2, and 1-H2, respectively; lanes
B13 with anti-EtMIC2 MAbs 9-B9, 4-C11, and 4-C11; lanes C12 with
the anti-His-tag MAb used as an irrelevant MAb control
4157
gametophyte stage in cecal tissue at 138, 146, and 150 h PI. Ka, La,
Ma, and Na were enlarged images of ln. Uninfected ceca tissue (i and j)
were labeled with anti-EtMIC1 or anti-EtMIC2 antibodies, respectively.
Mock samples labeled without primary antibodies as controls, Sz schizonts, Mz merozoites, Gt gametophytes, Zt zygote
4158
Fig. 4 (continued)
Discussion
E. tenella is an Apicomplexan parasite whose members possess an apical complex containing an assortment of unique
secretory organelles (rhoptries, micronemes, and dense granules). Apical micronemes are important organelles containing
more than ten proteins that are critical for motility of
E. tenella, for recognizing and binding of host cell-surface
proteins, and for invasion of host cells (Carruthers and Tomley
2008; Cowper et al. 2012). Regulated secretion of proteins
from apical micronemes is required for host cell invasion by
providing adhesive protein complexes that bind receptors on
the host cell surface. The EtMIC1 protein is a soluble
4159
4160
References
Allen PC, Fetterer RH (2002) Recent advances in biology and
immunobiology of Eimeria species and in diagnosis and control of
infection with these coccidian parasites of poultry. Clin Microbiol
Rev 15(1):5865
Belli SI, Ferguson DJ, Katrib M, Slapetova I, Mai K, Slapeta J, Flowers
SA, Miska KB, Tomley FM, Shirley MW, Wallach MG, Smith NC
(2009) Conservation of proteins involved in oocyst wall formation
in Eimeria maxima, Eimeria tenella and Eimeria acervulina. Int J
Parasitol 39:10631070
Bumstead J, Tomley F (2000) Induction of secretion and surface capping
of microneme proteins in Eimeria tenella. Mol Biochem Parasitol
110(2):311321
4161
Tomley FM, Bumstead JM, Billington KJ, Dunn PP (1996) Molecular
cloning and characterization of a novel acidic microneme protein
(Etmic-2) from the Apicomplexan protozoan parasite, Eimeria
tenella. Mol Biochem Parasitol 79(2):195206
Wallach M (2010) Role of antibody in immunity and control of chicken
coccidiosis. Trends Parasitol 26(8):382387
Wan KL, Chong SP, Ng ST, Shirley MW, Tomley FM, Jangi MS (1999)
A survey of genes in Eimeria tenella merozoites by EST sequencing.
Int J Parasitol 29(12):18851892
Wang T, Sun H, Zhang J, Liu Q, Wang L, Chen P, Wang F, Li H, Xiao Y,
Zhao X (2014) The establishment of Saccharomyces boulardii
surface display system using a single expression vector. Fungal
Genet Biol 64:110
Zhang L, Ma L, Liu R, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Hu C, Song M, Cai J, Wang M
(2012) Eimeria tenella heat shock protein 70 enhances protection of
recombinant microneme protein MIC2 subunit antigen vaccination
against E. tenella challenge. Vet Parasitol 188(34):239246
Zhang J, Chen P, Sun H, Liu Q, Wang L, Wang T, Shi W, Li H, Xiao Y,
Wang P, Wang F, Zhao X (2014) Pichia pastoris expressed EtMic2
protein as a potential vaccine against chicken coccidiosis. Vet
Parasitol. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.029
Zhou BH, Wang HW, Wang XY, Zhang LF, Zhang KY, Xue FQ (2010)
Eimeria tenella: effects of diclazuril treatment on microneme genes
expression in second-generation merozoites and pathological changes of caeca in parasitized chickens. Exp Parasitol 125(3):264270