International Journal of Mathematics and

Computer Applications Research (IJMCAR)

ISSN(P): 2249-6955; ISSN(E): 2249-8060
Vol. 6, Issue 2, Apr 2016, 61-66
TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.

PRIME NEAR RINGS WITH GENERALIZED JORDAN DERIVATIONS

C. JAYA SUBBA REDDY1, S. VASANTHA KUMAR2 & S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO3
Department of Mathematics, S. V. University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT
In this paper we proved that

be a 2, 3-torsion free prime near ring. If

such that ( ) , then

derivation

2-torsion free, then

( )=

is a commutative ring and if

. Moreover

satisfies

admits a nonzero generalized Jordan

= , then

is a derivation and

( ) +

( ), for all

, then

. If

is

is a commutative

ring.
KEYWORDS: Prime Ring, Near Ring, Center, Derivation, Generalized Derivation, Jordan Derivation, Generalized
Jordan Derivation

Received: Mar 01, 2016; Accepted: Mar 16, 2016; Published: Mar 30, 2016; Paper Id.: IJMCARAPR201607

Original Article

INTRODUCTION
In [1] Bell. H. E and Mason. G had Proved the following statements:
is 3-prime and 2-torsion free and

(B): If

is a 3-prime 2-torsion free near-ring which admits a nonzero derivation

( ) , then
(C):If

is a derivation such that

= 0, then

(A): If

, then

Preliminaries: Throughout this paper

( ) +

derivation), if (

)= ( ) +

.An additive map :

( ) (resp. (

near ring N is said to be prime if

denote the commutator

( ) ( )=

by Generalized

by Generalized Jordan derivation .

stands for a prime near ring with multiplicative center Z. An

is a derivation (resp. Jordan derivation), if

( ), holds for all ,

such that

is a commutative ring. After that Bell.H.E [2] replaced

derivation . Motivated by the above work we replaced Generalized derivation

additive map

for which

is a Commutative ring.

is 3-prime 2-torsion free near-ring admitting a nonzero derivation

( ) ( ), for all ,

= 0.

)= ( ) +

= 0, for all ,

)=

( ) +

( ) (resp. (

)=

is generalized derivation (resp.generalized Jordan

( ) ), holds for all ,

, implies

= 0 or

.According to [2], a

= 0 .While the symbol [ , ] will

We need the following lemmas:

Lemma 1: [1, Lemma 3] Let

be a 3-prime near ring.

If $ \ 0 , then $ is not a zero divisor.

If \ 0 contains an element $ such that $ + $ , then (N, +) is abelian.

If

www.tjprc.org

is a nonzero derivation and

is suc that

( ) = 0 or ( ) = 0 ,

editor@tjprc.org

62

C. Jaya Subba Reddy, S. Vasantha Kumar & S. Mallikarjuna Rao

then

= 0.
Lemma 2: [3, Proposition 1] If

( ), for all ,

is an arbitrary near ring and

is a derivation on

)=

( ) +

Lemma 3: Let

be an arbitrary near ring and let

be a generalized Jordan derivation on

(&)& + & (&) ' = (&)&' + & (&)', for all &, ', (

derivation .Then

, then (

Proof: Clearly (& ') = (& )' + &

with associated

(').

(1)

&(&') = (&)&' + & (&')

= (&)&' + &( (&)' + & ('))
= (&)&' + & (&)' + &

(').

(2)

Comparing (1) & (2), we get

(&)& + & (&) ' = (&)&' + & (&)', for all &, ', (
Lemma 4: Let ) be a 3-prime near ring, and let
0. If ( ( )) = 0 , then

be a generalized Jordan derivation with associated derivation

( ) = 0.
( ) = 0, for all

Proof: We are assuming that

We have to find out ( (

), for all

For that we take

( (

( ) +

( ( ) )+

( )

)=

( ) =0

( ) =0

+ ( ) ( )+ ( ) ( )+

( ) ( )+ ( ) ( )+

( (
Put
( (

( )=0

)) = ( ) ( ) + ( ) ( ) +
=

( )=0

( ) = 0.

in equation (3), we get

)= ( ) ( )+ ( ) ( )+

Applying

( ) = 0.

again, we get

( ( ) ( )+ ( ) ( )+

( )) = 0

( ( )) ( ) + ( )

(x)D(x) + D(x)

( )

(x) +

Substitute
( )

(3)

(x) +

(x)D(x) + D(x)

(x) + D(x)

(x) + D(x)
(x) + x

/ (x)

(x) + x
= 0.

/ (x)

=0
(4)

for ( ) in equation (3), we get

( )+ ( )

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

( )+

/(

) = 0.

(5)

NAAS Rating: 3.80

Prime Near Rings With Generalized Jordan Derivations

63

Substitute (5) in (4), we get

(x) ( ) + D(x)
Substitute

(x) = 0.

(6)

in ( ) in equation (3), we get

( ) ( )+ ( )

( ( )) ( ) +
Substitute

in

( ) = 0.

(7)

in equation (7), we get

( ( )) ( ) +

( ) ( )+ ( )

( ) = 0.

Substitute (6) in above equation, we get

( ( )) ( ) = 0, for all

Thus, by lemma1 (iii), ( ( )) = 0, for all

The Main Theorems

Theorem 1: (i) Let
such that ( ) , then
(ii) If
all ,

be a 3-prime 2-torsion free near ring. If

admits a non zero generalized Jordan derivation

is a commutative ring.

is 3-prime 2-torsion free near-ring admitting a nonzero derivation

, then

( ) ( )=

( ) ( ), for

is a commutative ring.

Proof: (i): From lemma 4, we have if ( ( )) = 0 , then

Since

such that

0,

( ) = 0.

such that 0 ( )

Since ( ) + ( ) = ( + ) ,
(N,+) is abelian by lemma1(ii)
To complete the proof, we show that
First, consider the case
So that (

)= ( ) +

is multiplicatively commutative.

= 0.
( ) = ( ) , for all

Then ( ) 1 = 1 ( )
( ) 1 ( )1 = 0
( )( 1 1 ) = 0.
( )[ , 1] = 0.
0, then [ , 1] = 0.
Now assume that
Then (
( ( ) +

www.tjprc.org

0, and let

)= ( ) +

\0

( ) .

( )) = ( ( ) +

( )), for all ,

, and lemma 3 we see tat

editor@tjprc.org

64

C. Jaya Subba Reddy, S. Vasantha Kumar & S. Mallikarjuna Rao

Since both ( ) in , we have

( )(

) = 0, for all ,

Provided that ( ) 0 , we can conclude that

0 and ( ) = 0 .

Proof: (ii) Assume that

( ) = 0, for all

In particular
Note that for

such that ( ) = 0.

)= ( ) +

is commutative.

( )=

( )

Hence by lemma 2, ( ) ( )

and ( ) ( ) , for each ,

. If one of these is zero, the other is a

central element squaring to 0, hence is also 0.The remaining possibility is that ( ) ( ) and
central elements, in which case ( ) is not a zero diviser. Thus ( ) ( ) ( ) =

( ) ( ) are non-zero

( ) ( ) ( ) yields

( )( ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )) = 0.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) = 0. Consequently,
Theorem2: Let
derivation .If

be a 3- prime near ring and let

/

= 0,then
(

Proof: We have
( (

)=

) = 0.

( ) +

Now we have to find

( (

( ) =0
( )+ ( )
(

( )+

/(

) = 0.

(8)

)=0

)=0

( ) +

( ) =0

( ( ) )+

( ) =0

( ) + ( ) ( )+ ( ) ( )+
( ) ( )+ ( ) ( )+
substitute ( ) for
( )

be a generalized Jordan derivation on N with associated

is 2-torsion free,then ($) = 0 .

= 0.Moreover, if

( ) ( )+ ( )

is commutative.

( )+ ( )

( )+

It now follows from (10) that

Then if ,

( ) = 0.

(9)

in equation (9) gives

From (8) & (10) we get ( )

Suppose now that

( )=0

/(

) = 0.

( ) = 0, for all
/(

) = 0, for all

(10)

(11)
and since

is 2-torsion free and that ($) 0 and let $

is 3-prime,

= 0.

be such that ($) 0.

and ( ) = 0 , then

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating: 3.80

Prime Near Rings With Generalized Jordan Derivations

( $) = ( )$ +

($) = 0

($) = 0 and since

65

is 3-prime and ($) is not a zero devisor, = 0.

= 0 and hence by (2) that

It follows from equation (10) that

= 0.

But this contradicts our assumption that ($) 0 .

Hence ($) = 0 .
Theorem 3: Let
that

be a 2, 3-torsion free prime near ring with 1. If

= 0 and (1) , then

is a generalized Jordan derivation on

such

= 0.

Proof: ( ) = (1. ) = (1) + 1 ( ).

So ( ) = ( + ( ), ( $.
If ( = 0, then

(12)
= 0, so

and

= 0 by (A) and therefore

If ( 0, then ( is not a zero divisor, hence by equation (11)

But then ( ) = ( and

( )=(

= 0, for all

Since ( is not a zero divisor, we get

= 0.

= 0 and

= 0.

= 0 is a contradiction.

Thus ( = 0.
Let us we introduced a generalized derivation
(

)=

( ) +

( ) , for all

also satisfied the following property

, where

is derivation. (*)

Using the above property we prove the following theorem:

Theorem 4: Let

be a 2, 3-torsion free prime near ring which admits a generalized Jordan derivation

zero associated derivation

such that

satisfies (*).Then

Proof: From lemma 4 says that ( )

with non

is a commutative ring.

or ( ( ) = 0 , then ( ( ) = 0

Now we calculate ( ( ) ( )) in two ways

Using the defining property of , we obtain
( ) ( ) =

( )

( )+ ( )
( ) ( ) =

And using (*), we obtain

Thus

( ) ( )=

( )=

( )

( ), for all

( )

( ). (13)

( ) ( )+ ( )

( ) =

( ) ( )

But from lemma4, equation (6), we get

( )

( ) = 0 , for all

Hence by lemma 1(iii) and using (A), we have

Then

www.tjprc.org

= 0, thus

= 0.

is commutative.

editor@tjprc.org

66

C. Jaya Subba Reddy, S. Vasantha Kumar & S. Mallikarjuna Rao

CONCLUSIONS
In this paper we proved that Nbe a 2,3-torsion free prime near ring. If N admits a nonzero generalized Jordan
derivation f such that f(N) Z, then N is a commutative ringand if D is a derivation and f = 0, then D/ = 0 . If N is 2torsion free, then D(Z) = 0 . Moreover f satisfies f(x ) = D(x)x + xf(x), for all x N, then N is a commutative ring
REFERENCES
1.

Bell.

H.

and

Mason.

G:

On

derivations

in

near-

rings,

in

(Tubingen,1985),G.Betsch,Ed.,vol.137of North-Holland Mathematics studies,

near

rings

and

near

fields

31-35, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The

Netherlands,1987.
2.

Bell. H. E: On prime Near-Rings with Generalized derivation, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical
Sciences, Vol, 2008, 1-5, 2008.

3.

Wang. X.-K: Derivations in prime near-rings, proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol.121, no.2, 361-366,1994.

Impact Factor (JCC): 4.6257

NAAS Rating: 3.80