Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Power Quality - 3
Ljubljana, Slovenia
2013/14
Prof. dr. Igor Papi
igor.papic@fe.uni-lj.si
Content
1st day
2nd day
3rd day
Session 1
Introduction to
Power Quality
what is PQ
economic value
responsibilities
Harmonics
definitions
calculations
non-linear loads
harmonic
sequences
Harmonics - design
of power factor
correction devices
resonance points
filter design
Session 2
Propagation of
harmonics
sources
consequences
cancellation
Flicker - basic
terms
voltage variation
flicker frequency
sources
flickermeter
Session 3
PQ standards
EN 50 160
other standards
limit values
Harmonics resonances in
network
parallel
resonance
series resonance
Flicker spreading
radial network
mashed network
simulation
examples
Session 4
PQ monitoring
measurements
PQ analyzers
data analyses
Harmonics case
study
calculation of
frequency
impedance
characteristics
Flicker mitigation
system solutions
network
enforcement
compensation
4th day
Flicker case study
calculation of
flicker spreading
in radial network
variation of
network
parameters
Voltage sags
definitions
characteristics
types
causes
Propagation of
voltage sags
transformer
connections
equipment
sensitivity
mitigation
Other voltage
variations
unbalance
voltage
transients
overvoltages
5th day
Interruptions
definitions
reliability indices
improving
reliability
Consequences of
inadequate power
quality
voltage quality
interruptions
costs
Modern
compensation
devices
active and hybrid
compensators
series and shunt
compensators
Conclusions
PQ improvement
and costs
definition of
optimal solutions
detuned filter
series connection of inductor and capacitor
resonance frequency is below the characteristic harmonic
(141 Hz, 225 Hz)
good response under different operating conditions
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 4
usc = 4,13 %
rated power
S n = 1 x 0,63 MVA
rated voltage
U MV = 20 kV; U LV = 0,4 kV
ratio R/X
( R / X )TR = 1 / 4
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 5
LTR =
2
U LV
u sc
1
= 32,4 H
2
100 S n 100 1 + ( R / X )TR
RTR =
2
U NN
u sc ( R / X )TR
= 2,54 m
2
S n 100 1 + ( R / X )TR
Z TR ( j 2 f ) = RTR + j 2 f LTR
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 6
100
10
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
10
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
10
0.1
0.01
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
10
0.1
0.01
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0.1
0.01
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.1
0.01
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
equivalent circuit with detuned filter
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
data for calculation of detuned filter
rated voltage
U LV = 0,4 kV
reactive power
Q f = 0,40 MVAr
filter frequency
ratio R/X of C
( R / X ) fC = 1 / 50
ratio R/X of L
( R / X ) fL = 1 / 10
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 16
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
calculation of parameters of detuned filter
detuned filter
141 Hz, p = 12,5 %
225 Hz, p = 5,0 %
p = 2Lf C f =
2
50 2
= 2
2
(2 f r ) f r
p(141 Hz ) = 0,05;
p (225 Hz ) = 0,125
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
calculation of parameters of detuned filter
detuned filter
Cf =
Q f (1 p )
2
100 U LV
C f (141 Hz ) = 6,96 mF ;
Lf =
C f (225 Hz ) = 7,57 mF
(2 f r )2 C f
L f (141 Hz ) = 0,183 mH ;
L f (225 Hz ) = 0,066 mH
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 18
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
calculation of parameters of detuned filter
detuned filter
Rf =
1
( R / X ) fC + 2 50 C f ( R / X ) fL
2 50 C f
R f (141 Hz ) = 15 m;
R f (225 Hz ) = 10 m
Z f ( j 2 f ) = R f + j 2 f Lf +
1
j 2 f C f
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
voltage harmonic source is on the network side
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
harmonic source is on the network side
impedance from the network side
series resonance
Z1 ( j ) = Z SC ( j ) + ZTR ( j ) +
1
1
1
+
Z L ( j ) Z f ( j )
absolute value Z1 ( j ) = Z1 ( j 2 f )
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 21
100
10
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
10
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
10
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
100
10
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
current harmonic source is on the load side
Detuned filter
frequency impedance characteristics
harmonic source is on the load side
impedance from the load side
parallel resonance
Z 2 ( j ) =
1
1
1
1
+
+
Z L ( j ) Z f ( j ) Z SC ( j ) + ZTR ( j )
absolute value Z 2 ( j ) = Z 2 ( j 2 f )
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 27
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
10
impedance
characteristics
as a function
of frequency
comparison with
classical
compensator
0.1
0.01
1 .10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Content
1st day
2nd day
3rd day
Session 1
Introduction to
Power Quality
what is PQ
economic value
responsibilities
Harmonics
definitions
calculations
non-linear loads
harmonic
sequences
Harmonics - design
of power factor
correction devices
resonance points
filter design
Session 2
Propagation of
harmonics
sources
consequences
cancellation
Flicker - basic
terms
voltage variation
flicker frequency
sources
flickermeter
Session 3
PQ standards
EN 50 160
other standards
limit values
Harmonics resonances in
network
parallel
resonance
series resonance
Flicker spreading
radial network
mashed network
simulation
examples
Session 4
PQ monitoring
measurements
PQ analyzers
data analyses
Harmonics case
study
calculation of
frequency
impedance
characteristics
Flicker mitigation
system solutions
network
enforcement
compensation
4th day
Flicker case study
calculation of
flicker spreading
in radial network
variation of
network
parameters
Voltage sags
definitions
characteristics
types
causes
Propagation of
voltage sags
transformer
connections
equipment
sensitivity
mitigation
Other voltage
variations
unbalance
voltage
transients
overvoltages
5th day
Interruptions
definitions
reliability indices
improving
reliability
Consequences of
inadequate power
quality
voltage quality
interruptions
costs
Modern
compensation
devices
active and hybrid
compensators
series and shunt
compensators
Conclusions
PQ improvement
and costs
definition of
optimal solutions
11
Voltage fluctuation
What is flicker?
Flicker frequency
Causes of flicker
Flicker evaluation
Flicker meter
Compatibility and planning levels
Voltage fluctuation
What is flicker?
12
What is flicker?
13
f 0 = 50 Hz
f f = 3 Hz
case 2
v (t ) = V (1 + m cos f t ) cos 0t
m
m
f 0 = 50 Hz
f 0 + f f = 53 Hz
f 0 f f = 47 Hz
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 40
Causes of flicker
loads drawing
large and highly
variable currents
arc furnaces
installations
voltage 20 kV
time (s)
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 41
Causes of flicker
Voltage (%)
14
Causes of flicker
welding machines
motor drives with cycloconverters
simulation results (interharmonics)
time
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 43
Causes of flicker
wind farms in distributed production
switching of capacitor banks
households
pumps, refrigerators, air conditioning, washing
machines, drills
devices with heavy-start motors
Flicker evaluation
flicker meter
IEC 61000-4-15: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Testing and measurements techniques - Section
15: Flickermeter - Functional and design specifications
flicker severity intensity of flicker annoyance defined
by the UIE-IEC flicker measuring method and evaluated
by short and long term severity
15
Flicker evaluation
flicker meter
short term severity Pst measured over a period of 10
minutes
long term severity Plt calculated from a sequence of
12 Pst values over a two hour interval, according to the
following expression:
12
Plt =
P
i =1
3
sti
12
Flicker evaluation
comparison between Plt and Pst
BLOCK 1
BLOCK 2
BLOCK 3
BLOCK 4
dB
0
-3
U / U
(%)
-60
0,05
input
voltage
adaptor
35
Hz
8,8
demodulator
weighting filter
voltage
mesurement
BLOCK 5
range
selector
calculation
of
Pst
X2
and
Plt
Hz
statistical
evaluation
squaring
and
smoothing
Pst
and
Plt
16
Scheme of a flickermeter
Scheme of a flickermeter
Pst = 0,0314 P0,1 + 0,0525 P1s + 0,0657 P3s + 0,28 P10 s + 0,08 P50 s
smoothed percentil values
i.e. P0.1 the level exceeded by only 0.1 % of the observation
period (10 minutes)
17
Flicker value
Flicker value
Pst = m Pstmi
i =1
18
quantity
Pst
1.0
Plt
0.8
quantity
planning levels
(IEC/TR3 61000-3-7)
planning levels
MV
HV
Pst
0.9
0.8
Plt
0.7
0.6
Flicker spreading
19
Content
1st day
2nd day
3rd day
Session 1
Introduction to
Power Quality
what is PQ
economic value
responsibilities
Harmonics
definitions
calculations
non-linear loads
harmonic
sequences
Harmonics - design
of power factor
correction devices
resonance points
filter design
Session 2
Propagation of
harmonics
sources
consequences
cancellation
Flicker - basic
terms
voltage variation
flicker frequency
sources
flickermeter
Session 3
PQ standards
EN 50 160
other standards
limit values
Harmonics resonances in
network
parallel
resonance
series resonance
Flicker spreading
radial network
mashed network
simulation
examples
Session 4
PQ monitoring
measurements
PQ analyzers
data analyses
Harmonics case
study
calculation of
frequency
impedance
characteristics
Flicker mitigation
system solutions
network
enforcement
compensation
4th day
Flicker case study
calculation of
flicker spreading
in radial network
variation of
network
parameters
Voltage sags
definitions
characteristics
types
causes
Propagation of
voltage sags
transformer
connections
equipment
sensitivity
mitigation
Other voltage
variations
unbalance
voltage
transients
overvoltages
5th day
Interruptions
definitions
reliability indices
improving
reliability
Consequences of
inadequate power
quality
voltage quality
interruptions
costs
Modern
compensation
devices
active and hybrid
compensators
series and shunt
compensators
Conclusions
PQ improvement
and costs
definition of
optimal solutions
Flicker spreading
calculation of voltage variation
dynamic load
U1
R, X
XI
U1
U2
P, Q
U2
RI
cos 1
U1 U 2 = R I cos + X I sin
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 59
Flicker spreading
relative voltage variation
U 1 U 2 R U 2 I cos + X U 2 I sin
=
U2
U 22
U R P + X Q
=
Un
U n2
U X Q Q
=
Un
U n2
S sc
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 60
20
Flicker spreading
relative voltage variation
active and reactive power variations of an arc furnace
Flicker spreading
flicker level decreases in the direction from the
disturbing load towards supply source
flicker level practically does not change in a radial
direction from the disturbing load where are no
supply sources
flicker reduction on transformers
Flicker spreading
transfer coefficient of flicker in a radial network
between point A and P (disturbing load)
TC AP =
Pst (A )
Pst (P )
P
P
21
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading in a radial network
case A
A
P
P
ZA
ZAP
ZA
Z A + Z AP
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading in radial network
case B
A
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading in radial network
case C
A
P
P
Z A + Z AB
Z A + Z AB + Z BP
22
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading in radial network
case D
A
P
P
steady-state calculation
dynamic simulations
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading in mashed network
v x =
Vx V 0, x V 1, x
=
V 0, x + V 1, x
Vx
kvij =
vi
v j
23
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading
in mashed
network
load flow method
comparison with
measurements
variation of load
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading in mashed network
current injection method
0 Y11
M .
0 .
I A = .
0 .
M .
0 Y N1
.
.
.
Y AA
.
.
.
.
Y1N V 1
. V 2
. M
. V A
. M
. VN-1
Y NN V N
V = Y 1I
kvij =
(V i )
(V j )
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading
in mashed
network
current injection
method
comparison with
measurements
variation of
injected current
24
Flicker spreading
flicker spreading through transformers
in a radial direction from the disturbing load towards
lower voltage levels (first approximation is value 1)
transfer coefficient of flicker from EHV to HV level is
approximately 0.8
transfer coefficient of flicker from HV to MV level is
approximately 0.9 (worst case)
transfer coefficient of flicker from MV to LV level is
approximately 1
network model
calibration of the model wit measurement results
simulation of flicker spreading in all nodes
present situation
future situation (2020)
analysis of compensation measures
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 74
25
voltage
level (kV)
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
L1
L2
L3
7,41
2,87
1,62
1,256
1,25
7,50
2,80
1,48
1,331
1,33
7,85
2,68
1,57
1,415
1,41
0,85
0,74
0,79
0,92
0,90
0,87
0,69
0,80
0,95
0,94
0,92
0,80
0,85
1,02
1,00
1,47
0,82
0,60
1,44
0,76
0,62
1,33
0,79
0,56
0,50
0,50
0,51
0,52
0,48
0,53
voltage
level (kV)
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
110
220
220
220
400
400
400
400
L1
L2
L3
0,50
0,60
0,81
0,72
0,81
0,39
0,30
0,40
0,63
0,56
0,52
0,52
0,75
0,88
1,98
0,40
0,31
0,37
0,61
0,58
0,53
0,51
0,78
0,75
0,87
0,56
0,44
0,41
0,65
0,60
0,34
0,56
0,35
0,58
0,41
0,60
0,59
0,41
0,74
0,27
0,59
0,42
0,74
0,23
0,60
0,46
0,74
0,59
26
time (s)
current (A)
time (s)
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 81
27
time (s)
current (A)
time (s)
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 82
Measurement results
arc furnace 40
MVA
voltage at 110 kV
voltage at 20 kV
current at 20 kV
Measurement results
arc furnace 40
MVA
voltage at 110 kV
voltage at 20 kV
current at 20 kV
28
Measurement results
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
10
15
20
25
12%
0%
29%
33%
17%
51%
67%
71%
20%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
110 kV
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
220 kV
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
400 kV
percentage of nodes
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 86
29
0%
0%
19%
49%
27%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
110 kV
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
Plt>1,5
100%
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
220 kV
Plt>1,5
100% 0,6<Plt<1
1<Plt<1,5
Plt>0,6
400 kV
percentage of nodes
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 88
Flicker mitigation
30
Content
1st day
2nd day
3rd day
Session 1
Introduction to
Power Quality
what is PQ
economic value
responsibilities
Harmonics
definitions
calculations
non-linear loads
harmonic
sequences
Harmonics - design
of power factor
correction devices
resonance points
filter design
Session 2
Propagation of
harmonics
sources
consequences
cancellation
Flicker - basic
terms
voltage variation
flicker frequency
sources
flickermeter
Session 3
PQ standards
EN 50 160
other standards
limit values
Harmonics resonances in
network
parallel
resonance
series resonance
Flicker spreading
radial network
mashed network
simulation
examples
Session 4
PQ monitoring
measurements
PQ analyzers
data analyses
Harmonics case
study
calculation of
frequency
impedance
characteristics
Flicker mitigation
system solutions
network
enforcement
compensation
4th day
Flicker case study
calculation of
flicker spreading
in radial network
variation of
network
parameters
Voltage sags
definitions
characteristics
types
causes
Propagation of
voltage sags
transformer
connections
equipment
sensitivity
mitigation
Other voltage
variations
unbalance
voltage
transients
overvoltages
5th day
Interruptions
definitions
reliability indices
improving
reliability
Consequences of
inadequate power
quality
voltage quality
interruptions
costs
Modern
compensation
devices
active and hybrid
compensators
series and shunt
compensators
Conclusions
PQ improvement
and costs
definition of
optimal solutions
Flicker mitigation
System enforcement
line disconnection
31
Okroglo 110 kV
sunkovit
Okroglo 110 kV
ostali
TR 412
400/110 kV
Plt = 1,13
Okroglo 110 kV
TR 412
400/110 kV
TR 411
400/110 kV
Okroglo 400 kV
Plt = 0,71
RTP Jeklarna
sunkovit odjem
Plt = 1,13
Plt = 3,03
Plt = 0,47
Plt = 3,44
RTP Jeklarna
sunkovit odjem
TR 411
400/110 kV
Okroglo 400 kV
Plt = 0,52
Plt = 0,71
electrical separation of
disturbing loads
connected substation
busbars
arc furnace is supplied
by two transformers in
parallel
electrical separation of
disturbing loads
disconnected substation
busbars
arc furnace is supplied
by one transformers
32
Compensation measures
series reactor
for minor flicker level reduction
in the point of common coupling
redistribution of flicker level
influences the operation of arc
furnace
series
reactors
arc
Compensation measures
Static Var Compensator SVC
flicker and reactive power
compensation
controllable shunt connected reactance
TCR Thyristor Controlled Reactor is
the main element
reactive compensation current is a
function of voltage
flicker reduction factor is up to 2
reliable good operational
experiences
small operational losses
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 98
Compensation measures
Static Var Compensator SVC
single-line diagram
TCR
fixed capacitors
filters
and
33
Compensation measures
Static Var Compensator SVC
voltage profile improvement with SVC
Compensation measures
Static Var Compensator SVC
arc furnace performance improvement with SVC
Compensation measures
Static Var Compensator SVC
practical applications
34
Compensation measures
Static Compensator - StatCom
flicker and reactive power
compensation
controllable source of reactive
current
Voltage Sources Converter - VSC
is the main element
employs GTO thyristors or IGBTs
flicker reduction factor is up to 5
not a lot of operational
experiences
higher operational losses
compared to SVC
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 103
Compensation measures
Static Compensator StatCom
single-line diagram
VSC
fixed capacitors
(tuned filters)
Compensation measures
Static Compensator StatCom
voltage profile improvement with StatCom
increased power of arc furnace
35
Compensation measures
Static Compensator StatCom
substantial flicker level reduction
Compensation measures
Static Compensator StatCom
comparison of the arc furnace currents with the
compensated grid currents
Compensation measures
Static Compensator StatCom
first StatCom application for flicker mitigation Hagfors,
Sweden (ABB commercial name SVC Light)
36
0%
0%
29%
33%
17%
51%
67%
71%
20%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
110 kV
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
220 kV
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
400 kV
percentage of nodes
4%
0%
0%
24%
66%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>1,5
Plt<0,6
110 kV
100%
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt>0,6
Plt>1,5
100% 0,6<Plt<1
1<Plt<1,5
220 kV
Plt>0,6
400 kV
percentage of nodes
0%
0%
16%
29%
33%
61%
17%
67%
71%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
110 kV
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
220 kV
Plt<0,6
percentage of nodes
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
400 kV
37
0%
0%
29%
33%
14%
53%
21%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
67%
71%
Plt>1,5
110 kV
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
Plt>1,5
220 kV
1<Plt<1,5
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
400 kV
percentage of nodes
Power Quality, Ljubljana, 2013/14 112
0%
0%
17%
82%
Plt>1,5
1<Plt<1,5
110 kV
0,6<Plt<1
Plt<0,6
Plt>1,5
100% 0,6<Plt<1
1<Plt<1,5
220 kV
Plt<0,6
percentage of nodes
Plt>1,5
100% 0,6<Plt<1
1<Plt<1,5
Plt<0,6
400 kV
38