Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The pulp and paper sector is a significant energy user and currently ranks fourth in the
industrial sector for its energy use. In 2006, the sector consumed 6.7 EJ of energy, which
represents 6% of global industrial energy use. Despite high energy use, the sector has a
low CO2 intensity due to extensive use of biomass as fuel (in 2006, the emissions of the sector
reached 184 Mt, representing only 3% of global emissions in 2006).1 The total energy saving
potential in the sector through improved process efficiency and systems/life cycle
improvements has been estimated to be in the range of 2.1-2.4 EJ/year.2
The processes used to produce pulp and to dry paper are the major energy consumers in the
industry. The main production facilities are either pulp mills or integrated paper and pulp
mills. Integrated mills have better energy efficiency.
Kraft pulping is the most extensively used chemical pulping process. It produces highquality fibers for higher paper grades. However, it requires large amounts of heat energy and
has a low fiber yield. Kraft mills are able to meet most or all of their energy needs from byproducts (i.e. black liquor) and they can even be a net exporter of energy. Similarly, sulfite
pulping, which is used for speciality papers, has a high energy consumption but can selfgenerate a large part of a mill's energy needs from by-products.
Mechanical pulping produces weaker fibers but it has a high yield, giving it a lower specific
final energy demand. Higher efficiencies are enabled by applications such as thermomechanical pulping, where heat is recovered at diffent grades. However, as electricity is the
main energy used, this technology may have high primary energy demand and CO2 emissions.
Pulp production from recovered fibers requires substantially less energy compared to virgin
pulp (the BAT values for recovered fiber is 0.7-3 GJ/t compared to around 14.3 GJ/t for Kraft
pulping).1 It is a promising option for reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions, with
estimates projected to be as high as 35%. However, the availability of recovered paper is
sometimes limited and resolving this issue will require changes to other parts of the paper
production lifecycle.
The amount of energy used by paper machines is generally dependent on the pulp quality
and paper grade, and it can show big variations. Integrated mills can achieve higher energy
efficiency by eliminating intermediate pulp drying and using better processes.
Application of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) can significantly enhance the energy
efficiency of pulp and paper industry. The CHP potential in the paper and pulp industry is
estimated to be in the range of 0.3-0.6 EJ/year. Typically, the introduction of CHP can result in
fuel savings of about 10-20% and energy savings of 30% compared to traditional
technologies.2,5
The IEA believes black-liquor gasification and bio-refinery concepts, advanced paper-drying
techniques, increased paper recycling, and carbon capture and storage will play a key role in
reducing energy consumption and GHG emissions in industry.4
benchmarks
A typical mill usually produces several types of pulp or paper, and uses various wood species
and different mixes of fiber raw material. Although the specific energy consumption of
different product types can be known, the total annual consumption usually fluctuates
depending on the distribution of production. There are also differences in the types of
production and the subprocesses involved. Collectively, these factors makes benchmarking
between different plants a challenge. Further, the impact of different energy efficiency
measures on product quality (e.g. tensile strength, freeness, opacity) creates an additional
challenge.
Meaningful benchmarking is often possible for mills working with certain types of pulp and
paper, using the same type of production, and involving comparable subprocesses.5 The tables
below provide best practice values for both stand-alone and integrated pulp and paper mills.
World Best Practice Final and Primary Energy Intensity Values for Stand-Alone Pulp Mills 1
Raw
Material
Product
Fuel Use
Steam
for Steam Exported
(GJ/ADt)
(GJ/ADt)
Process
Electricity
Use
(kWh/ADt)
Electricity
Produced
(kWh/ADt)
T
(GJ
Nonwood
Market
Pulp
Pulping
10.5
Wood
Market
Pulp
Kraft
11.2
640 1939
Sulfite
16
700 2121
18.
5
219
6636
0
6.6
330 1000
1.5
-4.2
Thermomechanical
Paper
Recovered
Pulp
400 1212
-1.3
0.3
7.7
-655 -1985
11.
1
World Best Practice Final and Primary Energy Intensity Values for Stand-Alone Paper Mills
Raw
Material
Product
Process
Electricity
Use
(kWh/ADt)
To
(GJ/
Pulp
Paper
machine
6.7
640 1939
9.0
Paper
machine
7.5
810 2455
10.4 1
Newsprint
Paper
machine
5.1
570 1727
7.2
Board
Paper
machine
6.7
800 2424
9.6
Kraftliner
Paper
machine
5.9
535 1621
7.8
World Best Practice Final and Primary Energy Intensity Values for Stand-Alone Paper Mills
Raw
Material
Product
Process
Electricity
Use
(kWh/ADt)
To
(GJ/
Paper
machine
Tissue
100
3030
0
6.9
10.5 1
World Best Practice Final and Primary Energy Intensity Values for Integrated Pulp and Paper M
Raw
Material
Product
Proces
s
Final
Wood
Electricity
Use
(kWh/ADt)
To
(GJ/
Kraft
14
14
120
3636
0
18.3 2
Kraft
14
14
100
3030
0
17.6 2
Sulfite
17
14
150
3030
0
22.4 2
Sulfite
18
17
120
4545
0
22.3 3
Newsprint
TMP
-1.3
18
220
3636
0
6.6 3
Magazine paper
TMP
-0.3
-1.3
210
6667
0
7.3
Board
50%
TMP
3.5
-0.3
230
6364
0
11.8 2
3.5
900 6970
11.2 2
Newsprint (de-inked)
100 2727
7.6 1
World Best Practice Final and Primary Energy Intensity Values for Integrated Pulp and Paper M
Raw
Material
Product
Proces
s
Final
Electricity
Use
(kWh/ADt)
To
(GJ/
Tissue (de-inked)
120
3030
0
Benchmark Footnotes:
[1]
Worrell, E., Price, L., Neelis, M., Galitsky, C., Nan, Z. (2008). "World Best Practice Energy
Intensity Values for Selected Industrial Sectors", Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
11.3 1