You are on page 1of 38

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

William G. Klain (AZ Bar No. 015851)


George H. King (AZ Bar No. 013287)
Lang & Klain, P.C.
8767 E. Via de Commercio, Suite 102
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
wklain@lang-klain.com
gking@lang-klain.com
filingKAL@lang-klain.com
Telephone: 480-947-1911
Kelly IP, LLP
David M. Kelly (DC Bar No. 642080; pro hac vice application pending)
Robert D. Litowitz (DC Bar No. 358658; pro hac vice application to be filed)
Anjie Vichayanonda (VA Bar No. 85471; pro hac vice application pending)
1919 M Street, NW, Suite 610
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: (202) 808-3570
Attorneys for the Plaintiff,
The Dial Corporation
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

12
13
14
15

The Dial Corporation, a Delaware


corporation,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18

v.
The Procter & Gamble Company, an Ohio
corporation,
Defendant.

19

Civil Action No. _____________


VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR:
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT,
FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN,
DILUTION, AND UNFAIR
COMPETITION
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

20
21

Plaintiff The Dial Corporation (Dial) brings this action against Defendant The

22

Procter & Gamble Company (P&G). Dial alleges as follows, upon actual knowledge

23

with respect to itself and its own acts, and upon information and belief as to all other

24

matters:

25
26
27
28

NATURE OF THE ACTION


1.

This is an action for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1114(1),

trademark infringement and false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. 1125(a),

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 2 of 38

trademark dilution under 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), trademark dilution under A.R.S. 44-

1448.01, and common-law trademark infringement and unfair competition.

2.

For over 90 years, Dials PUREX brand of laundry products has earned its

place on supermarket and household shelves. Competing against larger brands such as

P&Gs TIDE, Dials PUREX has commanded a significant share of the laundry detergent

market. Dial has emphasized the PUR component of its famous PUREX mark through

its use of the companion trademarks PURECLEAN, PURECLEAN TECHNOLOGY,

and PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. (the PURECLEAN Marks).

3.

Now, however, P&Gs TIDEthe market leader by a wide marginis

10

poised to dilute the distinctiveness of the decades-old PUREX brand and swamp Dials

11

PURECLEAN Marksand to confuse consumerswith a new eco-friendly version of

12

TIDE named PURCLEAN. Already, P&G has widely publicized the impending launch

13

of its new PURCLEAN product.

14

4.

The result would be nothing short of disastrous for the PUREX brand that

15

Dial and its predecessors have nurtured for decades. Many shoppers, unfamiliar with the

16

corporations behind the many brands of laundry products, will assume that Tide or P&G

17

owns or has swallowed-up PUREX. Even worse, shoppers may think that Dial is

18

infringing P&Gs PURCLEAN brand.

19

5.

P&G was well aware of the famous PUREX mark and the companion

20

PUR marks of its longstanding rival Dial when it selected the PURCLEAN mark. And

21

P&G is on notice that its new PURCLEAN brand will likely create consumer confusion.

22
23
24
25

Indeed, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected P&Gs PURCLEAN
trademark because it conflicts with Dials prior rights and is likely to confuse consumers.
Yet P&G has ignored Dials trademark rights and the publics right to be free from
confusion.

26
27
28
2

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 3 of 38

6.

Dial therefore brings this Complaint to protect its valuable trademarks and

to protect the public from the confusion that will likely exist if P&G goes forward with its

PURCLEAN campaign and launches the PURCLEAN product.

4
5
6
7
8

THE PARTIES
7.

Dial is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business located

at 7201 E. Henkel Way, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255.


8.

P&G is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business located at

One Procter & Gamble Plaza, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202.

9
10

JURISDICTION AND VENUE


9.

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to

11

15 U.S.C. 1121 and 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a) and (b). This Court has supplemental

12

jurisdiction over Dials state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367 because those

13

claims are so related to their federal claims that they form part of the same case or

14

controversy and derive from a common nucleus of operative facts.

15

10.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over P&G and venue is proper in the

16

District of Arizona pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c). P&G transacts business in

17

this state, including by promoting the PURCLEAN product that violates Dials

18

trademarks. In addition, Dials claims arise in part in this District, and a substantial

19

portion of the activity about which Dial complains has taken place in this District.

20

Further, P&G has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of acting in this District by,

21

among other things, regularly conducting business in this District, including offering and

22
23
24
25
26

selling its products through retail stores located in this District, advertising and promoting
its products, including the infringing PURCLEAN product, to customers in this District
and providing a website with its products through which customers in this District can
purchase P&Gs products. Venue is also proper because P&G is subject to personal
jurisdiction in this District.

27
28
3

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 4 of 38

PLAINTIFF, ITS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, AND ITS TRADEMARKS

I.

Dials Business Generally

11.

Dial is a leading manufacturer of consumer products, including products in

4
5

the laundry, home care, beauty, skin and body care, and personal care fields.
12.

Dials products include some of the most well-known and best-selling

brands in these categories, including PUREX laundry products, RENUZIT air fresheners,

DIAL skin and body care products, RIGHT GUARD antiperspirant products, and

COMBAT pest-control products.

II.

Dials Famous PUREX Trademark

10

13.

In 1922, Lionel S. Precourt and his son Ray Precourt began making their

11

household bleach product out of a 400 square foot garage in Los Angeles, using their own

12

homegrown recipe. The following year, they coined the mark PUREX, beginning a brand

13

and a business that would last throughout the next century. Over many decades, their

14

company, Purex Corporation, developed into an international manufacturing and

15

marketing organization that was among the 400 largest industrial enterprises in the

16

United States.

17
18
19

14.

In the 1970s, the company expanded its use of PUREX from household

bleach to other laundry products, including powder and liquid laundry detergents.
15.

In 1985, Dial acquired the PUREX household and consumer product lines

20

and all rights to the PUREX mark and brand. At that time, Purex Corporation had

21

approximately 8,000 employees, more than 40 manufacturing facilities, and sales in

22
23
24
25
26

excess of $700 million annually.


16.

Dial, and its predecessors in interest, have used the PUREX mark in

numerous channels of trade on a wide variety of laundry products in the United States.
These products have included laundry detergents, fabric softeners, and bleaching agents.
Representative images of such products are shown below.

27
28
4

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 5 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 6 of 38

17.

Dial has sold many billions of dollars of products under the PUREX mark

in retail stores located throughout the United States, including national stores such as

Wal-mart, Frys, Safeway, CVS, and Walgreens, and regional or local stores such as

Albertsons, Bashas, and Food City. Dials PUREX products are sold at all of these retail

outlets in the Phoenix, Arizona area. Representative annual sales revenues of all PUREX-

branded products over several decades in the United States shows the growth of the

PUREX business: 1953, over $19 million; 1967, over $192 million; 1975, over $440

million; 1981, $650 million. These sales revenues represented sales of a wide variety of

PUREX branded products, including bleach, laundry detergent, fabric softener,

10

dishwashing liquid, and stain removers. Sales of PUREX laundry products have

11

significantly increased over the years. For example, annual sales of just PUREX laundry

12

products in the United States have exceeded $300M since as early as 1998 and were more

13

than $640 million in 2015 alone.

14

18.

Dial and its predecessors have expended many millions of dollars over the

15

years advertising and promoting the PUREX mark through virtually every medium

16

including through direct mailings, national television, print and radio advertisements, the

17

Internet, and social media. In 2015 alone, Dial spent approximately $30 million to

18

advertise and promote PUREX branded-products and the PUREX brand.

19

19.

Dials products sold under the PUREX brand have received significant

20

unsolicited media coverage for many years, including for example, in national, regional,

21

and local publications and media outlets. As a result of Dials significant promotional

22
23
24
25
26

efforts, commercial success, and popularity, PUREX has long been one of the bestselling laundry detergents in the United States. In a market crowded with many brandname and private-label laundry detergents, Dials PUREX commanded approximately a
5.7 % market share in 2015.
20.

Based on Dials longstanding and extensive use of the PUREX mark, and

27
28

the widespread advertising, publicity, promotion, and substantial sales of products and

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 7 of 38

services under the PUREX mark, the PUREX mark is well-known and famous to the

general public and has been so for many years.

III.

Dials Use of Its PURECLEAN Marks

21.

Dial has for many years used the trademark PURECLEAN (as one or two

words) alone or in combination with other wording in connection with its laundry

products since 2006.

7
8
9
10

a.
22.

Dials Use of PURECLEAN for Laundry Products

During 2006-2007, Dial used the mark PURECLEAN on packaging and

marketing materials for its PUREX laundry detergent as shown in the representative
examples below consisting of a product label and online advertising materials.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 8 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
b.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

23.

Dials Use of PURECLEAN in the PURECLEAN.


PUREVALUE. PUREX. Mark

Since 2008 and continuing to the present, Dial has featured PURECLEAN

as the lead term in the mark PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. for laundry
detergents and fabric softeners.
24.

Dial has extensively advertised and promoted the PURECLEAN.

PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark in various ways, including on product packaging, in-store


displays, and coupons, in print advertising, digital advertising, and television

26
27
28

commercials, and on Dials websites and social media pages. These efforts have reached
many millions of consumers and created many millions of consumer impressions,

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 9 of 38

including on a large percentage of Dials target market for PUREX productswomen

between the ages of 25-49.

25.

For example, from 2008 continuously to the present, Dial has prominently

featured the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark on the packaging for certain

PUREX powder laundry detergent products as shown in the example below. Dial has sold

more than 11 million boxes of the product pictured below between 2008 and 2015,

including 7.5 million in the past four years alone. Dial has sold and distributed these

products through various channels, including laundromats, hotels, schools, hospitals, and

time-share and rental properties, among others. In laundromats, hotel laundry rooms, and

10

other pay-laundry facilities, these products are typically sold in vending machines. For

11

time-share and rental properties they are provided or made available to the property

12

guests. In all of these examples, consumers are exposed to the prominent use of the

13

PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark on the product packaging.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Other companies detergent products, including P&Gs TIDE detergent, are also sold in

22

vending machines at pay-laundry facilities.

23

26.

Dial has also prominently featured the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.

24

PUREX. mark on its point-of-sale displays for PUREX laundry detergent in retail stores

25

as shown in the representative examples pictured below: (a) the Daytona 500 display

26

appeared in approximately 1,000 Kroger grocery stores during 2011-2012; (b) more than

27

2,300 of the PUREX display units appeared in various grocery stores including

28
9

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 10 of 38

Albertsons, Hy-Vee, and Schnucks during 2011-2012; and (c) the PUREX UltraPacks

display appeared in approximately 240 Weis grocery stores and 15 Associated

Wholesalers stores during 2011-2012.

4
5
6
7
8
(a)

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

(b)

23
24
25
26
27
28
10

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 11 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

(c)

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

27.

Dial has also prominently featured the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.

PUREX. mark in TV advertising as shown by the screenshots below from two TV


commercials that aired in 2012 on numerous national television networks, including but
not limited to ABC, CBS, Bravo, TLC, E!, HGTV, Food, BET, Lifetime, Oxygen, TV
Land, Style, WE, TBS, and Nick at Nite. These TV commercials created over 600 million
consumer impressions.

11

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 12 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

28.

In

addition,

Dial

has

prominently

featured

the

PURECLEAN.

PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark on coupons distributed to consumers as shown by the


representative examples below. The three coupons shown below are examples of coupons
distributed during 2011-2012. Dial distributed more than 365 million of these coupons
featuring the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark.

28
12

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 13 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 14 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

29.

Dial has also prominently featured the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.

PUREX. mark on free-standing ads placed in coupon inserts in Sunday newspapers in


various locations that were targeted at customers of regional and local grocery stores such
as Wakefern/Shoprite, Weis, and Giant Eagle. Below are examples of such ads from
2011-2012. Dial distributed more than approximately 50 million of these ads featuring
the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark in coupon inserts.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 15 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 16 of 38

30.

Dial has also prominently featured the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.

PUREX. mark in print advertising in 2012 in national magazines, including but not

limited to Better Homes & Gardens, People, Good Housekeeping, Parents, Family

Circle, and Womans Day. Examples of such print ads are shown below. These

publications are among the most popular magazines in the country and reach many

millions of the target consumers for PUREX laundry detergent products. These print ads

created more than 235 million consumer impressions.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 17 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

31.

Dial has also prominently featured the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.

PUREX. mark in digital advertising campaigns, i.e., internet advertising, during 2012.
Dial placed banner ads featuring the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.PUREX. mark on
hundreds of websites. Representative examples of such ads are shown below. These
banner ads created over 100 million consumer impressions.

27
28
17

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 18 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 19 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

32.

Since as early as 2012, Dial also has prominently featured the

PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark on website advertising and promotion.


Shown below is a representative screenshot from Dials current www.purex.com website.

28
19

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 20 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

33.

In addition to its main website, Dial has used the PURECLEAN.

PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark on social media since as early as 2012. Shown below are

16
representative posts from Dials Facebook page featuring the PURECLEAN.
17
18

PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark from March July 2012.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 21 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

34.

Before P&Gs announcement of its PURCLEAN product, Dial commenced

plans to further expand its already significant use of the PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.
PUREX. mark for laundry detergent. For example, Dial has expanded its use of the
PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark on its social media pages as shown below
by the representative screenshots from its Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram pages.

25
26
27
28
21

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 22 of 38

Facebook

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Twitter

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 23 of 38

Instagram

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

35.

trademarks and branding are important components of Dials branding, advertising


positioning, and strategy for its PUREX line of laundry products, and have been for
years.
c.

20
21
22

As shown above, Dials PURECLEAN and PURECLEAN-formative

36.

Dials Use of PURECLEAN for Air Fresheners

Since 2006, Dial also has used the mark PURECLEAN in connection with

its popular RENUZIT brand of air fresheners and deodorizers. Below are representative

23

examples showing use of the PURECLEAN mark on such products and in product

24

marketing materials.

25
26
27
28
23

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 24 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 25 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

37.

There has long been a connection between air fresheners and deodorizers

and laundry detergent products. Over the years, Dial has frequently sold laundry products
co-branded with Dial RENUZIT mark to identify a RENUZIT deodorizing feature of its

28
25

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 26 of 38

laundry products (as shown in the examples below of products sold between 2006-2010).

P&G has also sold its TIDE laundry detergent and other laundry products co-branded

with P&Gs febreze mark to identify a febreze deodorizing feature as shown below.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

PLAINTIFFS TRADEMARK APPLICATIONS AND REGISTRATIONS


FOR ITS PUREX MARK, PURECLEAN MARK, AND
PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX MARK
38.

In addition to its longstanding and strong common-law rights in the

PUREX mark, Dial owns the following federal trademark registrations for the PUREX
mark and PUREX-formative marks covering laundry detergent and other goods (copies
of these registration certificates and assignment records showing ownership by Dial are
attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A):
Mark
PUREX

Reg. No. /Reg. Date

Goods / Date of First Use

1876275
Jan. 31, 1995

Laundry bleach.
Date of First Use: October 10, 1923

20
21

PUREX

22

3094059
May 16, 2006

Laundry care preparations, namely, fabric


softener, fabric freshener, dryer sheets.
Date of First Use: July 16, 2003

23
24

PUREX

25

1052724
Nov. 16, 1976

Laundry detergent.
Date of First Use: March 6, 1970

26
27

PUREX

General cleaning preparations in liquid


and dry forms having bleaching,

0578630
Aug. 11, 1953

28
26

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 27 of 38

Mark

Reg. No. /Reg. Date

Goods / Date of First Use

cleaning, and disinfecting properties.

Date of First Use: October 10, 1923

PUREX NO
SORT

4607365
Sept. 16, 2014

Laundry detergents.
Date of First Use: January 30, 2014

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

39.

In addition to its longstanding and strong common-law rights in the its

PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark and its PURECLEAN mark, Dial also
owns the following registration and pending application for such marks (copies of the
registration and pending application and assignment records showing ownership by Dial
are attached to the Complaint as Exhibit B):
Mark

13
14
15
16

Reg. No. / App. No.


Status

Goods / Date of First Use

PURECLEAN.
PUREVALUE.
PUREX.

Reg. No. 4132910


Registered: Apr. 24,
2012

Fabric softeners; laundry detergents.

PURECLEAN

App. No. 86735117


Filed: Aug. 24, 2015

Air fragrancing preparations.

Date of First Use: February 2, 2011


Date of First Use: January 8, 2007

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

P&GS WRONGFUL ACTS


40.

P&G is the largest producer of home and personal care products in the

United States and is the largest advertiser in the United States. TIDE detergent, which has
long been the best-selling detergent in the United States, is one of P&Gs best-selling and
most heavily advertised products in the United States.
41.

P&G announced its plans to release a new laundry detergent under the

24
25
26

brand PURCLEAN in May 2016. An example of the product as advertised by P&G in its
press releases and on its websites is shown below:

27
28
27

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 28 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

42.

In the product photos in its announcements, P&G displays the PURCLEAN

10

trademark as a separate mark from the TIDE trademark. On the label shown above,

11

PURCLEAN appears on a separate line from TIDE and each mark is displayed in its own

12

font and stylization. P&G also has placed the trademark notice TM next to the

13

PURCLEAN mark, as shown below in the close-up of the bottle.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

43.

P&G has filed a trademark application for the PURCLEAN mark.

Specifically, P&G filed intent-to-use U.S. Application Serial No. 86785110 on October

23
24
25
26
27

12, 2015 for the mark PURCLEAN covering laundry detergents (a copy of P&Gs
trademark application for the PURCLEAN mark is attached as Exhibit C).
44.

On February 6, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

(USPTO) issued a refusal of Application Serial No. 86785110 on grounds of a

28
28

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 29 of 38

likelihood of confusion with Dials U.S. Registration No. 4132910 for its PURECLEAN.

PUREVALUE. PUREX. mark. In particular, the Examining Attorney at the USPTO

assigned to review P&Gs application concluded that P&Gs mark PURCLEAN shared

identical phonetic equivalent wording with Dials PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE.

PUREX. mark and that P&Gs and Dials goods were both laundry detergents (a copy of

this Office Action issued by the Examining Attorney is attached as Exhibit D).

45.

P&Gs PURCLEAN mark is identical in pronunciation, commercial

impression, and meaning to PURECLEAN. In addition, P&Gs PURCLEAN mark is

virtually identical in appearance to PURECLEAN.

10

46.

P&G plans to sell, promote and advertise laundry detergent under its

11

PURCLEAN mark in the same trade channels as Dial, including in grocery stores, and

12

big-box stores, and through e-retailers such as Amazon.com.

13
14
15

47.

The customers for both parties laundry detergent products are identical or

overlapping, i.e., the general public.


48.

It appears that P&Gs plans to launch its PURCLEAN laundry detergent

16

have come to fruition based on: (1) its recent posting of the PURCLEAN product on its

17

website at http://tide.com/en-us/shop/type/liquid/tide-purclean; (2) print ads recently

18

appearing in U.S. publications; and (3) its recent social media promotion of its

19

PURCLEAN laundry detergent, including an April 22, 2016 post on Facebook promoting

20

its PURCLEAN product coming soon to a store near you in May 2016 (copies of

21

examples of these advertisements and promotions are attached as Exhibit E).

22
23
24
25
26

IV.

Harm to Dial and the General Public

49.

Although Dials PUREX is a popular and successful product line with

approximately a 5.7% market share, TIDE dominates the product category with
approximately 42.8% share of the U.S. laundry detergent market with its TIDE and TIDE
Simply Clean products.

27
28
29

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 30 of 38

50.

Dial spends significant amounts promoting and advertising its PUREX

mark, but P&Gs advertising of TIDE dwarfs Dials expenditures. As a result, there is a

likelihood that P&Gs massive advertising and promotional efforts will saturate the

market and dilute the distinctiveness of Dials PUREX mark. There is further the

likelihood that P&Gs massive advertising and promotional efforts for its new

PURCLEAN laundry detergent will overwhelm Dials use of its PURECLEAN Marks

and PUREX mark. As a result, consumers are likely to mistakenly believe that Dial

and/or its products sold under its PUREX mark and PURECLEAN Marks are affiliated

with, connected to, or offered by P&G, or that Dial is infringing P&Gs PURCLEAN mark.

10

51.

P&Gs use of its PURCLEAN mark in connection with the offering for

11

sale, sale, distribution or advertising of laundry detergent is likely to cause confusion, to

12

cause mistake, or to deceive, and unless enjoined, will irreparably harm the general

13

public, which has an interest in being free from confusion, mistake, and deception.

14

52.

P&Gs activities already have caused irreparable harm to Dial and Dials

15

PUREX and PURCLEAN Marks, and if not enjoined, will continue to irreparably harm

16

Dial and Dials PUREX and PURECLEAN Marks.

17

53.

P&G began using the PURCLEAN mark more than 90 years after Dial and

18

its predecessors first used its PUREX mark, and did so with knowledge of Dials prior

19

use of its PURECLEAN Marks, and Dials prior use and registration of its PUREX and

20

PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. marks. P&G knew or should have known that

21

its activities described above were infringing, and thus P&G acted knowingly, willfully,

22
23
24
25
26

in reckless disregard of Dials trademark rights, and in bad faith.


54.

Dial has no adequate remedy at law because money damages cannot

compensate Dial for the harm to its reputation and goodwill and the loss of control over
its famous PUREX trademark and the PURECLEAN Marks that will result from P&Gs
unauthorized use of PURCLEAN.

27
28
30

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 31 of 38

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF


Trademark Infringement Under
Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)

1
2
3

55.

Dial repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above.

56.

Without Dials consent, P&G used and continues to use in commerce

reproductions, copies, and colorable imitations of Dials PUREX, and PURECLEAN.

PUREVALUE. PUREX. federally registered trademarks, as set forth above, in

connection with the offering, distribution, and/or advertising of laundry products, which

is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive, in violation of Section

32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1).

10

57.

11

knowing.

12

58.

13
14

P&Gs activities described above have at all times been willful and/or

As a direct and proximate result of the actions of P&G described above,

Dial has been damaged and will continue to be damaged.


59.

As a direct and proximate result of the actions of P&G described above,

15

P&G has been unjustly enriched and has profited from appropriating the goodwill and

16

recognition of the PUREX and PURECLEAN. PUREVALUE. PUREX. marks.

17

19

SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF


Trademark Infringement, False Designation
of Origin, Passing Off, and Unfair Competition
Under Section 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1)(A)

20

60.

Dial repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above.

21

61.

P&Gs actions, as described above, including without limitation the use and

18

22

promotion of laundry detergent under its PURCLEAN mark, are likely to cause

23

confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of

24

Dial, its products, its PUREX and PURECLEAN Marks, and/or its commercial activities

25

by or with P&G, and thus constitute trademark infringement, false designation of origin,

26

and unfair competition in violation of Section 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.

27

1125(a)(1)(A).

28
31

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 32 of 38

62.

knowing.

63.

4
5

P&Gs activities described above have at all times been willful and/or

As a direct and proximate result of the actions of P&G described above,

Dial has been damaged and will continue to be damaged.


64.

As a direct and proximate result of the actions of P&G described above,

P&G has been unjustly enriched and has profited from appropriating the goodwill and

recognition of the PUREX and PURECLEAN Marks.


THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Trademark Dilution Under Section
43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)

8
9
10

65.

Dial repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above.

11

66.

Dial has engaged in extensive nationwide advertising, promotion, and use

12

of the PUREX mark for over 90 years. Further, Dial has had massive sales of its goods

13

and services sold under the PUREX mark for decades.

14

67.

Dials PUREX mark has for many years received extensive unsolicited

15

media attention nationwide. Such extensive and frequent media attention and commercial

16

success has had a substantial impact on the public and has long created an association in

17

the minds of consumers between the PUREX mark and Dial, and the PUREX mark is

18

famous and was famous nationwide before P&G commenced its unauthorized use of the

19

PURCLEAN mark.

20

68.

P&Gs actions described above, all occurring after PUREX mark became

21

famous, are likely to cause dilution by blurring of the distinctive quality of the famous

22

PUREX mark in violation of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c).

23

69.

24

knowing.

25

70.

26

P&Gs activities described above have at all times been willful and/or

As a direct and proximate result of the actions of P&G described above,

Dial and its famous PUREX mark has been damaged and will continue to be damaged.

27
28
32

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 33 of 38

FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF


Injury to Business Reputation; Dilution
Under A.R.S 44-1448.01

1
2
3

71.

Dial repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above.

72.

Dial owns the federally registered and famous PUREX mark.

73.

P&Gs use of the PURCLEAN mark occurred after the PUREX mark

became famous and is likely to dilute the distinctive quality of Dials famous PUREX

mark.

8
9
10
11
12

74.

P&Gs conduct constitutes injury to Dials business reputation and dilution

of the famous PUREX mark under A.R.S 44-1448.01.


75.

As a result of P&Gs conduct, Dial and its PUREX mark have suffered and

will continue to suffer damages and P&G has acquired profits at Dials expense.
76.

P&Gs conduct has caused Dial and its PUREX mark irreparable harm.

13

Unless enjoined permanently, P&Gs conduct will continue to injure Dials business

14

reputation and cause dilution of the PUREX mark.

15

77.

16

knowing.

17

78.

18

P&Gs activities described above have at all times been willful and/or

As a result of P&Gs conduct, Dial is entitled to the remedies provided in

Title 44, Chapter 10 pursuant to A.R.S 44-1448.01(B).

19

FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF


Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair
Competition, and Misappropriation

20
21
22
23

79.

Dial repeats and realleges each and every allegation set forth above.

80.

P&Gs actions described above constitute common law trademark

24

infringement, unfair competition, and misappropriation of Dials goodwill under the

25

common law of Arizona and other states.

26
27

81.

The actions of P&G described above have at all times relevant to this action

been willful.

28
33

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 34 of 38

1
2

82.

As a direct and proximate result of the actions of P&G alleged above, Dial

has been damaged and will continue to be damaged.


PRAYER FOR RELIEF

3
4

WHEREFORE, Dial prays that this Court enter judgment in its favor on each and

every claim for relief set forth above and award it relief including, but not limited to, the

following:

A.

An injunction temporarily, preliminarily, and permanently enjoining P&G

and its employees, agents, partners, officers, directors, owners, shareholders, principals,

subsidiaries, related companies, affiliates, distributors, dealers, retailers, and all persons

10
11

in active concert or participation with any of them:


1.

From using the PURCLEAN mark, and any other trademarks,

12

names, and other identifiers that are confusingly similar to Dials PUREX and

13

PURECLEAN Marks, in any unauthorized manner, including without limitation,

14

on or in connection with laundry detergent and related products and any associated

15

packaging, displays, and advertising and promotional materials in any media or

16

format;

17

2.

From using the PURCLEAN mark, and any other trademarks,

18

names, and other identifiers that are likely to dilute Dials PUREX mark, in any

19

unauthorized manner, including without limitation, on or in connection with

20

laundry detergent and related products and any associated packaging, displays, and

21

advertising and promotional materials in any media or format;

22
23
24
25
26

3.

From representing by any means whatsoever, directly or indirectly,

that P&G, any products or services offered by P&G, or any activities undertaken
by P&G, are authorized by, licensed by, sponsored or approved by, connected
with, guaranteed by, or produced, or otherwise affiliated with Dial or its PUREX
mark, PURECLEAN Marks, or the products sold under those marks;

27
28

4.

From otherwise competing unfairly with Dial in any manner;

34

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 35 of 38

5.

From shipping, delivering, transferring, or otherwise disposing of, in

any manner, any laundry products or related products and any associated

packaging, displays, and advertising and promotional materials that bear the

PURCLEAN mark or any other mark confusingly similar to Dials PUREX and

PURECLEAN Marks; and

6.

From assisting, aiding or abetting any other person or business entity

in engaging in or performing any of the activities referred to in subparagraphs

A.1-5 above.

B.

An Order directing P&G to withdraw and retract from the marketplace in

10

the United States all products, product packaging and displays, product inserts and

11

instructions, data sheets, advertisements, commercials, and other materials in connection

12

with laundry detergents and any related goods, that display the PURCLEAN mark and/or

13

any marks, names, and designs that are confusingly similar to Dials PUREX and

14

PURECLEAN Marks;

15
16
17

C.

An Order requiring P&G to pay Dial the cost for corrective advertising

and/or engage in corrective advertising in a manner directed by the Court.


D.

An Order directing P&G to file with this Court and serve on Dials

18

attorneys, thirty (30) days after the date of entry of any injunction, a report in writing and

19

under oath setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with the

20

injunction;

21
22
23
24
25
26

E.

An Order requiring P&G to account for and to pay any and all profits

arising from the foregoing acts of infringement, false designation of origin, unfair
competition, and an increasing of such profits for payment to Dial in accordance with
15 U.S.C. 1117, and other applicable statutes and laws;
F.

An Order requiring P&G to pay compensatory damages in an amount as yet

undetermined caused by the foregoing acts of infringement, false designation of origin,

27
28
35

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 36 of 38

unfair competition, and trebling such compensatory damages for payment to Dial in

accordance with 15 U.S.C. 1117, and other applicable statutes and laws;

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

G.

An Order requiring P&G to pay Dials costs and attorneys fees in this

action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117, and other applicable statutes and laws;
H.

An Order requiring P&G to pay punitive damages in an amount as yet

undetermined caused by the foregoing acts of P&G.


I.

Restitutionary relief against P&G and in favor of Dial, including

disgorgement of wrongfully obtained profits and any other appropriate relief;


J.

An Order requiring P&G to pay the costs of suit and reasonable attorneys

fees to the extent not specified above;


K.

An Order requiring P&G to abandon U.S. Application Serial No. 86785110

for the mark PURCLEAN; and


L.

Other relief as the Court may deem appropriate, including without

limitation all remedies provided for under any other applicable laws.

15
16
17

JURY DEMAND
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38, Dial respectfully demands a trial by jury for all
claims so triable.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: May 4, 2016


__/s/ William G. Klain_______________
William G. Klain (AZ Bar No. 015851)
George H. King (AZ Bar No. 013287)
Lang & Klain, P.C.
8767 E. Via de Commercio, Suite 102
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
wklain@lang-klain.com
gking@lang-klain.com
filingKAL@lang-klain.com
Telephone: 480-947-1911

26
27
28
36

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 37 of 38

1
2
3
4
5

David M. Kelly (DC Bar No. 642080;


pro hac vice application pending)
Robert D. Litowitz (DC Bar No. 358658;
pro hac vice application to be filed)
Anjie Vichayanonda (VA Bar No. 85471;
pro hac vice application pending)
KELLY IP, LLP
1919 M Street, NW, Suite 610
Washington, D.C. 20036
Telephone: (202) 808-3570

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff


The Dial Corporation

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
37

Case 2:16-cv-01327-JZB Document 1 Filed 05/04/16 Page 38 of 38

You might also like