Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• US strategic goals
• Army Missions and capabilities
o National defense act, 1920
o Pacific and continental defense
o Modernization
• Army Aviation
o Postwar missions vs Air Power theory
Billy Mitchell and Chesapeake Tests
Improvements in aviation technology
Strategic bombardment and its critics
Overseas Forces
Supposed to be ready for immediate defense of territory and to hold out for 30-90 days
-Hawaii—top priority, given much of limited resources
Maneuvers demonstrate ability to defeat invasion, reveal danger of aerial
attack on pearl harbor
-Philippines
Army and Navy unable to agree whether PI can be or should be defended,
written off in mid 30’s
Maneuvers demonstrate futility of defense against Japanese
-Panama
Strong harbor defenses, difficult terrain to invade
Maneuvers demonstrate danger of aerial attack
Douglas MacArthur, CoS 30-35
Set priorities in Great Depression
Fights to maintain officer corps
Slows modernization—cuts research, weapons, disbands armored units
Emphasizes industrial and manpower mobilization planning
Four Army Plan
-USA-NG force for immediate use until wartime army mobilized and industry
shifts to war production
Philippine Commitment
Immediate relief of PI if attacked
Armored warfare
1920 defense act makemechanized forces part of existing Infantry and Calvary branches
Infantry sees tanks as mobile fortress to assist attack on trenches
Calvary views tank as long range weapon to break through enemy lines
Conflicting missions inhibit design of tank
Experiments with Armored warfare
Inability to determine proper tank design
Bureauractic battles over weight, armament
Jap Strategy
• US Industrial and manpower would defeat Japan in long war
• Seize island bases, force US fleet to fight away through defensive screen
• Japanese fleet waits until US fleet weakened, then defeats it in decisive battle
o US will seek negotiated peace
Japanese assumptions
Distances, lack of bases meant fighting at extreme end of logistical lines
Batteles and campaigns would be fought and determined by
relatively small forces
Qualitative superiority in key technologies and combat skills would
give japan victory
US lacked fighting spirit, could not sustain defeats
Impact of Jap Victories
Sneak attack and Day of Infamy
Unified Americans behind war
Revenge, no compromise
Demand for complete destruction of Japan
In long run was a disaster for Japan
Japanese Offensives
Launched attacks, seized bases and infiltrated
US Navy Strategy
Destruction of battlefleet prevented immediate strike at Jap’s fleet
Decisions to launch spoiling attacks in 42-43
Ensure defense of Australia, supply lines
Inhibit construction of Jap bases on pacific islands, new guinea
Wait until US industry produced warships necessary for Central pacific island-
hopping advance to Japan
AERIAL WAR
Japanese emphasis on elite pilots, Xero gave short-term advantage 41-43 BUT
♦ Inadequate industrial strength to manufacture and deploy 2nd generation
airplanes, stuck with zero
♦ Inadequate pilot replacement program
♦ Result, by late 43 pilots and planes outclassed and no ability to regain
dominance
US unprepared in 41, but long term advantages
♦ 1942: US aviators developed tactics (thach weave, dive and break) to
compensate for inferior planes
♦ USN implements large polot training replacement program US industry
manufactures, deploys 2nd generation airplanes
By 1944, US planes and pilots dominant
F6F Hellcat
Highspeed maneuverable, rugged, heavy armor
Better rate of claim than Zero, better in drive
Multipurpose—close air supportm ait-to-air, attack enemy shipping, easily transportable
Performance
Max speeds 380mph
Range 945 miles
Ceilings 37000
Armament 6 .50 cal
F4U Corsair
Much faster than 0 better rate of climbm, 5000 higher ceiling,, maneuveravke
very rugged heavily armored
Great mulitpuroise airplane—ai to air ground support
Max speed 420mph ceiling 37000 feet
Range 1560 miles